Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dig Dis Sci ; 53(3): 647-56, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17676393

RESUMO

AIM: To determine the rate of endoscopic gastric/duodenal ulcers (GDUs) associated with use of aspirin (81 mg q.d.) alone or coadministered with celecoxib or naproxen. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind study, healthy subjects were randomized to receive daily aspirin (81 mg q.d.) plus celecoxib 200 mg q.d., naproxen 500 mg b.i.d., or placebo. Upper endoscopy was performed at baseline and day 7. The primary end point was incidence of GDUs >or=3 mm diameter. RESULTS: Incidence of GDUs was significantly lower in subjects receiving celecoxib plus aspirin (7%) compared with naproxen plus aspirin (25.3%; relative risk [RR], 0.28 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-0.45]; P < 0.001), but significantly higher than placebo plus aspirin (1.6%; RR, 4.78 [95% CI, 1.12-20.32]; P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: In a healthy population taking aspirin (81 mg q.d.), coadministration of celecoxib resulted in fewer GDUs than naproxen, but significantly more mucosal damage than aspirin alone.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Úlcera Duodenal/induzido quimicamente , Úlcera Gástrica/induzido quimicamente , Idoso , Celecoxib , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Naproxeno/efeitos adversos , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Distribuição Aleatória , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos
2.
Cancer ; 101(3): 613-9, 2004 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15274075

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pituitary adenomas display an array of hormonal and proliferative activity. Once primarily classified according to size (microadenomas, < 1 cm; macroadenomas, > or = 1 cm), these tumors are now further classified according to immunohistochemistry and functional status. With these additional classifications in mind, the goals of the current study were to determine the prevalence of pituitary adenomas and to explore the clinical relevance of the findings. METHODS: The authors conducted a metaanalysis of all existing English-language articles in MEDLINE. They used the search string (pituitary adenoma or pituitary tumor) and prevalence and selected relevant autopsy and imaging evaluation studies for inclusion. RESULTS: The authors found an overall estimated prevalence of pituitary adenomas of 16.7% (14.4% in autopsy studies and 22.5% in radiologic studies). CONCLUSIONS: Given the high frequency of pituitary adenomas and their potential for causing clinical pathologies, the findings of the current study suggest that early diagnosis and treatment of pituitary adenomas should have far-reaching benefits.


Assuntos
Adenoma/diagnóstico , Adenoma/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Biópsia por Agulha , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prevalência , Probabilidade , Distribuição por Sexo , Análise de Sobrevida
3.
Clin Ther ; 24(5): 818-34, 2002 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12075949

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus (Staph) and Streptococcus (Strep) infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The economic burden of these infections is also significant, especially among hospitalized patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate length of hospital stay (LOS) and total payments for hospital admissions for patients with Staph or Strep infection as a first (primary) or second or higher (comorbid) diagnosis. METHODS: From the 1994-1997 MarketScan inpatient database, admissions with Staph (n = 2,042) or Strep (n = 1,401) infection (905 as primary and 2,538 as comorbid diagnosis) and 89,899 control admissions without a diagnosis of gram-positive infection were identified. Crude and category-specific mean LOS and anti-log mean total payments were compared between admissions with Staph or Strep infection and admissions without a diagnosis of any gram-positive infection within major diagnostic categories and principal surgical procedures (SPs). RESULTS: For admissions with Staph or Strep infection as first (primary) diagnosis (n = 905), the mean LOS was 4.68 days (95% CI, 4.44-4.93) and 4.78 days (95% CI, 4.35-5.26), respectively. The mean total payments were $6,445 (95% CI, $6,045-$6,870) and $6,821 (95% CI, $6,149-$7,566), respectively. In contrast, the average LOS and total payment for the control group were 2.99 days (95% CI, 2.98-3.01) and $6,325 (95% CI, $6,284-$6,365). For admissions with infection as the comorbid diagnosis (n = 2,538), mean LOS and total payment were 4 days longer and $6,000 higher for Staph infections and 1.2 days longer and $1,200 higher for Strep infections than the control group. Within each SP, LOS and total payments were substantially higher for patients with Staph and Strep infections. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that infections with the pathogens Staph and Strep substantially increase LOS and total payments among hospitalized patients.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/economia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Comorbidade , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro de Hospitalização/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA