Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) ; 23(3): 375-8, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26715722

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the level of evidence of orthopaedic studies published in 2002 and 2012 to determine whether the quality and quantity of studies have increased. METHODS: The top 10 orthopaedic journals in 2002 and 2012 were identified, according to the Thomson Reuters impact factor. The level of evidence of each clinical article between January and June in 2002 and 2012 were determined by 2 senior orthopaedic trainees, according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence. Basic science articles, case reports, and non-systematic reviews were excluded. The proportions of papers designated to each level of evidence in 2002 and 2012 were compared, as was the mean level of evidence of studies in 2002 and 2012. RESULTS: In 2002, 379 clinical articles were identified and their level of evidence was level 1 (n=3), level 2 (n=67), level 3 (n=71), and level 4 (n=238). In 2012, 642 clinical articles were identified and their level of evidence was level 1 (n=26), level 2 (n=113), level 3 (n=167), and level 4 (n=336). The proportion of level 4 articles decreased from 62.8% in 2002 to 52.3% in 2012 (p=0.001), whereas the proportion of level 1 articles increased from 0.8% to 4.1% (p=0.002) and level 3 articles increased from 18.7% to 26.0% (p=0.008). The mean level of evidence improved from 3.44 in 2002 to 3.27 in 2012 (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: The quality and quantity of orthopaedic studies have increased from 2002 to 2012, but most studies remained of a low level of evidence.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Fator de Impacto de Revistas , Ortopedia , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos
2.
Int Orthop ; 36(6): 1185-9, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22234706

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Whilst patients undergoing total knee replacements generally have good relief of their symptoms, up to 20% complain of persisting pain. Revision rates have therefore been rising, particularly so for unexplained pain. We reviewed the causes of painful total knee replacements including extrinsic causes. METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients referred to our department with painful total knee replacement were reviewed with our standard protocol, including history and examination, inflammatory markers and radiological studies including radiographs of the hip and knee and computed tomography scan of the knee joint. RESULTS: Of the 45 patients, 15 patients had degenerative hip and lumbar spine disease which resolved after injections of the relevant joints. Nine patients had unexplained pain. CONCLUSIONS: Patients may still be undergoing knee arthroplasty for degenerative lumbar spine and hip osteoarthritis. We suggest heightened awareness at pre- and post-operative assessment and thorough history and examination with the use of diagnostic injections to identify the cause of pain if there is doubt.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/complicações , Articulação do Joelho , Osteoartrite do Quadril/complicações , Dor/etiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Artrite Reumatoide/fisiopatologia , Artrite Reumatoide/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/fisiopatologia , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/terapia , Traumatismos do Joelho/complicações , Traumatismos do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Traumatismos do Joelho/cirurgia , Articulação do Joelho/patologia , Articulação do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite do Quadril/fisiopatologia , Osteoartrite do Quadril/cirurgia , Dor/diagnóstico , Dor/fisiopatologia
3.
Foot Ankle Spec ; 3(2): 64-6, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20400414

RESUMO

Partial weight bearing is commonly advised after fracture of the lower extremity. Research has determined this to be inaccurate both in its instruction and its reproducibility. Many trauma departments are commonly using alternatives to plaster in the splintage of fractures, such as fiberglass and the prefabricated pneumatic braces. This study's null hypothesis is that there is no difference between partial weight bearing through a fiberglass cast as compared with a pneumatic walker. A prospective study was conducted in our department including all patients who had metatarsal or ankle fractures and could partially weight bear. Patients were excluded if they were not allowed to bear weight, had received operative fixation of their fracture, or were younger than age 16 years. The patients' total weight was measured first, and then they were trained to place 50% of their weight through the splinted limb. Three measurements were taken of their attempted weight bearing at 50%, and they were blinded to the results. Over a 16-month period, 117 patients were enrolled for this study: 72 in the pneumatic walker group and 45 in the fiberglass group. There was no significant difference in sex, age, or fracture type. There was a significant difference in percentage of weight placed through the splinted limb, with the pneumatic brace group placing much greater force than the fiberglass group. This may have been caused by altered proprioception from the walker. It is important to realize this when prescribing partial weight bearing in a particular splint as this may result in avoidable complications.


Assuntos
Traumatismos do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Tornozelo/fisiologia , Moldes Cirúrgicos , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Ossos do Metatarso/lesões , Ossos do Metatarso/fisiologia , Adulto , Braquetes , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/reabilitação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Suporte de Carga , Adulto Jovem
4.
Fertil Steril ; 82(6): 1672-4, 2004 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15589877

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To report improvement of azoospermia and hypogonadism after high-dose corticosteroid therapy in a patient with testicular sarcoidosis. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): A 27-year-old man with testicular sarcoidosis and azoospermia. INTERVENTION(S): High-dose corticosteroid therapy was commenced in an attempt to improve sperm count and restore gonadal function. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Analysis of sperm count, T, and gonadotropin response to steroid therapy. RESULT(S): FSH and LH concentrations decreased and T levels increased in parallel with control of disease activity with steroid therapy. Repeat semen analysis demonstrated a significant increase in sperm count, allowing sperm banking to take place. CONCLUSION(S): High-dose corticosteroid therapy may be indicated in testicular sarcoidosis, not only for control of systemic disease activity but also for recovery of gonadal function and spermatogenesis.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Oligospermia/etiologia , Sarcoidose/complicações , Sarcoidose/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Testiculares/complicações , Doenças Testiculares/tratamento farmacológico , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante/sangue , Humanos , Hormônio Luteinizante/sangue , Masculino , Sarcoidose/sangue , Sarcoidose/fisiopatologia , Contagem de Espermatozoides , Espermatogênese/efeitos dos fármacos , Doenças Testiculares/sangue , Doenças Testiculares/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA