Preferred language and diagnostic errors in the pediatric emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between language and diagnostic errors (DxE) in the pediatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: Electronic trigger identified ED encounters resulting in unplanned hospital admission that occurred within 10 days of an index visit from January 2018 through February 2022. Manual screening of each triggered encounter identified cases where the index visit diagnosis and hospitalization discharge diagnosis differed, and these were screened in for review using the Revised Safer Dx instrument to determine if a diagnostic error (DxE) occurred. Non-English primary language (NEPL) and English-proficient (EP) groups were established based on caregiver language. The primary outcome was the proportion of DxE each group. Data were analyzed using univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors of DxE. RESULTS: Electronic trigger identified 3,551 patients, of which 806 (22.7 %) screened in for Safer Dx review. 172 (21.3 %) experienced DxE. The proportion of DxE was similar between EP and NEPL groups (21.5 vs. 21.7 %; p=0.97). Age≥12 years and fewer prior admissions in the preceding 6 months predicted higher odds of DxE. NEPL did not predict higher odds of DxE. CONCLUSIONS: NEPL was not associated with increased odds DxE resulting in unplanned admission.

Clinical Pathway Adherence and Missed Diagnostic Opportunities Among Children with Musculoskeletal Infections.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical care pathways (CPs) integrate best evidence into the local care delivery context to promote efficiency and patient safety. However, the impact of CPs on diagnostic performance remains poorly understood. The objectives of this study were to evaluate adherence to a musculoskeletal infection (MSKI) diagnostic CP and identify recurrent failure points leading to missed diagnostic opportunities (MDOs). METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed from January 2018 to February 2022 for children 6 months to 18 years of age who had an unplanned admission for MSKI after being evaluated and discharged from the pediatric emergency department (PED) for related complaints within the previous 10 days. MDOs were identified using the Revised Safer Dx. Demographic and clinical characteristics of children with and without MDOs were compared using bivariate descriptive statistics. An improvement team reviewed the diagnostic trajectories of MDOs for deviations from the MSKI CP and developed a fishbone diagram to describe contributing factors to CP deviations. RESULTS: The study identified 21 children with and 13 children without MSKI-associated MDOs. Children with MDOs were more likely to have an initial C-reactive protein value > 2 mg/dL (90.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.01) and returned to care earlier than children without MDOs (median 2.8 days vs. 6.7 days, p = 0.004). Factors contributing to MDOs included failure to obtain screening laboratory tests, misinterpretation of laboratory values, failure to obtain orthopedic consultation, and failure to obtain definitive imaging. CONCLUSION: Several recurrent deviations from an MSKI diagnostic CP were found to be associated with MDOs. Future quality improvement efforts to improve adherence to this MSKI CP may prevent MDOs.

Use of e-triggers to identify diagnostic errors in the paediatric ED.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic errors (DxEs) are an understudied source of patient harm in children rarely captured in current adverse event reporting systems. Applying electronic triggers (e-triggers) to electronic health records shows promise in identifying DxEs but has not been used in the emergency department (ED) setting. OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of an e-trigger and subsequent manual screening for identifying probable DxEs among children with unplanned admission following a prior ED visit and to compare performance to existing incident reporting systems. DESIGN/METHODS: Retrospective single-centre cohort study of children ages 0-22 admitted within 14 days of a previous ED visit between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019. Subjects were identified by e-trigger, screened to identify cases where index visit and hospital discharge diagnoses were potentially related but pathophysiologically distinct, and then these screened-in cases were reviewed for DxE using the SaferDx Instrument. Cases of DxE identified by e-trigger were cross-referenced against existing institutional incident reporting systems. RESULTS: An e-trigger identified 1915 unplanned admissions (7.7% of 24 849 total admissions) with a preceding index visit. 453 (23.7%) were screened in and underwent review using SaferDx. 92 cases were classified as likely DxEs, representing 0.4% of all hospital admissions, 4.8% among those selected by e-trigger and 20.3% among those screened in for review. Half of cases were reviewed by two reviewers using SaferDx with substantial inter-rater reliability (Cohen's κ=0.65 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.75)). Six (6.5%) cases had been reported elsewhere: two to the hospital's incident reporting system and five to the ED case review team (one reported to both). CONCLUSION: An e-trigger coupled with manual screening enriched a cohort of patients at risk for DxEs. Fewer than 10% of DxEs were identified through existing surveillance systems, suggesting that they miss a large proportion of DxEs. Further study is required to identify specific clinical presentations at risk of DxEs.