Clinical Guide and Update on Porphyrias.

Physicians should be aware of porphyrias, which could be responsible for unexplained gastrointestinal, neurologic, or skin disorders. Despite their relative rarity and complexity, most porphyrias can be easily defined and diagnosed. They are caused by well-characterized enzyme defects in the complex heme biosynthetic pathway and are divided into categories of acute vs non-acute or hepatic vs erythropoietic porphyrias. Acute hepatic porphyrias (acute intermittent porphyria, variegate porphyria, hereditary coproporphyria, and aminolevulinic acid dehydratase deficient porphyria) manifest in attacks and are characterized by overproduction of porphyrin precursors, producing often serious abdominal, psychiatric, neurologic, or cardiovascular symptoms. Patients with variegate porphyria and hereditary coproporphyria can present with skin photosensitivity. Diagnosis relies on measurement of increased urinary 5-aminolevulinic acid (in patients with aminolevulinic acid dehydratase deficient porphyria) or increased 5-aminolevulinic acid and porphobilinogen (in patients with other acute porphyrias). Management of attacks requires intensive care, strict avoidance of porphyrinogenic drugs and other precipitating factors, caloric support, and often heme therapy. The non-acute porphyrias are porphyria cutanea tarda, erythropoietic protoporphyria, X-linked protoporphyria, and the rare congenital erythropoietic porphyria. They lead to the accumulation of porphyrins that cause skin photosensitivity and occasionally severe liver damage. Secondary elevated urinary or blood porphyrins can occur in patients without porphyria, for example, in liver diseases, or iron deficiency. Increases in porphyrin precursors and porphyrins are also found in patients with lead intoxication. Patients with porphyria cutanea tarda benefit from iron depletion, hydroxychloroquine therapy, and, if applicable, elimination of the hepatitis C virus. An α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone analogue can reduce sunlight sensitivity in patients with erythropoietic protoporphyria or X-linked protoporphyria. Strategies to address dysregulated or dysfunctional steps within the heme biosynthetic pathway are in development.

Hemochromatosis (HFE) gene mutations and response to chloroquine in porphyria cutanea tarda.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of hemochromatosis (HFE) gene mutations, which are associated with porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT), in the therapeutic response to chloroquine. DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed a database (Excel version 2001 [Microsoft Excel, Redmond, Wash]; date range of search, 1985-1999) of chloroquine-treated patients with PCT on whether HFE mutations (C282Y and H63D) might have influenced the clinical response, urinary porphyrin excretion, liver enzyme activities, and serum iron markers. Serum samples and corresponding complete sets of data before and after therapy were available in 62 of 207 patients with PCT who were treated exclusively with chloroquine. SETTINGS: Academic teaching hospital. INTERVENTION: For treatment, low-dose chloroquine diphosphate, 125 to 250 mg twice weekly, was used during a median time of 16 months (range, 12-26 months). RESULTS: Of the 62 German patients with PCT, 37 (60%) carries HFE mutations. Chloroquine therapy was accompanied by clinical remission and reduced urinary porphyrin excretion (P<.001) in the 24 patients (39%) with HFE wild type as well as in 35 HFE heterozygous patients with PCT (56%). Decreases of serum iron markers following chloroquine therapy were limited to patients with PCT and HFE wild type. All patients homozygous for the C282Y mutation (3 [5%] of 62) had high serum iron, ferritin, and transferrin saturation and failed to respond to chloroquine treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic response to chloroquine was not compromised by C282Y heterozygosity and compound heterozygosity of HFE mutations. Because HFE C282Y homozygotes (+/+) did not respond to chloroquine and a decrease in serum iron concentration was limited to patients with PCT and HFE wild type, phlebotomy should be first-line therapy in patients with PCT and HFE mutations.

Autoimmunity and HCV infection in porphyria cutanea tarda: a controlled study.

Autoimmunity and high rates of autoantibodies have been implicated in the pathogenesis of porphyria cutanea tarda. These abnormalities could be in part virus-induced, since porphyria cutanea tarda in most geographical regions is highly associated with hepatitis C virus infection. We analyzed the link of autoantibodies, autoimmune hepatitis and systemic lupus erythematosus in 111 patients with porphyria cutanea tarda and sex- and age-matched controls (mean age 58+/-13 years) in Germany, a region with a low prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection. Patients with porphyria cutanea tarda displayed lower rates of anti-nuclear antibodies (16/111, 14% vs 28/111, 25%, p<0,05) and of antibodies against smooth muscle (25/111, 23% vs 48/111, 43%, p<0,01), than controls. The percentage of patients with porphyria cutanea tarda with positive anti-HCV was low but significantly higher than in our controls (9/111, 8% vs 0/111, 0%, respectively), (p<0,05). Two patients with porphyria cutanea tarda (2/111, 2%) fulfilled the criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus and not one of 65 patients was found to have clinical autoimmune hepatitis. In the first controlled study of a large cohort of patients with porphyria cutanea tarda no increased prevalence of selected autoantibodies and autoimmune hepatitis was found. However, a higher prevalence of HCV infection and systemic lupus erythematosus in patients with porphyria cutanea tarda was confirmed.

[Coexistence of hereditary coproporphyria and porphyria cutanea tarda: a new form of dual porphyria]. / Koexistenz von hereditärer Koproporphyrie und Porphyria cutanea tarda: Eine neue Form einer dualen Porphyrie.

BACKGROUND: Dual porphyrias are characterized by two independent disturbances of porphyrin metabolism. PATIENT AND METHODS: At first a porphyria cutanea tarda was diagnosed in a 26-year-old female with back pain and red urine. Later a hereditary coproporphyria was ascertained by additional examinations. The metabolites of porphyrin metabolism were analyzed chromatographically. The activities of coproporphyrinogen oxidase and uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase were determined in blood cells. Molecular analysis was carried out by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis followed by direct sequencing. RESULTS: Excessive porphyrinuria of 3,128 nmol/24 h (normal < 165 nmol/24 h) with dominance of uro- and heptacarboxyporphyrin (75% of total porphyrins) indicated that the patient suffered from porphyria cutanea tarda. The course of the examination showed an alteration of the constellation with dominance of urinary and fecal coproporphyrin isomer III, which is characteristic for hereditary coproporphyria. Porphyrin precursors and porphyrins increased under the application of ethinylestradiol-cyproteronacetat. The dominance of coproporphyrin III stayed constant in feces besides enhanced urinary uro- and heptacarboxyporphyrin. The activity of the coproporphyrinogen oxidase was diminished to 35%. The uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase in erythrocytes was normal. The mother and both sisters were recognized as heterozygous gene carriers of hereditary coproporphyria in the latent phase by enhanced coproporphyrin with isomer I/III inversion in feces and decrease of the coproporphyrinogen oxidase activity to about 50%. Molecular analyses resulted in a point mutation at exon 4 (854C-->T), which revealed in an amino acid exchange (P258L) in the coproporphyrinogen oxidase protein. CONCLUSION: The hereditary coproporphyria is caused by a new mutation in the coproporphyrinogen oxidase gene in the case of a dual porphyria with co-existence of porphyria cutanea tarda and hereditary coproporphyria. The sporadic, hepatic porphyria cutanea tarda Type I is induced by estrogens. The large excretory variations reflect the influence of hormonal factors on the porphyria process of hereditary coproporphyria and porphyria cutanea tarda.