In-depth analysis of cost structure for electroconvulsive therapy in a performance-based hospital budget.

OBJECTIVE: New medical guideline recommendations for the treatment of major depressive disorders and regulative changes in the payment system of the German mental health care system warrant a revision of the framework in which electroconvulsive therapies (ECT) are offered. METHODS: A cost structure analysis of the clinical resources essential for the ECT procedure was conducted and economically validated, exemplified at a German inpatient ECT treatment center. RESULTS: The identification of directly attributable costs to the ECT intervention presupposes an accurate assessment of personnel engagement time and material consumption as well as an inclusion of overhead costs for the operational readiness of the hospital. CONCLUSION: The increasing importance of ECT in the clinical portfolio of therapy options demands an adequate refunding to support the expansion of this highly effective treatment. For the calculation of an appropriate reimbursement for ECT and ascertaining an acceptable contribution, a detailed knowledge of personnel costs and infrastructure settings of the respective hospitals is required.

[Cost assessment for endoscopic procedures in the German diagnosis-related-group (DRG) system - 5 year cost data analysis of the German Society of Gastroenterology project]. / Kosten endoskopischer Leistungen der Gastroenterologie im deutschen DRG-System ­ 5-Jahres-Kostendatenanalyse des DGVS-Projekts.

Background In the German hospital reimbursement system (G-DRG) endoscopic procedures are listed in cost center 8. For reimbursement between hospital departments and external providers outdated or incomplete catalogues (e. g. DKG-NT, GOÄ) have remained in use. We have assessed the cost for endoscopic procedures in the G-DRG-system. Methods To assess the cost of endoscopic procedures 74 hospitals, annual providers of cost-data to the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) made their data (2011 - 2015; §â€Š21 KHEntgG) available to the German-Society-of-Gastroenterology (DGVS) in anonymized form (4873 809 case-data-sets). Using cases with exactly one endoscopic procedure (n = 274 186) average costs over 5 years were calculated for 46 endoscopic procedure-tiers. Results Robust mean endoscopy costs ranged from 230.56 € for gastroscopy (144 666 cases), 276.23 € (n = 32 294) for a simple colonoscopy, to 844.07 € (n = 10 150) for ERCP with papillotomy and plastic stent insertion and 1602.37 € (n = 967) for ERCP with a self-expanding metal stent. Higher costs, specifically for complex procedures, were identified for University Hospitals. Discussion For the first time this catalogue for endoscopic procedure-tiers, based on §â€Š21 KHEntgG data-sets from 74 InEK-calculating hospitals, permits a realistic assessment of endoscopy costs in German hospitals. The higher costs in university hospitals are likely due to referral bias for complex cases and emergency interventions. For 46 endoscopic procedure-tiers an objective cost-allocation within the G-DRG system is now possible. By international comparison the costs of endoscopic procedures in Germany are low, due to either greater efficiency, lower personnel allocation or incomplete documentation of the real expenses.

Economic evaluation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia from a hospital management perspective.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is currently undergoing dramatic changes. We analyzed economic risks in hospitalized patients with CLL from a management perspective. METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients with CLL hospitalized in 2013 and 2014 at the University Hospital of Cologne were analyzed. To assess profit margins (PMs) per case, diagnosis-related group (DRG) reimbursement data were merged with an internal cost accounting scheme depending on age, prognostic factors, and DRG key performance indicators. RESULTS: In 112 patients, 284 cases coded by 19 different DRG with strongly fluctuating cost revenue ratios were found with an overall negative PM of €137 147. The DRG R61H was identified as the one most commonly coded (174 cases, 61.3%) with a deficit per case of €814. Subanalysis demonstrated that the payments were not cost covering due to excessive length of stay and staff costs. Significant differences in PM per case concerning age, length of stay and number of operation and procedure key (OPS) codes (P < 0.05) were found. CONCLUSION: In our research-driven tertiary care hospital, inpatient treatment of patients with CLL is not cost covering. This analysis demonstrates the need for novel care/reimbursement structures in CLL. From a hospital management perspective, cost revenue controlling is crucial to avoid major economic risks.