Poor kidney allograft survival associated with positive B cell - Only flow cytometry cross matches: a ten year single center study.

The presence of donor specific antibody (DSA) to class 1 or class 2 HLA as detected respectively in T cell or B cell - only flow cytometry cross matches (FCXMs) are risk factors for renal allograft survival, though the comparative risk of these XMs has not been definitively established. Allograft survival and FCXM data in 624 microcytotoxicity (CDC) XM negative kidney transplants were evaluated. Short and long term allograft survival was significantly less in recipients with T(-) B(+) FCXMs (1 year, 74%, 10 year, 58%) compared to T(+) B(+) FCXMs (1 year, 84%, 10 year, 68%) and to T(-) B(-) FCXM (1 year, 90%, 10 year, 85%). Risk factors were positive FCXM, deceased donor (DD) transplantation and donor age, but not race, gender, recipient age or previous transplant. Recipients with T(-) B(+) and T(+) B(+) FCXMs were at 4.5 and 2.5 fold greater risk, respectively, of DD allograft failure compared to patients with T(-) B(-) FCXMs. The quantitative value of FCXM did not correlate with the duration of graft survival. We conclude that patients with DSA to class 2 HLA have a greater risk of early and late allograft failure compared to patients with DSA to class 1 HLA.

Long-term kidney transplant outcome in obese patients in a predominantly African American population.

The impact of obesity on long-term kidney transplant outcome has largely been studied in non-African American patients. This study seeks to determine differences in outcome between obese and non-obese patients after kidney transplantation, in a predominantly African American population. We reviewed 642 adult renal transplant recipients who received their transplants at SUNY Downstate Medical Center between 1998 and 2007. Sixty-six percent of the patients studied were African American. The patients were divided into five groups according to their BMI status: underweight <20, normal 20-24.9, overweight 25-29.9, obese 30-34.9, and morbidly obese ≥35. There were no differences in race, gender, cytomegalovirus infection, type of transplant, panel-reactive antibody, retransplant status, flow cytometry cross-match results, mycophenolate mofetil therapy, and total HLA mismatch status. The mean discharge serum creatinine in the morbidly obese group was significantly higher than in other groups (p < 0.001). The difference in creatinine level disappeared at six wk and six months (p > 0.5), respectively. Acute rejection rates, delayed graft function, graft survival, and patient survival were not different between the groups. The findings from this large single-center study suggest that obese and morbidly obese patients had similar outcomes compared to other weight groups. Obese and morbidly obese African American patients should not be excluded from kidney transplantation on the basis of weight alone.

Long-term outcomes of dual kidney transplantation-a single center experience.

The shortage of kidney donors has led to broadening of the acceptance criteria for deceased donor organs beyond the traditional use of young donors. We determined long-term post-transplant outcomes in recipients of dual expanded criteria donor kidneys (dECD, n = 44) and compared them to recipients of standard criteria donor kidneys (SCD, n = 194) and single expanded criteria donor kidneys (sECD, n = 62). We retrospectively reviewed these 300 deceased donor kidney transplants without primary non-function (PNF) or death in the first two wk, at our center from 1996 to 2003. The three groups were similar in baseline characteristics. Kidney allograft survival and patient survival (nine yr) were similar in the three respective donor groups, SCD, sECD and dECD (60% vs. 59% vs. 64% and 82% vs. 73% vs. 73%). Acute rejection in the first three months was 23.2%, 16.1%, and 22.7% in SCD, sECD and dECD, respectively (p = 0.49) and delayed graft function was 25.2%, 31.9% and 17.1% in the three groups, respectively (p = 0.28). When PNF and death within the first two wk was included, there was no significant difference in graft survival between the three groups. In our population, recipients of dECD transplants have acceptable patient and graft survival with kidneys that would have usually been discarded.

Deceased-donor characteristics and the survival benefit of kidney transplantation.

CONTEXT: Transplantation using kidneys from deceased donors who meet the expanded criteria donor (ECD) definition (age > or =60 years or 50 to 59 years with at least 2 of the following: history of hypertension, serum creatinine level >1.5 mg/dL [132.6 micromol/L], and cerebrovascular cause of death) is associated with 70% higher risk of graft failure compared with non-ECD transplants. However, if ECD transplants offer improved overall patient survival, inferior graft outcome may represent an acceptable trade-off. OBJECTIVE: To compare mortality after ECD kidney transplantation vs that in a combined standard-therapy group of non-ECD recipients and those still receiving dialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective cohort study using data from a US national registry of mortality and graft outcomes among kidney transplant candidates and recipients. The cohort included 109,127 patients receiving dialysis and added to the kidney waiting list between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2002, and followed up through July 31, 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Long-term (3-year) relative risk of mortality for ECD kidney recipients vs those receiving standard therapy, estimated using time-dependent Cox regression models. RESULTS: By end of follow-up, 7790 ECD kidney transplants were performed. Because of excess ECD recipient mortality in the perioperative period, cumulative survival did not equal that of standard-therapy patients until 3.5 years posttransplantation. Long-term relative mortality risk was 17% lower for ECD recipients (relative risk, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.90; P<.001). Subgroups with significant ECD survival benefit included patients older than 40 years, both sexes, non-Hispanics, all races, unsensitized patients, and those with diabetes or hypertension. In organ procurement organizations (OPOs) with long median waiting times (>1350 days), ECD recipients had a 27% lower risk of death (relative risk, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.83; P<.001). In areas with shorter waiting times, only recipients with diabetes demonstrated an ECD survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: ECD kidney transplants should be offered principally to candidates older than 40 years in OPOs with long waiting times. In OPOs with shorter waiting times, in which non-ECD kidney transplant availability is higher, candidates should be counseled that ECD survival benefit is observed only for patients with diabetes.

Acute massive pulmonary embolism: role of the cardiac surgeon.

We present the case of a 72-year-old woman who had an acute massive pulmonary embolism after abdominal surgery. The patient had undergone a right hemicolectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy for locally invasive colonic adenocarcinoma. Six hours postoperatively, she required emergent intubation when she suddenly became cyanotic, severely hypotensive, and tachypneic, with an oxygen saturation of 50%. An acute massive pulmonary embolism was suspected, and an emergency transesophageal echocardiogram confirmed the diagnosis. On the basis of the patient's clinical condition and the echocardiographic findings, we performed an emergent pulmonary embolectomy, with the patient on cardiopulmonary bypass. We evacuated multiple large clots from both pulmonary arteries. The patient recovered and was discharged from the hospital 61 days postoperatively. Herein, we review the current literature on open surgical pulmonary embolectomy. This case supports the use of open pulmonary embolectomy for the treatment of hemodynamically unstable patients on the basis of clinical diagnosis. We discuss the role of emergent transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis and management of massive pulmonary embolism.

Kidney and pancreas transplantation.

Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients offer a unique and comprehensive view of US trends in kidney and pancreas waiting list characteristics and outcomes, transplant recipient and donor characteristics, and patient and allograft survival. Important findings from our review of developments during 2002 and the decade's transplantation trends appear below. The kidney waiting list has continued to grow, increasing from 47,830 in 2001 to 50,855 in 2002. This growth has occurred despite the increasing importance of living donor transplantation, which rose from 28% of total kidney transplants in 1993 to 43% in 2002. Policies and procedures to expedite the allocation of expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys were developed and implemented during 2002, when 15% of deceased donor transplants were performed with ECD kidneys. Unadjusted 1- and 5-year deceased donor kidney allograft survivals were 81% and 51% for ECD kidney recipients, and 90% and 68% for non-ECD kidney recipients, respectively. Although more patients have been placed on the simultaneous kidney-pancreas waiting list, the number of these transplants dropped from a peak of 970 in 1998 to 905 in 2002. This decline may be due to competition for organs from increasing numbers of isolated pancreas and islet transplants.

Effect of changing the priority for HLA matching on the rates and outcomes of kidney transplantation in minority groups.

BACKGROUND: HLA typing and the time a patient has spent on the waiting list are the primary criteria used to allocate cadaveric kidneys for transplantation in the United States. Candidates with no HLA-A, B, and DR mismatches are given top priority, followed by candidates with the fewest mismatches at the HLA-B and DR loci; this policy contributes to a higher transplantation rate among whites than nonwhites. We hypothesized that changing this allocation policy would affect graft survival and the racial balance among transplant recipients. METHODS: We estimated the relative rates of kidney transplantation according to race resulting from the current allocation policy and racial differences in HLA antigen profiles, using a Cox model for the time from placement on the waiting list to transplantation. Another model, also adjusted for HLA-B and DR antigen profiles, estimated the relative rates of kidney transplantation that would result if the distribution of these antigen profiles were identical among the racial and ethnic groups. We also investigated the effect of HLA matching on the risk of graft failure, using a Cox model for the time from the first transplantation to graft failure. The results of the two analyses were used to estimate the change in the racial balance of transplantation and graft-failure rates that would result from the elimination of HLA-B matching or HLA-B and DR matching as a means of assigning priority. RESULTS: Eliminating the HLA-B matching as a priority while maintaining HLA-DR matching as a priority would decrease the number of transplantations among whites by 4.0 percent (166 fewer transplantations over a one-year period), whereas it would increase the number among nonwhites by 6.3 percent and increase the rate of graft loss by 2.0 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Removing HLA-B matching as a priority for the allocation of cadaveric kidneys could reduce the existing racial imbalance by increasing the number of transplantations among nonwhites, with only a small increase in the rate of graft loss.