[Transanal total mesorectal excision-Indications, technique and results]. / Transanale totale mesorektale Exzision ­ Indikation, Technik, Ergebnisse.

Total mesorectal excision (TME) has become the standard treatment for rectal cancer in the middle and lower third. Meanwhile, many international trials have confirmed the noninferiority of laparoscopic TME compared to the open technique. Nevertheless, in the presence of anatomical limitations, such as narrow, obese, male pelvises as well as large rectal tumors, the adequate resection of the lower third of the rectum according to oncological criteria, is still challenging even for specialized colorectal surgeons. Therefore, the implementation of innovative approaches, such as robotic-assisted and transanal TME (TaTME) should shed light on this anatomically complex region and guarantee an oncological radical resection and the best possible preservation of neural structures. The advantages of this technique have so far only been provided by retrospective cohort studies by large international centers. Therefore, international prospective randomized trials are currently recruiting patients to analyze the surgical and oncological outcome of TaTME compared to conventional techniques. This article describes the TaTME technique per se, the fields of application and the current data situation. Practical recommendations for the safe implementation of this operative procedure are also presented. The TaTME procedure is reserved for highly specialized colorectal centers with a high volume of rectal cancer cases and appropriate expertise in minimally invasive visceral surgery.Die totale mesorektale Exzision (TME) ist der Goldstandard im Kontext der multimodalen Behandlung des Rektumkarzinoms im mittleren und unteren Drittel. Der transanale Zugang ist eine Ergänzung des zunehmend laparoskopischen Vorgehens, welcher gerade bei anatomischen Limitationen bei der onkologisch adäquaten Resektion des distalen Rektums Abhilfe schaffen soll. Die Nichtunterlegenheit in chirurgischen und onkologischen Parametern wird gegenüber konventionellen (laparoskopisch/offen) Operationsmethoden derzeit intensiv beforscht. Eine sichere Implementation dieser herausfordernden Technik ist an ein modulares Trainingskurrikulum gebunden.

Anastomotic leak after transanal total mesorectal excision: grading of severity and management aimed at preservation of the anastomosis.

AIM: The transanal approach to total mesorectal excision (TaTME) as an alternative to conventional anterior resection offers an improved view to otherwise restricted anatomical regions in obese and narrow male pelves and unfavourable tumour locations. Guidelines for the management of anastomotic leakage (AL) following low rectal resections are scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospectively collected data of all consecutive patients undergoing TaTME between December 2014 and April 2017 in our centre were analysed retrospectively. Existing classification systems for AL were modified with regard to transanal anastomotic-preserving management. RESULTS: TaTME was performed in 66 patients with a median age of 56.2 years. The overall incidence of AL was 12.1% (n = 8). AL grading was differentiated in Grades I to V according to the severity of necrosis and abscess development. Two patients suffered from AL Grade II, one patient from Grade III, three patients from Grade IV and two patients from Grade V. Preservation of the anastomosis following AL was achieved by the damage control concept in six of eight patients (75%) with a median duration of hospital stay of 36 days. Two patients received a Hartmann procedure (Grades IV and V). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that management of AL following TaTME is challenging but definitely amenable to strategies aimed at preserving the anastomosis by appropriate damage control. The modified classification system might serve as guidance for anastomosis-preserving management.

The role of dopamine in maintenance and distractability of attention in the "prefrontal cortex" of pigeons.

Selective attention is a crucial component of all sensory processing. Here we test the role of dopamine in attentional selection and in the maintenance of attention. Pigeons were trained on a moving-dot paradigm comparable to the shell game. In this paradigm, pigeons had to select a target among distractors and maintain attention to the target. Target and distractors consisted of white dots, moving at random on a touch-screen. In this task, the demand on attention was modulated by varying the number of distractors and the duration of motion. Both manipulations affected performance equally. In the next step, we investigated the contribution of dopamine to attention. Intracranial injections of D1-antagonist (Sch23390) before testing led to decrements in performance that equally affected trials with different attentional demand. This drop in performance cannot be attributed to altered motivation or motor performance. We conclude that dopamine has a critical role in attention. It is involved in the selection of targets for attention and in the stabilization of attention against interference. This is comparable to the role dopamine plays in working memory and argues for similar mechanisms underlying selective attention and working memory.