When spinal instrumentation revision is not an option: Salvage vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate for mechanical complications: A systematic review.

Intoduction: Mechanical complications from spinal fusion including implant loosening or junctional failure result in poor outcomes, particularly in osteoporotic patients. While the use of percutaneous vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been studied for augmentation of junctional levels to offset against kyphosis and failure, its deployment around existing loose screws or in failing surrounding bone as a salvage percutaneous procedure has been described in small case series and merits review. Research Question: How effective and safe is the use of PMMA as a salvage procedure for mechanical complications in failed spinal fusion?. Materials and Methods: Systematic search of online databases for clinical studies using this technique. Results: 11 studies were identified, only consisting of two case reports and nine case series. Consistent improvements were observed in pre- to post-operative VAS and with sustained improvements at final follow-up. The extra- or para-pedicular approach was the most frequent access trajectory. Most studies cited difficulties with visibility on fluoroscopy, using navigation or oblique views as a solution for this. Discussion and Conclusions: Percutaneous cementation at a failing screw-bone interface stabilises further micromotion with reductions in back pain. This rarely used technique is manifested by a low but increasing number of reported cases. The technique warrants further evaluation and is best performed within a multidisciplinary setting at a specialist centre. Notwithstanding that underlying pathology may not be addressed, awareness of this technique may allow an effective and safe salvage solution with minimal morbidity for older sicker patients.

Can a culture of team psychological safety and MDT proforma improve team performance and patient outcomes in spinal MDTs?

PURPOSE: Spinal multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) are now standard of care for complex patient management in tertiary spinal units. This study investigates whether a scheduling proforma, and cultural change to the team that promotes psychological safety, can improve spinal MDT effectiveness for team members and patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including 165 spinal MDT patients before and after intervention. The intervention was use of a scheduling proforma and team learning to promote a culture of psychological safety. Data on accident and emergency (A&E) attendances, unplanned emergency admissions and post-operative 30-day readmissions were collected. At the team level, data were collected from 16 MDT participants using the MDT Observational Assessment Rating Scale (MDT-OARS), which measures MDT effectiveness. RESULTS: Pre-intervention MDT-OARS was 28. Analysis of 80 patients demonstrated there were six A&E attendances, three unplanned emergency admissions and four post-operative 30-day re-admissions. Post-intervention MDT-OARS was 38 (p < 0.05). Analysis of 85 patients demonstrated there were three A&E attendances, one unplanned emergency admission and one post-operative re-admission. CONCLUSIONS: Team culture that promotes psychological safety, along with use of a scheduling proforma, can improve MDT effectiveness for participants in spinal MDTs.

A multicentre retrospective review of muscle necrosis of the leg following spinal surgery with motor evoked potential monitoring: a cause for concern?

PURPOSE: There are very few reported cases of compartment syndrome of the leg following spinal surgery via a posterior approach. An association between compartment syndrome and muscle over-activity via nerve stimulation during evoked potential monitoring was first suggested in 2003. No further reports have suggested this link. We present a multicentre retrospective review of a series of five patients who developed compartment syndrome of the leg following spinal surgery via a posterior approach, whilst un-paralysed and with combined sensory (SSEP)/motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring with an aim of highlighting this possible causative factor. METHODS: All data were collected contemporaneously and retrospective analysis was performed. We then arranged for a multidisciplinary review of the cases including surgeons, anaesthetists, radiologists, neurophysiologists and theatre and ward nursing staff. Finally, the literature was reviewed. RESULTS: All patients were operated on by three different surgeons, on different operating tables/mattresses in the prone position. The common factors were un-paralysed patients having motor/sensory monitoring, mechanical calf pumps and total intravenous anaesthesia. Three patients underwent surgical decompression of their compartments and two were treated expectantly. Three patients had confirmed intra-compartmental changes on MRI consistent with compartment syndrome and one had intra-compartmental pressure monitoring which confirmed the diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Previous cases in the literature have related to mal-positioning on the Jackson table or use of the knee-chest position for surgery. This was not the case for our patients; therefore, we suspect an association between overactive muscle stimulation and muscle necrosis. Further experimental studies investigating this link are required.

Site of maximum neovascularisation correlates with the site of pain in recalcitrant mid-tendon Achilles tendinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Neovascularisation is associated with pain in Achilles tendinopathy (AT). The anatomical relationship between ultrasound (US)-defined indicators of tendinopathy and clinically determined pain sites has not been investigated. PURPOSE: To measure the spatial correlation between the sites of maximum palpated tenderness, site of patient-indicated pain, maximum US-determined neovascularisation and maximum antero-posterior tendon thickness in patients with chronic recalcitrant AT (CRAT). METHODS: A custom-designed measuring apparatus and clinical examination were used to measure the sites of maximum tenderness and subjectively defined pain on 29 tendons from patients diagnosed with mid-tendon CRAT. All tendons had been previously non-responsive to eccentric loading. Maximal neovascularisation and tendon thickness were measured by US scanning in conjunction with the measuring device. RESULTS: A significant association exists between clinically determined pain and neovascularisation (r = 0.85, p < 0.001), patient reported pain (r = 0.91, p < 0.001), maximal tendon thickness (r = 0.91, p < 0.001), maximal thickness and maximal neovascularisation (r = 0.86, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sites of subjectively defined pain, clinically palpated tenderness, tendon thickness and neovascularisation are anatomically associated. Palpation can be reliably used as a clinical guide when planning interventions in patients with CRAT.