Compound Kushen injection combined with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: An evidence map and overview of systematic reviews.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: For the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), compound Kushen injection (CKi) is commonly used in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). AIMS OF THE STUDY: Our objective was to evaluate the reporting quality, methodological quality, risk of bias, and certainty of evidence for CKi combined with TACE for the treatment of patients with HCC by conducting systematic reviews (SRs). The purpose of this study was to improve the clinical application of CKis, strengthen clinical decision-making regarding CKis, and inform future research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used eight databases to systematically search SRs of CKi combined with TACE for HCC through February 21, 2023. The quality of reporting of SRs was evaluated using the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, methodological quality using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2, risk of bias using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Review, and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment. Finally, the assessment results were visualized by the evidence mapping method. This overview has been registered on PROSPERO with the registration title "Compound Kushen injection for hepatocellular carcinoma: An overview of systematic reviews" and registration number CRD42022369120. RESULTS: A total of 12 SRs meeting the inclusion criteria were included. In terms of reporting quality, 42% of SRs reported relatively complete reports and 58% had certain deficiencies. The methodological quality of all SRs was " critically low". The risk of bias was evaluated as low in 33% of SRs and high in 67% of SRs. The results of the evidence synthesis showed that, in the "moderate" level of evidence, CKi combined with TACE resulted in a 12.7%-21.5% benefit for one-year survival rate, 11.7%-17.2% benefit for objective response rate (ORR), 20.5%-27.1% benefit for quality of life, 22.2% benefit for nausea and vomiting, and 24.7%-27.4% benefit for leukopenia in HCC patients. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, CKi combined with TACE improved survival, ORR and quality of life in patients with HCC, and reduced adverse events. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the low methodological quality of the included SRs. The clinical efficacy of CKis must be confirmed in a large number of randomized controlled trials.

Potentially Overestimated Efficacy of Nanoparticle Albumin-bound Paclitaxel compared with Solvent-based Paclitaxel in Breast Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) has exhibited clinical efficacy in breast cancer treatment, but toxicities can be yielded more at the same time. We did this meta-analysis aiming to unambiguously compare nab-PTX with conventional solvent-based paclitaxel (sb-PTX) in breast cancer patients of all stages. Method: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for head-to-head randomized controlled trials of nab-PTX and sb-PTX in breast cancer. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval was used for dichotomous variables while Hazard ratio (HR) was used for time-to-event outcomes. Results: Our review finally included 9 studies with 3508 patients. Nab-PTX showed a benefit on objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.22 [1.04-1.43], P=0.01) as well as non-inferiority compared with sb-PTX in disease control rate (DCR) (RR=1.01 [0.98-1.04], P=0.44), overall survival (OS) (HR=0.99 [0.93-1.05], P=0.81) and disease free survival/progression free survival (DFS/PFS) (HR=0.92 [0.81-1.05], P=0.21). However, when it comes to toxicities (fatigue, nausea or vomiting, peripheral sensory neuropathy and adverse event related discontinuation), results favored sb-PTX (RR=2.89 [1.07-7.8], 3.15 [1.78-5.59], 2.11 [1.32-3.37], 2.02 [1.61-2.53]; P<0.05). Patients with metastatic tumors or undergoing conventional schedule responses better to nab-PTX than the compared groups (RR of ORR in metastatic vs early or locally advanced patients: 1.46 [1.09-1.96] vs 1.01 [0.94-1.08]; conventional vs dose dense group: 1.59 [1.23-2.06] vs 1.01 [0.91-1.12]). Conclusions: Nab-PTX can improve ORR compared with paclitaxel and should be given priority to when aiming to reduce tumor load in breast cancer. Sb-PTX of dose dense schedule is recommended when toxicity of nab-PTX is hard to bear for breast cancer patients.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of Lung Cancer patients with Hypercoagulability: A single-center, retrospective, real-world study.

Objective: We explored the clinical regularity and prognosis of lung carcinoma (LC) patients with hypercoagulability, which is often associated with the occurrence and development of tumors. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 624 LC patients diagnosed from 2010-2017 in the Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, China. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate survival and the log-rank test was used to identify differences in survival between groups. The predictive power of a hypercoagulation model was tested using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to explore independent factors associated with survival. A logistic regression model was used to explore factors related to hypercoagulability. The diagnostic power of relevant influencing factors on hypercoagulability was tested using ROC curve analysis. Results: Of 624 patients in the study, 161(25.8%) had hypercoagulability and 463 did not (normal group). The overall survival (OS) of the hypercoagulability group was significantly lower than the normal group (P < 0.0001). The ROC curve showed that the predictive power of the hypercoagulability model was better than that of a single coagulation indicator (P < 0.01). Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that hypercoagulability was an independent factor affecting the prognosis of LC (P<0.0001). The results of the logistic regression analysis showed that clinical stage (P < 0.05), cytokeratin 19 fragment (Cyfra211) (P < 0.05), and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (P < 0.05) were positively correlated with hypercoagulability. When combining clinical stage, Cyfra211, and the PLR to predict hypercoagulability, the area under the ROC curve was 0.797 (P < 0.01). Conclusions: In LC, hypercoagulability is an independent factor associated with poor OS and could be a prognostic factor.

Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in breast cancer: A protocol for systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) has exhibited clinical efficacy in breast cancer treatment, but toxicities can be yielded more at the same time. We did this meta-analysis aiming to unambiguously compare nab-PTX with conventional solvent-based paclitaxel in breast cancer patients of all stages. METHOD: Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical database, and WangFang database were searched for head-to-head randomized controlled trials of nab-PTX and solvent-based paclitaxel in breast cancer. Other sources will also be searched like Google Scholar and gray literatures. Two researchers will independently search the database and extract data from the articles. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Objective tumor response rate, chemotherapy completion rate after 4 or 6 cycles, and toxicity will be primary outcomes. Disease control rate, overall survival, and progression-free survival/disease-free survival will be included in secondary outcomes. Risk ratio with 95% confidence interval was used for dichotomous variables while hazard ratio was used for time-to-event outcomes. The following 3 data sets will all be considered when synthesizing the data: intention-to-treat population, those who actually received taxanes treatment, and those who were actually assessed. All the analyses were done using Review Manager Software 5.3. Any disagreements in study selection, data collection, and analysis will be resolved by a third investigator. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: This study is aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nab-PTX compared with PTX in breast cancer treatment as well as to find the best dose or schedule and identify the benefit population. This meta-analysis could provide evidence for clinicians to make a better choice between nab-PTX and PTX in different specific contexts. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019117912.

Prognostic significance of thrombocytosis in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

A potential relationship between poor prognosis and thrombocytosis has been suggested by previous studies in lung cancer, but the conclusions continued to be controversial. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the prognostic impact of thrombocytosis in lung cancer. The Cochrane Library, EMBASE and PubMed databases were comprehensively and systematically retrieved from establishment to May 5, 2020. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to evaluate overall effects. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics and Cochran's Q test. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to analyze the sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was examined using the Egger's test and pooled HR was regulated using the trim-and-fill approach when publication bias was observed. A total of 37 studies including 14,833 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis. Thrombocytosis was significantly correlated to poor overall survival (HR 1.033; 95% CI 1.017-1.050), disease-free survival (HR 1.568; 95% CI 1.276-1.928), and progression-free survival (HR 1.653; 95% CI 1.069-2.556). Although publication bias was identified, rectification for this bias using the trim-and-fill approach did not change the combined HR substantially. In conclusion, this meta-analysis result suggested that thrombocytosis is a predictor of poor prognosis in lung cancer.

The Effect of Ginkgo Biloba Dropping Pills on Hemorheology and Blood Lipid: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.

OBJECTIVE: A systematic review of randomized trials was performed to assess the effect of Ginkgo Biloba Dropping Pills (GBDP) on clinical hemorheology and blood lipid indicators. METHODS: The data of the Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Clinical Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Wanfang database, the VIP database, and the Sinomed were retrieved by computers from the establishment of the database to March 27, 2018, and screened and extracted by two researchers according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Cochrane 5.0 recommended bias risk assessment tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included literature, and Revman 5.3 software were used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: 10 literatures were finally selected in accordance with the standard. There were a total of 1201 cases, 608 cases in ginkgo biloba dropping pill group and 593 in routine treatment group. Compared with control group, GBDP significantly improved plasma viscosity [N=383, RR= - 0.45, 95%CI=(-0.86,-0.04), P=0.03], whole blood high shear [N=232, RR= - 0.92,95%CI=(-1.69, -0.16), P =0.02], whole blood low shear [N = 232, RR = - 2.22, 95% CI = (- 3.74, -0.7), P = 0.004], red blood cell specific volume [N =132, RR = - 4.55, 95% CI = (- 6.36, 2.73), P < 0.000 01], fibrinogen [N=243, RR=-0.60,95%CI=(-0.82,-0.39), P<0.00001], triglyceride [N=912, RR=-0.60,95%CI=(-1.12, -0.07), P =0.03], cholesterol [N=912, RR=-0.97,95%CI=(-1.41, -0.52), P <0.0001], low-density cholesterol [N=1100, RR=-0.72,95%CI=(-1.19, -0.25), P =0.003], and sensitivity analysis before and after of high-density cholesterol [N=1020, RR=0.08,95%CI=(-0.17,0.34), P =0.52] and [N=683, RR=0.27,95%CI=(0.13,0.42), P =0.0003]. And seven adverse reactions were reported. CONCLUSION: GBDP can improve hemorheology indexes, which is to reduce the blood viscosity, to improve blood lipid status, and to prevent and treat cardiocerebral and renal vascular diseases to a certain extent, with slight clinical adverse reactions. But our results were based on small amount of clinical studies with poor quality and insufficient evidence, which may lead to low credibility of conclusions. Therefore, more large-sample, multiple-center, randomized controlled clinical trials and related mechanisms researches are needed to obtain better clinical trial evidence in order to verify the further effectiveness and safety of GBDP on hemorheology.