RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Transcranial focused ultrasound (TUS) can suppress human motor cortical excitability. However, it is unclear whether the TUS may interact with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) when they co-delivered in multiple trials. METHODS: Nineteen subjects received three different TUS-TMS co-stimulation protocols to the motor cortex including concurrent stimulation (TUS-TMS-C), separated stimulation (TUS-TMS-S), and TMS only. In each condition, two runs of 30 stimulation trials were conducted with a five-minute rest between runs. Motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded during stimulation and at 0, 10, 20, and 30 min after stimulation. The MEP amplitudes after intervention were normalized to the mean pre-intervention MEP amplitude and expressed as MEP ratios. An additional test with TUS alone was applied to all participants to assess whether TUS itself can elicit after-effects. RESULTS: There were no significant after-effects of all three interventions on MEP ratios. However, 11 subjects who showed online inhibition (OI + ) during the TUS-TMS-C protocol, defined as having MEP ratio less than 1 during TUS-TMS-C, showed significant MEP suppression at 10, 20 and 30 min after TUS-TMS-C. In 8 subjects did not show online inhibition (OI-), defined as having MEP ratios greater than 1 during TUS-TMS-C, showed no significant inhibitory after-effects. OI + and OI- status did not change in a follow-up repeat TUS-TMS-C test. TUS alone did not generate inhibitory after-effects in either OI + or OI- participants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that co-delivery of TUS and TMS can elicit inhibitory after-effect in subjects who showed online inhibition, suggesting that TUS and TMS may interact with each other to produce plasticity effects. SIGNIFICANCE: TUS and TMS may interact with each other to modulate cortical excitability.
RESUMO
According to the theory of coordinated reset (CR) stimulation, multifocal bursts of stimuli delivered in a random order with a specific interval may reduce the resonance power of the oscillatory generator in the epicenter. We develop a noninvasive coordinated multifocal burst stimulation (COMBS) with three repetitive transcranial stimulation machines based on CR theory to modulate the target frequency in the primary motor cortex and to assess its effect on motor cortical excitability in separate experiments. Electroencephalography and electromyography were recorded in 16 healthy participants during a finger-tapping task, both before and after the intervention. The resting oscillatory power at the targeted frequency was not changed by COMBS. α-Band power was increased in both preparation and movement stages and the low ß-band power was increased in the movement stage of the finger tapping task. The extent of low ß-band event-related desynchronization was reduced by COMBS. There were no changes in reaction time, but there was a trend for a reduced error rate after COMBS. In another 14 healthy participants, there were no significant changes in cortical excitability before and after COMBS measured by rest motor threshold, short interval intracortical inhibition, short interval intracortical facilitation, and cortical silent period. The result indicates that COMBS may modify the cortical oscillatory power and its perturbation within specific movement stage.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study, to our knowledge, to apply coordinated reset (CR) neuromodulation to the motor cortex with three repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) stimulators to assess its effect on cortical oscillation. The results revealed enhancement of α-band power specifically in preparation and movement stages and low ß-band power in the movement stage of a motor task. It postulated that CR stimulation may modify the motor cortical oscillation in the specific movement stages.