Allergoid-specific T-cell reaction as a measure of the immunological response to specific immunotherapy (SIT) with a Th1-adjuvanted allergy vaccine.

BACKGROUND: Specific immunotherapy (SIT) is believed to modulate CD4+ T-helper cells. In order to improve safety, SIT vaccines are often formulated with allergoids (chemically modified allergens). Interaction between T-cells and allergoids is necessary to influence cellular cytokine expression. There have been few reports on identification the early cellular effects of SIT. METHOD: Patients allergic to grass and/or mugwort pollen (n= 21) were treated with a 4-shot allergy vaccine (Pollinex Quattro) containing appropriate allergoids (grass/rye and/or mugwort) adsorbed to L-tyrosine plus a Th1 adjuvant, monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL). Fourteen grass-allergic patients served as untreated controls. Using the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of these patients, an optimized lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) was employed to monitor the in vitro proliferative response of T-cells to an allergoid challenge (solubilised Pollinex Quattro) before the first and last injection and then 2 and 20 weeks after the final injection. Control challenges utilised preparations of a similar pollen vaccine without the adjuvant MPL and a tree pollen vaccine with and without MPL. RESULTS: The LTT showed increased LTT stimulation indices (SI) in 17/20 SIT patients when the solublised vaccine preparation was used as a challenge before the last injection and 2 weeks after, in comparison to pre-treatment levels. Twenty weeks after therapy, the SI decreased to baseline level. A vaccine challenge without MPL gave lower SI levels. A challenge of a clinically inappropriate tree allergoid vaccine gave no response, and a nontreated group also showed no response. CONCLUSION: Following a short-course SIT adjuvated with MPL, challenges of allergoids were shown to activate allergen-specific T cells in vitro. There was an additional stimulating effect when the challenge was in combination with MPL. There were no non-specific effects of MPL, shown by the tree allergoid/MPL control. The timing of the response was closely correlated to the treatment course; reactivity fell two weeks after the final injection and 20 weeks later it was at baseline level. Thus an immunological response to SIT was detected after very few injections. This methodology could provide a basis for monitoring the immediate progress of allergy vaccinations.

Sublingual specific immunotherapy for adults and children: a post-marketing surveillance study.

BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a relatively new form of treatment for type I allergies and a good safety profile is rapidly being established. Evidence on the efficacy of SLIT is increasing, and the present study provides further supportive data. We describe the results of treatment with a SLIT vaccine formulated with a range of allergen extracts obtained by allergologists in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Adult and child patients (n = 159, 81 males, 78 females) with confirmed type I allergic sensitivities were treated with a standardized SLIT vaccine (ORALVAC) using the sublingual-swallow method. Evaluation of the efficacy of SLIT was based on the consumption of anti-allergic medication and a global assessment. Tolerability assessment was based on the incidence of local or systemic reactions. RESULTS: Medication use was significantly reduced compared with that in previous years (p = 0.023). In a large subgroup of patients treated for pollen sensitivity the significance was stronger (p = 0.016). Global assessment revealed that only 3.5 % of patients showed no change in symptoms after therapy. High tolerability was achieved and no serious or severe adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Over a one-year period, adult and child patients with a variety of type I allergies were treated with a SLIT vaccine that has shown significant efficacy and was well-tolerated with no serious or severe adverse events.

Efficacy and tolerability of short-term specific immunotherapy with pollen allergoids adjuvanted by monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) for children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Specific immunotherapy (SIT) with pollen allergoids formulated with the Th1-inducing adjuvant 3-deacylated monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL adjuvant, Corixa) has shown good efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of pollen allergies in adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate this treatment in children and adolescents aged 6-17 years old who were sensitive to grass/rye or tree pollens. METHODS: An open, multicenter study was performed using 90 children and adolescents. The patients received four subcutaneous injections of grass/rye (n = 64) or tree pollen allergoids (n = 26) adsorbed to L-tyrosine and containing MPL adjuvant. Efficacy was measured by symptom and medication scoring, skin prick test reactivity and IgG/IgE antibody responses. Tolerability was monitored by recording adverse events. RESULTS: Both grass/rye and tree pollen treatment groups showed significant reductions in symptom scores and anti-allergic medication use compared with the previous pollen seasons (p < 0.01 in all cases). After therapy, skin prick test reactivity was significantly reduced in both groups and pollen-specific IgG was significantly increased in both groups whereas little change was apparent in pollen-specific IgE. Overall tolerability was similar to results obtained in previous studies in adults. CONCLUSION: Short-term SIT using four injections of grass/rye or tree pollen allergoids adsorbed to L-tyrosine and with MPL adjuvant was shown to be effective with good tolerability. The treatment compared favorably with previous studies in adults.

Allergen-specific immunotherapy with a monophosphoryl lipid A-adjuvanted vaccine: reduced seasonally boosted immunoglobulin E production and inhibition of basophil histamine release by therapy-induced blocking antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific immunotherapy represents a causal form of treatment for IgE-mediated allergies. The allergen extract-based analyses of immunotherapy-induced effects yielded highly controversial results regarding a beneficial role of therapy-induced IgG antibodies. OBJECTIVE: We analysed allergen-specific IgE, IgG subclass, and IgM responses in patients treated with a grass pollen allergy vaccine adjuvanted with monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), a Th1-inducing agent, and in a placebo group using recombinant timothy grass pollen allergen molecules (rPhl p 1, rPhl p 2, rPhl p 5). RESULTS: The strong induction of allergen-specific IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies observed only in the actively treated group was associated with significant clinical improvement. Therapy-induced allergen-specific IgM and IgG2 responses were also noted in several actively treated patients. An inhibition of allergen-dependent basophil histamine release was only obtained with sera containing therapy-induced allergen-specific IgG, but not with sera obtained before therapy or from placebo-treated patients. Moreover, patients with therapy-induced allergen-specific IgG antibodies showed a reduced induction of allergen-specific IgE responses during seasonal grass pollen exposure. CONCLUSION: Successful immunotherapy with the MPL-adjuvanted grass pollen allergy vaccine is associated with the production of allergen-specific IgG antibodies. These blocking antibodies may have protective effects by inhibiting immediate-type reactions and systemic increases of IgE responses caused by seasonal allergen exposure.

Single-course specific immunotherapy with mixed pollen allergoids: results of a multi-centre study.

BACKGROUND: A short-term immunotherapy vaccine for the treatment of pollen allergy has been developed utilising L-tyrosine adsorbed allergoids. The reduced number of injections could provide advantages over long-term therapy schedules. This would improve compliance and support application of specific immunotherapy (SIT) to a greater extent. We report a multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this treatment in a clinical practice setting. METHODS: Patients (n = 1808) with a diagnosis of sensitivities to various pollens and symptoms of allergic asthma and/or allergic rhinitis and/or allergic conjunctivitis were selected. The vaccine formulation was made up according to individual sensitivities and contained L-tyrosine adsorbed allergoids. The patients were treated with a 3-injection initial course followed by a 3-injection maintenance course. Efficacy was measured by consumption of symptomatic anti-allergic medication compared with that in the previous season and by physician assessment using a 5-point scale. All adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Efficacy was demonstrated by a considerable decrease in regular and frequent use of medication compared with that in the previous season (p < 0.001). In addition, in 80 % of the patients, the physician's assessment was either "good" or "very good". These outcomes were unaffected by the closeness of the treatment course to the onset of the pollen season. Tolerability was good and most local and systemic reactions were mild. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of pollen-allergic patients with a short-term SIT using a 6-injection pollen allergoid/L-tyrosine vaccine in a clinical practice setting provided a high level of efficacy with a low incidence of mainly mild adverse events.

A well-tolerated grass pollen-specific allergy vaccine containing a novel adjuvant, monophosphoryl lipid A, reduces allergic symptoms after only four preseasonal injections.

BACKGROUND: We present data showing that a Th1-inducing adjuvant can reduce the number of injections required for allergy vaccination. Allergy vaccination is the only treatment for type 1 hypersensitivity that can alter the underlying disease process. A switch of specific T-cell activity from Th2 >Th1 to Th1 >Th2 is believed to be an important change seen after long-term vaccination therapy. An immunologic adjuvant that enhances such a switch could be used to reduce the number of injections required. This would improve compliance with the treatment and provide pharmacoeconomic advantages. Such an adjuvant is 3-deacylated monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL adjuvant, Corixa). METHODS: A multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind clinical study was performed with a new standardized allergy vaccine comprising a tyrosine-adsorbed glutaraldehyde-modified grass pollen extract containing MPL adjuvant. Four subcutaneous injections of the active product were given preseasonally to 81 grass pollen-sensitive subjects, and 60 received placebo injections (tyrosine alone). Diary cards were used to record symptoms and medication taken during approximately 30 days of the grass pollen season. RESULTS: There was a statistical advantage in favour of the active treatment for nasal (P = 0.016) and ocular (P = 0.003) symptoms and combined symptom and medication scores (P=0.013). Titrated skin prick testing revealed a significant reduction of skin sensitivity in the active group compared to placebo (P = 0.04). Grass-pollen-specific IgG antibody was raised by active treatment (P < 0.01). A rise in IgE antibody was seen in the placebo group during the season (P < 0.01). The first year's treatment rise of IgE was not seen in the active group, and no rise occurred during the pollen season. More local adverse events were seen in the active group. There was no difference in generalized adverse events. CONCLUSION: A new, well-tolerated allergy vaccine, incorporating a Th1-inducing adjuvant, MPL, was efficacious and after only four preseasonal injections produced antibody changes normally associated with long injection schedules. This may encourage wider application of allergy vaccination. The vaccine is now available in a number of countries as Pollinex Quattro.

Design of an optimally-diagnostic skin test solution for diagnosis of sensitivity to timothy grass (Phleum pratense) pollen.

BACKGROUND: Although most of the common allergen extracts that are used for diagnosis of type 1 hypersensitivity are now well standardized, this gives no assurance that they are within the concentration range that gives the best chance of a true diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the most appropriate concentration range of timothy grass pollen Phleum pratense extract to diagnose sensitivity to this pollen correctly through skin-testing. METHODS: Dilutions of a well-standardized extract were made and used to skin test "true' positive and "true' negative populations of subjects as identified by case history, challenge tests and radioallergosorbent test (RAST). Weal diameters were measured and the data were submitted to receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. For any particular weal size cut-off, the optimal diagnostic concentration (ODC) range was thus calculated. RESULTS: A 3 mm weal diameter cut-off was chosen as an appropriate size for routine diagnosis. Therefore the ODC range at this diameter was used to establish a product target concentration and specification for formulation of the diagnostic reagent. This method of allergen extract standardization can lead to a true-biological unitage that can be used for labelling purposes. CONCLUSION: The optimum concentration range at which to formulate an allergen extract, in terms of an in vitro immunologically based assay, can be determined by carrying out ROC analysis of the results of clinical studies as described in this communication. Diagnostic units (DU), are now used by us for labelling of such final formulations which conveys the information that the product is at the most appropriate concentration for diagnosis.