[Pathologist occupational hazards: Results of a survey for the French case]. / Risques professionnels chez les pathologistes : résultats d'une enquête française.

INTRODUCTION: The profession of pathologist exposes to various risks, notably infectious, physical and chemical. The objective of this study was to make an inventory of these occupational risks to which pathologists are subjected and to evaluate the pathologies that they presented. A particular attention was given to microscopic and screen work as they can induce musculoskeletal or ophthalmic disorders, and stress-related psychological disorders. METHOD: An anonymous online questionnaire containing 54 questions had been sent by mail to pathologists via the French Society of Pathology and the Syndicate of French Pathologists. RESULTS: Five hundred and twelve pathologists responded to the survey. Thirty-eight percent reported musculoskeletal disorders in the last 6 months. Visual disturbances concerned 73.4% of respondents. In the last 12 months, 33.3% of pathologists had been injured or had had mucosal projections during macroscopic or autopsy specimens. The frequency of infectious diseases was low (6.2%) as well as that of cancers (3.9%). Psychological disorders such as depression or burnout were reported by 16.7% of respondents. Pathologists seemed happy at work and had a good overall lifestyle. Few doctors had medical follow-up and few had benefited from ergonomic advice and training on the risks of chemicals. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed the interest of a medical surveillance adapted to the pathologies presented by the pathologists. Educational and preventive measures should be introduced early in the career, focusing on ergonomics and learning about chemical and biological hazards.

Assessment of preventive measures for accidental blood exposure in operating theaters: a survey of 20 hospitals in Northern France.

BACKGROUND: Accidental exposures to blood of body fluids (ABE) expose health care workers (HCW) to the risk of occupational infection. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to assess the prevention equipment available in the operating theater (OT) with reference to guidelines or recommendations and its use by the staff in that OT on that day and past history of ABE. METHODS: Correspondents of the Centre de Coordination de la Lutte contre les Infections Nosocomiales (CCLIN) Paris-Nord ABE Surveillance Taskforce carried out an observational multicenter survey in 20 volunteer French hospitals. RESULTS: In total, 260 operating staff (including 151 surgeons) were investigated. Forty-nine of the 260 (18.8%) staff said they double-gloved for all patients and procedures, changing gloves hourly. Blunt-tipped suture needles were available in 49.1% of OT; 42 of 76 (55.3%) of the surgeons in these OT said they never used them. Overall, 60% and 64% of surgeons had never self-tested for HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV), respectively. Fifty-five surgeons said they had sustained a total of 96 needlestick injuries during the month preceding the survey. Ten of these surgeons had notified of 1 needlestick injury each to the occupational health department of their hospital (notification rate, 10.4%). CONCLUSION: The occurrence of needlestick injury remained high in operating personnel in France in 2000. Although hospitals may improve access to protective devices, operating staff mindful of safety in the OT should increase their use of available devices, their knowledge of their own serostatus, and their ABE notification rate to guide well-targeted prevention efforts.