The "Standing Peanut" Scaphoid View: A Semi-supinated Radiographic View for Intraoperative Evaluation of Screw Placement in Scaphoid Waist Fractures.

Scaphoid waist fractures are the most common fracture of the scaphoid. Operative management is indicated with unstable fractures and often for nondisplaced waist fractures to decrease time to union and return to work/sport. Screw placement within the central axis of the scaphoid is paramount and correlates with outcomes. Assessment of intrascaphoid screw placement is classically done via intraoperative fluoroscopy. An additional fluoroscopic view is presented to assist in confirming implant positioning. Along with the standard anterioposterior, lateral, pronated oblique, and "scaphoid" view we obtain a "standing peanut" view for assessment of central screw placement. This view also allows for further evaluation of center/center positioning and better assessment of fixation crossing the fracture into the proximal pole. The "standing peanut" view is best obtained in a sequential manner beginning with the forearm in neutral rotation. First, the forearm is then supinated 30 degrees; next, the wrist is placed at 45 degrees of ulnar deviation. Then finally, 10 degrees of wrist extension. We utilize this additional intraoperative view in conjunction with the standard fluoroscopic views for assessing and ensuring center-center implant positioning, particularly within the proximal pole. When ensuring center-center positioning, we prefer this view as an adjunct view to the standard fluoroscopic views intraoperatively. It provides a beneficial view of the proximal pole delineating the number of screw threads that have obtained proximal pole purchase. We have found it particularly useful in the setting of scaphoid waist fracture nonunion with the classic 'humpback' deformity after correction with volar interposition grafting. Standard radiographic views may be misinterpreted regarding implant positioning if there remains any residual flexion. The view requires little in the way of training to obtain once appreciated and exposes the patient to minimal additional radiation.

Risk factors of instability following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with no history of shoulder surgery.

Introduction: As its indications expand, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) utilization continues to increase. Though relatively uncommon, instability following rTSA can be associated with significant morbidity and need for subsequent revision and treatment. This case control study aims to characterize factors leading to instability after rTSA, especially in those with no previous shoulder surgery. Methods: 194 rTSAs performed within the study period with appropriate operative indications and follow-up were included. Risk factors used in analysis included age, gender, BMI, ASA class, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), glenosphere, tray, and liner size. Data was analyzed using a hierarchical binary logistical regression to create a predictive model for instability. Results: Seven patients sustained a post-operative dislocation. Mean time to dislocation was 60.4 weeks. Five required open reduction with placement of either a larger humeral tray or polyethylene spacer. One required open reduction with osteophyte removal, and one was converted to a resection arthroplasty. Dislocators were more likely to have a larger BMI (p = 0.002), higher ASA classification (p = 0.09), and larger liner size (p = 0.01). Conclusion: This study demonstrates a large series of patients successfully treated with rTSA. Dislocations were an uncommon complication, but were clearly associated with higher patient BMI, ASA classification, and increased liner size.

Optimizing the Patient Telemedicine Experience in an Orthopaedic Clinic.

With the rapid advancements in today's technology, the telemedicine model of healthcare has become an increasingly useful tool for healthcare providers and patients to interact outside of the confines of a traditional office visit. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, many providers have been forced to adopt a component of telemedicine into their practice. In an effort to improve the telemedicine system for continued use, 519 patients in an orthopaedic clinic at a Level One academic system were surveyed on their willingness and confidence to use telemedicine in future orthopaedic visits. Though most patients reported that they had been unwilling to use telemedicine for their current visit, the majority were neutral or willing to use telemedicine in the future. In this study, we present some challenges to the orthopaedic telemedicine visit, patient sentiment towards the current and future use of telemedicine in orthopaedics, as well as possible direction for improvement so that telemedicine can be better incorporated into the orthopaedic clinic.