Relacorilant, a Selective Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulator in Development for the Treatment of Patients With Cushing Syndrome, Does Not Cause Prolongation of the Cardiac QT Interval.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of relacorilant, a selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator under investigation for the treatment of patients with endogenous hypercortisolism (Cushing syndrome [CS]), on the heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc). METHODS: Three clinical studies of relacorilant were included: (1) a first-in-human, randomized, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose (up to 500 mg of relacorilant) study in healthy volunteers; (2) a phase 1 placebo- and positive-controlled thorough QTc (TQT) study of 400 and 800 mg of relacorilant in healthy volunteers; and (3) a phase 2, open-label study of up to 400 mg of relacorilant administered daily for up to 16 weeks in patients with CS. Electrocardiogram recordings were taken, and QTc change from baseline (ΔQTc) was calculated. The association of plasma relacorilant concentration with the effect on QTc in healthy volunteers was assessed using linear mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS: Across all studies, no notable changes in the electrocardiogram parameters were observed. At all time points and with all doses of relacorilant, including supratherapeutic doses, ΔQTc was small, generally negative, and, in the placebo-controlled studies, similar to placebo. In the TQT study, placebo-corrected ΔQTc with relacorilant was small and negative, whereas placebo-corrected ΔQTc with moxifloxacin positive control showed rapid QTc prolongation. These results constituted a negative TQT study. The model-estimated slopes of the concentration-QTc relationship were slightly negative, excluding an association of relacorilant with prolonged QTc. CONCLUSION: At all doses studied, relacorilant consistently demonstrated a lack of QTc prolongation in healthy volunteers and patients with CS, including in the TQT study. Ongoing phase 3 studies will help further establish the overall benefit-risk profile of relacorilant.

Effect of Miricorilant, a Selective Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulator, on Olanzapine-Associated Weight Gain in Healthy Subjects: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

PURPOSE: Antipsychotic medications, including olanzapine, are associated with substantial weight gain and metabolic disturbances. We sought to determine whether coadministration of miricorilant, a selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator, with olanzapine can ameliorate these effects. METHODS: Sixty-six healthy men were enrolled in a 2-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The primary objective was to evaluate changes in body weight after 14 days coadministration of olanzapine (10 mg) + miricorilant (600 mg) compared with olanzapine (10 mg) + placebo. Secondary objectives included evaluating (a) the safety and tolerability of the combination; (b) the effects of the combination on glucose, insulin, insulin resistance, and triglycerides; and (c) the impact of the combination on hepatic enzymes. RESULTS: Subjects administered olanzapine + miricorilant gained less weight than subjects administered olanzapine + placebo (mean weight gain on day 15, 3.91 kg vs 4.98 kg; difference between groups, -1.07 kg; 95% confidence interval, -1.94 to -0.19; P = 0.017]). Compared with the placebo group, coadministration of miricorilant with olanzapine was associated with smaller increases in insulin (difference, -3.74 mIU/L; P = 0.007), homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (difference, -0.47; P = 0.007), triglycerides (difference, -0.29 mmol/L; P = 0.057), aspartate aminotransferase (difference, -32.24 IU/L; P = 0.009), and alanine aminotransferase (difference, -49.99 IU/L; P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Miricorilant may provide a promising option for ameliorating the detrimental effects of olanzapine, and investigation of this medication in patients affected by antipsychotic-induced weight gain is warranted. Two phase 2 studies of miricorilant in patients with recent and long-standing antipsychotic-induced weight gain are currently in progress.

Elinzanetant (NT-814), a Neurokinin 1,3 Receptor Antagonist, Reduces Estradiol and Progesterone in Healthy Women.

CONTEXT: The ideal therapy for endometriosis (EM) and uterine fibroids (UFs) would suppress estrogenic drive to the endometrium and myometrium, while minimizing vasomotor symptoms and bone loss associated with current treatments. An integrated neurokinin-kisspeptin system involving substance P and neurokinin B acting at the neurokinin (NK) receptors 1 and 3, respectively, modulates reproductive hormone secretion and represents a therapeutic target. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to assess the effects of the novel NK1,3 antagonist elinzanetant on reproductive hormone levels in healthy women. METHODS: A randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 33 women who attended for 2 consecutive menstrual cycles. In each cycle blood samples were taken on days 3 or 4, 9 or 10, 15 or 16, and 21 or 22 to measure serum reproductive hormones. In cycle 2, women were randomly assigned to receive once-daily oral elinzanetant 40, 80, 120 mg, or placebo (N = 8 or 9 per group). RESULTS: Elinzanetant dose-dependently lowered serum luteinizing hormone, estradiol (120 mg median change across cycle: -141.4 pmol/L, P = .038), and luteal-phase progesterone (120 mg change from baseline on day 21 or 22: -19.400 nmol/L, P = .046). Elinzanetant 120 mg prolonged the cycle length by median of 7.0 days (P = .023). Elinzanetant reduced the proportion of women with a luteal-phase serum progesterone concentration greater than 30 nmol/L (a concentration consistent with ovulation) in a dose-related manner in cycle 2 (P = .002). Treatment did not produce vasomotor symptoms. CONCLUSION: NK1,3 receptor antagonism with elinzanetant dose-dependently suppressed the reproductive axis in healthy women, with the 120-mg dose lowering estradiol to potentially ideal levels for UFs and EM. As such, elinzanetant may represent a novel therapy to manipulate reproductive hormone levels in women with hormone-driven disorders.

An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of the Effect of Relacorilant on the Activity of Cytochrome P450 Drug Metabolizing Enzymes.

Relacorilant is a selective modulator of the glucocorticoid receptor in development for the treatment of several serious diseases. The widely used cocktail method was employed to assess relacorilant's effect on various cytochrome P450 (CYP) drug metabolizing enzymes in vitro and in vivo. Inhibition of CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 as well as induction of CYP1A2, CYP2B6, and CYP3A4 were assessed in vitro (relacorilant concentrations up to 10 µM). A clinical study in healthy subjects (n = 27) evaluated the inhibition of CYP3A4, CYP2C8, and CYP2C9 in vivo by administering single doses of probe CYP substrates (midazolam, pioglitazone, and tolbutamide) alone and in combination with relacorilant (350 mg). Pharmacokinetic sampling was conducted, and safety was assessed throughout the study. Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated using 90% confidence intervals of the geometric least squares mean ratios of test (probe substrate with relacorilant) vs reference (probe substrate alone) using boundaries of 80% to 125%. In vitro, relacorilant inhibited CYP3A4, CYP2C8, and CYP2C9 but did not meaningfully affect the activity of the other CYP enzymes evaluated. Consistent with the in vitro data, relacorilant was shown to be a strong CYP3A inhibitor in vivo (>8-fold increase in midazolam area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration and area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity). Coadministration of relacorilant with drugs highly dependent on CYP3A for clearance is expected to increase the concentrations of these drugs. Importantly, clinical evaluation of relacorilant showed no inhibition of CYP2C8 or CYP2C9 in vivo. Accordingly, drugs that are substrates of only CYP2C8 and/or CYP2C9 can be coadministered with relacorilant without dose adjustment.

Assessment of Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacological Effect of Orally Administered CORT125134: An Adaptive, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1 Clinical Study.

CORT125134 is an orally active, high-affinity, selective antagonist of the glucocorticoid receptor that is being developed for indications that may benefit from the modulation of cortisol activity. This first-in-human study was conducted to evaluate the dose-related safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacological effects of CORT125134 and its active metabolite CORT125201. Eighty-one healthy male or female subjects received a single dose of 5 to 500 mg CORT125134 or matching placebo across 9 cohorts; 1 cohort received 150 mg CORT125134 after a high-fat breakfast; and 46 subjects received 50 to 500 mg CORT125134 or matching placebo once daily for up to 14 days across 4 cohorts. CORT125134 was well tolerated at doses up to 250 mg per day for 14 days. CORT125134 was absorbed rapidly and eliminated with a mean half-life ranging from 11 to 19 hours. Steady state was achieved by day 7. Exposure increased in a greater than proportional manner, particularly at lower doses. Exposure to CORT125201 at steady state was less than 5% that of parent CORT125134. Evidence for the desired pharmacological effect (glucocorticoid receptor antagonism) was demonstrated by the ability of CORT125134 to prevent several effects of the glucocorticoid receptor agonist prednisone.

Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of FAAH Inhibitor V158866: A Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Phase I Study in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The inhibition of fatty acid amide hydrolase 1 (FAAH) has been proposed as a novel mechanism for treating pain syndromes by increasing the levels of endogenous cannabinoids (ECs). This study describes the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of V158866, a reversible FAAH inhibitor, after first administration to man. METHODS: 51 healthy male subjects were recruited into this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, adaptive dose, phase I single (Part A) and repeated ascending dose (Part B) study. The primary outcome was the safety and tolerability of V158866. Secondary outcomes were (1) pharmacokinetics of V158866 and (2) pharmacodynamics of V158866, as assessed by changes in plasma EC concentrations. RESULTS: Single oral doses of 5-300 mg and repeated oral doses of 50-500 mg were evaluated. V158866 was well tolerated, with no apparent treatment-related effects on laboratory variables. V158866 was rapidly absorbed with a mean terminal elimination half-life of 9.6-18.3 h (Day 7; Part B). V158866 reached steady state within 2-3 days of administration, with an accumulation ratio, based on AUC0-24h, of approximately 2 on Day 7. V158866 showed a linear relationship between dose and AUC across the entire dose range. V158866 caused reversible, dose-related increases in plasma ECs. At hemi-equilibrium, there was a sigmoidal maximum effect relationship between plasma V158866 concentrations and changes in plasma ECs. CONCLUSIONS: V158866 is well tolerated, with linear pharmacokinetics suitable for once-daily administration, and reversible effects on plasma ECs. Maximum increases in plasma ECs occur with V158866 doses of 300-500 mg/day.

Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group fixed-dose study of a potential adjuvant compound, VML-670.

Sexual dysfunction is common during acute and continuation treatment of depressed patients with selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) re-uptake inhibitors (ssRIs), but there is no consensus on clinical management. Compounds with 5-HT(1A) agonist properties have been proposed as adjuvant agents in patients continuing with ssRIs. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group fixed-dose 4-week treatment study. Previously depressed male or female patients in symptomatic remission receiving stable doses of fluoxetine or paroxetine but experiencing treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction were randomised to double-blind treatment with placebo or VML-670 (a 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(1D) agonist). sexual dysfunction was assessed by the Arizona sexual Experiences scale (ASEX). Two-hundred and eighty-eight patients (204 women, 84 men; mean age 44.2 years) received VML-670 (n = 149; 107 women, 42 men) or placebo (n = 139; 97 women, 42 men). In the intention-to-treat, last-observation carried forward analysis (n = 282), proportionately more patients became free of sexual dysfunction with VML-670 (34.3% versus 27.9% with placebo) but this difference was not statistically significant. Male patients treated with VML-670 showed a significantly greater (p =0.01) improvement in ability to achieve and maintain penile erection (a secondary outcome measure). A similar proportion of patients reported on-treatment, treatment-emergent adverse events with VML-670 (71.1%) and placebo (68.3%), and a similar proportion experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (36.9% versus 35.3%). Double-blind treatment with VML-670 offered no significant advantage over placebo on the primary outcome measure in the overall sample. Further studies may be warranted in larger groups of male patients with sexual dysfunction.

Single oral dose safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of PNU-96391 in healthy volunteers.

The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of PNU-96391, an orally active weak dopamine D2 receptor antagonist with modulatory properties of central dopaminergic function, was characterized. Fifty-three healthy normal volunteers were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, single-dose study. Subjects were assigned to single oral doses of placebo and 1, 3, 10, 30, 100, 150, and 200 mg PNU-96391. Safety and tolerability were assessed using telemetry, Holter monitoring, surface ECG, vital signs, safety laboratories, and adverse event reports. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by model-independent techniques. Adverse events were infrequent, of mild to moderate intensity, and in the dose range of 1 to 150 mg. Dose escalation was stopped at 200 mg because of severe nausea, dizziness, lightheadedness, and tachycardia. Besides the increase in heart rate, no other drug-related effects on vital signs were observed. Safety laboratory measurements were not significantly changed. Evidence of drug activity was demonstrated by a dose-dependent elevation in serum prolactin. PNU-96391 was rapidly absorbed, with maximum concentrations achieved between 0.5 and 4 hours in all subjects. The half-life of the drug was short (2 to 6 h). The main metabolite, PNU-100014, was rapidly formed, with a t(max) ranging from 1 to 6 hours. Peak levels of the metabolite are approximately half of the parent drug, and the half-life is slightly longer (4 to 10 h). Increases in dose resulted in linear increases in exposure for both PNU-96391 and PNU-100014. Hence, PNU-96391 was well tolerated at doses ranging from 1 to 150 mg.