The state of vascular surgery education in the United States.

With the growing proportion of elderly population in the US and a relatively fixed supply of well-trained vascular surgeons, there is a serious concern that we will be facing a shortage of vascular surgery workforce in the near future. One of the main reasons why there is a shortage of vascular surgeons in the US is due to the fact that many students don't get exposed to this field throughout their student lives and a recent survey of medical students from a non-urban tertiary care academic institution showed that early exposure of the medical students to the surgical careers is correlated with an increased interest in the surgical field. This review of the state of vascular surgery education in the US at the undergraduate level describes in detail the importance of an early introduction to vascular surgery in the education curricula, the current state of the education, potential avenues to improve the exposure of students to the field of vascular surgery and the importance of this effort in matching the increasing need for vascular surgeons for an aging population which is likely to require dedicated care by vascular surgeons of the future. At the present time, the two pathways by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to obtain dedicated vascular surgery training in the US include either enrolling in a two year clinical fellowship after completion of general surgery training or to match in a five year vascular surgery integrated residency program after successful completion of medical degree.

Patients living farther from a tertiary care center are more likely to undergo peripheral arterial bypass for acute and chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the association between the proximity to the tertiary care hospital and the severity of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) at the time of lower extremity bypass (LEB) in a rural-urban mix region. METHODS: Patients undergoing LEB from 2010 to 2020 at Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center were reviewed and stratified into two study groups based on a median distance from hospital (ie, Group I: ≥34 miles and Group II: <34 miles). Patients' demographic features, preoperative data including comorbidities, and medications were analyzed. A univariate analysis for the patient characteristics between the two study groups, along with evaluation of postoperative outcomes, and a multivariate predictive modeling to study the PAD stage as the indication of LEB was performed. A P-value of < .05 was set as a significant difference between the groups for all the analyses. RESULTS: There were 175 patients (49.9%) in Group I and 176 patients (50.1%) in Group II with a mean age of 65 ± 11.92 years (median, 64.61 years). No significant difference was observed in gender (P = .530), age (P = .906), and functional status (P = .830) between study groups. It was observed that patients in Group I were more likely to be overweight or obese (71.3% vs 57%; P = .007) and had a prior history of myocardial infarction (24.3% vs 15.3%; P = .036) in comparison to Group II. No postoperative outcomes were found to be statistically different between the study groups. The multivariate analyses based on various confounders displayed that patients in Group I had 56% higher likelihood of LEB for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-2.62; P = .042). Group I patients also had five times higher odds of LEB for acute limb ischemia (adjusted odds ratio, 5.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-18.13; P = .012) as compared with those in the Group II. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' proximity to a major tertiary hospital may have implications on the disease progression for patients with PAD and could also be related to inadequate vascular services in primary and secondary hospitals. Lack of preventive care and disease management in regions afar from a tertiary hospital could be other implicating factors and highlights the need for outreach programs, along with distribution of vascular specialists, to reduce geographical disparities and ensure equity in access to care.

Preoperative Chronic Steroid Use is Associated with Increased Incidence of Postoperative Mortality and Limb Loss following Peripheral Arterial Bypass Surgery for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Steroids are a commonly prescribed medication in the United States and have been associated with poor surgical and treatment outcomes. The objective of this study is to assess the relationship between chronic steroid use and surgical outcomes of femoropopliteal and femoral-distal bypasses in patients suffering from chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: All adult patients undergoing femoropopliteal and femoral-distal bypasses with single segment autologous vein with an indication of CLTI in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) between 2012 and 2021 were stratified between chronic preoperative steroid use (Group I) and no preoperative use (Group II). Primary outcomes of the study included 30-day mortality, amputation, and combined outcome of mortality and/or limb loss. Secondary outcomes included specific bypass related, cardiovascular, respiratory and renal outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 8,324 patients (66.8% Male, 33.2% Females) underwent peripheral arterial bypass operations for the indication of chronic limb threatening ischemia. The median age was 68 years. Group I included 408 patients (4.9%) and Group II included 7,916 patients (95.1%). As compared to patients in Group II, those in Group I were more likely to be females (Group I: 42.2% vs. Group II: 32.8%), more likely to have co-existing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Group I: 20.6% vs. Group II: 11.8%), less likely to be diabetic (Group I: 45.9% vs. Group II: 48%), less likely to be smokers (Group I: 30.6% vs. Group II: 45.4%) and more likely to be in American Society of Anesthesiologists III or IV Classes (Group I: 98% vs. Group II: 96.5%) (all P < 0.05). Primary outcomes were as follows: 30-day mortality (Group I: 3.3% vs. Group II: 1.7%), amputation (Group I: 5.9% vs. Group II: 2.8%), 30-day mortality and/or amputation (Group I: 9.1% vs. Group II: 4.5%) (all P < 0.05). Among secondary outcomes, the following were found to be statistically significant: untreated loss of patency (Group I: 4.2% vs. Group II: 1.7%), significant bleeding (Group I: 26.2% vs. Group II: 16.5%), wound infection/complication (Group I: 18.6% vs. Group II: 15%), and return to operating room (Group I: 21.8% vs. Group II: 16.7%) (all P < 0.05). As compared to patients with an indication of tissue loss (Rutherford's class V and VI), patients in Group I with an indication of rest pain (Rutherford's class IV) were more likely to experience 30-day mortality, major amputation and a composite of mortality and amputation. Risk adjusted analysis showed that chronic steroid use has a statistically significant effect on 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.7, P = 0.05), amputation (AOR 2.05, P < 0.001), composite outcomes of mortality and amputation (AOR 1.959, P < 0.001), untreated loss of patency (AOR 2.31, P = 0.002), bleeding (AOR 1.33, P < 0.011) and unplanned return to the operating room (AOR 1.36, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic steroid use in patients undergoing femoropopliteal or femoral-distal bypass is associated with a higher risk of 30-day mortality, major amputation, readmission, bleeding, return to operating room, and untreated loss of patency. No significant difference in outcomes were appreciated in patients with chronic steroid use and with Rutherford class V or VI disease (tissue loss), suggesting that the effects of steroids may be less prominent in those with the most advanced peripheral arterial disease. These findings may aid physicians with risk stratification and preoperative discussions regarding open revascularization in patients receiving chronic steroid therapy. More studies including randomized trials are needed to guide perioperative management of steroids in this cohort.