Evidence-Based Decision Making 4: Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are systematically developed statements to assist practitioners and patient to reach appropriate health-care decisions. The synthesis and translation of a large amount of evidence into practice recommendations should ultimately reduce the use of unnecessary or harmful interventions, help patients to achieve maximum benefit, and minimize risk, all at an acceptable cost.In the past, CPGs were developed based on expert opinion, and using consensus methodology either formally or informally. Over the last 30 years, the evolution of increasingly transparent and robust methodology has led to more "evidence-based" recommendations. Clinical practice guidelines should be developed within the principles of bias minimization, systematic evidence retrieval and review, and a focus on patient relevant outcomes. Multiple nationally based and international groups now have published specific guidance for the development, dissemination, and evaluation of CPG.This chapter describes the key principles of CPG development, including the importance of updating, disseminating, and evaluating the impact of CPG , and attempts to differentiate CPG intended for populations of patients from "evidence-based decision making" for individual patients, recognizing that the fundamental principles are the same.

The pharmacokinetics of meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam during sustained low efficiency haemodiafiltration (SLED-HDF).

OBJECTIVE: We analysed the pharmacokinetics of meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam in patients undergoing a standardised session of sustained low efficiency haemodiafiltration (SLED-HDF) to inform the dosing of these drugs in an acute setting. PARTICIPANTS: Six stable patients with end-stage kidney disease. METHODS: An open-label pilot pharmacokinetic study of meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam. SLED-HDF was undertaken for 4 h. Plasma drug concentrations were measured pre- and post-filter and in the effluent at multiple time points. The pharmacokinetic data was analysed using non-compartmental methods. The fraction of time that individual plasma concentration profiles were predicted to remain above the MIC break-points for commonly isolated gram-negative pathogens during a prolonged SLED-HDF session was assessed using two targets; fT > MIC (fraction of time above the MIC) and the more aggressive fT > 4 × MIC (fraction of time above 4 × MIC). RESULTS: Meropenem total and SLED-HDF clearance ranged from 141 to 180 mL/min and 126-205 mL/min, respectively. Piperacillin total and SLED-HDF clearance values ranged from 131 to 252 mL/min and 135-162 mL/min, respectively. Our results suggest that prolonged SLED-HDF (12 h) will only maintain a sufficient meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam plasma concentration to achieve a target of fT > MIC for gram-negative pathogens (MIC 2 mg/L-meropenem, 8 mg/L-piperacillin-tazobactam) for less than 40% of the time. Plasma concentrations would be inadequate to achieve the more aggressive target of 100 % fT > 4xMIC target recommended for critically unwell patients. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic data obtained from this pilot study demonstrate significant quantities of meropenem and piperacillin are removed during a SLED-HDF session. This may lead to subtherapeutic concentrations of piperacillin and meropenem over the duration of HDF session. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australasian Clinical Trials Registry Network (ACTRN12616000078459).