Antimicrobial susceptibility among bacterial isolates from ICU and non-ICU setting and different age groups: results from the tigecycline evaluation and Surveillance trial in North America.

As part of the tigecycline evaluation and Surveillance trial (t.e.S.t.), isolates were collected from centers in North America. In vitro activity was assessed for isolates collected in 2006 using ClSi guidelines and ClSi or FDA interpretive criteria. Data were analyzed according to intensive care unit (iCU) or non-iCU location and age group (18-64 years and > 65 years).Rates of mRSA in 2006 were higher among isolates from patients aged >65 years (52.0%) than younger patients (48.4%) and from non-iCU settings (48.0%) than from the iCU (45.3%). Rates of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp. (resistant to levofloxacin and amikacin as well as the carbapenems and/or third generation cephalosporins), and eSbl-producing K. pneumoniae among isolates collected from the iCU were 70.7%, 5.8%, and 16.6%, respectively.Tigecycline, linezolid and vancomycin were active against all isolates of S. aureus, including mRSA, from both settings and the two age groups. Among E. faecium, >95% of isolates were susceptible to linezolid, and tigecycline maintained MIC(90)s of 0.06-0.12 mg/l. Against Acinetobacter spp., the most active antimicrobials were tigecycline and minocycline irrespective of age group or patient setting (MIC(90)s 2 and 8 mg/l, respectively). Percentage susceptibility off K. pneumoniae was >90% against tigecycline, imipenem, meropenem, cefepime and amikacin for isolates from both age groups and settings. Against eSbl-producing K. pneumoniae, imipenem (88.9%-96.4%) and tigecycline (85.1%-100%) demonstrated the highest rates of activity. tigecycline demonstrated excellent activity against clinically relevant resistant organisms.

A pharmacodynamic simulation to assess tigecycline efficacy for hospital-acquired pneumonia compared with other common intravenous antibiotics.

A pharmacodynamic model was used to generate supportive data comparing tigecycline with other broad-spectrum agents against pathogens implicated in hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). A 5000 patient Monte Carlo simulation determined the probability of target attainment (PTA) of tigecycline (+/- ceftazidime) compared with imipenem, levofloxacin, and piperacillin/tazobactam (+/- vancomycin). PTA was calculated over MICs of current Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria collected from worldwide surveillance and weighted by the expected prevalence of these pathogens causing HAP. For monotherapy, the weighted PTA was imipenem (78.2%), piperacillin/tazobactam (73.3%), tigecycline (62.9%), and levofloxacin (62.5%). By pathogen PTA was greatest for tigecycline against Gram-positives, and ceftazidime or imipenem against Gram-negatives. Combination therapy increased PTA to 88.6%, 85.5%, 80.6%, and 69.8% for tigecycline, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and levofloxacin, respectively. Based on contemporary resistance data, tigecycline plus ceftazidime is predicted to achieve its pharmacodynamic targets similarly to combination therapy with imipenem plus vancomycin for the treatment of patients with HAP.

Comparative analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility among organisms from France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK as part of the tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial.

As part of the tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial (TEST), bacterial isolates were collected from 39 centres in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK between January 2004 and August 2006. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined according to CLSI guidelines. Italy had the highest rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (36.4%), and was the only country to report vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (8.6%). Tigecycline was the only agent to which all Gram-positive isolates were susceptible. For many of the Gram-negative organisms collected, antimicrobial susceptibilities were lowest among isolates from Italy and highest among isolates from Spain. The notable exception was Acinetobacter baumannii, where the poorest susceptibility profile was among isolates from Spain. For A. baumannii, MIC(90)s of imipenem varied from 1 mg/L for isolates in France and Germany to > or =32 mg/L for isolates from Italy and Spain. Tigecycline was the only agent to maintain an MIC(90) of < or =1 mg/L against isolates from all five countries. The in-vitro activity of tigecycline against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates may make it valuable in the treatment of hospital infections, including those caused by otherwise antimicrobial-resistant organisms.

Determining incidence of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 38 centres from 17 countries: the PEARLS study 2001-2002.

The PEARLS study prospectively monitored selected nosocomial pathogens from 38 centres in 13 European, three Middle Eastern countries and South Africa during 2001-2002. Extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production rates among Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter spp. were 5.4% (142/2609), 18.2% (401/2,206) and 8.8% (204/2,328), respectively, for all study sites. The overall ESBL production rate for the combined Enterobacteriaceae was 10.5% (747/7,143), highest in Egypt, 38.5%, and Greece, 27.4%, and lowest in The Netherlands, 2.0%, and Germany, 2.6%. IEF, PCR and DNA sequencing determined 10.7% false positives among Enterobacter spp. when using NCCLS guidelines to screen for ESBL production. The prevalence of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium was 32.4% (294/908) and 8.7% (83/949), respectively. PEARLS provides baseline data against which prospective changes in resistant determinants and outcomes can be measured in this ongoing study.

Treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections with quinupristin-dalfopristin in patients intolerant of or failing prior therapy. For the Synercid Emergency-Use Study Group.

Safety and efficacy of quinupristin-dalfopristin (an injectable streptogramin antibiotic) were evaluated in the treatment of a variety of infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients either intolerant of or failing prior therapy. The influence of resistance phenotypes on treatment outcome was also assessed. This worldwide, multicentre, open-label, non-comparative, emergency-use clinical study enrolled patients with one or more of nine predefined, culture-confirmed infections with MRSA, who had no clinically appropriate alternative antibiotic therapy. The recommended quinupristin-dalfopristin dose was 7.5 mg/kg administered iv every 8 h for a duration judged appropriate by the investigator. There were no restrictions on prior or concomitant treatment with other antibiotics. Clinical, microbiological and laboratory assessments were performed at baseline, during study drug treatment, within 24 h after the last dose, and 7-21 days post-therapy. Ninety patients [age (mean +/- S.D.) 57.4 +/- 18.5 years] with significant underlying medical illnesses were treated at 63 centres in five countries. The most common indications were bone and joint infection (44.4% of patients) and skin and skin structure infection (16.7%). The mean (+/- S.D.) daily dose and treatment duration was 20.2 +/- 2.9 mg/kg/day for 28.5 +/- 22.3 days, most frequently administered every 8 h. The overall success rate (defined as a clinical outcome of either cure or improvement and a bacteriological outcome of eradication or presumed eradication) was 71.1% in the all-treated population (n = 90) and 66.7% in patients who were both clinically and bacteriologically evaluable (n = 27). Success rates for endocarditis, respiratory tract infection and bacteraemia of unknown source were below the population mean. The macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin type B resistance phenotype did not appear to alter the response rate. The most common non-venous adverse events related to study medication were arthralgias (10.8%), myalgias (8.6%) and nausea (8.6%). Quinupristin-dalfopristin should be considered as a treatment option for infections caused by MRSA, especially in patients intolerant of or failing alternate therapy.

Characterization of isolates associated with emerging resistance to quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid) during a worldwide clinical program.

Quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid) is an i.v. antibiotic active against serious Gram-positive infections. Its unique dual mode of action means that the potential for resistance development is expected to be low. To determine the incidence of in vitro emerging resistance in worldwide clinical studies, susceptibility to quinupristin/dalfopristin was measured for baseline pathogens and corresponding on- or post-study isolates from 880 evaluable patients. In comparative studies of community-acquired pneumonia, complicated skin and skin structure infections, and nosocomial pneumonia, the incidence of emerging resistance was low (1 of 453; 0.22%; 95% CI: 0. 01-1.4%). Resistance development occurred in only one pathogen (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). In noncomparative studies, six instances (1.8% of 338 evaluable cases; 95% CI: 0.7 to 4.0%) of emerging resistance (all vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium) were confirmed, accompanied by therapeutic failure in four cases. Molecular typing did not confirm the identity of one pair of strains. Overall, the incidence of emerging resistance to quinupristin/dalfopristin was low.

Comparison of the in vitro activity of and pathogen responses to sparfloxacin with those of other agents in the treatment of respiratory tract, urinary tract, and skin and skin-structure infections.

The in vitro activity of and pathogen responses to sparfloxacin were compared with those of standard therapies for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia, complicated skin or skin-structure infections, urinary tract infections, acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, and acute maxillary sinusitis in 7 multicenter controlled trials in North America. Sparfloxacin was administered orally as a 400-mg loading dose followed by 200 mg once daily for up to 10 days. The bacteriologic efficacy of sparfloxacin (84% to 95%) was comparable to that of comparator drugs (77% to 100%). Sparfloxacin was generally 2 to 8 times more active (minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% of strains tested [MIC90]: 0.03 to 0.5 microg/mL) than comparators against common pathogens isolated in community-acquired infections, especially Streptococcus pneumoniae, including penicillin-resistant strains; Moraxella catarrhalis; Haemophilus influenzae; Streptococcus pyogenes; and Staphylococcus aureus. Sparfloxacin was also effective against Chlamydia and Mycoplasma species. The emergence of resistance was uncommon during sparfloxacin therapy (0.3% of 1100 cases). Higher area under the plasma concentration-time curve/MIC and maximum plasma concentration/MIC ratios for sparfloxacin were associated with clinical and bacteriologic efficacy, whereas lower ratios were associated with clinical and bacteriologic failure. The clinical efficacy of sparfloxacin (80% to 95%) was comparable to that obtained with the comparator drugs (71% to 92%). In addition, sparfloxacin was well tolerated and had an overall frequency of related adverse events similar to that of the comparators. There was a higher frequency of photosensitivity reactions but a lower level of digestive adverse events with sparfloxacin compared with comparators. Sparfloxacin is a suitable therapeutic alternative for the empiric treatment of respiratory tract infections owing to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile and activity against typical and atypical respiratory tract pathogens, even in geographic areas with a high incidence of penicillin resistance.

Evaluation of in vitro activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin and comparator antimicrobial agents against worldwide clinical trial and other laboratory isolates.

This report summarizes the activities of quinupristin/dalfopristin (Q/D) and appropriate comparator antibiotics, including ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, rifampin, teicoplanin, and vancomycin, against selected gram-positive pathogens, including Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Streptococcus pyogenes. The study pathogens were obtained from 2 sources: (1) clinical isolates taken from patients participating in Q/D worldwide Phase III comparative and noncomparative (emergency-use program) clinical trials; and (2) other isolates collected from the laboratories of 45 geographically distinct medical centers around the world. Q/D was highly active, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) < or = 1.0 microg/mL against most isolates, including those known to be resistant to methicillin, vancomycin, or erythromycin. Q/D was active (MICs < or = 1 microg/mL) against 95% of the vancomycin-resistant E. faecium strains, for example, whereas ciprofloxacin was active against 6%. Q/D was equally active against methicillin-susceptible or -resistant S. aureus strains (MIC90=1 microg/mL), as was vancomycin (MIC90=2 microg/mL), whereas ciprofloxacin was much less active against methicillin-resistant strains than against methicillin-susceptible strains (MIC90=32 vs 1 microg/mL). Given its spectrum of activity, Q/D may provide a viable option for the treatment of severe respiratory and skin and skin-structure infections caused by gram-positive bacteria, especially when strains with known or suspected resistance to other commonly used antibiotics are present.

Characterization of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates from the United States and their susceptibility in vitro to dalfopristin-quinupristin.

In the course of clinical studies with the investigational streptogramin antimicrobial dalfopristin-quinupristin, isolates of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium were referred to our laboratory from across the United States. Seventy-two percent of the strains were of the VanA type, phenotypically and genotypically, while 28% were of the VanB type. High-level resistance to streptomycin or gentamicin was observed in 86 and 81%, respectively, of the VanA strains but in only 69 and 66%, respectively, of the VanB strains. These enterococci were resistant to ampicillin (MIC for 50% of the isolates tested [MIC50] and MIC90, 128 and 256 microg/ml, respectively) and to the other approved agents tested, with the exception of chloramphenicol (MIC90, 8 microg/ml) and novobiocin (MIC90, 1 microg/ml). Considering all of the isolates submitted, dalfopristin-quinupristin inhibited 86.4% of them at concentrations of < or = 1 microg/ml and 95.1% of them at < or = 2 microg/ml. However, for the data set comprised of only the first isolate submitted for each patient, 94.3% of the strains were inhibited at concentrations of < or = 1 microg/ml and 98.9% were inhibited at concentrations of < or = 2 microg/ml. Multiple drug resistance was very common among these isolates of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, while dalfopristin-quinupristin inhibited the majority at concentrations that are likely to be clinically relevant.

Comparison of the activity of meropenem with that of other agents in the treatment of intraabdominal, obstetric/gynecologic, and skin and soft tissue.

Meropenem, a new carbapenem with improved stability in the presence of human dehydropeptidase-I[1], was evaluated in three prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trials in North America. We compared the in vitro activity of meropenem and conventional antimicrobial agents for the treatment of intraabdominal, obstetric/gynecologic, and skin or soft tissue infections as well as the responses of pathogens to all of these agents. The trials of the drug for intraabdominal infection were double blind, and those for the obstetric/gynecologic and soft tissue infections were open labeled. Overall, MICs of meropenem for pathogens were lower, and the pathogen response rates were at least comparable to those for the following comparative agents: clindamycin plus tobramycin (for intraabdominal infections); clindamycin plus gentamicin (for obstetric/gynecologic infections); and imipenem and cilastatin (for skin or soft tissue infections). Meropenem has high in vitro potency and covers a broad spectrum of anaerobic and aerobic pathogens.

Comparison of sensititre broth microdilution and agar dilution susceptibility testing techniques for meropenem to determine accuracy, reproducibility, and predictive values.

The stability, accuracy, reproducibility, and predictive value of Sensititre MIC panels containing meropenem (Merrem) were evaluated by using National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)-recommended American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains and 110 selected strains of rapidly growing and fastidious aerobes and anaerobes with various degrees of susceptibility to meropenem. The NCCLS-recommended agar dilution method was used as a standard reference method. Meropenem-containing Sensititre MIC panels were monitored for their stabilities at room temperature and reproducibilities over 24 months by using six ATCC strains. Ninety-nine percent of the MICs of both meropenem and imipenem obtained for NCCLS-recommended ATCC strains were within the established ranges after 2 years. The overall agreement (+/- 1 twofold dilution) between the Sensititre and the agar dilution meropenem MICs was greater than 93%. The predictive value of meropenem MICs for indicating suspeptibility or resistance obtained by the Sensititre method was greater than 90%. No major or very major interpretive errors were observed, and only 5% of meropenem MICs were associated with minor interpretive errors. Problematic organisms were not observed. The Sensititre MIC panels containing meropenem offer a convenient and valid alternative to the NCCLS reference method for the susceptibility testing of potential pathogens likely to be recovered from mixed infections.