RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rapid distraction of the periodontal ligament is an effective method to shorten the orthodontic treatment time. The objectives of the present study were to assess the effects of an HYCON device (Adenta GmbH, Germany) on the rate of en masse retraction of the anterior teeth, duration of retraction, anchorage loss, root resorption, and soft tissue changes. METHODS: This study was conducted on 60 female patients aged >18 years, divided randomly into two equal groups: Group 1 comprised 30 patients with HYCON, and group 2 comprised 30 patients with nickel-titanium closed coil springs. Skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes were evaluated on pre- and post-retraction lateral cephalograms, and the rates of anterior tooth movement and anchorage loss were assessed monthly on the dental casts of the patients. Root resorption was assessed using intraoral periapical radiograph. Student's t test was used for the analysis of parametric data, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for nonparametric data. RESULTS: HYCON significantly shortened the retraction duration by 3 months. The rate of anterior teeth retraction was two times faster in group 1, compared with group 2. There was a significant difference in the anchorage loss between the groups in only first 2 months of treatment. Group 2 showed significantly more root resorption and soft tissue changes than group 1 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HYCON is an effective device for significantly shortening the duration of retraction with anchorage loss of 2 to 2.5 mm. However, careful monitoring for possible root resorption should be performed.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Traumatic mandibular fractures are the most common fractures of the facial region and are associated with loss of neurosensation in the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). The present study aimed to compare IAN recovery after traumatic mandibular fractures between the open and closed reduction methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 90 patients with traumatic mandibular fractures of the body, angle, and symphysis, divided into two groups of 45 patients: group 1 was treated with closed reduction and fixation with rich arch-bar fixation under local anesthesia, and group 2 was treated with open reduction and rigid internal fixation with 2-mm titanium mini plates and monocortical screws (6 mm), and the plate was fixed to the fractured bony fragments. All patients underwent neurosensory testing using the Zuniga and Essick algorithm at baseline (preoperative), one week after surgery (postoperative), at three months, and at six months of follow-up. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in IAN recovery between the groups. The most common site of fracture was the body (44% in group 1 and 56% in group 2). The maximum recovery was observed in the younger age group (25-30 years). At baseline, functional nerve recovery was observed in 40 cases (88%) in group 1 and 38 cases (84%) in group 2, and the difference was not statistically significant. Levels A and B tests were affected by surgical management and improved after three months. The total recovery in group 1 ranged from 60% to 80%, and that in group 2 ranged from 56% to 72%. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of the current study, both methods are recommended for surgical management of traumatic mandibular fractures with IAN recovery in 60-80% of cases six months postoperatively.
