Tribomechanical Properties of PVA/Nomex® Composite Hydrogels for Articular Cartilage Repair.

Due to the increasing prevalence of articular cartilage diseases and limitations faced by current therapeutic methodologies, there is an unmet need for new materials to replace damaged cartilage. In this work, poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) hydrogels were reinforced with different amounts of Nomex® (known for its high mechanical toughness, flexibility, and resilience) and sterilized by gamma irradiation. Samples were studied concerning morphology, chemical structure, thermal behavior, water content, wettability, mechanical properties, and rheological and tribological behavior. Overall, it was found that the incorporation of aramid nanostructures improved the hydrogel's mechanical performance, likely due to the reinforcement's intrinsic strength and hydrogen bonding to PVA chains. Additionally, the sterilization of the materials also led to superior mechanical properties, possibly related to the increased crosslinking density through the hydrogen bonding caused by the irradiation. The water content, wettability, and tribological performance of PVA hydrogels were not compromised by either the reinforcement or the sterilization process. The best-performing composite, containing 1.5% wt. of Nomex®, did not induce cytotoxicity in human chondrocytes. Plugs of this hydrogel were inserted in porcine femoral heads and tested in an anatomical hip simulator. No significant changes were observed in the hydrogel or cartilage, demonstrating the material's potential to be used in cartilage replacement.

Biomechanical Comparison of Multilevel Stand-Alone Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion With Posterior Pedicle Screws: An In Vitro Study.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) allows placement of large interbody cages while preserving ligamentous structures important for stability. Multiple clinical and biomechanical studies have demonstrated the feasibility of stand-alone LLIF in single-level fusion. We sought to compare the stability of 4-level stand-alone LLIF utilizing wide (26 mm) cages with bilateral pedicle screw and rod fixation. METHODS: Eight human cadaveric specimens of L1-5 were included. Specimens were attached to a universal testing machine (MTS 30/G). Flexion, extension, and lateral bending were attained by applying a 200 N load at a rate of 2 mm/sec. Axial rotation of ± 8° of the specimen was performed at 2°/sec. Three-dimensional specimen motion was recorded using an optical motion-tracking device. Specimens were tested in 4 conditions: (1) intact, (2) bilateral pedicle screws and rods, (3) 26-mm stand-alone LLIF, (4) 26-mm LLIF with bilateral pedicle screws and rods. RESULTS: Compared to the stand-alone LLIF, bilateral pedicle screws and rods had 47% less range of motion in flexion-extension (p < 0.001), 21% less in lateral bending (p < 0.05), and 20% less in axial rotation (p = 0.1). The addition of bilateral posterior instrumentation to the stand-alone LLIF resulted in decreases of all 3 planes of motion: 61% in flexion-extension ( p < 0.001), 57% in lateral bending (p < 0.001), 22% in axial rotation (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Despite the biomechanical advantages associated with the lateral approach and 26 mm wide cages, stand-alone LLIF for 4-level fusion is not equivalent to pedicle screws and rods.

Biomechanical Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation after Multilevel Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Human Cadaveric Biomechanical Study. OBJECTIVES: Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion (LLIF) utilizing a wide cage has been reported as having favorable biomechanical characteristics. We examine the biomechanical stability of unilateral pedicle screw and rod fixation after multilevel LLIF utilizing 26 mm wide cages compared to bilateral fixation. METHODS: Eight human cadaveric specimens of L1-L5 were included. Specimens were attached to a universal testing machine (MTS 30/G). Three-dimensional specimen range of motion (ROM) was recorded using an optical motion-tracking device. Specimens were tested in 3 conditions: 1) intact, 2) L1-L5 LLIF (4 levels) with unilateral rod, 3) L1-L5 LLIF with bilateral rods. RESULTS: From the intact condition, LLIF with unilateral rod decreased flexion-extension by 77%, lateral bending by 53%, and axial rotation by 26%. In LLIF with bilateral rods, flexion-extension decreased by 83%, lateral bending by 64%, and axial rotation by 34%. Comparing unilateral and bilateral fixation, LLIF with bilateral rods reduced ROM by a further 23% in flexion-extension, 25% in lateral bending, and 11% in axial rotation. The difference was statistically significant in flexion-extension and lateral bending (P < .005). CONCLUSIONS: Considerable decreases in ROM were observed after multilevel (4-level) LLIF utilizing 26 mm cages supplemented with both unilateral and bilateral pedicle screws and rods. The addition of bilateral fixation provides a 10-25% additional decrease in ROM. These results can inform surgeons of the incremental biomechanical benefit when considering unilateral or bilateral posterior fixation after multilevel LLIF.

Small Chondral Defects Affect Tibiofemoral Contact Area and Stress: Should a Lower Threshold Be Used for Intervention?

Background: Chondral defects in the knee have biomechanical differences because of defect size and location. Prior literature only compares the maximum stress experienced with large defects. Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that pressure surrounding the chondral defect would increase with size and vary in location, such that a size cutoff exists that suggests surgical intervention. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Isolated chondral defects from 0.09 to 1.0 cm2 were created on the medial and lateral femoral condyles of 6 human cadaveric knees. The knees were fixed to a uniaxial load frame and loaded from 0 to 600 N at full extension. Another defect was created at the point of tibiofemoral contact at 30° of flexion. Tibiofemoral contact pressures were measured. Peak contact pressure was the highest value in the area delimited within a 3-mm rim around the defect. The location of the peak contact pressure was determined. Results: At full extension, the mean maximum pressures on the medial femoral condyle ranged from 4.30 to 6.91 MPa at 0.09 and 1.0 cm2, respectively (P < .01). The location of the peak pressure was found posteromedial in defects between 0.09 and 0.25 cm2, shifting anterolaterally at sizes 0.49 and 1.0 cm2 (P < .01). The maximum pressures on the lateral femoral condyle ranged from 3.63 to 5.81 MPa at 0.09 and 1.0 cm2, respectively (P = .02). The location of the peak contact pressure point was anterolateral in defects between 0.09 and 0.25 cm2, shifting posterolaterally at 0.49 and 1.0 cm2 (P < .01). No differences in contact pressure between full extension and 30° of flexion were found for either the lateral or medial condyles. Conclusion: Full-thickness chondral defects bilaterally had a significant increase in contact pressure between defect sizes of 0.49 and 1.0 cm2. The location of the maximum contact pressures surrounding the lesion also varied with larger defects. Contact area redistribution and cartilage stress change may affect adjacent cartilage integrity. Clinical Relevance: Size cutoffs may exist earlier in the natural history of chondral defects than previously realized, suggesting a lower threshold for intervention.