[Social determinants of contraceptive use in Tunisia]. / Les déterminants sociaux de l'utilisation des méthodes contraceptives en Tunisie.

BACKGROUND: In Tunisia, the "Revolution" of January 2011 highlighted significant regional disparities and social inequalities in access to health care, including reproductive health services. The purpose of this study was to analyze the social determinants of the use of contraception in Tunisia. METHODS: A cross-sectional national study conducted in 2012; on a sample of 15 to 49-year married women (n=4374) drawn by a two levels random sampling. Prevalence of contraception and its association factors were assessed. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the variation of contraception prevalence with area of residence, age, level of education, number of children and household income. RESULTS: The prevalence of contraception was 66.4 %. Eighty-two percent of women used a modern contraceptive method. The use of contraceptive methods was significantly dependent on the age (P<0.001), area of residence (P=0.008), education (P<0.001). The prevalence of contraception was higher in North West (OR=1.1 [0.81-1.5]; P<0.001), among multiparous women (OR=4.49 [3.57-5.66]; P<0.001), among the youngest women (OR=1.4 [0.9-2,19]; P<0.001) and among those with higher levels of education (OR=1.62 [1.19-2.21]; P=0.008). CONCLUSION: Tunisia, precursor Arab country in family planning, is recording a slowdown in the use of contraception in comparison with other countries of North Africa. Social determinants, such as, age, living conditions, area of residence and level of education are indicators to consider when targeting interventions.

[Pelvic actinomycosis: Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects]. / Actinomycose pelvienne : aspects diagnostiques et thérapeutiques.

OBJECTIVES: Actinomycosis is a rare little known granulomatous suppurative disease, more common in women, aided by the use of contraceptive purposes intrauterine device (IUD). Pelvic location is the rarest with an extension to adjacent organs making preoperative diagnosis difficult and misleading clinical presentation. Early diagnosis of this affection determines the therapeutic strategy and avoids mutilating interventions especially in young women. METHODS: We reviewed the record of women who consulted the department of obstetrics and gynecology at Ben Arous hospital (Tunisia) between January 2003 and December 2013 for a pelvic pain syndrome and in whom diagnosis of actinomycosis was suspected by clinical and imaging and confirmed by pathology. RESULTS: Eight cases of gynecologic abdominopelvic actinomycosis were diagnosed during the study period. Seven patients were carriers of an intrauterine device, with an average duration of 5 years wearing. Functional signs were essentially pelvic pain and fever. Physical examination of patients mainly showed two clinical presentations: a pelvic tumor syndrome or abdominopelvic and an array of pelvic abscess or pelvic inflammatory disease. Radiological investigations were allowed to suspect the diagnosis of actinomycosis only in one patient, in whom percutaneous biopsy confirmed the histological diagnosis without resorting to a surgical procedure. Operative procedures performed were varied as appropriate. The diagnosis of actinomycosis was made by pathology without any cases of bacterial isolation. All patients received antibiotic treatment with penicillin. The subsequent evolution was favorable. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of actinomycosis should be considered in any invasive abdominal mass of neoplastic appearance and in case of table of genital infection especially in patients bearing IUD for 5 years or more.