A phase I trial of oral ridaforolimus (AP23573; MK-8669) in combination with bevacizumab for patients with advanced cancers.

AIMS: This phase I dose-escalation study was designed to evaluate the combination of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor ridaforolimus with the vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor bevacizumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen adult patients with refractory advanced solid tumours received oral ridaforolimus (30 or 40 mg) once daily for 5 days per week (QDx5/wk) combined with intravenous bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks [Q2wk] or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks [Q3wk]). Patients were evaluated for dose-limiting toxicities, safety and anti-tumour activity. RESULTS: A 40 mg dose of ridaforolimus with either bevacizumab dosing schedule was the recommended phase II dose. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported; the most common drug-related adverse events were mucosal inflammation and anorexia. Seven patients, with clinical features that included primary tumour of the abdominal origin (colorectal, pancreatic or gynaecological cancers) and previous abdominal radiotherapy, reported serious adverse events related to bowel perforations. There were no objective responses, but 65% of patients had a best response of stable disease. CONCLUSION: Oral ridaforolimus (40 mg QDx5/wk) is feasible to combine with standard doses of bevacizumab, although careful patient selection would be needed to mitigate the risk of bowel perforation-related adverse events. Combination therapy produced prolonged stable disease in several heavily pretreated patients.

Ridaforolimus as a single agent in advanced endometrial cancer: results of a single-arm, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: This open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor ridaforolimus in women with advanced endometrial cancer. METHODS: Women with measurable recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer and documented disease progression were treated with ridaforolimus 12.5 mg intravenously once daily for 5 consecutive days every 2 weeks in a 4-week cycle. The primary end point was clinical benefit response, defined as an objective response or prolonged stable disease of 16 weeks or more. RESULTS: In all, 45 patients were treated with single-agent ridaforolimus. Clinical benefit was achieved by 13 patients (29%), including 5 (11%) with confirmed partial responses and 8 (18%) with prolonged stable disease. All patients with clinical benefit response received ridaforolimus for more than 4 months. In this heavily pretreated population, the 6-month progression-free survival was 18%. Ridaforolimus was generally well tolerated: adverse events were predictable and manageable, consistent with prior studies in other malignancies. Overall, the most common adverse events were diarrhoea (58%) and mouth sores (56%); most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were anaemia (27%) and hyperglycaemia (11%). CONCLUSION: Single-agent ridaforolimus has antitumor activity and acceptable tolerability in advanced endometrial cancer patients. Further clinical evaluation of ridaforolimus is warranted.

Phase I/IIa trial of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor ridaforolimus (AP23573; MK-8669) administered orally in patients with refractory or advanced malignancies and sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Ridaforolimus is an inhibitor of mTOR with evidence of antitumor activity in an I.V. formulation. This multicenter, open-label, 3 + 3 design nonrandomized, dose-escalation, phase I/IIa trial was conducted to determine the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic parameters, maximum tolerated dose, and antitumor activity of oral ridaforolimus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors refractory to therapy were eligible. Seven different continuous and intermittent dosing regimens were examined. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-seven patients were enrolled in this study among which 85 were patients with sarcoma. Stomatitis was the most common DLT observed. The dosing regimen, 40 mg QD × 5 days/week, provided the best combination of cumulative dose, dose density, and cumulative exposure, and was the recommended dosing regimen for subsequent clinical development. PK was nonlinear, with less than proportional increases in day-1 blood AUC0-∞ and Cmax, particularly with doses >40 mg. The terminal half-life estimate of ridaforolimus (QD × 5 40 mg) was 42.0 h, and the mean half-life ∼30-60 h. The clinical benefit rate, (complete response, partial response, or stable disease for ≥4 months was 24.5% for all patients and 27.1% for patients with sarcoma. CONCLUSION: Oral ridaforolimus had an acceptable safety profile and exhibited antitumor activity in patients with sarcoma and other malignancies. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00112372.

Dose-ranging, placebo-controlled study of cetirizine nasal spray in adults with perennial allergic rhinitis.

A total of 360 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis were randomized in a placebo-controlled, dose-finding study comparing three concentrations (0.06%, 0.125%, and 0.25%) of a cetirizine nasal spray, administered three times a day for 2 weeks. The primary criterion of efficacy was the percentage of days with no or only mild symptoms of rhinitis (PDMax1), as evaluated by the patients. The median PDMax1 were 16.7%, 30.8%, 42.9%, and 26.7% for the placebo, 0.06%, 0.125%, and 0.25% groups, respectively. Although the global comparison among the four groups only approached statistical significance (P = 0.076), the difference (26.2%) between the placebo and 0.125% groups was clinically and statistically significant (P = 0.011). For the global evaluation by the investigator, the best results were seen in the 0.125% group (P = 0.03). The occurrence of adverse events did not differ among the four treatment groups and consisted mainly of nasal events, occurring in 22.5%, 17.1%, 12.9%, and 24.4% of the patients for the placebo, 0.06%, 0.125%, and 0.25% groups, respectively (P = 0.184). These results indicate that the 0.125% concentration is significantly better than placebo and offers the best therapeutic ratio.

Randomized phase II trial of iproplatin and carboplatin in advanced breast cancer. The EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group and the EORTC Data Center.

BACKGROUND: The observed activity of cisplatin in breast cancer and its unattractive toxicity profile in palliative treatment warranted further study of platinum analogues in this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, 61 of whom had been previously treated with chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to therapy with either iproplatin (n = 32) or carboplatin (n = 30). Both platinum analogues were administered intravenously, iproplatin at a dose of 240 mg/m2 every 4 weeks and carboplatin at a dose of 450 mg/m2 every 5 weeks. RESULTS: Only two patients responded to iproplatin (7%) for durations of 21 and 61 weeks, and one patient responded to carboplatin (3%) for a duration of 64 weeks. All responses were complete. At the given dose schedules carboplatin was more myelosuppressive than iproplatin. Non-hematologic toxicities included nausea and vomiting (93% vs. 90%), diarrhea (20% vs. 10%) and hemorrhage (16% vs. 10%) for iproplatin and carboplatin, respectively. Two patients developed alopecia with carboplatin. No renal toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Both iproplatin and carboplatin have limited activity in previously treated women with advanced breast cancer when given in conventional dosages.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of zeniplatin, a new platinum complex.

Forty-six patients with refractory solid malignancies received the new platinum complex [2,2-bis(aminomethyl)-1,3-propanediol-N-N'] [1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato] [(2-)0,0')] platinum (zeniplatin). Zeniplatin was given, without hydration or mannitol, as a 60- to 90-min i.v. infusion every 3 weeks at doses ranging from 8 to 145 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose of zeniplatin was 145 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity of zeniplatin was dose-related leukopenia and neutropenia, with the nadir usually observed between 1 and 2 weeks after therapy and recovery usually occurring by 3 weeks after therapy. Thrombocytopenia was rare. The most prominent non-hematological side-effect of zeniplatin was nausea and vomiting. Other non-hematological side-effects were mild or absent. Zeniplatin did not induce significant neurological or auditory toxicity. Zeniplatin was not nephrotoxic at doses less than or equal to 120 mg/m2. At 145 mg/m2, the clearance decreased by a mean of 40% after 2 cycles of therapy. Two patients, one with malignant melanoma and one with renal cell cancer, achieved a partial response. Pharmacokinetics of free (plasma ultrafiltrates) and total platinum in plasma were determined in 5 patients. An in vitro study of the rate and extent of zeniplatin binding to protein in human plasma was also performed. Free and total platinum were measured by flameless atomic absorption spectrometry; free zeniplatin was measured in ultrafiltrate by HPLC. Total and free plasma platinum concentrations were co-modelled using the information from the in vitro study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Value of CEA levels and of immunoscintigraphy (using CEA-marked antibodies) for the diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of breast cancer: apropos of a case]. / Interêt du dosage du CEA et de l'immunoscintigraphie (par anticorps anti CEA marqués) pour le diagnostic et le monitoring thérapeutique du cancer du sein: à propos d'un cas.

A 33-year-old woman, who at 29 underwent mastectomy for a localised breast cancer (TINOMO), presented a relapse shown by a rapid rise in seric level of CEA. The classical complete work-up was negative. The location of the relapse was demonstrated by anti-CEA immunoscintigraphy. Radiotherapy, hormonotherapy and chemotherapy allowed to achieve a complete remission with normalization of CEA level and of immunoscintigraphy.

Comparative effect of cisplatin, spiroplatin, carboplatin and iproplatin in a human tumor clonogenic assay.

A modified double-layer Hamburger and Salmon cloning assay was used to test cisplatin and its analogs (spiroplatin, carboplatin and iproplatin) on fresh tumor samples from 63 patients with a variety of non-hematological malignancies. Among them were 18 breast cancers, 17 ovarian cancers and 7 of unknown primaries. Half the patients received prior chemotherapy. Cisplatin regimens were given in 16 cases. When possible, cells were exposed for 1 h to each drug in concentrations of 0.1 microgram/ml and 1.0 microgram/ml for cisplatin and spiroplatin, 1.0 microgram/ml and 10 micrograms/ml for carboplatin and iproplatin. A greater than or equal to 50% cell kill with at least one drug was found in 20 samples including 8 ovarian cancers, 3 breast cancers and 1 unknown primary. A greater than or equal to 70% cell kill was seen in 2 samples with cisplatin, 3 with spiroplatin and carboplatin, and 6 with iproplatin. There was only partial cross-resistance between cisplatin and its analogs. Among 57 paired comparisons of cisplatin with spiroplatin, 2 showed drug sensitivity to cisplatin alone, 6 to spiroplatin alone, and 6 to both. The same sort of observation was made with carboplatin. The lack of cross-resistance between cisplatin and iproplatin was particularly striking: among 53 pairs, 6 were sensitive to cisplatin alone, 8 to iproplatin alone, and 2 to both. About 20% of the samples that were resistant to cisplatin were sensitive to iproplatin. Our data show hints of activity in breast and ovarian cancers with all analogs and suggest that they will achieve clinical antitumor activity similar to that they will achieve clinical antitumor activity similar to that of cisplatin. The in vitro evidence of incomplete cross-resistance between cisplatin and its analogs should be investigated further.

Validation of clinical predictive value of in vitro colorimetric chemosensitivity assay in head and neck cancer.

For chemosensitivity testing, a rapid in vitro colorimetric method (MTT assay) was used. Eleven head and neck cancer cell lines were investigated to distinguish five known active agents from five compounds inactive in phase II studies. Evaluation of the reliability of the assay for assessing drug sensitivity in this tumor cell population was done by correlating the in vitro results with reported in vivo response data. Methotrexate and cisplatin (clinically active) and vindesine and doxorubicin (less active clinically) were recognized in vitro as active and correlated well with clinical experience. Bleomycin (clinically active) was ineffective against some cell lines. The in vitro findings for the clinically inactive drugs (deoxyazacytidine, lomustine, and carmustine) also corresponded. Amsacrine and etoposide, contrary to clinical experience, showed activity in vitro. Further comparison of MTT assay results with clinical data is warranted and essential before its use in large-scale drug screening studies.

Phase II trials with flavone acetic acid (NCS. 347512, LM975) in patients with advanced carcinoma of the breast, colon, head and neck and melanoma.

Phase II trials of flavone acetic acid have been performed in a total of 87 patients including 17 with advanced breast cancer, 23 with advanced colorectal cancer, 25 with advanced malignant melanoma and 22 with advanced head and neck cancer. Patients with colorectal cancer and melanoma had received no prior chemotherapy; in breast and head and neck cancer patients prior chemotherapy had been given with a median of 5 and 2 drugs respectively. The schedule used was a once-weekly regime, with a dose of 4.8 gms/m2 given as a 1 hour infusion, together with alkalinization (with i.v. sodium bicarbonate) given before and after FAA. Reassessment was performed after 6 weekly doses, although in 23 patients fewer than 6 doses were given, because of early disease progression in 15, and undue toxicity in 5. An additional 3 patients died within 72 hours of having received FAA and, although the precise cause of death in each case was not established, FAA toxicity could not be excluded. Treatment was generally manageable, the major manifestations of toxicity comprising uncomfortable warmth and flushes, nausea, diarrhoea, and visual complaints. Hypotension was also documented in 8 patients. No objective responses were seen in any of the patient sub-groups, although disease-stabilization was seen in 3 patients with breast cancer, 1 patient with advanced colorectal cancer, 2 patients with advanced melanoma and 4 patients with head and neck cancer. Further Phase II studies, using a higher dose of 8.6 gm/m2 over 6 hours once weekly, are currently in progress in Europe.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Phase I study of Brequinar sodium (NSC 368390) in patients with solid malignancies.

Brequinar sodium (DUP 785, NSC 368390) is a novel quinoline-carboxylic acid derivative that has been selected for clinical evaluation because of its broad spectrum of antitumor activity in animal models and its novel chemical structure. This compound inhibits the mitochondrial enzyme dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHO-DH), which catalyzes the conversion of dihydroorotate to orotate, leading to a blockage in the pyrimidine de novo biosynthesis. A total of 43 patients received 110 courses of Brequinar sodium by short-term intravenous (i.v.) infusion, which was repeated every 3 weeks. Dose escalation was initially based on a modified Fibonacci scheme. After pharmacokinetic data from mice and man became available, a pharmacologically guided dose escalation was used; at toxic levels, dose escalation was applied on the basis of clinical judgement. The dose-limiting toxicities were myelosuppression, mucositis, skin rash, nausea and vomiting. The maximum tolerable doses for poor- and good-risk patients were 1,500 and 2,250 mg/m2, respectively. One mixed response was observed in a patient with papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. The recommended doses for phase II studies are 1,200 and 1,800 mg/m2 Brequinar sodium, given by a 1-h i.v. infusion every 3 weeks to poor- and good-risk patients, respectively.

Pharmacokinetics of Brequinar sodium (NSC 368390) in patients with solid tumors during a phase I study.

The pharmacokinetics of the novel antipyrimidine agent Brequinar sodium (NSC 368390; DUP 785) was studied in 23 patients with solid tumors during the phase I study of this compound. The drug was administered by short-term (10-60 min) intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. The doses ranged from 15 to 2250 mg/m2. At doses higher than 1500 mg/m2 the areas under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC) increased non-proportionally, while the total body clearance (Clt) dropped substantially, indicating non-linear pharmacokinetics of the drug. Brequinar sodium showed a triphasic decay of plasma concentrations with half-life ranges of 11.1-36.6 min, 1.7-6.9 h and 12.5-25.0 h, respectively. The volume of distribution (Vdss) ranged from 4.4 to 10.6 l/m2. The total body clearance (Clt) ranged from 6.9 to 22.1 ml/min with a small contribution of the renal clearance (0.04-0.4 ml/min). Up to 7 days, the cumulative urinary excretion (CUE) and the cumulative fecal excretion (CFE) ranged from 0.4 to 8.3% and from 7.7 to 18.3% of the dose, respectively. There was evidence for the presence of drug metabolites in urine and feces. There was no drug accumulation with repeated administration of Brequinar sodium by the above mentioned drug schedule. The ratio between the plasma AUC at the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) in man and that at the mouse LD10 was 0.8, while the ratio between the respective doses was 5.7. The ratios between the AUC in patients and that at the mouse LD10 were applied to guide dose escalation in the phase I study. The results of the above mentioned pharmacokinetic studies were useful for the choice of an optimal schedule for phase II trials of Brequinar sodium.

Short-term effects of Carbetimer on calcium and bone metabolism in man.

Carbetimer is a new antineoplastic agent whose limiting toxicity consists of dose- and treatment duration-dependent hypercalcemia. We examined the short-term effects of Carbetimer on calcium metabolism on days, 1, 3 and 5 during 11 5-day courses (6.5-8.2 g/m2/day given over daily 2-h infusions, q 3-4 weeks). Blood parameters were measured before and after Carbetimer, whereas urinary parameters were studied in three consecutive 2-h collections before, during and after Carbetimer infusions. Carbetimer effects were similar regardless of the infusion day. We found a consistent decrease of plasma ionized Ca (Ca2+) levels from 4.56 +/- 0.05 mg/dl before infusion to 4.28 +/- 0.06 mg/dl after infusion (P less than 0.001) whereas total serum Ca (corrected for protein levels) did not change. The fall of Ca2+ stimulated parathyroid function, as suggested by the increased plasma PTH levels, the decreased serum phosphorus and TmP/GFR index, or the increased urinary phosphate and cyclic AMP excretion. Carbetimer infusions also induced a marked increase in urinary Ca excretion (expressed as mg Ca/mg creatinine) from 0.093 +/- 0.011 before to 0.359 +/- 0.042 during and 0.177 +/- 0.031 after infusion (P less than 0.011). These changes were best explained by Carbetimer-induced Ca chelation that we confirmed in vitro by incubating Carbetimer at various concentrations in whole blood for 2 h at 37 degrees C, e.g. 2 mg of Carbetimer/ml lowered Ca2+ from 4.82 to 3.20 mg/dl without changing total Ca levels. On the other hand, a direct effect of Carbetimer on bone cannot be excluded since we observed an increase of serum osteocalcin levels from 2.0 +/- 0.3 to 2.5 +/- 0.4 ng/ml after infusion (P less than 0.001). In summary, the short-term effects of Carbetimer on calcium metabolism markedly differ from the long-term effects. They mainly consist of a dose-related calcium chelation leading to a decrease in Ca2+ levels, an increase in urinary Ca excretion and a stimulation of parathyroid function.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) in patients with stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Forty-six patients with Stage III-IV previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine. The overall response rate was 70%, with a 9% complete response rate. The most frequent side effects were myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting, alopecia, neurotoxicity and stomatitis. Definitive local therapy consisted of surgery alone in 13 cases, surgery plus radiation in another 13, and radiotherapy alone in 14. Six patients, four of whom died, received no definitive local therapy and two were lost to follow-up. The median disease-free survival time was 10.5 months, and the most frequent cause of failure was local regional relapse (85%). Median survival time was 13 months and there were eight long-term survivals (median 48 months). Response to chemotherapy was independent of all analysed prognostic factors. Disease-free survival and survival were significantly influenced by the presence or absence of lymph nodes. Our results do not support the routine use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin, and vincristine in patients with advanced cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Measurements of response to chemotherapy using ultrasound in metastatic liver involvement.

The liver is a frequent site of metastases and in several cases the only available target for assessing the activity of chemotherapeutic agents. A standard procedure for liver measurements by ultrasound was investigated. One hundred and twenty-three chemotherapy cycles were evaluated. This study shows that metastatic involvement of the liver can be measured by several ultrasound parameters which represent different features of the same process: the number and the surface of the nodules, the volume of the organ. Ultrasound parameters were correlated with liver function tests, CEA, hepatomegaly and measurements of other metastatic sites. The surface of metastases still appeared to be the most reliable criterion of response. Our results suggest that several liver ultrasound parameters may help to definitely assess the type of response to chemotherapy.

Phase I clinical trial with carbetimer.

Carbetimer, a low molecular weight polymer derived from ethylene and maleic anhydride, belongs to a class of chemical compounds different from previously available anticancer agents. It has shown moderate antitumor activity against the Madison 109, Lewis lung, colon 26 and M5076 ovarian carcinomas. In the human tumor stem cell assay, antitumor activity was seen against carcinomas of the breast, ovary, lung, colon and kidney. A total of 26 patients with solid tumors were entered into this trial; carbetimer was given on 5 consecutive days as a 1-2-h intravenous infusion. The dose was escalated from 1.08 to 11 g/m2/day. The drug did not induce the usual side-effects of chemotherapy: leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, alopecia and mucositis were minimal or totally absent. Gastrointestinal toxicity was limited to mild to moderate nausea and vomiting; these were observed at all dose levels and required antimetics in only two patients. The major side-effects of carbetimer consisted of hypercalcemia and neurotoxicity. Hypercalcemia was dose- and treatment duration-dependent. The precise mechanism of hypercalcemia is presently under investigation, but remains unclear. Neurotoxicity was observed only after prolonged therapy; two patients, who received cumulative doses higher than 250 g/m2, developed a peripheral neuropathy with paresthesia, decrease in sensory perception and motor weakness. One patient recovered completely; the other patient improved slightly before developing fatal brain metastases. Two patients with malignant melanoma exhibited major antitumor response; both were previously treated; after excellent partial responses to carbetimer, both were operated on and one is presently disease-free 2 1/2 years after completion of therapy with carbetimer. In conclusion, carbetimer is a new compound with an unusual pattern of side-effects and interesting antitumor activity against malignant melanoma. Its antitumor activity is presently being investigated in phase II trials.

Mucocutaneous side effects of Brequinar sodium. A new inhibitor of pyrimidine de novo biosynthesis.

Brequinar sodium (NSC 368390; DUP 785) is a new inhibitor of pyrimidine de novo biosynthesis which has completed Phase I clinical trials within the framework of the Early Clinical Trials Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). The main side effects of this compound are myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting, stomatitis and/or mucositis, and skin rash. In this report, the authors describe the pattern of mucocutaneous side effects of Brequinar sodium in patients who received the drug by four different schedules: (1) short-term intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks; (2) weekly; (3) twice weekly; and (4) five times daily every 4 weeks. Mucocutaneous toxicities of Brequinar sodium included mainly cytotoxic reactions (stomatitis and/or mucositis and skin rash). However, rare episodes of local reactions (phlebitis at the site of injection), photosensitivity reactions (to sun light), angioneurotic edema, and localized secondary hyperpigmentation of the inflamed skin also occurred. Stomatitis and/or mucositis appeared to be dose-dependent and schedule-dependent. The skin rash consisted of a drug-induced toxic dermatitis which occurred mostly at the highest dose levels. Initial recommendations for the management of mucocutaneous toxicities of Brequinar sodium during Phase II trials are discussed.

[Diagnosis and treatment of unknown primary tumors]. / Mise au point diagnostique et thérapeutique des tumeurs de site primitif inconnu.

Cancers of unknown origin represent approximately 5% of all cancers and are therefore as frequent as some solid tumors such as gastric or pancreatic cancers. The diagnosis of cancer of unknown origin should be based on a detailed pathological examination including immunohistochemical techniques and electron microscopy; hormonal receptors should also be measured. Besides detailed medical history and physical examination, only a few additional tests should be carried out: routine chemistry including the assay of HCG, alphafoetoprotein and specific antigen of the prostate, chest X-ray, thyroid scan, mammography and abdominal CT scan. Other tests are generally not of sufficient specificity and sensitivity. Unknown primary tumors arising in the cervical area are frequently squamous cell carcinomas corresponding to occult primary tumors of the upper aerodigestive mucosae and are efficiently treated by cervicofacial radiotherapy or lymph node dissection. Women presenting with axillary lymph nodes with no obvious primary tumor should be treated according to the guidelines used for breast cancer. The patients with inguinal lymph nodes of unknown origin are usually treated with radiation therapy. The syndrome of germinal tumors of extragonadic origin corresponds to cases of undifferentiated or poorly differentiated carcinomas in patients under 50 years of age and with one of the following characteristics: involvement of the median organs, lung involvement, lymph node involvement or increase of alphafoetoprotein or HCG. The therapeutic approach recommended for these patients consists of the chemotherapeutic combination used for testicular cancer. For all other patients, the prognosis remains poor. Patients with local symptoms may be treated by radiation therapy; others may receive a combination of fluorouracil, doxorubicin and mitomycin.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin and melphalan.

Cisplatin and melphalan given ip exert a synergistic therapeutic effect against ascitic P388 leukemia in mice and have different dose-limiting toxic effects as well as favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics in ip phase I studies. We gave a total of 98 courses of cisplatin (escalated from 40 to 120 mg/m2) and melphalan (escalated from 12 to 30 mg/m2) to 30 patients with ip tumors, most of whom had residual ovarian cancer following iv cisplatin-containing regimens. Treatment was delivered in 2 L of 0.9% NaCl through a Tenckhoff catheter with or without a Port-a-Cath system every 28 days for one to nine cycles. Myelosuppression was dose-related and leukopenia was dose-limiting. The maximum tolerated dose was 120 mg of cisplatin/m2 and 20 mg of melphalan/m2. With the exception of treatment-induced nausea and vomiting, nonhematologic toxic effects were mild and no (or very little) local toxicity occurred. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed that the areas under the peritoneal concentration versus time curve averaged 16-fold and 17-fold more than the area under the plasma curve for cisplatin and melphalan, respectively. Objective responses were documented by third-look laparotomy in ovarian cancer patients with minimal (less than 2 cm) residual disease.