Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Br J Gen Pract ; 73(727): e88-e94, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36127155

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: International variations in cancer outcomes persist and may be influenced by differences in the accessibility and organisation of cancer patient pathways. More evidence is needed to understand to what extent variations in the structure of primary care referral pathways for cancer investigation contribute to differences in the timeliness of diagnoses and cancer outcomes in different countries. AIM: To explore the variation in primary care referral pathways for the management of suspected cancer across different countries. DESIGN AND SETTING: Descriptive comparative analysis using mixed methods across the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) countries. METHOD: Schematics of primary care referral pathways were developed across 10 ICBP jurisdictions. The schematics were initially developed using the Aarhus statement (a resource providing greater insight and precision into early cancer diagnosis research) and were further supplemented with expert insights through consulting leading experts in primary care and cancer, existing ICBP data, a focused review of existing evidence on the management of suspected cancer, published primary care cancer guidelines, and evaluations of referral tools and initiatives in primary care. RESULTS: Referral pathway schematics for 10 ICBP jurisdictions were presented alongside a descriptive comparison of the organisation of primary care management of suspected cancer. Several key areas of variation across countries were identified: inflexibility of referral pathways, lack of a managed route for non-specific symptoms, primary care practitioner decision-making autonomy, direct access to investigations, and use of emergency routes. CONCLUSION: Analysing the differences in referral processes can prompt further research to better understand the impact of variation on the timeliness of diagnoses and cancer outcomes. Studying these schematics in local contexts may help to identify opportunities to improve care and facilitate discussions on what may constitute best referral practice.


Assuntos
Benchmarking , Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Atenção Primária à Saúde
4.
BMJ Support Palliat Care ; 5 Suppl 1: A22, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25960496

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During strategy consultation in Northern Ireland an "End of Life Care Passport" was suggested as a way to address myriad communication difficulties involved in living with evolving illness. AIM: To build a patient-owned communication tool to facilitate important conversations and capture key information as health changes. METHODS: Participatory action methods used to engage service users, carers, patient advocates, and healthcare professionals. Views harnessed via: face to face, email, telephone, via series of workshops. Iterative process of drafting, dissemination, evaluation, re drafting. Pilot version launched (350 disseminated): used for a 3 month evaluative period by 3 groups: living with dementia, with motor neurone disease, with advanced respiratory illness. Feedback widely sought from participating individuals and groups. RESULTS: The emergent tool(1) very different from originally envisaged. Key issues include widespread rejection of "End of Life Care Passport" (felt to be professionally based perspective); very high level of engagement with the process, imperative to develop a tool which focusses on language and communication needs of patient and carers rather than professionals. Emergent tool contains ten sections and brief explanatory content. Housed as A5 portable ring binder (e-version suggested), updated collaboratively by patient, carers, key supporters, professionals. CONCLUSION: Patients and carers face multiple communication difficulties negotiating changing health. At particular risk are those with rare illness and those whose capacity is limited due to illness, language or cultural barriers. There is a role for a communication tool which houses key evolving information, is completed collaboratively and patient owned and controlled. REFERENCE: http://www.rcgp.org.uk/rcgp-near-you/rcgp-northern-ireland/my-healthcare-passport.aspx.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA