[Silencing ERp29 promotes the invasiveness of human PCa cells in vitro: Molecular mechanisms].

OBJECTIVE: To analyz the correlation of the expression of ERp29 with the clinicopathological characteristics of PCa and investigate the effect of small interfering RNA (siRNA) silencing the ERp29 gene on the biological behavior of PCa LNCaP cells. METHODS: The expression of the ERp29 gene in the BPH and PCa tissues was detected by immunohistochemistry and that of the ERp29 protein in the PCa and adjacent normal tissues of 6 PCa patients determined by Western blot. Human LNCaP cells were transfected with siRNA using LipofectamineTM 2000, and the expressions of ERp29 mRNA and protein in the LNCaP cells detected by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and Western blot, respectively. The proliferation of the LNCaP cells was measured by MTT assay, their in vitro migration and invasiveness evaluated by the Transwell method, and the expressions of E-cadherin and Vimentin determined by qRT-PCR. RESULTS: The expression of ERp29 was significantly lower in the PCa than in the adjacent normal tissue (73.9% vs 91.9%， P < 0.05), with a significant correlation between the down-regulated ERp29 expression and metastasis (M) staging (P < 0.05). After transfection with siRNA, the LNCaP cells showed dramatically increased proliferation, migration and invasiveness (P < 0.05), and the expression of E-cadherin was markedly down-regulated while that of Vimentin up-regulated as compared with those in the normal control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The ERp29 gene may be a novel repressor of tumor metastasis. Silencing ERp29 can promote the invasiveness of human PCa cells in vitro by down-regulating the expression of E-cadherin and increasing epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

lncARSR promotes liver cancer stem cells expansion via STAT3 pathway.

Liver cancer stem cells (CSCs) have important functions in tumorigenesis, progression, recurrence and drug resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). lncARSR has been reported to play an important role in the maintenance and self-renewal of renal cancer stem cells, but its role in liver cancer stem cells (CSCs) remains obscure. Herein, we observed high expression of lncARSR in chemoresistant hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). A remarkable increase of lncARSR expression in EpCAM or CD133-positive liver CSCs as well as in CSC-enriched hepatoma spheres. Interference lncARSR suppressed liver CSC expansion by inhibiting the dedifferentiation of hepatoma cells and decreasing the self-renewal ability of liver CSCs. Mechanistically, we found STAT3 as the downstream of lncARSR in HCC cells. The special STAT3 inhibitor S3I-201 abolished the discrepancy in liver CSC proportion and the self-renewal capacity between lncARSR knockdown hepatoma cells and control cells, which further confirmed that STAT3 was required in lncARSR promoted liver CSCs expansion. More importantly, interference lncARSR HCC cells were more sensitive to sorafenib or cisplatin treatment. This maybe means that patients with low lncARSR levels benefited from cisplatin or sorafenib treatment, but patients with high lncARSR expression did not. Conclusion: lncARSR was upregulated in liver CSCs and could promote HCC cells dedifferentiation and liver CSCs expansion by targeting STAT3 signaling.

Treatment of gallbladder stone with common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for stone can be carried out by either laparoscopic transcystic stone extraction (LTSE) or laparoscopic choledochotomy (LC). It remains unknown as to which approach is optimal for management of gallbladder stone with common bile duct stones (CBDS) in Chinese patients. METHODS: From May 2000 to February 2009, we prospective treated 346 consecutive patients with gallbladder stones and CBDS with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and LCBDE. Intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay and costs were analyzed. RESULTS: Because of LCBDE failure,16 cases (4.6%) required open surgery. Of 330 successful LCBDE-treated patients, 237 underwent LTSE and 93 required LC. No mortality occurred in either group. The bile duct stone clearance rate was similar in both groups. Patients in the LTSE group were significantly younger and had fewer complications with smaller, fewer stones, shorter operative time and postoperative hospital stays, and lower costs, compared to those in the LC group. Compared with patients with T-tube insertion, patients in the LC group with primary closure had shorter operative time, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower costs. CONCLUSIONS: In cases requiring LCBDE, LTSE should be the first choice, whereas LC may be restricted to large, multiple stones. LC with primary closure without external drainage of the CBDS is as effective and safe as the T-tube insertion approach.

Primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus T-tube.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is now one of the main methods for treating choledocholithiasis accompanied with cholelithiasis. The objective of our study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic primary closure for the treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones compared with T-tube drainage. METHODS: Patients who underwent CBD stones were studied prospectively from 2002-2012 in a single center. A total of 194 patients were randomly assigned to group A (LCBDE with primary closure) with 101 cases and group B (LCBDE with T-tube drainage) with 93 cases. Intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy were performed in all patients. Patient demographics, intraoperative findings, postoperative stay, complications, and hospital expenses were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: There was no mortality in the two groups. Four patients (3.96%) of group A were converted to open surgery, and three patients (3.23%) in group B. The mean operating time was much shorter in group A than in group B (102.6 ± 15.2 min versus 128.6 ± 20.4 min, P < 0.05). The length of postoperative hospital stay was longer in group B (4.9 ± 3.2 d) than in group A (3.2 ± 2.1 d). The hospital expenses were significantly lower in group A. Three patients experienced postoperative complications, which were related to the usage of the T-tube in group B. The incidences of overall postoperative complications were insignificantly lower in group A. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic primary closure of CBD is safe and effective for the management of CBD stones, and can be performed routinely as an alternative to T-tube drainage.

Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the common bile duct (CBD) is closed with T-tube drainage after choledochotomy and removal of CBD stones. However, the insertion of a T-tube is not without complication and the patients have to carry it for several weeks before removal. In the laparoscopic era, surgery is performed with minimally invasive techniques in order to reduce the trauma, hasten recovery, and reduce the hospital stay of patients. T-tube insertion seems to negate these benefits. This randomized study was designed to compare the two methods applied after LCBDE and to determine whether primary closure can be as safe as closure with T-tube drainage. METHODS: From May 2000 to January 2008, 93 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS) and gallbladder in situ were enrolled in this randomized study to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, postoperative stay, and hospital expenses were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: There was no mortality in both groups. A T-tube was inserted in 46 patients and the CBD was closed primarily in 47. There were no differences in the demographic characteristics or clinical presentations between the two groups. Compared with the T-tube group, the operative time and postoperative stay were significantly shorter, the hospital expenses were significantly lower, and the incidences of overall postoperative complications and biliary complications were statistically and insignificantly lower in the primary closure group. CONCLUSION: LCBDE with primary closure without external drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy is feasible and as safe as T-tube insertion.

Risk factors affecting conversion in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard in the treatment for cholelithiasis, but there are still some patients requiring conversion to open cholecystectomy for several factors. The objective of this study was to evaluate preoperative risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. METHODS: One thousand two hundred and sixty-five laparoscopic cholecystectomies were carried out from January 2005 to January 2006 in our hospital. Preoperative clinical, laboratory and radiographic parameters of these patients were kept prospectively and analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: Conversion to open cholecystectomy was needed in 94 patients (7.4%). The main reason for conversion was inability to safely display and identify anatomical structures of Calot's triangle correctly secondary to severe inflammation or dense adhesions, Multivariate analysis identified male sex, with Murphy's sign positive, gall bladder wall thickness > 4 mm and previous upper abdominal surgery as independent predictors of conversion rate to laparotomy. CONCLUSION: Preoperative risk factors evaluated by the present study confirm the likelihood of conversion. Recognition of these factors was important for understanding the characteristics of patients at a higher risk of conversion. Identifying risk factors will help the surgeon to plan and counsel the patients and introduce new policies.