[Primitive renal synovial sarcoma: a cystic tumor in young patients]. / Synovialosarcome primitif rénal: une tumeur kystique chez des patients jeunes.

INTRODUCTION: The study of the clinical, histological and immunohistochemical aspects of three kidney tumors corresponding to synovial sarcomas operated on in our center over three years. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Three patients aged between 27 and 33 had an enlarged nephrectomy for kidney tumors corresponding to a histological examination of a synovial sarcoma. The tumors were symptomatic in 100% of cases with back pain and spontaneous rupture. Size varied from 5 to 13cm. The radiological aspect was a cystic tumor (BosniakIV) in two cases and in the other a spontaneous perirenal hematoma. Two were in the right kidney and one in the left kidney. The parts were analyzed after fixation. Immunohistochemical coloration and an analysis in molecular biology by RT-PCR of fusion transcripts were carried out. RESULTS: One patient died because of local development and metastasis 24 months after an enlarged nephrectomy associated with radio chemotherapy (Maidprotocol). Two patients were in total remission after an average of 25 months following the same treatment. The histology found a mesenchymal fusocellular monotone proliferation corresponding to a sarcoma. In all three cases, it was a biphasic form with plaques of fusiform cells and epithelial cells. The immunohistochemical study shows a positivity of the contingent epithelial and fusiform. The muscular markers were negative. A study in molecular biology of the fusion transcript allowed for the finding of a translocation (X;18) in all three cases. CONCLUSION: Primitive synovial sarcoma of the kidney occured in young patients. The translocation (X;18) is pathognomonic of the diagnosis. The prognosis is bleak despite complete excision, radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

[AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter implantation: can the penoscrotal approach constitute an alternative to the perineal approach?]. / Implantation du sphincter urinaire artificiel AMS 800: la voie péno-scrotale est-elle une alternative à la voie périnéale ?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term results of penoscrotal and perineal artificial urinary sphincter implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From May 2005 to February 2007, 37 artificial urinary sphincters were implanted successively, via a penoscrotal approach in 16 cases and via a perineal approach in 21 cases. Incontinence was secondary to prostate surgery (n=36) and pelvic trauma (n=1). Seventeen patients had a history of external beam radiotherapy. The times and modalities of activation of the sphincter were identical in the two groups. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients, the mean operating time, the mean catheterization duration, the mean hospital stay and the mean postoperative follow-up were equivalent in the two groups. Six urethral erosions (37.5%) and one scrotal erosion due to the pump (6.6%) were observed in the penoscrotal group and infection of the sphincter in two patients (9.5%) and pump migration in another two patients (9.5%), but no urethral erosions were observed in the perineal group. The success rate without revision was 56% in the penoscrotal group and 71.5% in the perineal group. CONCLUSION: The perineal approach is the reference incision, as the penoscrotal approach is associated with a high rate of erosion. The penoscrotal urethral approach can constitute an alternative when the bulbar urethra cannot be used.