Tranexamic acid-induced ureteric clot obstruction in a patient with urothelial cell carcinoma resulting in upper urinary tract perforation.

This is the first report of upper urinary tract (UUT) perforation secondary to tranexamic acid (TXA) induced ureteric clot obstruction. A 77-year-old woman was referred to the urology department with intermittent, painless visible haematuria from a lesion in the right upper calyx, suspicious of urothelial cell carcinoma. She did not have any flank pain or blood clots in her urine. Preoperatively, her haemoglobin level dropped from 113 g/L to 95 g/L and was prescribed oral TXA by her general practitioner, which led to extensive clot formation within the right kidney and ureter resulting in pain and ureteric obstruction. At ureteroscopy, a large ureteric blood clot was extracted and perforation close to the tumour with resultant urinary extravasation was noted. The patient subsequently underwent a successful nephroureterectomy, but risk of potential perforation-related complications such as tumour seeding, sepsis and urinoma formation could have been avoided. TXA in haematuria from the UUT should be strongly discouraged due to the risk of ureteric clot obstruction and UUT perforation.

Evidence and clinical trials in Endourology: where are we going.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is an ongoing explosion in the amount and quality, of research in the field of Endourology. From a solid basis of systematic reviews and small, single centre trials it has been possible to design large randomised controlled trials in the UK and in the USA. This review will describe some of the more recent trials (small and large) that are helping to provide a solid evidence base for our practice in Endourology. ONGOING STUDIES: Randomised controlled trial (RCTs) include: The Therapeutic Interventions for Stones in the Ureter (TISU), the Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible Ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal Shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones (PURE RCTs) and the Prevention of Urinary Stones with Hydration (PUSH). Quality of life (QoL) measures and studies include: the Wisconsin Stone QoL Questionnaire, the Cambridge Renal Stone PROM, the Cambridge Ureteral Stone PROM, the Urinary stone and Intervention QoL questionnaire and the Study to Enhance Understanding of sTent-associated Symptoms (STENTS). The Core Outcome Set in Trials on treatments for Renal and UreteriC sTones (COSTRUCT) study aims to define a core outcome set to be used in future trials. SUMMARY: On-going studies will provide higher quality evidence on the treatment of ureteric and renal stones to inform treatment decision making and guideline recommendations. They will also guide decisions relating to prevention and recurrence and give insight into the true impact of urinary stones and endourological interventions on patients' quality of life. Future studies will incorporate big data and artificial intelligence.

Obstructive uropathy and vesicovaginal fistula secondary to a retained sex toy in the vagina.

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal foreign bodies (FBs) are a rare cause of vesicovaginal, rectovaginal, or urethrovaginal fistulae. AIM: The aim of this study was to describe a rare case of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) and obstructive uropathy and to review the literature. METHODS: A case is presented. A comprehensive review of the literature was performed (1948-2013). RESULTS: A 38-year-old woman presenting with sepsis, obstructive uropathy, and severe emaciation was found to have a sex toy retained in her vagina for 10 years. This had caused a VVF and bilateral hydroureteronephrosis. Bilateral nephrostomies were inserted and she underwent cystoscopy and examination under anesthesia (EUA) with retrieval of FB. A left ureteric stricture was demonstrated. Transabdominal VVF repair with omental flap and left ureteric re-implantation was performed. The VVF recurred, which was successfully re-repaired transvaginally. Seventy-six full text articles were reviewed. There were no previously published cases of VVF following vaginal sex toy insertion. There are four cases of obstructive uropathy secondary to a vaginal FB in the literature: three pessaries and one plastic cap. There are 44 cases of VVF secondary to FB: 22 plastic caps (typically from aerosol bottles, inserted for masturbation or contraception) and 5 pessaries. At least nine were in girls aged ≤18 years. Average presentation is 15 months (range 2 months to 35 years) after FB insertion. Most cases were managed with surgical repair; predominantly transvaginal. CONCLUSIONS: This case describes an extremely rare but potentially life-threatening case of obstructive uropathy caused by a chronically retained sex toy, and adds to the list of potentially rare causes of a VVF and obstructive uropathy. We advocate urinary diversion, staged removal of FB, upper urinary tract imaging, and EUA with VVF repair and/or ureteric reimplantation if required. Transvaginal is the preferred access for FB-associated VVF repair without concomitant ureteric reimplantation.