International survey on growth indices and impacting factors in children with food allergies.

BACKGROUND: Elimination diets required for the management of food allergies increase the risk for poor growth in children. Currently, no worldwide data exist on this topic and limited published data exist on the impact of atopic comorbidity, type of allergy and foods eliminated on growth. We therefore set out to perform a worldwide survey on growth and impacting factors in food allergic children. METHODS: A prospective growth survey was performed of children (aged 0-16 years) on an elimination diet with confirmed immunoglobulin (Ig)E and non-IgE mediated food allergies. Data collected included: weight-for-age, weight-for-height, height-for-age, head circumference, body mass index, type of food allergy and eliminated foods, allergic comorbidities and replacement milk/breast milk. Multivariable regression analysis was used to establish factors that affected growth. RESULTS: Data from 430 patients from twelve allergy centres were analysed: median age at diagnosis and data collection was 8 months and 23 months, respectively. Pooled data indicated that 6% were underweight, 9% were stunted, 5% were undernourished and 8% were overweight. Cow's milk elimination lead to a lower weight-for-height Z-scores than other food eliminations and mixed IgE and non-IgE mediated allergy had lower height-for-age Z-scores than IgE mediated allergy. Children with only non-IgE mediated allergies had lower weight-for-height and body mass index. Atopic comorbidities did not impact on growth. CONCLUSIONS: Stunting is more common in children with food allergies than low weight. Children particularly at risk of poor growth are those with non-IgE and mixed IgE and non-IgE mediated allergies, as well as those with cow's milk allergy.

Extraintestinal manifestations in children with gastrointestinal food allergy.

OBJECTIVES: The presence of extraintestinal manifestations (EIM) in children with gastrointestinal (GI) food allergy (GIFA) is greatly debated. In the present study we assessed the prevalence of EIM in children with GIFA and investigated whether their presence is helpful in the allergy-focused history-taking process. METHODS: The medical records of all children with a proven diagnosis of GIFA were reviewed along with those of children diagnosed as having inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as controls. Data regarding age at onset, age at diagnosis, atopic family history, atopic comorbidities, GI symptoms, and EIM were recorded. RESULTS: Data from 436 children with GIFA and 74 children with IBD were included in the analysis. EIM were documented in 368 children with GIFA, including fatigue (53.0%), allergic shiners (49.1%), mouth ulcers (39.0%), joint pain/hypermobility (35.8%), poor sleep (34.4%), night sweats (34.4%), headache (22.7%), and bed-wetting (17.7%). The proportion of patients with EIM was higher in the GIFA group compared with that in the IBD group (368/436 [84.4%] vs 40/74 [54.1%]; P < 0.001). Segregating the GIFA group into children with and without atopic comorbidities, both atopic (276/30; 89.9%) and nonatopic (93/130; 71.5%) children showed higher proportion of EIM than children with IBD ([40/74; 54.1%], P < 0.01 and <0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: GIFA are commonly associated with a wide range of EIM, which appear to represent important and specific clinical features of this group of conditions. Their recognition in taking an allergy-focused history may play an important role for both diagnosis and management.

Malnutrition in children with food allergies in the UK.

BACKGROUND: The mainstay of dietary management of food allergies remains the elimination diet. However, the removal of major food groups may predispose children to an inadequate nutrient intake. We therefore set out to establish growth status in food allergic children receiving dietetic input in the UK. METHODS: Dietitians were approached via the Food Allergy and Intolerance Specialist Group from the British Dietetic Association and asked to submit anthropometrical data for children with food allergies. Data collected related to the systems involved and number of foods excluded. Malnutrition was defined according to World Health Organization standards. RESULTS: Data from 13 different centres yielded 97 patients (51 male and 46 female) of which 66 excluded ≤2 foods and 31 excluded ≥3 foods. Data indicated that 8.5% had a weight for age ≤ -2 Z-score and, conversely, 8.5% were ≥2 Z-score. For height for age, 11.1% were ≤ -2 Z-score and, for weight for height, 3.7% were ≤ -2 Z-score and 7.5% ≥2 Z-score. Type of allergy, system involved and specific food elimination did not impact on the level of malnutrition. However, the elimination of ≥3 foods significantly impacted on weight for age (P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that children with food allergies are more underweight than the general UK population, which appears to be linked to the number of foods excluded. However, the impact of the disease process itself should not be disregarded. Additionally, obesity can also occur in this population despite dietary elimination.

¿Se realiza correctamente la punción lumbar en pediatría? Revisión de las recomendaciones actuales y análisis de la realidad / Do paediatricians perform lumbar puncture correctly? Review of recommendations and analysis the technique in Spain

Introducción: La punción lumbar (PL) es una técnica ampliamente utilizada en pediatría. La realización adecuada de la técnica puede evitar la mayoría de las complicaciones asociadas. Objetivo: Evaluar si en España los pediatras y los residentes de pediatría siguen las recomendaciones de la técnica de la PL. Material y métodos: Estudio transversal basado en un cuestionario escrito distribuido por correo electrónico a través de la Sociedad Española de Urgencias Pediátricas, que recogía datos epidemiológicos y preguntas de respuesta múltiple sobre la realización de la PL. Resultados: Se analizaron 206 cuestionarios, 143 (69,5%) respondidos por pediatras y 63 (30,5%) por residentes de pediatría. Hacen la PL sin los padres presentes 128 médicos (62,1%), aplican sedoanalgesia 198 (96,1%); 84 (42%) sólo analgesia local. Colocan al paciente sentado 108 (53,7%). La mayoría utiliza aguja tipo Quincke (126; 62,7%), orienta bien el trocar al hacer la punción 22 (36,1%) residentes y 21 pediatras (15,1%), diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p=0,001). En los neonatos, 63 (46%) pediatras y 19 (30,2%) residentes usan aguja sin fiador tipo «palomilla», diferencia también significativa (p=0,035). Reintroducen el estilete para redirigir el trocar 190 (92,2%) encuestados y para extraerlo 186 (93%). Recomiendan reposo tras la PL 195 (94,7%) médicos. Conclusiones: La mayoría de los pediatras orientan mal el trocar cuando hacen una PL y siguen utilizando aguja tipo «palomilla» en los neonatos a pesar de que está desaconsejado. Los residentes de pediatría y los pediatras con menor experiencia siguen las recomendaciones con mayor frecuencia(AU)

Introduction: Lumbar puncture (LP) is a commonly performed procedure in paediatrics. Performing this technique properly can avoid the most common associated complications. Objective: To assess whether paediatricians and paediatric residents in Spain follow current recommendations for the LP technique. Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted by sending a questionnaire by mail through the Spanish Society of Paediatric Emergencies, collecting demographic information and responses to multiple choice questions about LP technique. Results: A total of 206 questionnaires were analysed, of which 143 (69.5%) were answered by paediatricians, and 63 (30.5%) by paediatric residents. The majority (128; 62.1%) of physicians did not allow parents to be present during LP, 198 (96.1%) routinely use analgesia and sedation; 84 (42%) only used local anaesthesia. The majority of respondents used standard Quincke needles (126; 62.7%). The bevel was correctly positioned when puncturing the dura mater by 22 residents (36.1%) and 21 paediatricians (15.1%), a variation that was statistically significant (P=.001). For neonatal lumbar punctures, 63 paediatricians (46%) and 19 paediatric residents used a butterfly needle which did not contain a stylet, and this difference was also statistically significant (P=.035). Of those surveyed, 190 (92.2%) re-inserted the stylet when re-orientating the needle, and 186 (93%) re-oriented this when removing it. The recommendation of bed rest was made by 195 (94.7%) physicians. Conclusions: The majority of paediatricians orient the bevel wrongly when inserting the needle during LP, and still use "butterfly" needles in newborns, despite warnings to the contrary. Paediatric residents and less experienced paediatricians follow the recommendations more frequently(AU)

[Do paediatricians perform lumbar puncture correctly? Review of recommendations and analysis the technique in Spain]. / ¿Se realiza correctamente la punción lumbar en pediatría? Revisión de las recomendaciones actuales y análisis de la realidad.

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar puncture (LP) is a commonly performed procedure in paediatrics. Performing this technique properly can avoid the most common associated complications. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether paediatricians and paediatric residents in Spain follow current recommendations for the LP technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted by sending a questionnaire by mail through the Spanish Society of Paediatric Emergencies, collecting demographic information and responses to multiple choice questions about LP technique. RESULTS: A total of 206 questionnaires were analysed, of which 143 (69.5%) were answered by paediatricians, and 63 (30.5%) by paediatric residents. The majority (128; 62.1%) of physicians did not allow parents to be present during LP, 198 (96.1%) routinely use analgesia and sedation; 84 (42%) only used local anaesthesia. The majority of respondents used standard Quincke needles (126; 62.7%). The bevel was correctly positioned when puncturing the dura mater by 22 residents (36.1%) and 21 paediatricians (15.1%), a variation that was statistically significant (P=.001). For neonatal lumbar punctures, 63 paediatricians (46%) and 19 paediatric residents used a butterfly needle which did not contain a stylet, and this difference was also statistically significant (P=.035). Of those surveyed, 190 (92.2%) re-inserted the stylet when re-orientating the needle, and 186 (93%) re-oriented this when removing it. The recommendation of bed rest was made by 195 (94.7%) physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of paediatricians orient the bevel wrongly when inserting the needle during LP, and still use "butterfly" needles in newborns, despite warnings to the contrary. Paediatric residents and less experienced paediatricians follow the recommendations more frequently.