The Sinai Robotic Surgery Trial in HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SIRS 2.0 trial) - study protocol for a phase II non-randomized non-inferiority trial.

Background: Human papillomavirus associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPVOPSCC) usually affects a younger patient population. As such, the risk for long term toxicity associated with therapy is an important consideration. Multiple trials focused on de-escalation of therapy to preserve survival outcomes while minimizing treatment toxicity are currently in progress, however the question of which patients are ideal candidates for de-escalation remains unanswered. Circulating tumor DNA (cfHPVDNA) has emerged as a means of monitoring disease in patients with HPVOPSCC. Undetectable postoperative cfHPVDNA levels portend a better prognosis and by extension, may identify ideal candidates for de-escalation therapy. We propose an overview and rationale for a new institutional clinical trial protocol focusing on the use of cfHPVDNA to risk stratify patients for adjuvant therapy. We hypothesize that many surgical patients currently receiving radiation therapy may be clinically observed without adjuvant therapy. Methods: Patients with measurable cfHPVDNA and clinically resectable HPVOPSCC will undergo TORS resection of tumors and neck dissection. Patients with undetectable cfHPVDNA at 3 weeks post-op will be allocated to low or high-risk treatment protocol groups. The low risk group consists of patients with <4 positive lymph nodes, ≤2 mm extranodal extension (ENE), and perineural invasion (PNI) or lymphovascular invasion (LVI) alone. The high-risk group is made up of patients with ≥4 positive lymph nodes, gross ENE, positive margins, N2c disease and/or the combination of both PNI and LVI. The low-risk group will be allocated to an observation arm, while the high-risk group will receive 46 Gy of adjuvant radiotherapy and weekly cisplatin therapy. The primary outcome of interest is 2-year disease recurrence with secondary outcomes of 2-year disease free survival, locoregional control, overall survival, and quality of life measures. A sample of 126 patients in the low-risk group and 73 patients in the high-risk group will be required to evaluate non-inferiority to the standard of care. Discussion: This study will provide much needed recurrence and survival data for patients that undergo primary TORS followed by observation or de-escalated adjuvant therapy. Additionally, it will help delineate the role of cfHPVDNA in the risk stratification of patients that undergo treatment de-intensification.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: outcomes from a United States experience.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is commonly used in Asia for resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) and early (T1) colorectal cancers. It allows for en bloc removal and is often curative. We describe outcomes of colorectal ESD from a United States (US) academic medical center and compare this to international experiences. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of colonic lesions referred to the University of Chicago Medical Center for ESD from 2012 to 2020. Clinical and procedural data were collected. RESULTS: The study included 78 lesions with mean size of 29.7 mm (range 10-100 mm). The overall en bloc resection rate was 73.1% (n = 57). Between the first and second half of the study, it improved from 61.5 to 84.6% (p = 0.02). Histology showed adenocarcinoma in fifteen lesions (19.2%). Of all neoplastic lesions (n = 68), resection with negative margins (R0) was achieved in 54 cases (79.4%). Adverse events occurred in 9 cases (11.5%), but most (n = 6, 66.7%) were successfully treated endoscopically. Follow-up endoscopy was performed in 46 patients (59.0%) at a mean interval of 6.8 months (SD ± 5.0 months) with two case of recurrent lesion (4.3%). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows successful colorectal ESD outcomes at a US tertiary center. The en bloc resection rate was lower than other cohorts, but a learning curve was demonstrated. The R0 resection, lesion recurrence, and adverse event rates were similar to other non-Asian experiences, but not as favorable as in Asia [Fuccio et al. in Gastrointest Endosc 86:74-86.e17, 2017]. Increased ESD training in the US can help optimize utilization and outcomes.

Endoscopic resection is more effective than biopsy or EUS to detect residual rectal neuroendocrine tumor.

Background and study aims Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are often discovered incidentally and may be misidentified as adenomatous polyps. This can result in a partial resection at the index procedure, and lesions are often referred for staging or evaluation for residual disease at the resection site. The aim of this study was to identify the ideal method to confirm complete excision of small rectal NETs. Patients and methods Data from patients with a previously resected rectal NET referred for follow-up endoscopy or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate analysis was performed on categorical data using the Chi-squared test. Results Forty-nine patients with rectal NETs were identified by pathology specimens. Of those, 39 underwent follow-up endoscopy or EUS and were included. Baseline characteristics included gender (71 % F, 29 % M), age (57.2 ±â€Š13.4 yrs) lesion size (7.3 ±â€Š4.2 mm) and location. The prior resection site was identified in 37/39 patients who underwent tissue sampling. Residual NET was found histologically in 14/37 lesions. All residual disease was found during salvage endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and 43 % had a normal-appearing scar. Every patient undergoing EUS had an unremarkable exam. Initial cold biopsy polypectomy ( P  = 0.006), visible lesions ( P  = 0.001) and EMR/ESD of the prior resection site ( P  = 0.01) correlated with residual NET. Conclusions Localized rectal NETs may be incompletely removed with standard polypectomy. If an advanced resection is not performed initially, repeat endoscopy with salvage EMR or ESD of the scar should be considered. For small rectal NETs, biopsy may miss residual disease when there is no visible lesion and EUS appears to have no benefit.

Dissection-enabled scaffold-assisted resection (DeSCAR): a novel technique for resection of residual or non-lifting gastrointestinal neoplasia of the colon, expanded experience and follow-up.

Background and study aims Colonic lesions may not be amenable to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) due to previous manipulation, submucosal invasion, or lesion flatness. In 2018, we described Dissection-enabled Scaffold Assisted Resection (DeSCAR) to be safe for the endoscopic resection of non-lifting or residual colonic lesions 1 In this study, we expand our original cohort to describe our expanded experience with patients undergoing DeSCAR and assess the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of DeSCAR for endoscopic resection of non-lifting or residual colonic lesions. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed 57 patients from 2015-2019 who underwent DeSCAR for colonic lesions with incomplete lifting and/or previous manipulation. Cases were reviewed for location, prior manipulation, rates of successful resection, adverse events, and endoscopic follow up to assess for residual lesions. Results Fifty-seven lesions underwent DeSCAR. Of the patients, 51 % were female, and average patient age was 69 years. Lesions were located in the cecum (n = 16), right colon (n = 27), left colon (n = 10), and rectum (n = 4). Average lesion size was 27.7 mm. Previous manipulation occurred in 54 cases (72 % biopsy, 44 % resection attempt, 18 % intralesional tattoo). The technical success rate for resection of non-lifting lesions was 98 %. There were two delayed bleeding episodes (one required endoscopic intervention) and one small perforation (managed by endoscopic hemoclip closure). Endoscopic follow up was available in 31 patients (54 %) with no residual adenoma in 28 patients (90 % of those surveilled). Conclusions Our expanded experience with DeSCAR demonstrates high safety, feasibility, and effectiveness for the endoscopic management of non-lifting or residual colonic lesions.

Outcomes of endoscopic treatment of leaks and fistulae after sleeve gastrectomy: results from a large multicenter U.S. cohort.

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy is the most commonly performed bariatric surgery in the United States. Leaks after sleeve gastrectomy (SGL) occur in 1% to 3% of patients. Endoscopic therapies are increasingly used for treatment of SGLs, but few data exist on their outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess technical success, leak resolution, and reoperation rates of patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for repair SGLs. SETTING: Eight high-volume academic endoscopy centers. METHODS: Patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for SGLs from 2007 to 2017 were identified. Patients were excluded if the index endoscopic therapy for SGL was performed elsewhere or if no follow-up data were available. Leaks were classified as acute (≤7 d of SG), early (1-6 wk), late (7-12 wk), and chronic (>12 wk). Leak resolution was defined as lack of extraluminal air, extravasation on oral contrast radiography, cross-sectional imaging, or resolution of percutaneous drain output. Demographic and procedural data were recorded as rates of additional therapy, adverse events, and surgical revision. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients met criteria for analysis (70 women, age 42.6 ± 10.8 yr). A total of 295 endoscopic sessions (median 3, range 1-14) were performed across the cohort. SGLs resolved after index endoscopic therapy in 43 (50.1%) patients. The primary outcome of endoscopic resolution of SGL was observed in 62 patients (72.9%). There were 34 (11.5%) PRAE (the majority occurring with self-expandable metal stents), all but 1 of which were managed endoscopically. Surgical revision was required in 23 (21.7%) patients. On univariate analyses independent variables associated with the need for surgical revision included both acute and chronic SGLs (P = .028), loculated subphrenic collections/abscesses (P = .03), and intraabdominal sepsis (P = .03). On multivariable logistic regression using statistically significant predictors from the univariate analyses, acute SGLs were significantly associated with a need for surgical revision (odds ratio 4.8, 95% confidence interval 1.2-18.9, P = .025). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic therapy for SGLs is associated with good clinical success, avoiding the need for surgical revision in 73% of patients, with an acceptable adverse event profile. Patients with acute or chronic SGLs and those with loculated abscesses or intraabdominal sepsis are more likely to undergo surgical revision. Endoscopic therapy is an appropriate first-line modality for the management of SGLs, especially those not classified as acute or chronic.

Biliary stent migration to hepatic duct-case report of a late complication.

Endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated biliary plastic stents may be technically challenging and sometimes unsuccessful. Here we report the case of a 59-year-old woman with a migrated biliary stent in the right hepatic duct, which was diagnosed after the patient presented with cholangitis. The patient presented with constant abdominal pain in the right upper quadrant lasting for two days, along with nausea and bilious vomiting. The stent was retrieved by a polypectomy snare after failure of biliary basket and forceps. We performed a novel procedure for extraction of a migrated plastic stent, by using a polypectomy snare.

Parathyroid adenoma Localization.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral neck exploration is the gold standard for parathyroid adenoma localization in primary hyperparathyroidism. But surgeons do not have adequate experience for accurate surgical exploration and new methods are developed for surgery like unilateral exploration and minimally invasive surgery, thus, preoperative localization could reduces time and stress in surgical performance. METHOD: 80 patients with documented primary hyperparathyroidism and with raised serum calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were selected. The results of ultrasonographic localization for each patient were compared with findings of surgery and 99m technetium sestamibi scintigraphy. Also variables such as preoperative serum calcium, PTH level and adenoma weight were compared between patients who had localized and non-localized adenoma with ultrasonography or Sestamibi scan. The data was compared with student's t-test. RESULTS: In a prospective diagnostic tests accuracy study, 80 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism were enrolled. Ultrasonography images detected enlarged parathyroid glands in 61 of 80 patients (76.3%) with sensitivity of 83.5% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 89.7%. Sestamibi scintigraphy detected adenoma in 63 patients (78.8%) with sensitivity of 85% and PPV of 91.3%. There was no significant deference between ultrasonography and scintigraphy in localization of adenomas. Both ultrasonography and scintigraphy used for determining localization, and they located 73 adenomas (91.3%) with sensitivity of 97.3% and PPV of 93.5%. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography as an accurate method for localization of enlarged parathyroid glands in primary hyperparathyroidism, is comparable in overall utility with sestamibi scintigraphy. This study suggests a strategy for initial testing with one method, followed by the alternate imaging test if the first test happens to be negative.

24-hour ambulatory pH-metry in patients with refractory heartburn: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic condition that affects a large proportion of population. The aim of our study was to determine what percentages of patients with persistent heartburn on acid suppressive therapy have evidence of reflux disease while off acid suppressive therapy. METHODS: In a prospective study 48 patients with refractory heartburn from Taleghani Hospital were enrolled who had been on a double dose of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for 8 weeks without improvement. Because of low index of suspicion for GERD as an etiology, all the patients underwent 24h pH-metry while off PPI. The variables of pH-metry such as the fraction time of pH <4 were evaluated by comparing to normal volunteers. RESULTS: The mean "number of acid refluxes" was 49.98 in upright position and 6.29 in supine position. The mean "longest acid reflux" duration was 2.98 minutes in upright and 3.13 minutes in supine position. The total time fraction of pH <4 was 2.97% in upright position, 1.2 % in supine position and 2.74% in postprandial state. The mean DeMeester score was 10.06 (SD=10.48). However, the difference in the total fraction of time with pH <4 was not significant. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that most of the patients with refractory heartburn did not have acid reflux. Patients with refractory heartburn often do not have evidence of reflux disease on pH monitoring, thus evaluating these patients should be performed while on acid suppressive therapy (using impedance-pH monitoring) in order to clarify the relationship between symptoms and acid and non-acid reflux.