Effectiveness of a Smoking Cessation Program during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic has caused major obstacles for effective smoking cessation programs by significantly limiting access to healthcare. This cross-sectional analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of a self-developed smoking cessation program during the pandemic. The program was based on remote lectures, educational interventions, and hybrid services provided by an outpatient clinic. We assessed 337 participants enrolled to the program between January 2019 and February 2022. Data on demographic characteristics, medical history, and smoking status at baseline and after at least 1-year follow-up were collected from medical records and a standardized self-developed questionnaire. Participants were classified into two groups according to their current smoking status. The smoking cessation rate at 1 year was 37% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31-42%). Major predictors of smoking cessation were the place of residence, ability to refrain from smoking during severe illness, and the number of cigarettes smoked per day. The proportion of participants with high levels of nicotine dependence at baseline was 40.8% (95% CI: 34.5-47.5%) vs. 29.1% (95% CI: 23.4-35.5%) after the program. In the group that did not quit smoking, there were more participants who smoked within 5 min after waking up than before the program (40.4% [95% CI: 34.0-47.1%] vs. 25.4% [95% CI: 19.9-31.6%]). Effective smoking cessation interventions can be performed using remote counseling and education.

The comparison between Caprini and Padua VTE risk assessment models for hospitalised cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy at the tertiary oncology department in Poland: is pharmacological thromboprophylaxis overused?

AIM OF THE STUDY: Thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients during hospitalization reduces the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: To assess the underuse and the overuse of thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients at a tertiary oncology department, we retrospectively analyzed 1983 consecutive hospitalizations of 498 cancer patients who received chemotherapy from October 2016 to May 2017. The Padua prediction score (≥ 4 points) and Caprini risk assessment (≥ 5 points) were used to identify patients at high risk of VTE. RESULTS: The majority of individuals (n = 363, 72.9%) suffered from advanced lung cancer. We found that 419 (84.14%) patients received thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin 40 mg qd,including 181 (43.2%) individuals using concomitant mechanical thromboprophylaxis. As few as 44 (8.8%) and 11 (2.2%) patients did not receive thromboprophylaxis despite high VTE risk based on the Caprini risk assessment and Padua prediction score, respectively (p < 0.001). The number of patients without high risk of VTE, who received pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, was higher when the Padua prediction score was used compared with the Caprini risk assessment (n = 391 [78.5%] vs. n = 210 [42.2%], respectively; p < 0.001). Three patients (0.6%) experienced vascular events during hospital stay, including one symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. No major bleeding was observed. Predictors of thromboprophylaxis overuse were as follows: previous VTE and abnormal pulmonary function for both scales. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that thromboprophylaxis in cancer in patients undergoing chemotherapy is suboptimal in Poland in part due to the use of various VTE risk scores yielding discrepant results in everyday practice.