Metal tolerance in plants: Molecular and physicochemical interface determines the "not so heavy effect" of heavy metals.

An increase in technological interventions and ruthless urbanization in the name of development has deteriorated our environment over time and caused the buildup of heavy metals (HMs) in the soil and water resources. These heavy metals are gaining increased access into our food chain through the plant and/or animal-based products, to adversely impact human health. The issue of how to restrict the entry of HMs or modulate their response in event of their ingress into the plant system is worrisome. The current knowledge on the interactive-regulatory role and contribution of different physical, biophysical, biochemical, physiological, and molecular factors that determine the heavy metal availability-uptake-partitioning dynamics in the soil-plant-environment needs to be updated. The present review critically analyses the interactive overlaps between different adaptation and tolerance strategies that may be causally related to their cellular localization, conjugation and homeostasis, a relative affinity for the transporters, rhizosphere modifications, activation of efflux pumps and vacuolar sequestration that singly or collectively determine a plant's response to HM stress. Recently postulated role of gaseous pollutants such as SO2 and other secondary metabolites in heavy metal tolerance, which may be regulated at the whole plant and/or tissue/cell is discussed to delineate and work towards a "not so heavy" response of plants to heavy metals present in the contaminated soils.

Raffinose accumulation and preferential allocation of carbon (14 C) to developing leaves impart salinity tolerance in sugar beet.

Sugar beet is a salt-tolerant crop that can be explored for crop production in degraded saline soils. Seeds of multigerm genotypes LKC-2006 (susceptible) and LKC-HB (tolerant) were grown in 150 mM NaCl, from germination to 60 days after sowing, to decipher the mechanism of salinity tolerance at the vegetative stage. The biomass of the root and leaf were maintained in the tolerant genotype, LKC-HB, under saline conditions. Na+ /K+ ratios were similar in roots and leaves of LKC-HB, with lower values under salinity compared to LKC 2006. Infrared temperatures were 0.96°C lower in LKC-HB than in LKC-2006, which helped regulate the leaf water status under stressed conditions. Pulse-chase experiment showed that 14 C photosynthate was preferentially allocated towards the development of new leaves in the tolerant genotype. The sugar profile of leaves and roots showed accumulation of raffinose in leaves of LKC-HB, indicating a plausible role in imparting salinity tolerance by serving as an osmolyte or scavenger. The molecular analysis of the genes responsible for raffinose synthesis revealed an 18-fold increase in the expression of BvRS2 in the tolerant genotype, suggesting its involvement in raffinose synthesis. Our study accentuated that raffinose accumulation in leaves is vital for inducing salinity tolerance and maintenance of shoot dry weight in sugar beet.