Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Obstet Gynecol ; 142(6): 1455-1458, 2023 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37884025

RESUMO

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is underdiagnosed peripartum. We administered a primary care screening tool and a pregnancy-related PTSD screening tool to postpartum patients presenting to our urban safety-net institution within 6 months of delivery, between August 2021 and February 2022. Our primary outcome was prevalence of positive PTSD screening results. Most patients (364/376, 96.8%) completed screening. Thirty (8.4%) had a positive score on at least one instrument, and seven of these 30 (23.3%) did not have a positive postpartum depression screening result. Among patients with a positive score, the majority (66.7%) obtained behavioral health follow-up. We found that routine PTSD screening for postpartum patients is feasible and identified patients at risk for PTSD. Obstetric practitioners should consider integrating PTSD screening into routine care.


Assuntos
Depressão Pós-Parto , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/diagnóstico , Estudos de Viabilidade , Período Pós-Parto , Depressão Pós-Parto/diagnóstico , Depressão Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos
2.
Psychol Rep ; 126(6): 2821-2833, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36167491

RESUMO

Humans tend to assign valence to objects, people, and events in the environment, but there are individual differences in the evaluation of the affective nature of these environmental stimuli. This exploratory study investigated how individual differences in anxiety and avoidance in close relationships are associated with the emotional appraisal of valenced and neutral stimuli. Participants evaluated negative, neutral, and positive stimuli for emotional valence in an image classification task. There was a positivity offset across all participants, in that neutral stimuli were evaluated as more positive than negative. Individuals higher on the Experiences in Close Relationships-Anxiety subscale showed a negativity bias in reaction times and ratings: they had faster response times to negative than to positive stimuli and had a greater tendency to evaluate positive stimuli as "negative." Individuals higher on the Experiences in Close Relationships-Avoidance subscale gave more positive ratings of negative stimuli and more negative ratings of positive stimuli, which may suggest a general blunted response to emotional stimuli. Findings are discussed in the context of the literature on individual differences and emotional appraisal of stimuli.


Assuntos
Ansiedade , Emoções , Humanos , Ansiedade/psicologia , Emoções/fisiologia , Transtornos de Ansiedade , Viés
3.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol ; 33(5): 550-554, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32535218

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare rates of positive postpartum depression screens at 6 weeks postpartum among adolescents and young adults (AYA) initiating immediate postpartum contraceptive implants and those initiating other methods. DESIGN: Through a retrospective observational design, we collected data on demographics, reproductive history, prenatal and postnatal depression, and postpartum contraception. SETTING: Patients participating in an AYA prenatal-postnatal program were eligible for inclusion. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 497 patients were enrolled between January 2013 and December 2016. The median age was 19 years (range 13-22 years); 86% were primiparous, 50% were Latina, 24% were black, and 16% were white; 34% initiated immediate postpartum implants (n = 169). INTERVENTION: Those initiating a contraceptive implant within the first 14 days postpartum were included in the intervention group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We compared rates of positive Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scales (EDPS) (scores ≥10) in AYA initiating immediate postpartum implants and those initiating other contraceptive methods. RESULTS: The AYA initiating immediate postpartum implants were similar to the rest of the cohort in baseline characteristics, aside from an increased rate of preterm births among the intervention group (19.4% vs 12.1%; P = .03). Prenatally, 14% had an elevated Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) scores (11.5% immediate postpartum implants vs 15.4% comparison, P = .25). At 6 weeks postpartum, 7.6% had a positive postpartum depression screen; this rate was significantly lower for those initiating immediate postpartum implants compared to those choosing other methods (4.1% vs 9.5%, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Providers should continue to encourage AYA to choose whichever highly effective contraceptive method they prefer for postpartum use.


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais Femininos/administração & dosagem , Depressão Pós-Parto/diagnóstico , Desogestrel/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA