Mohs micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinomas: appropriateness of 'Rotterdam' criteria and predictive factors for three or more stages.

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands basal cell carcinomas (BCC) are eligible for Mohs microscopic surgery (MMS) if certain criteria are fulfilled. OBJECTIVE: To study the MMS indication criteria practised at the department of dermatology of the Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam and to identify predictive factors for extensive subclinical tumour spread among BCCs eligible for MMS. METHODS: Pre-operative patient and tumour characteristics were derived retrospectively between January 2nd 2006 and December 28th 2009 from 1174 patient records, accounting for 1464 BCCs. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to calculate crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for one vs. two or more stages and for narrow (≤ 2 stages) vs. extensive subclinical spread (≥ 3 stages). RESULTS: H-zone location [adjusted OR 1.51 (95% CI 1.16-1.96)], recurrent tumour [adjusted OR 1.50 (95% CI 1.11-2.02)], aggressive subtype [adjusted OR 1.25 (95% CI 1.01-1.56)] and tumour size ≥ 11 mm [adjusted OR 1.53 (95% CI 1.20-1.96)] were significantly associated with two or more stages. Predictive factors for extensive subclinical spread were recurrent tumour [adjusted OR 2.26 (95% CI 1.61-3.17)], tumour size ≥ 21 mm [adjusted OR 1.69 (95% CI 1.13-2.51)] and location in the H-zone [adjusted OR 1.68 (95% CI 1.15-2.46)]. CONCLUSION: 'Rotterdam' indication criteria used for MMS are appropriate. Predictors for extensive subclinical spread are important for patients' and surgeons' expectations prior to the operation about time span, defect size, reconstruction and possible associated morbidity.

Efficacy of risedronate in men with primary and secondary osteoporosis: results of a 1-year study.

Osteoporosis is prevalent in men with an estimated one in eight men older than 50 years suffering from osteoporotic fracture, and a higher mortality rate after fracture among men compared with women. There are few approved therapies for osteoporosis in men. This observational study assesses the efficacy and safety of risedronate in the treatment of men with primary and secondary osteoporosis. A single-center, open label, randomized, prospective 1-year study was conducted in men with primary or secondary osteoporosis. Patients were randomized to risedronate (risedronate 5 mg/day plus calcium 1,000 mg/day and vitamin D 800 IU/day) or control groups (alfacalcidol 1 mug/day plus calcium 500 mg/day or vitamin D 1,000 IU/day plus calcium 800 mg/day). Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements, X-rays of the spine, a medical history and physical exam, and patient self-assessments of back pain were performed at baseline and 12 months. Blinded semi-quantitative fracture assessment was conducted by a radiologist. A total of 316 men with osteoporosis were enrolled in the trial (risedronate, n=158; control, n=158). At 1 year lumbar spine BMD increased by 4.7% in the risedronate group versus an increase of 1.0% in the control group (P<0.001). Significant increases in BMD at the total hip and femoral neck were also observed with risedronate compared with the control group. The incidence of new vertebral fracture in the risedronate group was reduced by 60% versus the control group (P=0.028). Daily treatment with risedronate for 12 months significantly increased BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip and significantly reduced the incidence of new vertebral fractures. This is the first prospective, randomized, controlled trial to demonstrate a significant reduction in vertebral fractures in 1 year in men with primary or secondary osteoporosis.

Effective and rapid treatment of painful localized transient osteoporosis (bone marrow edema) with intravenous ibandronate.

Localized transient osteoporosis (LTO; bone marrow edema syndrome) is a rare disorder of generally unknown etiology that is characterized by acute onset of disabling bone pain. Treatment options are currently limited and largely ineffective. The locally increased bone turnover and low bone mineral density (BMD) typical of LTO indicate a potential role for bisphosphonate therapy. Ibandronate, a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, has proven efficacy in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis and corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis when administered as a convenient intermittent intravenous (i.v.) injection with a between-dose interval of 2 or 3 months. In a study of 12 patients with LTO, ibandronate was administered as an initial 4-mg i.v. dose with a second, optional injection of 2 mg at 3 months. Daily calcium and vitamin D supplements were provided. Pain was measured at baseline and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months using a visual analog scale (VAS) of 1-10, and BMD was measured at baseline and 6 months. I.v. ibandronate provided rapid and substantial pain relief. The mean (SD) VAS score decreased from 8.4 (1.3) at baseline to 0.5 (0.7) at 6 months, at which time seven patients had achieved complete pain relief. At 6 months, mean lumbar spine BMD had increased by 4.0% (range -0.8 to 7.7%) in the overall population. I.v. ibandronate injection affords advantages over currently available oral and i.v. bisphosphonates and thus offers a promising therapeutic advance in the treatment of LTO.

Efficacy of etidronate and sequential monofluorophosphate in severe postmenopausal osteoporosis: a pilot study.

In a three-year pilot study on 52 women with severe postmenopausal osteoporosis, treatment with etidronate followed by calcium and vitamin D (ECaD) was compared to etidronate followed by monofluorophosphate, calcium and vitamin D (EFCaD). BMD in lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck increased significantly more with EFCaD than with ECaD. Pain-mobility score decreased significantly more with EFCaD than with ECaD (p=0.006). New vertebral fractures occurred in three patients under EFCaD (12%) and in nine under ECaD (35%), (p=0.048). Three patients under EFCaD (12%) and 15 under ECaD (58%) did not respond to therapy (p of difference=0.001). Mild or moderate adverse reactions were reported by 25 patients, with no significant difference between the two groups. The pilot study suggests that etidronate, sequentially followed by monofluorophosphate, could be a safe, effective and relatively inexpensive therapy in severe postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Alendronate treatment of established primary osteoporosis in men: 3-year results of a prospective, comparative, two-arm study.

Our trial was a 3-year, open-label, prospective, comparative, clinical study comparing the effects of oral alendronate (ALN), 10 mg daily, and alfacalcidol (AC), 1 microg daily, on bone mineral density (BMD), fracture events, height, back pain, safety and tolerability in 134 men with established primary osteoporosis. All men received 500 mg calcium daily. BMD was measured at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Spine radiographs were obtained at baseline and every 12 months thereafter, and were evaluated by a radiologist blinded to treatment assignment. At 3 years, AC-treated patients showed a significant mean increase of 3.5% in lumbar spine BMD, compared with a mean increase of 11.5% in men receiving ALN ( p<0.0001 between groups). The corresponding increases in femoral neck BMD were 2.3% and 5.8% for the AC and ALN groups, respectively ( p=0.0015 between groups). Over 3 years, new vertebral fractures occurred in 24.2% of the AC-treated patients and in 10.3% of the ALN-treated patients ( p=0.040). ALN-treated patients also had a significantly lower height loss. There were no between-group differences regarding nonvertebral fractures or changes in back pain. Both therapies were well tolerated, with a compliance rate >90%. We conclude that although AC has significant effects on BMD, ALN has greater effects on BMD and fracture efficacy.

Superiority of alfacalcidol over plain vitamin D in the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Supplementation therapy with plain vitamin D plus calcium is in general regarded as effective prevention or first-step treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). The aim of our study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of the D-hormone analog alfacalcidol with plain vitamin D in patients with established GIOP with or without vertebral fractures. Patients on long-term glucocorticoid (GC) therapy were included as matched pairs to receive randomly either 1 microg alfacalcidol plus 500 mg calcium per day (group A, n=103) or 1000 IU vitamin D3 plus 500 mg calcium (group B, n=101). The two groups were well matched in terms of mean age, sex ratio, mean height and weight, daily dosage, and duration of GC therapy, and the percentages of the three underlying diseases included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and polymyalgia rheumatica. The baseline mean bone mineral density (BMD) values at the lumbar spine for the two groups were -3.26 (alfacalcidol) and -3.25 (vitamin D(3)) and, at the femoral neck, -2.81 and -2.84, respectively (T scores). Rates of prevalent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures did not differ between groups. During the 3-year study, we observed a median percentage increase of BMD at the lumbar spine of 2.4% in group A and a loss of 0.8% in group B ( P<0.0001). There also was a larger median increase at the femoral neck in group A (1.2%) than in group B (0.8%) ( P<0.006). The 3-year rates of patients with at least one new vertebral fracture were 9.7% among those assigned to the alfacalcidol group and 24.8% in the vitamin D group (risk reduction 0.61, 95% CI 0.24-0.81, P=0.005). The 3-year rates of patients with at least one new nonvertebral fracture were 15% in the alfacalcidol group and 25% in the vitamin D group (risk reduction 0.41, 95% CI 0.06-0.68, P=0.081). The 3-year rates of patients with at least one new fracture of any kind were 19.4% among those treated with alfacalcidol and 40.65% with vitamin D (risk reduction 0.52, 95% CI 0.25-0.71, P=0.001). In accordance with the observed fracture rates, the alfacalcidol group showed a substantially larger decrease in back pain than the plain vitamin D group ( P<0.0001). Generally, side effects in both groups were mild, and only three patients in the alfacalcidol group and two in the vitamin D group had moderate hypercalcemia. We conclude that alfacalcidol plus calcium is highly superior to plain vitamin D3 plus calcium in the treatment of established GIOP.

Intermittent intravenous ibandronate injections reduce vertebral fracture risk in corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: results from a long-term comparative study.

Despite its well-known benefits, chronic corticosteroid therapy causes osteoporotic fractures in approximately 30-50% of patients treated. To prevent the occurrence of these fractures, treatment with oral bisphosphonates is recommended. However, current oral bisphosphonates, which are given either daily or weekly, are associated with stringent, inconvenient dosing guidelines. Less frequent dosing may provide greater acceptability. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ibandronate, a highly potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, when given by intravenous (i.v.) injection every 3 months in men and women with established corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (CIO; lumbar spine [L2-L4] bone mineral density [BMD] T-score < or =-2.5). A total of 115 participants were assigned to receive daily calcium supplements (500 mg) plus either ibandronate (2 mg) injections every 3 months or daily oral alfacalcidol (1 microg), for 3 years. Intermittent i.v. ibandronate injections produced significantly greater increases in mean BMD at the lumbar spine (13.3% versus 2.6%, respectively; p<0.001), and femoral neck (5.2% versus 1.9%, respectively; p<0.001) versus daily oral alfacalcidol, after 3 years, relative to baseline. This study was not statistically powered to show a difference between the groups with respect to fracture incidence. Nevertheless, after 36 months, the frequency of patients with new vertebral fractures was significantly lower in the patients receiving ibandronate relative to those taking alfacalcidol (8.6% versus 22.8%, respectively; p=0.043). This is the first time that significant vertebral fracture reduction has been demonstrated with an i.v. bisphosphonate in CIO. Patients treated with i.v. ibandronate injections also experienced less back pain (p<0.001) and less height loss (p=0.001) than those receiving oral alfacalcidol. Both regimens were well tolerated. In conclusion, intermittent i.v. ibandronate injections are efficacious, well-tolerated, and convenient, and promise to offer physicians an important therapeutic advance in the management of osteoporosis.

Three-monthly ibandronate bolus injection offers favourable tolerability and sustained efficacy advantage over two years in established corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: Corticosteroids are widely prescribed, although treatment-related side-effects are common. Of these adverse events (AEs), osteoporosis is considered the most serious. Currently, oral bisphosphonates are the standard treatment for corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (CIO). However, intermittent intravenous (i.v.) therapy may have advantages, including lack of gastrointestinal AEs, improved bioavailability and increased compliance. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of 3-monthly i.v. ibandronate bolus injections in patients with established CIO. The results from a planned 2-yr interim analysis are reported. METHOD: In this controlled, prospective, open-label, parallel-group study, 104 patients (49 men and 55 women) with established CIO (mean T-score <-2.5 s.d. at the lumbar spine (L2-L4) received daily calcium (500 mg) plus either 3-monthly i.v. ibandronate (2 mg) bolus injections or oral daily alfacalcidol (1 micro g). The primary end-point was bone mineral density (BMD) change at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and calcaneus after 24 months. RESULTS: Compared with oral daily alfacalcidol, i.v. ibandronate produced significantly superior gains in mean (+/-s.d.) BMD at the lumbar spine (2.2+/-3.1 vs 11.9+/-7.4%; P<0.001), femoral neck (1.3+/-1.8 vs 4.7+/-4.0%; P<0.001) and calcaneus (7.6+/-3.8 vs 15.5+/-10.7%; P<0.0001) after 2 yr. Consistent with these BMD gains and, although the study was not powered for fractures, a trend towards a reduction in vertebral fractures and greater back pain relief was seen in the ibandronate group. The overall incidence of AEs was similar in the two treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Three-monthly i.v. ibandronate bolus injections are significantly superior to alfacalcidol in the treatment of CIO. These data confirm the potential of ibandronate for the treatment of osteoporosis associated with corticosteroid use. The ease of administration, lack of AEs and good compliance associated with intermittent i.v. ibandronate make it a potentially valuable alternative to oral bisphosphonate therapy for the treatment of CIO.

Alendronate treatment of established primary osteoporosis in men: results of a 2-year prospective study.

Men with osteoporosis have been neglected in the past, and only a few therapeutic trials have been performed in men. The bisphosphonate, alendronate, has been widely used for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. This prospective, open label, active controlled, randomized clinical study compared the effects of oral alendronate (10 mg daily) and alfacalcidol (1 microg daily) on bone mineral density (BMD), safety, and tolerability in 134 males with primary established osteoporosis. All men received supplemental calcium (500 mg daily). After 2 yr, alfacalcidol-treated patients showed a mean 2.8% increase in lumbar spine BMD (P < 0.01) compared with a mean increase of 10.1% in men receiving alendronate (P < 0.001). The corresponding changes in femoral neck BMD were +2.2% and +5.2% for the alfacalcidol and alendronate groups, respectively (P = 0.009). The incidence rates of patients with new vertebral fractures were 18.2% and 7.4% for the alfacalcidol and alendronate groups, respectively (P = 0.071). Both therapies were well tolerated. Thus, alendronate produced favorable effects on BMD consistent with the results from another study in male osteoporosis. The average increase rates were higher than with alfacalcidol. Alendronate may be superior to alfacalcidol in the treatment of men with established primary osteoporosis.

Activity and expression of JNK1, p38 and ERK kinases, c-Jun N-terminal phosphorylation, and c-jun promoter binding in the adult rat brain following kainate-induced seizures.

The activity and/or expression of the mitogen-activated protein kinases c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1, p38 and extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2, as well as their substrates, the transcription factors c-Jun and activating transcription factor-2, were examined following systemic application of kainate in the cortex and hippocampus of the adult rat brain. The protein expression levels of all three mitogen-activated protein kinases remained constant during the observation period. Unexpectedly, c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 was the only mitogen-activated protein kinase activated in this model of excitotoxicity, its activity raised from between 1 and 3 h moderate basal to maximal levels between 6 and 12 h. In contradistinction, activity of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 fell from their substantial basal levels and did not recover; activity of p38 was characterized by a high basal level that almost entirely disappeared and did not return to basal levels even 10 days after kainate application. c-Jun protein was rapidly expressed, with a maximum after 3 h and a slow decline after 12 h. Supershift assays revealed that, during the early induction phase of the c-jun gene, the proximal activator protein-1 (jun1) site of the c-jun promoter was mainly occupied by the constitutively expressed activating transcription factor-2, whereas the late induction correlated with the predominant binding of c-Jun and, to a lesser extent, activating transcription factor-2 to the distal activator protein-1 (jun2) site. The time-course of the N-terminal phosphorylation of c-Jun as determined by immunocytochemistry paralleled the activity of c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 and showed a compartment-specific regulation between 3 and 12 h. A second set of supershift experiments demonstrated that c-Jun, but not activating transcription factor 2, bound to activator protein-1 sites in the promoter of substance P and collagenase genes, but not of the cyclo-oxygenase-2 gene. Our results demonstrate that activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1, phosphorylation of c-Jun and selective occupation of the c-jun promoter by activating transcription factor-2 or c-Jun are part of the neuronal response following excitotoxicity that is considered as the mechanism for neuronal apoptosis in vivo. Some of these findings differ substantially from in vitro experiments and underline the necessity to analyse the neuronal stress pathways in the adult brain.

[Osteoporosis in the man: diagnosis and therapy]. / Osteoporose beim Mann: Diagnostik und Therapie.

The prevalence of osteoporosis in men has been underestimated in the past. Vertebral fractures were found in about 10% in men of age 50 and over 20 to 30% of all hip fractures in advanced age occur in men. Lower life expectancy of men but also differences in bone geometry and remodeling contribute to the lower rate of fractures in comparison to the female gender. In men with suspected osteoporosis a thorough history, physical and clinical examination is mandatory to exclude other localized or generalized osteopathies and to differentiate in primary and secondary osteoporosis. Only some small studies have been published so far on treatment of osteoporosis in men, i.e. therapeutic decisions are mainly based on existing results in postmenopausal osteoporosis. The basis of treatment is calcium and vitamin D supplementation and individually adapted recommendations on life style and risk factor avoidance. In established osteoporosis in adequate analgesic therapy is very important. In cases with secondary osteoporosis, if possible, etiological therapy should be started. Antiresorptive therapy (e.g. calcitonin, bisphosphonates) or osteoanabolic therapy (e.g. fluoride) can later be added, while in idiopathic osteoporosis this is the first option. According to the existing experiences there is in general a good chance to ameliorate the condition in men. There is however an urgent need for further data on therapy of osteoporosis in men.

Avoidance of vertebral fractures in men with idiopathic osteoporosis by a three year therapy with calcium and low-dose intermittent monofluorophosphate.

There are currently no trial-based recommendations for the treatment of idiopathic osteoporosis in men. A prospective, controlled, randomized 3-year study was conducted to evaluate the effects of intermittent, low-dose fluoride combined with continuous calcium supplementation on bone mass and future fracture events in men with this disease. Sixty-four men with idiopathic osteoporosis (mean age 53 years; mean T-score at L2-4, -2.75) and no previous vertebral fractures were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. Group A received intermittent (3 months on, 1 month off) treatment with monofluorophosphate 114 mg/day (i.e. 15 mg fluoride ions) plus continuous calcium supplementation (950-1000 mg/day). Group B received continuous calcium (1000 mg/day) alone. Bone mineral density was measured at the lumbar spine, hip and radius at 6-months intervals; thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs were obtained every 12 months. In group A bone density increased at all sites (by between +1.2% and +8.8%), while group B showed moderate decreases (by between -1.4% and -5.2%). After 36 months, bone densities at all sites in group A were significantly higher than those of group B. Three patients (10%) in group A suffered a total of 4 vertebral fractures versus 12 patients (40%) with 17 fractures in group B (p = 0.008). Non-vertebral fractures occurred in 3 patients in group A versus 11 in group B, though this difference was not significant. Back pain was significantly reduced in group A and unchanged in group B (after 3 years p = 0.0003). All side-effects were mild and transient. Early treatment of idiopathic osteoporosis in the male using the fluoride-calcium regimen we tested can improve cancellous and cortical bone density, reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures and attenuate back pain.

Sciatic nerve transection evokes lasting up-regulation of angiotensin AT2 and AT1 receptor mRNA in adult rat dorsal root ganglia and sciatic nerves.

The angiotensin AT2 receptor is involved in tissue repair and cellular stress responses in non-neuronal cells. We have previously observed that the AT2 receptor-induced neurite formation in PC12W cells is paralleled by a reduced neurofilament M expression as it occurs in nerve fiber regeneration. Here we show that transection and crush of sciatic nerve fibers of adult rats results in dramatic changes of AT2, AT1a and AT1b receptor mRNA in dorsal root ganglion neurons (DRGs) and in sciatic nerves 3, 14 and 28 days after axotomy and crush. The expression patterns were determined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay, and the specificity of amplification products was verified by Southern blot hybridization. Whereas axotomy evoked a transient increase of AT2 receptor mRNA by more than 1000% after 3 days in proximal and after 14 days in distal sciatic nerve stumps (510%), the maximum expression in DRGs was observed after 14 days (1100%). Sciatic nerve crush resulted in a time-dependent up-regulation of AT2 receptor mRNA in sciatic nerve segments coinciding with the successful regeneration of nerve fibers. In sciatic nerves, AT1a and AT1b receptor mRNA levels were increased within different time-courses and to different extents with a maximum expression of 570%. In contrast to AT1a receptor mRNAs, AT1b receptor mRNA levels were increased in DRGs by maximally 800%. These results suggest that AT2 and AT1 receptor-mediated pathways are involved in Schwann cell-mediated myelination and in neuroregenerative responses of DRGs.

[Severe osteomalacia in endemic sprue. An important differential diagnosis in osteoporosis]. / Schwere Osteomalazie bei einheimischer Sprue. Eine wichtige Differentialdiagnose bei V. a. Osteoporose.

A 67-year-old woman has a 20-year history of recurrent abdominal pain, diarrhea and diffuse bone pain. During the course of numerous hospitalisations the diagnoses "iron deficiency anemia", "iron absorption disorder", "osteoporosis" and "hyperparathyroidism" had been made. Despite treatment with vitamin D3, calcium, fluorides and iron, the patient's condition deteriorated to such a degree that she became in need of constant care. After 20 years of illness, nontropical sprue (celiac disease) with secondary intestinal osteopathy was identified. High-dose parenteral treatment with vitamin D3, oral calcium supplementation and a gluten-free diet resulted in an improvement of the patient's condition within three months, and the patient can now largely look after herself again.

[Osteoporosis in men. Pathogenesis and clinical classification of 254 cases]. / Osteoporose bei Männern. Pathogenese und klinische Einteilung bei 254 Fällen.

In a prospective study, 321 consecutive male patients, aged between 16 and 86 years, referred to the Department of Medicine of the Medical Centre at Leverkusen from many parts of Germany over a three-year period with the diagnosis of osteoporosis, underwent a standardized programme of clinical investigation: 254 (79%) were found to have the condition. The programme consisted of a detailed history, physical examination, a battery of laboratory tests, X-ray examination of the skeleton and osteodensitometry. Where, as a result, underlying disease or risk factors were suspected, further tests were performed. 98 patients (39%) were found by densitometric criteria to have preclinical, 156 (61%) manifest osteoporosis with one or more vertebral body fractures. There was no significant difference regarding bone density between the preclinical and manifest cases. 76 of the 254 (30%) patients had no detectable pathogenetic factors, i. e. their osteoporosis was classified as idiopathic (mean age 51 years), while as senile osteoporosis in 16 elderly patients (mean age 78 years). The remaining 162 patients had 286 risk factors within 24 different categories. Depending on duration, intensity and combination of these risk factors, the osteoporosis was classified as primary with few risk factors or as secondary osteoporosis of single or multiple aetiology (mean age of these three groups was 51, 56 and 52 years, respectively). The most important demonstrable risk factors were (in decreasing order of frequency) glucocorticoid treatment, alcohol consumption, smoking, hypogonadism, hypercalciuria, liver disease, Crohn's disease, low calcium nutrition, hyperthyroidism, physical inactivity, stomach operation and plasmacytoma.--This study indicates that if there is evidence of significant risk factors detailed bone densitometry should be performed so that any necessary treatment can be initiated early. If there is known osteoporosis, staging and exact analysis of risk factors is a precondition for any cause-oriented treatment.