EEG synchronized left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for treatment resistant depression is feasible and produces an entrainment dependent clinical response: A randomized controlled double blind clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Synchronizing a TMS pulse with a person's underlying EEG rhythm can modify the brain's response. It is unclear if synchronizing rTMS trains might boost the antidepressant effect of TMS. In this first-in-human trial, we demonstrated that a single TMS pulse over the prefrontal cortex produces larger effects in the anterior cingulate depending on when it is fired relative to the individual's EEG alpha phase. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESES: We had three hypotheses. 1) It is feasible to synchronize repetitive TMS (rTMS) delivery to a person's preferred prefrontal alpha phase in each train of every session during a 30-visit TMS depression treatment course. 2) EEG-synchronized rTMS would produce progressive entrainment greater than unsynchronized (UNSYNC) rTMS. And 3) SYNC TMS would have better antidepressant effects than UNSYNC (remission, final Hamilton Depression Rating <10). METHODS: We enrolled (n = 34) and treated (n = 28) adults with treatment resistant depression (TRD) and randomized them to receive six weeks (30 treatments) of left prefrontal rTMS at their individual alpha frequency (IAF) (range 6-13 Hz). Prior to starting the clinical trial, all patients had an interleaved fMRI-EEG-TMS (fET) scan to determine which phase of their alpha rhythm would produce the largest BOLD response in their dorsal anterior cingulate. Our clinical EEG-rTMS system then delivered the first TMS pulse in each train time-locked to this patient-specific 'preferred phase' of each patient's left prefrontal alpha oscillation. We randomized patients (1:1) to SYNC or UNSYNC, and all were treated at their IAF. Only the SYNC patients had the first pulse of each train for all sessions synchronized to their individualized preferred alpha phase (75 trains/session ×30 sessions, 2250 synchronizations per patient over six weeks). The UNSYNC group used a random firing with respect to the alpha wave. All other TMS parameters were balanced between the two groups. The system interfaced with a MagStim Horizon air-cooled Fig. 8 TMS coil. All patients were treated at their IAF, coil in the F3 position, 120 % MT, frequency 6-13 Hz, 40 pulses per train, average 15-s inter-train interval, 3000 pulses per session. All patients, raters, and treaters were blinded. RESULTS: In the intent to treat (ITT) sample, both groups had significant clinical improvement from baseline with no significant between-group differences, with the USYNC group having mathematically more remitters but fewer responders. (ITT -15 SYNC; 13 UNSYNC, response 5 (33 %), 1 (7 %), remission 2 (13 %), 6 (46 %). The same was true with the completer sample - 12 SYNC; 12 UNSYNC, response 4, 4 (both 30 %), remission 2 (17 %), 3 (25 %)). The clinical EEG phase synchronization system performed well with no failures. The average treatment session was approximately 90 min, with 30 min for placing the EEG cap and the actual TMS treatment for 45 min (which included gathering 10 min of resting EEG). Four subjects (1 SYNC) withdrew before six weeks of treatment. All 24 completer patients were treated for six weeks despite the trial occurring during the COVID pandemic. SYNC patients exhibited increased post-stimulation EEG entrainment over the six weeks. A detailed secondary analysis of entrainment data in the SYNC group showed that responders and non-responders in this group could be cleanly separated based on the total number of sessions with entrainment and the session-to-session precision of the entrained phase. For the SYNC group only, depression improvement was greater when more sessions were entrained at similar phases. CONCLUSIONS: Synchronizing prefrontal TMS with a patient's prefrontal alpha frequency in a blinded clinical trial is possible and produces progressive EEG entrainment in synchronized patients only. There was no difference in overall clinical response in this small clinical trial. A secondary analysis showed that the consistency of the entrained phase across sessions was significantly associated with response outcome only in the SYNC group. These effects may not simply be due to how the stimulation is delivered but also whether the patient's brain can reliably entrain to a precise phase. EEG-synchronized clinical delivery of TMS is feasible and requires further study to determine the best method for determining the phase for synchronization.

Biomarkers predict the efficacy of closed-loop rTMS treatment for refractory depression.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive FDA-approved therapy for major depressive disorder (MDD), specifically for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Though offering promise for those with TRD, its effectiveness is less than one in two patients (i.e., less than 50%). Limits on efficacy may be due to individual patient variability, but to date, there are no established biomarkers or measures of target engagement that can predict efficacy. Additionally, TMS efficacy is typically not assessed until a six-week treatment ends, precluding interim re-evaluations of the treatment. Here, we report results using a closed-loop phase-locked repetitive TMS (rTMS) treatment that synchronizes the delivery of rTMS based on the timing of the pulses relative to a patient's individual electroencephalographic (EEG) prefrontal alpha oscillation indexed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Among responders, synchronized rTMS produces two systematic changes in brain dynamics: a reduction in global cortical excitability and enhanced phase entrainment of cortical dynamics. These effects predict clinical outcomes in the synchronized treatment group but not in an active-treatment unsynchronized control group. The systematic decrease in excitability and increase in entrainment correlated with treatment efficacy at the endpoint and intermediate weeks during the synchronized treatment. Specifically, we show that weekly biomarker tracking enables efficacy prediction and dynamic adjustments through a treatment course, improving the overall response rates. This innovative approach advances the prospects of individualized medicine in MDD and holds potential for application in other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Increased entrainment and decreased excitability predict efficacious treatment of closed-loop phase-locked rTMS for treatment-resistant depression.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an FDA-approved therapy for major depressive disorder (MDD), specifically for patients who have treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, TMS produces response or remission in about 50% of patients but is ineffective for the other 50%. Limits on efficacy may be due to individual patient variability, but to date, there are no good biomarkers or measures of target engagement. In addition, TMS efficacy is typically not assessed until a six-week treatment ends, precluding the evaluation of intermediate improvements during the treatment duration. Here, we report on results using a closed-loop phase-locked repetitive TMS (rTMS) treatment that synchronizes the delivery of rTMS based on the timing of the pulses relative to a patient's individual electroencephalographic (EEG) prefrontal alpha oscillation informed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We find that, in responders, synchronized delivery of rTMS produces two systematic changes in brain dynamics. The first change is a decrease in global cortical excitability, and the second is an increase in the phase entrainment of cortical dynamics. These two effects predict clinical outcomes in the synchronized treatment group but not in an active-treatment unsynchronized control group. The systematic decrease in excitability and increase in entrainment correlated with treatment efficacy at the endpoint and intermediate weeks during the synchronized treatment. Specifically, we show that weekly tracking of these biomarkers allows for efficacy prediction and potential of dynamic adjustments through a treatment course, improving the overall response rates.

The timing of transcranial magnetic stimulation relative to the phase of prefrontal alpha EEG modulates downstream target engagement.

BACKGROUND: The communication through coherence model posits that brain rhythms are synchronized across different frequency bands and that effective connectivity strength between interacting regions depends on their phase relation. Evidence to support the model comes mostly from electrophysiological recordings in animals while evidence from human data is limited. METHODS: Here, an fMRI-EEG-TMS (fET) instrument capable of acquiring simultaneous fMRI and EEG during noninvasive single pulse TMS applied to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was used to test whether prefrontal EEG alpha phase moderates TMS-evoked top-down influences on subgenual, rostral and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Six runs (276 total trials) were acquired in each participant. Phase at each TMS pulse was determined post-hoc using single-trial sorting. Results were examined in two independent datasets: healthy volunteers (HV) (n = 11) and patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 17) collected as part of an ongoing clinical trial. RESULTS: In both groups, TMS-evoked functional connectivity between DLPFC and subgenual ACC (sgACC) depended on the EEG alpha phase. TMS-evoked DLPFC to sgACC fMRI-derived effective connectivity (EC) was modulated by EEG alpha phase in healthy volunteers, but not in the MDD patients. Top-down EC was inhibitory for TMS pulses during the upward slope of the alpha wave relative to TMS timed to the downward slope of the alpha wave. Prefrontal EEG alpha phase dependent effects on TMS-evoked fMRI BOLD activation of the rostral anterior cingulate cortex were detected in the MDD patient group, but not in the healthy volunteer group. DISCUSSION: Results demonstrate that TMS-evoked top-down influences vary as a function of the prefrontal alpha rhythm, and suggest potential clinical applications whereby TMS is synchronized to the brain's internal rhythms in order to more efficiently engage deep therapeutic targets.

Daily prefrontal closed-loop repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) produces progressive EEG quasi-alpha phase entrainment in depressed adults.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation modality that can treat depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, or help smoking cessation. Research suggests that timing the delivery of TMS relative to an endogenous brain state may affect efficacy and short-term brain dynamics. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether, for a multi-week daily treatment of repetitive TMS (rTMS), there is an effect on brain dynamics that depends on the timing of the TMS relative to individuals' prefrontal EEG quasi-alpha rhythm (between 6 and 13 Hz). METHOD: We developed a novel closed-loop system that delivers personalized EEG-triggered rTMS to patients undergoing treatment for major depressive disorder. In a double blind study, patients received daily treatments of rTMS over a period of six weeks and were randomly assigned to either a synchronized or unsynchronized treatment group, where synchronization of rTMS was to their prefrontal EEG quasi-alpha rhythm. RESULTS: When rTMS is applied over the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and synchronized to the patient's prefrontal quasi-alpha rhythm, patients develop strong phase entrainment over a period of weeks, both over the stimulation site as well as in a subset of areas distal to the stimulation site. In addition, at the end of the course of treatment, this group's entrainment phase shifts to be closer to the phase that optimally engages the distal target, namely the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). These entrainment effects are not observed in the group that is given rTMS without initial EEG synchronization of each TMS train. CONCLUSIONS: The entrainment effects build over the course of days/weeks, suggesting that these effects engage neuroplastic changes which may have clinical consequences in depression or other diseases.