Body composition in patients with hepatic glycogen storage diseases.

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the body composition of hepatic glycogen storage disorders (GSDs) through dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. METHODS: This was an exploratory, observational, cross-sectional study. Twenty-four patients with GSD (type Ia: n = 13, Ib: n = 5, III: n = 2, and IX-α/ß/γ: n = 4; female sex: n = 13; age <8 y: n = 3, 8-19 y: n = 14, and >19 y: n = 7) were included. Three-day dietary records were collected in the week preceding dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Body composition findings were correlated with clinical parameters, uncooked cornstarch (UCCS) regimen, dietary intake, and markers of treatment adherence. RESULTS: An elevated fat mass (FM) index was found in 16 of 21 patients (age 8-19 y: n = 10 and >19 y: n = 6; GSD type Ia: n = 12, Ib: n = 2, III: n = 1, and IX-γ: n = 1). A lean mass (LM) index evaluation showed no LM deficits in relation to corresponding reference populations. Relative skeletal muscle index values were decreased in 2 of 7 adult patients (type Ib: n = 1 and IX-α: n = 1). UCCS (g/d) correlated positively with the FM index (rs = 0.7; P ≤ 0.01). In contrast, relative UCCS intake (g/kg body weight) was negatively associated with LM/kg (rs = -0.8; P ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a high frequency of elevated FM in patients with hepatic GSDs. We also suggest that treatment with UCCS is associated with excess weight in these patients. Additionally, the treatment strategy can impair protein intake, and lead to a decrease in LM.

A triple-blinded crossover study to evaluate the short-term safety of sweet manioc starch for the treatment of glycogen storage disease type Ia.

BACKGROUND: Glycogen storage disease type 1a (GSD Ia) is characterized by severe fasting hypoglycemia. The clinical management includes the administration of uncooked cornstarch (UCCS). Although such a diet approach is effective in achieving euglycemia, its impact on the quality of life of patients should be considered. In vitro analyses suggest a longer release of glucose when using sweet manioc starch (SMS). METHODS: We compared the efficacy and safety of the administration of SMS and UCCS during a short-fasting challenge in patients with GSD Ia in a randomized, triple-blind, phase I/II, cross-over study. GSD Ia patients aged ≥ 16 years and treated with UCCS were enrolled. Participants were hospitalized for two consecutive nights, receiving UCCS or SMS in each night. After the administration of the starches, glucose, lactate and insulin levels were measured in 1-h interval throughout the hospitalization period. The procedures were interrupted after 10 h of fasting or in a hypoglycemic episode (< 3.88 mmol/L). RESULTS: Eleven individuals (mean age: 21.6 ± 4.3 years; all presenting body mass index > 25 kg/m2) participated in the study. The average fasting period was 8.2 ± 2.0 h for SMS and 7.7 ± 2.3 h for UCCS (p = 0.04). SMS maintained euglycemia for a greater period over UCCS. Increased lactate concentrations were detected even in absence of hypoglycemia, not being influenced by the different starches investigated (p = 0.17). No significant difference was found in total cholesterol, HDL, triglycerides and uric acid levels in both arms. None of the patients showed severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: SMS appears to be non-inferior to UCCS in the maintenance of euglycemia, thus emerging as a promising alternative to the treatment of GSD Ia.