A phase I trial assessing the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of single-dose Auron Misheil therapy in healthy male subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Auron Misheil therapy (AMT) is a combination of widely used pharmaceuticals and herbal components that has been used since the 1980s as a supportive therapy, mainly in end-stage cancer patients on a compassionate basis. This phase I study was conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of AMT in a controlled trial environment. METHODS: The study was conducted in a single rising dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Three groups of eight healthy male volunteers received one of three doses of AMT (0·011, 0·033 or 0·066 mL AMT/kg body weight intramuscularly; n = 6 per group) or placebo (n = 2 per group). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Auron Misheil therapy was shown to be well tolerated, revealing no severe or serious adverse events. There were no unexpected PK or PD results for any of the three components of AMT. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide important PK, PD and safety data for AMT, and support further controlled clinical investigation in patients with different types of cancer as an option for supportive care.

Phase II study with cisplatin and paclitaxel in combination with weekly high-dose 24 h infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Results from our previous phase II study demonstrating high efficacy and low toxicity for a weekly schedule of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin in intensively pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer prompted addition of paclitaxel and cisplatin to this regimen for a phase II study of outpatient first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. (MBC). Twenty-eight patients with metastatic breast cancer have been evaluated. Pretreatment comprised adjuvant CTX in 24 out of 28 patients, but no prior CTX for MBC. Patients were treated with 5-FU 2 g/m2 (24 h infusion) plus leucovorin 500 mg/m2 (2 h infusion prior to 5-FU) weekly for 6 weeks (days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36); in addition, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3 h infusion) was administered on days 0 and 21, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 (1 h infusion) on days 1 and 22 prior to 5-FU/leucovorin, repeated every 50 days. All patients were treated as outpatients using Port-a-Cath systems and portable pumps. Aside from common total alopecia, neutropenia was common but only of short duration. No episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred. Non-hematologic toxicities (NCl CTC grade, percent of patients) consisted of mild to moderate diarrhea (2+3, 47%), mucositis (2, 14%), and nausea and vomiting (2+3, 60%). Out of 28 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease 25% (seven out of 28) achieved a CR, 57% (16 out of 28) achieved a PR, 11% (three out of 28) had a SD and 7% (two out of 28) had a PD. Overall RR was 82% (95% confidence interval 66-100%). Median remission duration was 8 months, median time to progression 9 months and median survival time 28 months with a median follow-up of 21 months. We conclude that the combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU/leucovorin is an effective non-anthracycline-containing regimen for the first-line treatment of MBC.

Clinical phase II evaluation of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin in metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel as single agent has shown marked activity in several malignancies. The aim of the present phase II trial was to determine the activity of paclitaxel/cisplatin in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel was administered over three hours followed by cisplatin (100 mg/m2), repeated every 22 days. Twenty-eight patients were entered and received a total of 99 cycles (median 2, range 1-6). All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 25 for response. RESULTS: Hematologic toxicities included leukopenia CTC grade 3 in 13 patients, and grade 4 in five patients, neutropenia grade 3 in nine patients, and grade 4 in eight patients, grade 3 anemia and grade 2 thrombocytopenia in one patient each. Non-hematologic toxicities included hypotension grade 2 (six patients), grade 3 (four patients), and grade 4 (two patients). A decline in renal function was observed in 15 courses and 10 patients, leading to a median delay of 2.5 days. Neurosensory and neuromotor toxicity grade 1 were observed in 13 patients (grade 2: 12 patients; grade 3: one patient), myalgia grade 3 in one patient, asthenia grade 3 in two and grade 4 in one patient. Partial responses were observed in 12 patients for an overall response rate of 48% (95% CI: 28%-68%) with a median response duration of 6.5 months (range 1-10 months). Stable disease was observed in seven patients, of who two also had clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 administered over three hours combined with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 is an active regimen warranting further evaluation.

Metastatic breast cancer: experience with the combination paclitaxel plus epirubicin.

This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of the combination of paclitaxel (Taxol) and epirubicin, the 4'-epimer of doxorubicin, in women with metastatic breast cancer. A total of 85 patients with histologically proven metastatic breast cancer were treated in two cohorts; epirubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. infused over 1 hour, followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 i.v. infused over 3 hours (group A), and epirubicin 90 mg/m2 i.v. via a 1-hour infusion, followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 i.v. via a 3-hour infusion (group B). Of the 85 patients, 68 were evaluable for response and toxicity (43 in group A and 25 in group B). The combination was generally well tolerated. The higher epirubicin dose induced more severe neutropenia and one case of cardiotoxicity. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild, with no severe mucositis or peripheral neuropathy reported. Overall, 68% of patients in group A and 68% of patients in group B responded. A phase III trial comparing paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2, plus epirubicin, 60 mg/m2, with the standard combination of epirubicin, 60 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, Neosar), 600 mg/m2, is currently in progress.

Phase II study of paclitaxel and epirubicin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), the first taxane used in routine clinical practice, has aroused considerable interest for its high single-agent activity against breast cancer and for its novel mechanism of action. Epirubicin, the 4' epimer of doxorubicin, is another agent with a high activity against breast cancer and is known for its lower rate of toxic side effects, especially toxic cardiac events, compared with its mother compound. The combination of paclitaxel and doxorubicin yielded response rates between 63% and 93% in phase I/II studies. In these studies, however, the investigators reported severe cardiac toxic events. The rationale for the current study was therefore to evaluate the combination of paclitaxel/epirubicin, focusing mainly on cardiac toxicity. In two groups, 85 patients with metastatic breast cancer entered the study. Approximately 20% of the patients had primary metastatic breast cancer with large tumors at the primary site. Half of the patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Study medication in group A consisted of epirubicin 60 mg/m2 given intravenously over 1 hour, followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion after premedication with steroids, antihistamines, and H2-blockers. In group B, epirubicin 90 mg/m2 was combined with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, given in the same manner as in group A. Dose escalation to 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel was planned in both groups. The main toxicity in both groups was neutropenia (73% World Health Organization grade 3/4 in group A and 93% in group B). Other hematologic side effects were rare. No febrile neutropenia was reported in group A, but two episodes occurred in group B. Peripheral neuropathy, arthralgia, and myalgia were mild (only World Health Organization grades 1 and 2). Alopecia was universal. In group A, the paclitaxel dose could be escalated to 200 mg/m2 in 15 patients and to 225 mg/m2 in seven patients. Dose reduction due to severe neutropenia was necessary in 11 patients. No cardiac events were reported in group A. In group B, the paclitaxel dose could be escalated to 200 mg/m2 in only one patient, and no patient reached 225 mg/m2. Three patients needed a dose reduction. In this group, one patient had a greater than 10% decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction with no clinical signs. In group A, 43 patients were evaluable for response; in group B, 25 patients were evaluable. Thirteen patients were out of protocol with only bone metastasis, and two patients had more than one prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The response rate was identical in both groups, with five complete remissions and 24 partial remissions in group A and three complete responses and 14 partial remissions in group B. The duration of response was 8.2 months in both groups. The median cumulative epirubicin dose was 420 mg/m2 in group A and 630 mg/m2 in group B. The combination of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and epirubicin 60 or 90 mg/m2 can be administered safely to patients with metastatic breast cancer. Although response was not the primary end point of this trial, the response data are nonetheless encouraging and suggest that further evaluation of this combination-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer is warranted.

Phase I/II study of the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: We performed a phase I/II study evaluating the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to define a feasible and safe combination regimen that could be recommended for future phase III studies. DESIGN: This study was a parallel two-arm, non-randomized, open trial. In a first step, carboplatin was administered at a fixed dose of AUC 5 and paclitaxel was escalated in 25 mg/ m2 steps starting at 135 mg/m2. Paclitaxel was given as a three-hour infusion. Carboplatin was administered on day 1 following paclitaxel in one study arm and 24 hours after paclitaxel infusion on day 2 in the other study arm. Carboplatin was escalated to AUC 6 and AUC 7.5 after the MTD for paclitaxel had been defined. Treatment was repeated every three weeks. PATIENTS: Sixty-one patients with untreated histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer were recruited of whom 59 were found eligible and evaluable for toxicity. Thirty-three patients with bidimensionally measurable disease were evaluable for tumor response. RESULTS: We could not detect any advantage of the two-day schedule compared with the more convenient one-day schedule. Dose limiting toxicities were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and neurotoxicity. Except for two patients, toxicity was acceptable and clinically managable. One patient died of neutropenic sepsis and one further patient developed grade III peripheral neurotoxicity that did not resolve within two months after chemotherapy had been terminated. Overall objective response rate was 70%. The MTD for paclitaxel was 185 mg/m2 and AUC 6 for carboplatin, respectively. Secondary prophylaxis with G-CSF did not allow further dose escalation and therefore is not generally recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel 185 mg/m2 given as three-hour infusion followed by carboplatin AUC 6 is a feasible and safe regimen and can be recommended for phase III trials. Observed response rates justify further evaluation of this combination. A randomized phase III trial comparing a three-hour infusion of paclitaxel 185 mg/m2 combined with either carboplatin AUC 6 or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 as first-line chemotherapy of advanced ovarian cancer has recently been initiated by our group.

Infusional 5-FU, folinic acid, paclitaxel, and cisplatin for metastatic breast cancer.

Our phase II study results demonstrating high efficacy and low toxicity for a weekly schedule of high-dose, 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil(5-FU)/folinic acid (HD5-FU/FA) in intensively pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer prompted addition of paclitaxel (Taxol) to the regimen, for a phase I/II study of outpatient second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. That study further prompted the addition of cisplatin (Platinol) to the regimen for first-line treatment. So far, 28 patients with metastatic breast cancer have been evaluated. Pretreatment comprised adjuvant chemotherapy in 24 of 28 patients, but no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients were treated with HD5-FU 2 g/m2 (24-hour infusion) plus FA 500 mg/m2 (2-hour infusion prior to FU) weekly for 6 weeks (days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36); in addition, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion) was administered on days 0 and 21 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 (1-hour infusion) on days 1 and 22 prior to HD5-FU/FA, repeated every 50 days. Patients were treated as outpatients using Port-a-Cath systems and portable pumps. Neutropenia was common (67% World Health Organization grade 3) but mild to moderate in most patients and was of short duration. No hospitalizations were required because of febrile neutropenia, and no granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was used. Aside from common total alopecia, nonhematologic toxicities consisted mainly of moderate myalgia, diarrhea, mucositis, and nausea and vomiting. Hand-foot syndrome and peripheral neuropathy were cumulative and occurred most commonly during the third treatment cycle, with mild-to-moderate expression. In 28 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease, 25% (7/28) attained a complete response, 57% (16/28) achieved partial response, 11% (3/28) had stable disease, and 7% (2/28) had disease progression. Overall response was 82% (95% confidence interval, 66% to 100%). Eight of 28 patients are still receiving treatment. It is concluded that the combination of paclitaxel/cisplatin with weekly HD5-FU/FA appears to be effective in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Preliminary results must be confirmed by the final analysis of response duration, time to progression, and survival.

Extended phase II study of paclitaxel as a 3-h infusion in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with plantinum.

An extended phase II study was performed to evaluate single-agent paclitaxel as salvage chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 3-h infusion schedule of paclitaxel in terms of toxicity and antitumour efficacy. Furthermore, we analysed the impact on response and survival of the extent of prior chemotherapy and status of resistance against platinum. This study was an open, non-randomised, multicentre trial. The dose of paclitaxel used was 175 mg/m2 in patients who had received one or two prior therapies, and 135 mg/m2 in patients who had received three prior therapies. Paclitaxel was given as a 3-h infusion. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks. 114 patients with platinum-pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer were recruited of whom 112 were found eligible and evaluable for toxicity. 104 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease who received more than one course of chemotherapy were evaluable for response, progression-free (PFS) and survival. Toxicity was generally manageable. Main toxicities were non-cumulative neutropenia with 22.3% of courses with WHO grade 3/4 and peripheral neuropathy which occurred in more than half of the courses and was of WHO grade 2 and 3 in 20.1 and 1.3% of the courses, respectively. Neuropathy was associated with the higher dose per course and with cumulative paclitaxel dose. Objective responses were reported in 20% (21/104) of the patients (95% CI 13-29%) with a median response duration of 36.7 weeks. Survival and PFS for the whole group were 45.9 and 15.1 weeks, respectively. Performance status, number of tumour lesions and extent of prior chemotherapy were found to be prognostic factors for survival. Extent of prior chemotherapy was the only prognostic factor for PFS. Platinum resistance did not predict response to treatment. Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 given as a 3-h infusion is an appropriate treatment for patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer who have not previously received more than two chemotherapy regimens. Paclitaxel did not show results superior to historical data for platinum retreatment in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer.

Paclitaxel administered over 3 h followed by cisplatin in patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a clinical phase I study.

We have performed a clinical phase I trial of a combination treatment with paclitaxel given as 3-hour infusion and cisplatin to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. Doses administered ranged from 135 mg/m2 paclitaxel/75 mg/m2 cisplatin to 250 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin. Twenty-four patients have been entered into this study. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 225-250 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin. The dose-limiting toxicity of this regimen was myelosuppression (granulocytopenia). Neurosensory and neuromotor toxicity was moderate. However, analyses of threshold electrotonus studies indicated subclinical neurotoxicity in most patients. One patient receiving 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin developed grade 3 motor-neurotoxicity. Orthostatic hypotension was observed in 8 patients receiving doses of 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin or higher. Objective responses were observed at paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/ cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (n = 5; complete response in 1 patient), paclitaxel 200 mg/ m2/cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (n = 3; partial response in 3 patients) and at paclitaxel 225 mg/m2/cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (n = 8; partial response in 1 patient). Eleven additional patients had stable disease. We conclude that paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion followed by cisplatin is an active regimen in advanced head and neck cancer and that orthostatic hypotension may be a potentially significant clinical toxicity.

Paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a phase I trial.

Recently, a randomized study conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG 111) demonstrated that, given by a 24-hour infusion, the combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) is superior to combination cisplatin/cyclophosphamide in previously untreated patients with advanced ovarian cancer. This combination, however, necessitates hospitalization. Combination paclitaxel/carboplatin would be expected to induce fewer nonhematologic side effects but may be more myelotoxic. Thus, we started a phase I dose-escalation study to determine the maximal tolerated dose of paclitaxel given as a 3-hour infusion in combination with carboplatin, both drugs administered every 21 days. The paclitaxel dose was escalated by increments of 25 mg/m2, starting at 135 mg/m2 (level 1), 160 mg/m2 (level 2), 185 mg/m2 (level 3), and 210 mg/m2 (level 4). Carboplatin was administered to achieve an area under the concentration-time curve of 5, using the Calvert formula For study levels 5 and 6, the carboplatin dose was targeted at area under the concentration-time curves of 6 and 7.5, respectively, and was combined with a fixed paclitaxel dose of 185 mg/m2. Thirty previously untreated patients with stage IIC to IV ovarian cancer were enrolled. Nonhematologic toxicity, including nausea/vomiting and arthralgia/myalgia, was mild. Across all dose levels, a total of 16 patients developed peripheral neurotoxicity (World Health Organization grades 1 and 2). At dose level 5, one patient experienced reversible grade 4 neurotoxicity. Neutropenia was the principal dose-limiting hematologic toxicity. During 33 (31%) of 106 courses, World Health Organization grade 4 neutropenia was observed. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was required in only 7.6% of courses. Thrombocytopenia was less than that expected when carboplatin is given alone. Clinical responses were observed in eight of 14 patients, for an overall response rate of 57%. The combination of carboplatin plus paclitaxel was found to be an active regimen. This trial demonstrates that carboplatin dosed by the Calvert equation and 3-hour paclitaxel can be combined safely at full therapeutic doses for six or more courses in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Preliminary results of a phase II study of epirubicin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Preliminary results of this ongoing phase II study of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) plus epirubicin administered as first-line treatment to women with metastatic breast cancer indicate encouraging response rates and no severe toxicity. Among the 57 patients admitted to this study, 52% had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy (85% with cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil), 46% had received radiotherapy, and 30% had received both forms of therapy; 63% of patients were postmenopausal, mainly with poorly differentiated tumors, and 80% presented with > or = 2 metastatic sites. Epirubicin 60 mg/m2 was administered intravenously as a 1-hour infusion followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 infused over 3 hours. Standard premedication was given. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was not used. Neutropenia was evident in 72% of cycles but was not severe. Instances of anemia and thrombocytopenia were rare. Alopecia was universal. All nonhematologic toxicity observed was mild or moderate (peripheral neuropathy, myalgia, nausea, vomiting World Health Organization toxicity grade < 2). At this time, 41 patients are currently evaluable for response, complete and partial remission are evident in seven and 21 patients, respectively. The overall response rate so far is 68%. An additional 12 patients show evidence of stable disease, and one has shown disease progression. Paclitaxel is considered a promising new drug in the adjuvant treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Combining it with epirubicin allows safe administration with no evidence of severe cardiotoxicity. The incidence of adverse cardiac events was much lower than that observed with combinations of paclitaxel and doxorubicin.

Phase I study of paclitaxel administered as a 1-hour infusion: toxicity and pharmacokinetics.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) is one of the most important new drugs used in the treatment of solid tumors. Use of paclitaxel, however, is associated with some toxicity. The main adverse side effects include myelotoxicity, neurotoxicity, hypersensitivity reactions, and asthenia. Toxicity seems to be schedule dependent. Currently, paclitaxel is routinely administered via 3- or 24-hour infusions. This study was performed to evaluate the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of a 1-hour infusion. Thirty-four patients with incurable solid tumors were included. Dose levels were escalated from 150 to 250 mg/m2. Thirty-four patients received a total of 105 courses of paclitaxel. The dose-limiting toxicity was World Health Organization grade 3 neuropathy at a dose of 250 mg/m2 in two of three patients. Two patients were not evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity because treatment was stopped after fewer than three courses due to disease progression. Neither had experienced a dose-limiting toxicity. Other toxicities were World Health Organization grade 1/2 neutropenia, asthenia, myalgia, arthralgia, and grade 1 hypersensitivity. Twenty-one patients were evaluable for preliminary anticancer efficacy. A partial response was observed in five patients (24%), stable disease in three (14%), and progressive disease in 13 (62%). The maximum tolerated dose was established at 250 mg/m2. A dose of 225 mg/m2 is recommended for further phase II trials. There was considerable interindividual and some intraindividual variability in pharmacokinetic parameters. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were linear up to 225 mg/m2, while a slightly overproportional increase in the peak plasma concentration and the area under the concentration-time curve was observed at 250 mg/m2, suggesting that paclitaxel's pharmacokinetic characteristics may be nonlinear at higher doses.

Simultaneous radiochemotherapy with paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer: a clinical phase I study.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) is one of the most active single agents available for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with reported response rates of 21% to 24%. Its observed radiosensitizing effect is attributed to its interruption of cell development at the G2/M phase of the cell cycle, when cells are most sensitive to the killing effects of ionizing radiation. This phase I study of paclitaxel and simultaneous radiation therapy in patients with previously untreated, locally advanced inoperable stage IIIA/B NSCLC was designed to determine the maximum tolerated paclitaxel dose, to define the safety and toxicity of this combined modality, and to obtain preliminary data on its activity. Patients received a fixed dose of radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/d, 5 days a week, in shrinking-field technique, for a total dose of 59.4 Gy) and concomitant chemotherapy with a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel once weekly on day 1, initially at a dose of 45 mg/m2, for 3 weeks. This dose remained constant during study levels 1 to 3, with the number of weeks of treatment increasing to 5 and 7 at levels 2 and 3, respectively. At dose level 4, the paclitaxel dose was increased to 55 mg/m2 over 7 weeks. Of 22 NSCLC patients who entered the study, 18 are evaluable for toxicity and response. Responses included one complete and 10 partial remissions; the other seven patients had minimal improvement. The therapy was well tolerated; no severe adverse events were associated with paclitaxel or radiotherapy. This combined modality appears to be a practicable and effective treatment for NSCLC. The maximum tolerated paclitaxel dose has not yet been reached, and dose escalation is planned.

Single-agent paclitaxel as a 3-hour infusion.

This ongoing phase II trial of patients with inoperable stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer is seeking to determine the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) when administered as a 3-hour infusion. The 58 patients now evaluable met standard eligibility requirements, including no prior chemotherapy. Paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 was delivered every 3 weeks for up to 10 courses, depending on patient response. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 50 were evaluable for response. There were no complete responses, 12 patients had partial responses, 12 had progressive disease, and 26 had no change. The median time to response was 8.7 weeks; the median survival was 10 months. Leukopenia, when observed, was grade 1 or 2 in all but one case. Likewise, all nonhematologic effects were mild, with the exception of one case of grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. The 3-hour infusion schedule is more convenient, and the authors feel that the safety of the schedule is confirmed by these results. However, the efficacy of the shortened schedule, compared with a 24-hour infusion, remains to be proven.

Paclitaxel and simultaneous radiation in locally advanced stage IIIA/B non-small cell lung cancer: a clinical phase I study.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) is one of the most active single agents for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, with response rates of 21% to 24%. We present a phase I study with paclitaxel and simultaneous radiation in previously untreated, locally advanced, inoperable, stage IIIA/B non-small cell lung cancer. The aims of the study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose, define the safety and toxicity, and obtain preliminary data about the activity of the combined modality. Patients received a fixed dose of radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/d, 5 days a week for 6.5 weeks, for a total dose of 59.4 Gy) and concomitant chemotherapy with paclitaxel 45 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15 in level 1; days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29 in level 2; and days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 in level 3. The paclitaxel dosage was increased to 55 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43 in level 4. Paclitaxel was administered as a 3-hour continuous intravenous infusion. Dexamethasone, clemastine, and ranitidine were given for hypersensitivity prophylaxis. Twenty-two patients (18 men and four women) entered the study; their median age was 66.5 years (age range, 38 to 74 years). Disease stage was IIIA in six of 22 patients and stage IIIB in 16. Six patients were treated at level 1, five at level 2, five at level 3, and six at level 4. There were 18 patients evaluable for toxicity and response. Side effects generally were moderate during the treatment period. One patient withdrew by request after the first course, one patient died of tumor bleeding after five courses, one patient died of progressive disease (lymphangiosis carcinomatosa of both lungs) after the sixth course, and one patient is too early for evaluation. Among the 18 patients evaluable for response, there were one complete and 10 partial remissions; seven patients reached a minor response. It is concluded that the therapy was well tolerated in these patients. Importantly, no severe adverse events were observed that could be associated with paclitaxel or radiotherapy. This combined modality appears to be a practicable and effective treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. The maximum tolerated dose has not yet been reached, and dose escalation is planned.

Interim Analysis of a Phase II study of epirubicin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), the first taxane to be used routinely in clinical practice, has aroused considerable interest for its high single-agent activity in breast cancer and its novel mechanism of action. The 4' epimer of doxorubicin, epirubicin is an agent with high activity against breast cancer but a lower rate of toxic side effects, especially cardiotoxic events, than its parent compound. Although the paclitaxel/doxorubicin combination has yielded response rates between 63% and 94% in phase I/II studies, some severe cardiotoxic events were reported. The rationale for our study was to evaluate the paclitaxel/epirubicin combination, focusing mainly on cardiotoxicity. In all, 57 patients with metastatic breast cancer entered the study, 28% of whom had primary metastatic breast cancer with large tumors at the primary site. Half of the patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Study medication consisted of 60 mg/m2 epirubicin given intravenously over 1 hour, followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion after premedication with steroids, antihistamines, and H2 antagonists. The main toxicity was neutropenia (World Health Organization toxicity index grade 3/4, 72%). Other hematologic side effects were rare and no febrile neutropenia was reported. Peripheral neuropathy, arthralgia, and myalgia were mild (only World Health Organization grade 1 and 2). All patients had alopecia. The paclitaxel dose was escalated to 200 mg/m2 in eight patients, four of whom received a further escalation to 225 mg/m2. Severe neutropenia necessitated dose reductions in eight patients. No cardiac adverse events were reported. Of 41 patients evaluable for response, seven had complete remissions and 21 had partial remissions (68%). An additional 12 patients (29%) had stable disease. The combination of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and epirubicin 60 mg/m2 can be administered safely to patients with metastatic breast cancer. Although response was not the primary end point of this trial, the response data are nonetheless encouraging and suggest that further evaluation of the role of this combination in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer is warranted.

Paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer.

In a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) given as a 3-hour infusion in combination with carboplatin administered every 21 days to women with advanced ovarian cancer, paclitaxel doses were escalated as follows: level 1, 135 mg/m2; level 2, 160 mg/m2; level 3, 185 mg/m2; and level 4,210 mg/m2. The fixed dose of carboplatin at levels 1 through 4 was given to achieve an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5 using the Calvert formula. In levels 5 and 6 the carboplatin dose was targeted at AUCs of 6 and 7.5, respectively, combined with a fixed paclitaxel dose of 185 mg/m2. To date, 30 previously untreated patients, all with a good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 to 2) have been entered into this ongoing study. The dose-limiting toxicity of the combination was myelosuppression (leukopenia, granulocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia). Neurotoxicity was largely moderate. So far, 14 patients are evaluable for response; of these, eight (57%) showed objective (complete or partial) response and disease stabilized in six patients. No patient had disease progression. We conclude that the combination of paclitaxel 185 mg/m2 administered as a 3-hour infusion followed immediately by a 1-hour infusion of carboplatin at an AUC of 6 can be administered safely in a 21-day schedule in the outpatient setting. The recommended dose for phase III studies is paclitaxel 185 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 6.

Paclitaxel and simultaneous radiation in the treatment of stage III A/B non-small cell lung cancer.

In a clinical phase II trial, radiotherapy and escalating doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) were given concurrently to patients with stage IIIA/B non-small cell lung cancer. Radiotherapy was given in daily doses of 2 Gy, 5 days a week, in weeks 1 to 3 and 6 to 8 for a total dose of 56 Gy. Paclitaxel was given in 3-hour infusions on day 1, also in weeks 1 to 3 and 6 to 8. The starting dose level was 50 mg/m2; the subsequent dose levels were 60, 72, 86, and 103 mg/m2. Cohorts of three to six patients were assigned to each dose level until intolerable toxicity (eg, World Health Organization grade 3 or 4 leukopenia) occurred in three of the six patients. Currently, 15 patients have entered the study. Twelve patients have finished the treatment protocol and are evaluable for toxicity and response. Hematologic toxicity was mild, and even at 86 mg/m2, the highest evaluable dose level, no severe myelosuppression was noticed. The main clinical toxicity was the occurrence of pulmonary infections, which were seen in five patients. One of these patients had a Pneumocystis carinii infection, but no pathogens were isolated from the four others with interstitial infections. Mild to moderate esophagitis was seen in five patients. All patients showed a decrease of tumor size. Four patients had a major response with nearly complete disappearance of radiologic tumor signs, five patients had a partial remission, and three patients experienced a minor response. Thus, the overall response rate was 75%. In summary, the maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel has not yet been achieved, the occurrence of pulmonary infections represents the major clinical toxicity, and the extremely high response rate merits further clinical evaluation of this regimen.

Clinical phase I study of paclitaxel followed by cisplatin in advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

We performed a clinical phase I trial of the combination of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and cisplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, using a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel followed by a 1-hour infusion of cisplatin. Treatment with this combination was repeated every 21 days. Patients who had received prior treatment with platinum-containing regimens were excluded. However, patients who had received two or fewer courses of radiochemotherapy not including platinum compounds were eligible. At present, 21 patients have been entered into this ongoing study. Doses ranged from paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 to paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose was reached at paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity of this regimen was myelosuppression (leukopenia, granulocytopenia). Clinically, neurosensory toxicity was moderate. However, preliminary analyses of threshold electrotonus studies indicate the presence of subclinical neurotoxicity in most patients. One patient receiving paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 developed grade 3 motor neurotoxicity. Profound orthostatic hypotension was observed in five patients receiving paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 or higher. Neurotoxicity was of delayed onset and slowly reversible, and its severity appeared to be dose related. Twelve patients are currently evaluable for response. Of these, three partial remissions were observed (6, 6+, and 3+ months). Five additional patients had stable disease. We conclude that the combination of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion followed by cisplatin is an active regimen in advanced head and neck cancer. In addition to myelosuppression, orthostatic hypotension may be a potentially significant clinical toxicity. Clinical phase II studies have been initiated, using a dose of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2.