Simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus antigen and antibodies in dried blood spots.

BACKGROUND: Enzyme immunoassays (EIA) designed to detect hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen and anti-HCV antibodies (HCV AgAb) simultaneously can improve the early detection of HCV infection when molecular diagnostic methods are not widely available. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the suitability of dried blood spot (DBS) samples for detecting HCV AgAb using commercial EIAs. STUDY DESIGN: Paired serum and DBS samples were assayed using two commercial EIAs for HCV AgAb (Monolisa™ HCV AgAb ULTRA and Murex HCV AgAb). Manufacturer's recommendations were followed for sera while sample volume, incubation time and cut-off (CO) determination were evaluated for the DBS samples. The values of sensitivity, specificity, inter-rater agreement, detection limit, assay precision and stability of DBS samples at different conditions (22-26°C, 2-8°C and -20°C) were determined. RESULTS: It was necessary to increase the DBS sample volume fourfold compared to the sera samples to approximate the DBS Optical Density (OD) values to the sera OD values. Using ROC curve to recalculate CO values for the DBS samples, sensitivity was 97.5% for both EIAs, while the specificity was 99.71% for Monolisa™ HCV AgAb ULTRA and 95.95% for Murex HCV AgAb. Accurate testing results were obtained with DBS samples for 60 days at all conditions evaluated; storage at -20°C resulted in low OD variation. Both EIAs demonstrated the same limit of detection among DBS samples [estimated viral load of 3.1 International Units per millilitre (IU/mL)] and low OD value variability in repetitivity and reproducibility studies. CONCLUSION: DBS samples can be used for the detection of HCV AgAb by EIA as they present comparable performance characteristics and excellent stability among various storage conditions.

Dried blood spot samples: optimization of commercial EIAs for hepatitis C antibody detection and stability under different storage conditions.

This study was undertaken to optimize and compare the efficiency of two commercial EIAs for anti-HCV detection (HCV Ab Radim, Pomezzia, Italy and ETI-AB-HCVK-4 DiaSorin, Vercelli, Italy), in dried blood spot (DBS) samples. The long-term stability of anti-HCV on DBS samples stored at three environmental conditions was also evaluated at: 2-8 °C, 20-25 °C, and -20 °C. Paired DBS and serum samples were obtained from individuals with or without anti-HCV. The type of elution buffer, sample and conjugate volume, sample incubation time and cut-off values were evaluated. For both EIAs, a larger sample volume was used, and the cut-off value determined by the manufacturer was employed for Radim EIA; however, ROC curve analysis was used for the DiaSorin EIA. The sensitivity and specificity of Radim EIA on DBS were 97.5% and 99.5%, respectively, and of DiaSorin EIA were 88.9% and 98.9%, respectively. Accurate results were obtained for a period of 117 days using DBS samples stored at all storage conditions, but storage at -20 °C resulted in the lowest variation among the absorbance values. Both EIAs demonstrated the same limit of detection (until dilution of 1:10(4) with estimated viral load of 3.1 × 10(-1) UI/ml), but the Radim EIA was associated with the best performance because a low coefficient of variation was observed in the repetition and reproducibility studies. In conclusion, commercial EIAs can be optimized for anti-HCV detection in DBS samples that are extremely stable at different conditions for more than 100 days.

An evaluation of different saliva collection methods for detection of antibodies against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV).

BACKGROUND: Saliva samples can be used as an alternative fluid for against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) detection owing to the ease of collection and excellent acceptability. This study was conducted to optimize a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect anti-HCV in saliva samples. METHODS: Ninety-six individuals donated paired serum and saliva samples that were obtained, using a commercial device (Salivette) and spitting into a sterile container. Initially, elution buffer for the Salivette samples, sample volume, incubation time and temperature, and two different anti-HCV EIAs were evaluated. Using the optimized assay, three methods for cut-off calculation were also evaluated. RESULTS: A 20-fold increase in the sample volume for both collection methods was needed. Moreover, the Radim assay was the most appropriate assay for anti-HCV detection in saliva samples, and the quality parameters were increased when a ROC curve was used to determine the cut-off value. Using this optimized assay, the sensitivities, specificities, accuracies, positive and negative predictive values were above 90% for saliva obtained using both the Salivette and spitting methods. Using this assay, discordant false-negative results were obtained for only two Salivette samples and five spitting samples. The concordance kappa was 93% for the Salivette method and 86.1% for the spitting method, demonstrating excellent performance. CONCLUSIONS: Saliva samples obtained for both methods can be employed for anti-HCV detection among HCV-infected or HCV-suspected cases, but several modifications must be performed on commercial EIAs to obtain good results. Moreover, samples obtained with commercial devices are more appropriate for anti-HCV detection in saliva samples.

Trends in HCV prevalence, risk factors and distribution of viral genotypes in injecting drug users: findings from two cross-sectional studies.

In the last decade, a declining prevalence of HCV infection has been described in injecting drug users (IDUs) in different countries. This study is the first to assess temporal trends in drug-injecting patterns, HCV infection rates and viral genotype distribution in 770 Brazilian IDUs, recruited by two cross-sectional studies (1994-1997 and 1999-2001). A substantial decline in the prevalence of HCV infection was found over the years (75% in 1994 vs. 20.6% in 2001, P<0.001) that may be a consequence of the significant reduction in the overall frequencies of drug injection and needle-sharing, as well as the participation of IDUs in initiatives aimed at reducing drug-related harm. No trend was found in terms of viral genotype distribution. Despite the favourable scenario, preventive measures must be maintained, especially in vulnerable subgroups such as young or new injectors, where risky behaviours through direct and indirect sharing practices remain common.