The Impact of Sterile Instrument Set Wrapping Defects on Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Theatre Lists.

Introduction Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a universally dreaded complication of any surgical procedure. The goal of this single-center study was to examine the issue of orthopaedic instrument wrapping defects with a focus on the importance of a high level of surveillance to enable identification of these defects in order to reduce the risk of instrument contamination. We also evaluated the impact on patient care, theatre staff, hospital finances and resource utilization during a defined study period in order to stimulate critical discussion and further research into potentially eliminating this problem via change in practice and advances in technology. To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first paper that looks at this problem from the above perspective within the United Kingdom National Health Service. Methods  We conducted a prospective service evaluation project over a 30-week period from December 2021 to July 2022 across our three hospital sites within the United Kingdom National Health Service. We collated data on defects found in orthopaedic instrument wrappings as detected by visual inspection under ambient or theater lighting and the resulting surgical case cancellations. Defect types included in the study were all puncture holes, abrasions or tears visible to the naked eye irrespective of their size.  Results  A total of 601 orthopaedic sets were rejected during the study period due to defects identified in the sterile instrument wrappings. Of these, 437 were due to holes/tears in the wrapping, 129 were due to wet inner wrappings and 35 were due to insecure wrappings. This directly resulted in same-day cancellation of 13 surgical cases or 0.27% of booked cases with extra sets required for the other affected cases. These 13 cases could not proceed as they involved loan kits where no remedial action could be taken. Remedial action was required for the other 588 operation list cases affected by the sterile wrapping defects. The majority of the identified defects and resulting theatre case cancellations (61.5%) were in hip and knee arthroplasty surgery. The calculated potential financial loss due to these problems was £145,000 over the seven-month study period. This financial cost is equivalent to the best practice top-up tariff in England for treating approximately 108 hip fracture patients based on £1,335 per patient.  Conclusion  Our study identified defects in the sterile instrument wrappings affecting both the inner with or without involving the outer wrapping layer and resulting in cancellation of elective and trauma orthopaedic cases with resultant clinical and financial implications. There is a need to be more vigilant in identifying defects in drapes. Further research is warranted to improve ways of identifying defects in sterile wrappings and devise new protective mechanisms during sterilisation that can eliminate the use of sterile instrument wrappings.

Improving practice: efforts to reduce occipital pressure ulcers.

Cervical collars are necessary to stabilize the cervical spine of trauma patients but are known to contribute to the development of occipital pressure ulcers. A quality improvement project that began on one nursing unit stimulated the development of evidence-based practice guidelines and a multidisciplinary research study. As a result, a standardized plan of care and cervical collar recommendations were implemented, resulting in a sharp decline in the incidence of occipital pressure ulcers.

Patients who complete advance directives and what they prefer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine health care preferences expressed by patients in advance directives (ADs) and to identify characteristics of patients who completed them. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A computer-generated random sample of 500 patients was selected from the 25,865 (margin of error, +/- 4.34%) unique patients who submitted ADs to Mayo Clinic Rochester between January 1, 2004, and July 1, 2005. After excluding 24 (4.8%) patients who had submitted documents related to financial and property matters instead of ADs, we analyzed the contents of the 476 ADs and the demographic features of the patients to whom the documents belonged. RESULTS: The median (range) age of the patients at the time they signed their respective ADs was 67 (19-97) years. Of the 476 study patients, 409 (91.3%) were high school graduates; 339 (71.2%) had submitted a combined AD, which has features of a living will and a health care power of attorney; 434 (91.2%) had designated a health care agent; and most had granted the agent powers to consent for procedures (340 [78.3%]), to access information (327 [75.3%]), and to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatments (337 [77.6%]). Most patients expressed a desire for pain control (308 [64.7%]). For the clinical situations of dying or permanent unconsciousness, most patients explicitly expressed a preference to avoid "general life support" (371 [77.9%]) but did not explicitly address common life-sustaining treatments, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, blood transfusion, and artificial nutrition and hydration (if they did, nearly all expressed a preference to avoid the treatments). CONCLUSION: In ADs submitted to our institution, most patients designated a health care agent and granted the agent broad decision-making powers. Although most expressed a desire to avoid "general life support" if dying or permanently unconscious, few expressed preferences regarding specific life-sustaining treatments. Patients, clinicians, and others who use ADs, and investigators contemplating research involving ADs, might find these results informative.

Range-of-motion restriction and craniofacial tissue-interface pressure from four cervical collars.

BACKGROUND: Occipital pressure ulcers are well-known complications for trauma patients wearing cervical collars. We assessed the effects of four commercial cervical collars (Aspen, Philadelphia, Miami J, and Miami J with Occian back [Miami J/Occian]) on cervical range of motion (CROM) and mandibular and occipital tissue-interface pressure (TIP). METHODS: Forty-eight healthy volunteers (24 men, 24 women; mean age, 38.9 years +/- 10.5 years) were stratified by body mass index. CROM was measured in the seated position without and with collars. Sagittal, coronal, and rotatory CROM was measured with a goniometer. Occipital and mandibular pressures were mapped with subjects in upright and supine positions. RESULTS: All collars significantly restricted CROM in all planes (p < 0.001). The Philadelphia and standard Miami J collars were the most restrictive. The Aspen collar was the least restrictive for flexion and rotation. The Miami J/Occian back was the least restrictive for extension and lateral flexion. For supine measurements, Miami J and Miami J/Occian back had the lowest mean TIP, whereas Aspen and Philadelphia collars had the greatest (p < 0.001). For upright measurements, the Miami J/Occian back produced the smallest mean TIPs; the other collars, ranked by ascending TIP, were Philadelphia, Miami J, and Aspen (p < 0.001). Philadelphia and Miami J collars had significant collar-body mass index interaction effects on supine occiput mean pressure (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Miami J and Philadelphia collars restricted CROM to the greatest extent. Miami J and Miami J/Occian back had the lowest levels of mandibular and occipital pressure; these collars may markedly reduce the risk of occipital pressure ulcers without compromising immobilization.