The effects of modified versus unmodified wheat gluten administration in patients with celiac disease.

Celiac disease (CD) treatment requires a gluten-free diet (GFD), although alternative approaches have been proposed. Modification of gliadin peptides using microbial transglutaminase (mTG) inhibits their ability to induce immune response in vitro. Our aim was to evaluate the safety of mTG-modified wheat flour ingestion in CD patients. Twenty-one CD patients in remission were randomized to receive mTG-modified (n=11) or unmodified (n=10) wheat flour rusks, in double-blind fashion. Monthly, patients completed a symptom questionnaire. Serum anti-tTG, EMA and creatinine levels were monitored. At baseline and after 90days, serum anti-actin antibodies (AAA) were measured and upper endoscopy was performed. Data were analyzed by non-parametric tests. 7/11 patients eating modified rusks and 7/10 patients receiving unmodified rusks completed the study. At baseline, all patients showed negative serum anti-tTG and EMA results. At the end, 2/7 (28.6%) patients ingesting modified and 4/7 (57.1%) patients taking unmodified rusks presented positive serum anti-tTG and EMA results. Creatinine results were unmodified. Moreover, 1/7 (14.3%) patients ingesting modified and 4/7 (57.1%) patients taking unmodified rusks presented villous atrophy. In patients who received unmodified rusks, the AAA levels increased significantly and duodenal anti-tTG levels appeared higher than those measured in patients who ate modified rusks. Abdominal swelling, bloating and nausea were more severe in patients ingesting unmodified rusks than those taking modified rusks. Our results may support larger clinical trials to confirm the enzymatic treatment of wheat flour as an alternative to GFD. Clinicaltrials.gov registration no: NCT02472119.

Identification of a serum transglutaminase threshold value for the noninvasive diagnosis of symptomatic adult celiac disease patients: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: A celiac disease (CD) diagnosis is based on duodenal histology, with the exception of children showing anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) serum levels exceeding ten times the cut-off. Our aim was to reproduce this simplified approach in adults, identifying an anti-tTG threshold value useful to diagnose CD without endoscopic procedures. METHODS: A total of 671 adult CD patients were subjected to blood sampling to determine anti-tTG serum levels, as well as to endoscopy with biopsy to perform duodenal histology. The anti-tTG serum levels/cut-off ratio was compared with the degree of duodenal lesions. RESULTS: Anti-tTG serum levels/cut-off ratio determined in patients with type IIIc was significantly higher than that measured in patients with type IIIb (p < 0.001), IIIa (p < 0.001), II (p < 0.05) and 0 (p < 0.001) of Marsh-Oberhuber histological classification. A significant correlation (r = 0.297, p < 0.0001) was found between the anti-tTG serum levels/cut-off ratio and the degree of duodenal lesions. The anti-tTG serum levels/cut-off ratio was classified as an accurate parameter (AUC = 0.715, p < 0.0001), with the best diagnostic performance obtained considering the threshold value >3.6 (sensitivity = 76.8 %, PPV = 97.2 %). CONCLUSIONS: The anti-tTG serum levels/cut-off ratio correlates with the degree of duodenal lesions and, if used with the threshold value >3.6, could avoid endoscopy with biopsy in about 75 % of seropositive adults waiting for CD diagnosis. However, since this procedure could also imply CD diagnosis in almost 3 % of seropositive patients with normal villous architecture, a consensus opinion is needed to suggest its use in the diagnosis of adult CD.