The motivation to obtain nicotine-conditioned reinforcers depends on nicotine dose.

Stimuli associated with nicotine (NIC) can acquire new meaning via Pavlovian conditioning. If a stimulus is associated with the primary reinforcing effects of NIC, the new conditional properties of the stimulus should make it a more valuable reinforcer (i.e., increase the motivation to obtain the stimulus), and this value should be based, in part, on the strength or intensity of the primary reinforcer (i.e., NIC dose). The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether NIC-conditioned reinforcement increased motivation to obtain non-NIC stimuli, as reflected by performance on a progressive ratio (PR) reinforcement schedule, and whether this increased motivation was systematically related to NIC dose. Two Paired groups were allowed to nose-poke for NIC (0.03 or 0.09mg/kg/infusion, IV) accompanied by 15-s illumination of a stimulus light (conditional stimulus or CS). Two Unpaired groups (0.03 or 0.09mg/kg/infusion) could also make a nose-poke response for the CS; however their NIC infusions were controlled by the Paired group (i.e., yoked design). A fifth group (CS-Only) was allowed to nose-poke for CS presentations and saline infusions. After 29 conditioning sessions the nose-poke operant was prevented by obscuring the receptacle and the CS (accompanied by saline infusion for all groups) was made contingent upon a novel operant response (lever press). During the acquisition of this novel response, each CS/saline infusion earned increased the number of responses required to earn the next CS/saline infusion. Pairings with the primary reinforcing effects of NIC resulted the acquisition of a novel response for the CS. Motivation to obtain the CS depended on salience (dose) of the primary reinforcement (NIC).

Repeated administration of the D1/5 antagonist ecopipam fails to attenuate the subjective effects of cocaine.

RATIONALE: Dopaminergic compounds have been targeted as potential treatments for cocaine abuse because of the known role of dopamine systems in drug reinforcement. Recent preclinical and human data have focused on the D1/5 antagonist, SCH 39166 (ecopipam), as a potential therapeutic agent. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to determine whether treatment with chronic ecopipam can blunt or block the subjective effects of cocaine in the absence of significant behavioral impairment or toxic physiological effects. METHODS: Four doses of ecopipam (0, 10, 25, and 100 mg p.o.) were administered daily for 1 week each in double-blind, random order to inpatient cocaine-dependent volunteers (n = 10). Cocaine challenge doses (0, 25, and 50 mg/70 kg i.v.) were administered on the 7th day in ascending order, 1 h apart. RESULTS: Ecopipam alone produced reliable dose-dependent deficits in performance on the digit symbol substitution task (DSST) and the circular lights task, but not a balance task. Impairment on the DSST waned with repeated dosing suggesting the development of tolerance. Ecopipam resulted in few direct subjective effects. Cocaine alone produced dose-dependent changes in prototypic subjective and physiological measures, however, ecopipam largely failed to alter either cocaine's direct effects or the desire for cocaine. CONCLUSIONS: Although the performance effects verify that these doses of ecopipam were behaviorally active, the absence of an attenuation of cocaine's effects of craving for cocaine in this chronic dosing paradigm suggests this compound is unlikely to be an effective pharmacotherapy for cocaine abuse.

Cue dependency of nicotine self-administration and smoking.

A paradox exists regarding the reinforcing properties of nicotine. The abuse liability associated with smoking equals or exceeds that of other addictive drugs, yet the euphoric, reinforcing and other psychological effects of nicotine, compared to these other drugs, are more subtle, are manifest under more restricted conditions, and do not readily predict the difficulty most smokers experience in achieving abstinence. One possible resolution to this apparent inconsistency is that environmental cues associated with drug delivery become conditioned reinforcers and take on powerful incentive properties that are critically important for sustaining smoking in humans and nicotine self-administration in animals. We tested this hypothesis by using a widely employed self-administration paradigm in which rats press a lever at high rates for 1 h/day to obtain intravenous infusions of nicotine that are paired with two types of visual stimuli: a chamber light that when turned on signals drug availability and a 1-s cue light that signals drug delivery. We show that these visual cues are at least as important as nicotine in sustaining a high rate of responding once self-administration has been established, in the degree to which withdrawing nicotine extinguishes the behavior, and in the reinstatement of lever pressing after extinction. Additional studies demonstrated that the importance of these cues was manifest under both fixed ratio and progressive ratio (PR) schedules of reinforcement. The possibility that nicotine-paired cues are as important as nicotine in smoking behavior should refocus our attention on the psychology and neurobiology of conditioned reinforcers in order to stimulate the development of more effective treatment programs for smoking cessation.

Nicotine self-administration in rats: estrous cycle effects, sex differences and nicotinic receptor binding.

RATIONALE: Research on smoking behavior and responsiveness to nicotine suggests that nicotine's effects may depend on the sex of the organism. OBJECTIVE: The present study addressed four questions: 1) Will female rats self-administer nicotine? 2) Does self-administration by females vary as a function of estrous cycle? 3) Does self-administration by females differ from that of males? 4) Does self-administration of nicotine result in up-regulation of nicotinic receptor binding and are these changes similar in males and females? METHODS: Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were allowed to self-administer nicotine at one of four doses (0.02-0.09 mg/kg, free base) on both fixed and progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement. RESULTS: Females acquired nicotine self-administration across the entire range of doses. Acquisition of self-administration at the lowest dose was faster in females than males. However, few sex differences were found in the number of active responses, number of infusions, or total intake of nicotine during stable fixed ratio self-administration. In contrast, females reached higher break points on a progressive ratio. For both schedules, females had shorter latencies to earn their first infusion of each session and demonstrated higher rates of both inactive and timeout responding. There was no effect of estrous cycle on self-administration during either fixed or progressive ratio sessions. Self-administered nicotine resulted in average arterial plasma nicotine levels between 53 and 193 ng/ml and left hemi-brain levels between 174 and 655 ng/g, depending on dose. Nicotine self-administration produced similar up-regulation of nicotinic receptor binding sites in males and females, as reflected by increased right hemi-brain binding of [3H]-epibatidine, when compared to the brains of untreated control rats. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that while males and females may regulate their intake of nicotine similarly under limited access conditions, the motivation to obtain nicotine is higher in females.

Differential effects of response-contingent and response-independent nicotine in rats.

Passive administration of nicotine activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis and sympathetic nervous system. However, little is known about the effects of self-administered nicotine. Drug-naive rats were trained to respond for food reinforcement and then tested in one, 1-h session in which they received response-contingent i.v. nicotine or response-independent i.v. nicotine or saline. Blood draws were taken immediately prior to the session, 15 min after the first infusion and immediately after the session. Both response-contingent and response-independent nicotine (RI/N) increased corticosterone within 15 min, however, corticosterone levels returned to baseline in animals receiving response-contingent nicotine (RC/N) by the end of the session while remaining elevated in those receiving RI/N. Furthermore, only RI/N increased plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine levels; RC/N produced no effect. These differences indicate that nicotine's acute effects are powerfully modified by the presence of a contingency relationship between drug administration and the animal's behavior and that this relationship develops very rapidly.

Mecamylamine prevents tolerance but enhances whole brain [3H]epibatidine binding in response to repeated nicotine administration in rats.

RATIONALE: Chronic administration of nicotine in rats results in upregulation of neuronal nicotinic receptors. Upregulation has been proposed to reflect receptor desensitization, which may underlie functional tolerance to nicotine's effects. However, evidence indicates that tolerance and upregulation do not always parallel each other, suggesting that either upregulation does not always reflect desensitization, or mechanisms other than receptor desensitization account for tolerance to nicotine. OBJECTIVES: The present studies examined tolerance to nicotine-induced antinociception and changes in receptor binding after two regimens of intermittent nicotine injections in rats. The role of receptor activation in upregulation and tolerance was also examined by co-administering nicotine with the non-competitive antagonist, mecamylamine. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were administered a short (once-daily, s.c. for 6 days (0.35 mg/kg)) or long (twice-daily for 11 days (0.66 mg/kg)) series of injections and tolerance to nicotine-induced antinociception and [3H]epibatidine binding in whole brain were measured. RESULTS: The short series of injections resulted in tolerance to nicotine-induced antinociception, but failed to increase [3H]epibatidine binding. In contrast, the long series of injections resulted in both tolerance and increased receptor binding. Once-daily pairings of mecamylamine (1 mg/kg, s.c.) with nicotine (0.35 mg/kg) for 6 days blocked the development of tolerance, indicating receptor activation is necessary for tolerance to occur. Pairing mecamylamine with nicotine (0.66 mg/kg) twice daily for 11 days blocked tolerance but produced a greater increase in [3H]epibatidine binding than nicotine alone. CONCLUSIONS: A dissociation of tolerance from receptor upregulation was observed in the present study. The finding that receptor activation may be necessary for tolerance but not upregulation is discussed within the context of possible mechanisms controlling tolerance to nicotine.

Nicotine self-administration in rats on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement.

RATIONALE: Robust intravenous (i.v.) nicotine self-administration (SA) in rats has been reported by several laboratories, including our own, using fixed ratio (FR) schedules of reinforcement. Studies on other drugs of abuse, however, suggest that progressive ratio (PR) schedules may provide additional information not gained using FR schedules. OBJECTIVE: Here, we attempt to establish and characterize nicotine SA on a PR. METHODS: One study allowed animals to acquire SA on a FR at four doses of nicotine (0.02, 0.03, 0.06, 0. 09 mg/kg) before being switched to a PR. A second study examined extinction by saline substitution or pretreatment with the nicotinic antagonist, mecamylamine, including a preliminary analysis into the role of secondary reinforcers in the extinction process. RESULTS: SA of nicotine on a PR was stable across repeated sessions. The number of infusions earned on a PR correlated with infusion rate on a FR; however, a large portion of the variance in SA on a PR could not be accounted for by infusion rate on a FR. Infusions on a PR increased across the same range of doses that produced a decrease in the infusion rate on a FR. Extinction of responding occurred after saline substitution or pretreatment with mecamylamine, and animals re-acquired when nicotine was again available without pretreatment. The presence of drug-paired stimuli appeared to lengthen the extinction process. CONCLUSIONS: Nicotine supports stable SA on a PR. Since PR and FR schedules may measure different aspects of nicotine reinforcement, PR schedules may be valuable in further characterizing group and individual differences in nicotine reinforcement.

The role of corticosteroids in nicotine's physiological and behavioral effects.

This paper reviews evidence indicating that adrenal corticosteroids modulate the responsiveness of mice and rats to nicotine. Adrenalectomy increases, and both acute and chronic corticosteroid administration decrease, some of the physiological and behavioral effects of nicotine. One function of adrenal steroids may be to regulate stress-induced changes in nicotine sensitivity. Another is to mediate the development of chronic tolerance when nicotine is given intermittently, and when the resulting tolerance has a learned component. A role of glucocorticoids in the development of tolerance to nicotine is suggested by the findings that a conditioned elevation of plasma corticosterone, which anticipates nicotine delivery, accompanies the development of chronic tolerance and that environmental cues evoke a conditioned corticosterone response, but only after they have become associated with nicotine delivery. The mechanisms by which adrenal steroids modulate nicotine sensitivity are not known, although recent in vitro evidence suggests that steroids can rapidly and reversibly reduce nicotinic receptor function. While most of the data are consistent with the hypothesis that corticosteroids reduce nicotine responsiveness, and thus promote a learned form of tolerance, there are new findings that corticosteroids increase the development of sensitization to the locomotor-activating effects of nicotine. These data suggest that formulations postulating a unidirectional effect of corticosteroids on nicotine's actions (e.g. decreased sensitivity) must be revised to take into account interacting variables such as the specific nicotine effect being studied and whether that effect normally exhibits tolerance or sensitization. Finally, research is presented which indicates that the corticosterone-elevating effects of nicotine, previously reported for experimenter-administered drug, are also produced when nicotine administration is contingent on an operant response, and at a dose which sustains the development of nicotine self-administration in rats. These findings highlight the feasibility of using self-administration models in future explorations of the relationship between adrenal steroids and nicotine function.

The effects of nicotine on the immune system.

Although considerable work has been done on the potential health effects of smoking, little is known about the contribution of nicotine to those effects. This paper presents an overview of the immune system, and a discussion of the existing literature on the effects of tobacco smoke and nicotine on immunity. Treatment with nicotine has been shown to influence all aspects of the immune system, including alterations in humoral and cellular immunity. In addition, preliminary data suggest that gender and genetic factors impact on the immunological effects of nicotine. Finally, the possible mechanisms that might mediate the effects of nicotine are discussed.

Acquisition of nicotine self-administration in rats: the effects of dose, feeding schedule, and drug contingency.

The studies presented here were designed to further clarify the nature of nicotine self-administration (SA) based on a limited access model in which rats are food restricted, receive operant training using food reinforcement, and are then tested in daily 1-h drug sessions. We examined the effects of dose, feeding schedule, and contingency of drug delivery on acquisition of nicotine SA. Two doses of nicotine bitartrate, 0.03 and 0.06 mg/kg per infusion (free base), supported the transition from food-reinforced to drug-reinforced responding, although the pattern of behavior differed between these doses. In contrast, 0.01 mg/kg per infusion failed to maintain nicotine SA. In a second study, animals were divided into three groups according to feeding schedule. Rats that were both weight restricted and food deprived showed the highest level of SA behavior, although neither food deprivation nor weight restriction was necessary to establish SA. In the third experiment, rats that were switched from food to nicotine as the response-dependent reinforcer maintained higher response rates throughout a 9-day period than animals switched to response-independent (i.e., yoked) nicotine which showed minimal responding after day 1. Furthermore, the differences between self-administering and yoked animals emerged during the first session, suggesting that nicotine may serve as a reinforcer during the first drug exposure in naive animals. These results indicate that acquisition of nicotine SA can be influenced by both dose of nicotine and feeding schedule and that, in animals previously trained on a food-reinforced operant, active lever pressing is maintained only when nicotine delivery is contingent upon responding.

Nicotine self-administration in rats.

Considering the importance of self-administration models in determining mechanisms of drug maintained behavior, we attempted to replicate the findings of nicotine self-administration by Corrigall and Coen. Male, Sprague-Dawley rats, trained on food reinforcement, acquired relatively high and stable rates of self-administration of IV nicotine bitartrate (0.03 mg/kg, free base). Extinction and reacquisition followed substituting saline and then nicotine, respectively. Responses, infusions and intake decreased at 0.003 mg/kg, while intake increased at 0.06 mg/kg. This model of nicotine self-administration provides a reliable alternative to experimenter-administration models for examining the effects of nicotine.