Operating room discharge after deep neuromuscular block reversed with sugammadex compared with shallow block reversed with neostigmine: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if reversing a deep or moderate block with sugammadex, compared with a shallow block reversed with neostigmine, reduces the time to operating room discharge after surgery and the time spent in the postanesthesia care unit. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Monocentric study performed from February 2011 until May 2012. PATIENTS: One hundred consenting women with American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I or II were randomized into 2 groups. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic hysterectomy was performed under desflurane general anesthesia. For the neostigmine (N) group, 0.45 mg · kg-1 rocuronium was followed by spontaneous recovery. A 5-mg rescue bolus was administered only if surgical evaluation was unacceptable. At the end of surgery, 50 µg · kg-1 neostigmine with glycopyrrolate was administered. For the sugammadex (S) group, a higher intubating rocuronium dose (0.6 mg · kg-1) was followed by 5-mg boluses each time the train-of-four count exceeded 2. Sugammadex (2-4 mg · kg-1) was administered to reverse the block. All patients were extubated after obtaining a train-of-four ratio of 0.9. MEASUREMENTS: The duration between the end of surgery and operating room discharge and the time spent in the postanesthesia care unit. MAIN RESULTS: The time till operating room discharge was shorter and more predictable in group S (9.15±4.28 minutes vs 13.87±11.43 minutes in group N; P=.005). The maximal duration in group S was 22 minutes, compared with 72 minutes in group N. The time spent in the postanesthesia care unit was not significantly different (group S: 47.75±31.77 minutes and group N: 53.43±40.57 minutes; P=.543). CONCLUSION: Maintaining a deep neuromuscular block during laparoscopic hysterectomy reversed at the end of the procedure with sugammadex enabled a faster and more predictable time till operating room discharge than did the classical combination of a shallower block reversed with neostigmine.

Performance of acceleromyography with a short and light TOF-tube compared with mechanomyography: a clinical comparison.

BACKGROUND: Disturbances in the thumb's movement interfere with the functioning of acceleromyography in many clinical settings. The short and light (SL) train-of-four (TOF)-Tube is a new version of a rigid tubular device that was designed to protect the thumb from external disturbances during surgery, even when the hand is not accessible by the anaesthesiologist. OBJECTIVE: To compare the precision and performance of acceleromyography performed with the aid of the SL TOF-Tube (AMGTT) with standard isometric mechanomyography (MMG). DESIGN: Simultaneous arm-to-arm comparison of both methods in the same anaesthetised patient. SETTING: A monocentric study, performed from September 2007 to June 2008. PATIENTS: Nineteen ASA I to II patients scheduled to undergo lower limb orthopaedic surgery under general anaesthesia. INTERVENTION: Neuromuscular transmission monitoring during baseline, onset and spontaneous recovery of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Initial baseline and repeatability coefficients were assessed during 10 consecutive measurements of the first twitch height (T1) and TOF T4/T1 ratio and compared using a z test. The spontaneous recoveries of defined blockade levels (onset, T1 25% of initial calibration and TOF ratio 0.9) were compared in terms of duration and intensity. Agreement between both techniques was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The mean ±â€ŠSD control TOF ratios were 98 ±â€Š1% (MMG) and 103 ±â€Š2% (AMGTT). The repeatability coefficients were higher (P < 0.001) and the onset was longer (mean 0.44 min) (P < 0.001) when they were measured by AMGTT. The recoveries of T1 25% and TOF ratio 0.9 were not significantly different between the two methods, and the limits of agreement were in the usual range of contralateral comparisons (-19 and +24% for TOF ratio 0.9). CONCLUSION: Compared with mechanomyography, acceleromyography performed with the aid of an SL TOF-Tube offered acceptable precision and equivalent performance during neuromuscular block recovery.