Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Parasitol Res ; 117(12): 3799-3807, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30251056

RESUMO

Digenea usually use ventral sucker for sustainable attachment within intestine of their definitive vertebrate host. However, if the ventral sucker is absent or poorly developed, the means of attachment are unclear. We investigated attachment and locomotion in such digeneans: three species of the family Microphallidae (Microphallus piriformes, M. pygmaeus, and Levinseniella brachysoma) and two species of the family Heterophyidae (Cryptocotyle concava and C. lingua). Their tegumental spines and musculature were described with use of fluorescent actin staining, confocal microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. Locomotion of living worms was observed and recorded. Wide serrated tegumental spines probably play the main role in attachment. Their firm contact with the host mucosa may be provided by the action of the ventral concavity-when the entire body or its part acts as a sucker. Dorsoventral muscle bundles act like radial musculature of the sucker generating negative pressure in the ventral concavity. The solid layer of longitudinal muscle fibers on the ventral body surface provides support for the bottom of the ventral concavity. In all microphallids, a U-shaped arrangement of body wall musculature (mostly originating from longitudinal fibers) outlines posterior part of the ventral concavity ridge. In all the studied species, tegumental spines, body wall musculature, and dorsoventral muscle bundles are better developed in the forebody which moves more actively than the hindbody.


Assuntos
Adesão Celular/fisiologia , Heterophyidae/anatomia & histologia , Heterophyidae/fisiologia , Mucosa Intestinal/parasitologia , Locomoção/fisiologia , Actinas , Animais , Microscopia Confocal , Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura , Coloração e Rotulagem
2.
Protist ; 169(5): 697-726, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30125804

RESUMO

Blastogregarines are poorly studied parasites of polychaetes superficially resembling gregarines, but lacking syzygy and gametocyst stages in the life cycle. Furthermore, their permanent multinuclearity and gametogenesis by means of budding considerably distinguish them from other parasitic Apicomplexa such as coccidians and hematozoans. The affiliation of blastogregarines has been uncertain: different authors considered them highly modified gregarines, an intermediate apicomplexan lineage between gregarines and coccidians, or an isolated group of eukaryotes altogether. Here, we report the ultrastructure of two blastogregarine species, Siedleckia nematoides and Chattonaria mesnili, and provide the first molecular data on their phylogeny based on SSU, 5.8S, and LSU rDNA sequences. Morphological analysis reveals that blastogregarines possess both gregarine and coccidian features. Several traits shared with archigregarines likely represent the ancestral states of the corresponding cell structures for parasitic apicomplexans: a distinctive tegument structure and myzocytotic feeding with a well-developed apical complex. Unlike gregarines but similar to coccidians however, the nuclei of male blastogregarine gametes are associated with two kinetosomes. Molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal that blastogregarines are an independent, early diverging lineage of apicomplexans. Overall, the morphological and molecular evidence congruently suggests that blastogregarines represent a separate class of Apicomplexa.


Assuntos
Apicomplexa/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Apicomplexa/genética , Filogenia , Apicomplexa/classificação , Apicomplexa/ultraestrutura , Corpos Basais/metabolismo , DNA de Protozoário/genética , Células Germinativas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Células Germinativas/ultraestrutura , Ativação Linfocitária , Microscopia Eletrônica
3.
BMC Evol Biol ; 15: 189, 2015 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26373845

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The somatic musculature in trematode hermaphroditic generation (cercariae, metacercariae and adult) is presumed to comprise uniform layers of circular, longitudinal and diagonal muscle fibers of the body wall, and internal dorsoventral muscle fibers. Meanwhile, specific data are few, and there has been no analysis taking the trunk axial differentiation and regionalization into account. Yet presence of the ventral sucker (= acetabulum) morphologically divides the digenean trunk into two regions: preacetabular and postacetabular. The functional differentiation of these two regions is already evident in the nervous system organization, and the goal of our research was to investigate the somatic musculature from the same point of view. RESULTS: Somatic musculature of ten trematode species was studied with use of fluorescent-labelled phalloidin and confocal microscopy. The body wall of examined species included three main muscle layers (of circular, longitudinal and diagonal fibers), and most of the species had them distinctly better developed in the preacetabuler region. In majority of the species several (up to seven) additional groups of muscle fibers were found within the body wall. Among them the anterioradial, posterioradial, anteriolateral muscle fibers, and U-shaped muscle sets were most abundant. These groups were located on the ventral surface, and associated with the ventral sucker. The additional internal musculature was quite diverse as well, and included up to twelve separate groups of muscle fibers or bundles in one species. The most dense additional bundles were found in the preacetabular region and were connected with the suckers. CONCLUSIONS: Previously unknown additional somatic musculature probably provides the diverse movements of the preacetabular region, ventral sucker, and oral sucker (or anterior organ). Several additional muscle groups of the body wall (anterioradial, posterioradial, anteriolateral fibers and U-shaped sets) are proposed to be included into the musculature ground pattern of trematode hermaphroditic generation. This pattern is thought to be determined by the primary trunk morphofunctional differentiation into the preacetabular and the postacetabular regions.


Assuntos
Músculos/anatomia & histologia , Trematódeos/fisiologia , Animais , Microscopia Confocal , Músculos/fisiologia , Federação Russa , Trematódeos/anatomia & histologia , Trematódeos/classificação , Trematódeos/crescimento & desenvolvimento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...