Population pharmacokinetics of riociguat in a pediatric population (aged ≥ 6 years) with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The PATENT-CHILD study investigated riociguat in children aged ≥ 6 to <18 years with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treated with tablets or an oral pediatric suspension based on bodyweight-adjusted dosing of up to 2.5 mg three times daily. PATENT-CHILD demonstrated an acceptable riociguat safety profile and individual plasma concentrations in pediatric patients were consistent with those in adult patients. METHODS: Using the data set from PATENT-CHILD and building on existing population pharmacokinetic (PK) models for riociguat and its major metabolite (M1) in adults with PAH, a coupled riociguat-M1 PK model was developed. The final model developed incorporated a one-compartment model for riociguat, coupled to a one-compartment model for M1, allowing for presystemic formation of M1. It included allometric scaling exponents for bodyweight. RESULTS: Apparent clearance of riociguat was similar in children and adult patients with PAH (median [interquartile range] 2.20 [1.75-3.44] and 2.08 L/h [1.55-2.97]). Factors contributing to lower PK exposure were lower riociguat maintenance dose in PATENT-CHILD, and a higher riociguat clearance in some adolescent patients, compared with adult patients. No effects of formulation, sex, or age on riociguat PK were observed. An exploratory PK/pharmacodynamics analysis found the increase in 6-min walking distance in pediatric patients treated with riociguat was not related to riociguat PK. CONCLUSIONS: Body size is the main determinant of PK in growing children, and the model supports clinical data that, for children weighing < 50 kg, a bodyweight-adjusted dose of riociguat should be used to achieve a similar exposure to that observed in adults with PAH.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of rivaroxaban in children and comparison to prospective physiologically-based pharmacokinetic predictions.

Rivaroxaban has been investigated in the EINSTEIN-Jr program for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children aged 0 to 18 years and in the UNIVERSE program for thromboprophylaxis in children aged 2 to 8 years with congenital heart disease after Fontan-procedure. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling were used throughout the pediatric development of rivaroxaban according to the learn-and-confirm paradigm. The development strategy was to match pediatric drug exposures to adult exposure proven to be safe and efficacious. In this analysis, a refined pediatric PopPK model for rivaroxaban based on integrated EINSTEIN-Jr data and interim PK data from part A of the UNIVERSE phase III study was developed and the influence of potential covariates and intrinsic factors on rivaroxaban exposure was assessed. The model adequately described the observed pediatric PK data. PK parameters and exposure metrics estimated by the PopPK model were compared to the predictions from a previously published pediatric PBPK model for rivaroxaban. Ninety-one percent of the individual post hoc clearance estimates were found within the 5th to 95th percentile of the PBPK model predictions. In patients below 2 years of age, however, clearance was underpredicted by the PBPK model. The iterative and integrative use of PBPK and PopPK modeling and simulation played a major role in the establishment of the bodyweight-adjusted rivaroxaban dosing regimen that was ultimately confirmed to be a safe and efficacious dosing regimen for children aged 0 to 18 years with acute VTE in the EINSTEIN-Jr phase III study.

Population pharmacokinetics of regorafenib in solid tumours: Exposure in clinical practice considering enterohepatic circulation and food intake.

AIM: Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor with clinical efficacy in a range of advanced solid tumours. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed to evaluate the variability of the PK of regorafenib and its pharmacologically active metabolites M-2 and M-5 in solid tumours. METHODS: The model was initially developed using densely sampled phase 1 data and information on food intake to incorporate enterohepatic circulation (EHC) that was identified to considerably contribute to the PK of regorafenib. This was then applied to sparsely sampled data from four phase 3 studies in patients with advanced solid tumours. The need for exact food intake data to estimate individual drug exposure was evaluated. RESULTS: By incorporating EHC, the model adequately described the PK profiles of regorafenib, M-2 and M-5 after single and multiple doses in patients from phase 1 studies. Individual exposure in phase 3 studies was adequately described based on assumptions on the time and frequency of food intake, although exact food intake data are recommended to improve the estimation. Covariate analysis identified sex and body mass index (BMI) as impacting exposure to regorafenib, and sex as strongly impacting exposure to M-2 and M-5 (also influenced by the BMI effect on parent regorafenib in the joint model developed); however, these factors accounted for a small portion of the overall variability in exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The adequate description of regorafenib PK after multiple dosing requires the incorporation of EHC. Neither single nor combined covariates predicted exposures that would warrant a priori regorafenib dose adjustment.

Population Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Response Analysis of Finerenone: Insights Based on Phase IIb Data and Simulations to Support Dose Selection for Pivotal Trials in Type 2 Diabetes with Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Finerenone (BAY 94-8862) is a potent non-steroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist being developed for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. METHODS: We present the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis for efficacy and safety markers based on data from two clinical phase IIb studies: ARTS-DN (NCT01874431) and ARTS-DN Japan (NCT01968668). RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of finerenone were adequately characterized, with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and body weight as influencing covariates. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve in Japanese patients did not differ from that in the global population, and the investigated pharmacokinetics were dose- and time-linear. In addition, the pharmacokinetic model provided robust individual exposure estimates to study exposure-response. The concentration-effect relationship over time for the efficacy marker urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) was well-characterized by a maximum effect model indicating saturation at high exposures. For the safety markers, a log-linear model and a power model were identified for serum potassium concentration and eGFR, respectively, indicating attenuation of effect gains at high exposures. There was no apparent ethnic effect on the investigated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships. The model-predicted times to reach the full (99%) steady-state drug effect on UACR, serum potassium, and eGFR were 138, 20, and 85 days, respectively, while the pharmacokinetic half-life was 2-3 h and steady state was achieved after 2 days, indicating timescale separation. CONCLUSION: Our dose-exposure-response modeling and simulation indicates effects were largely saturated at finerenone 20 mg and doses of both 10 and 20 mg once daily appear safe and efficacious at reducing albuminuria.

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the relationship between testosterone and prostate specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer during treatment with leuprorelin.

AIMS: This investigation aimed to quantitatively characterize the relationship between the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist leuprorelin, testosterone (T) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentrations over time, to aid identification of a target T concentration that optimises the balance of the benefits of T suppression whilst reducing the risk of side effects related to futile over-suppression. METHODS: Data from a single dose study to investigate the effect of leuprorelin in a 6-month depot formulation on T and PSA in prostate cancer patients were analysed using a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling approach. The developed model was qualified using external data from 3 studies, in which the effect of different formulations of leuprorelin on T and PSA was evaluated in prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: The effect of leuprorelin on the relationship between T and PSA was adequately characterized by the Romero model with minor modifications, combined with a turnover model to describe the delay in response between T and PSA. The data were significantly better described when assuming a minimum PSA level that is independent on the treatment-related reduction in T, as compared to a model with a proportional reduction in PSA and T. CONCLUSIONS: The model-based analysis suggests that on a population level, reducing T concentrations below 35 ng/dL does not result in a further decrease in PSA levels (>95% of the minimal PSA level is reached). More data are required to support this relationship in the lower T and PSA range.

An Integrated Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize Levonorgestrel Pharmacokinetics After Different Administration Routes.

To compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the progestin levonorgestrel for various routes of administration, an integrated population PK analysis was performed. This analysis integrated data from 10 clinical pharmacology studies and resulted in a single, comprehensive population PK model (and its applications) describing the PK of levonorgestrel and its variability for 6 levonorgestrel-containing contraceptives: 3 intrauterine systems (IUSs; levonorgestrel [LNG]-IUS 20 [Mirena® ], LNG-IUS 12 [Kyleena® ], and LNG-IUS 8 [Jaydess® /Skyla® ]); 2 oral contraceptives (the progestin-only pill [Microlut® /Norgeston® ] and the combined oral contraceptive [Miranova® ]); and a subdermal implant (Jadelle® ). The levonorgestrel-containing contraceptives administered orally or as an implant act mainly via their systemic (unbound) levonorgestrel exposure, whereas levonorgestrel administered via an IUS is released directly into the uterine cavity, resulting in lower systemic levonorgestrel concentrations. The integrated population PK analysis revealed that the combined oral contraceptive led to the highest levonorgestrel exposure, followed by the progestin-only pill and the implant, which led to similar levonorgestrel exposure, and the IUSs, which led to the lowest levonorgestrel exposure (in decreasing order: LNG-IUS 20, LNG-IUS 12, and LNG-IUS 8). The difference was even more distinct at the end of the indicated duration of use of 3 years (LNG-IUS 8) and 5 years (LNG-IUS 20 and LNG-IUS 12). Comparing the 3 IUSs and the implant, in vivo release rates were highest for the implant, followed by LNG-IUS 20, then LNG-IUS 12, and were lowest for LNG-IUS 8. This is in line with the comparison of the total levonorgestrel concentrations.

Exposure-response relationship of regorafenib efficacy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To explore the relationship between regorafenib exposure and efficacy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had disease progression during sorafenib treatment (RESORCE). METHODS: Exposure-response (ER) analyses for regorafenib were performed using data from a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (RESORCE). Patients received 160mg regorafenib or placebo once daily (3weeks on/1week off in a 4-week cycle) with best supportive care until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Kaplan-Meier analyses for overall survival (OS) and time-to-progression (TTP) were performed in which regorafenib-treated patients were grouped into four categories according to their estimated average exposure over 4weeks in cycle 1. While this analysis primarily focused on efficacy, a potential correlation between exposure and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was also evaluated. If any differences were observed between Kaplan-Meier plots, the ER analysis continued with a multivariate Cox regression analysis to evaluate the correlation between exposure quartile categories and the efficacy and safety parameters while taking into consideration the effect of the predefined clinically relevant demographic and baseline covariates. The functional form of the ER relationship within the regorafenib treatment group was subsequently evaluated. RESULTS: Based on visual assessment of the Kaplan-Meier plots, no meaningful relationship between the exposure categories and TEAEs were observed, although median OS and TTP tended to be longer in the higher exposure categories. Further ER analyses, which considered the effects of predefined covariates and the different shapes of the ER relationship, focused on efficacy. The baseline risk factors Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥1, alpha-fetoprotein levels ≥400ng/ml, and aspartate transaminase or alanine transaminase levels >3×upper limit of normal were significantly associated with OS (P<0.01) and age was associated with TTP. A statistically significant difference was found for OS and TTP between patients receiving regorafenib compared with those receiving placebo in the multivariate ER analysis (P<0.01) in favor of regorafenib. However, within the group of regorafenib-treated patients, the effect of regorafenib exposure on efficacy, either by estimating four effect sizes for each quartile, or by including a continuous linear or nonlinear relationship between individual exposure and efficacy, was not significant (P>0.01) and relatively flat. This suggests that increasing regorafenib exposure would not result in a meaningful increase in OS or TTP. CONCLUSION: After considering the baseline risk factors: ECOG performance status, alpha-fetoprotein levels, and hepatic function for OS and age for TTP, the ER analysis in regorafenib-treated patients showed similar efficacy over the entire predicted exposure range in RESORCE. This supports the selected regorafenib dose of 160mg once daily (3weeks on/1week off in a 4-week cycle) in patients with intermediate or advanced HCC who have experienced disease progression on sorafenib.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Tapentadol Extended Release (ER) in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Moderate or Severe Chronic Pain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Tapentadol is a centrally acting analgesic with two mechanisms of action, µ-opioid receptor agonism and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition. The objectives were to describe the pharmacokinetic behavior of tapentadol after oral administration of an extended-release (ER) formulation in healthy subjects and patients with chronic pain and to evaluate covariate effects. METHODS: Data were obtained from 2276 subjects enrolled in five phase I and nine phase II and III studies. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was conducted using NONMEM. RESULTS: The population estimates of apparent oral clearance and apparent central volume of distribution were 257 L/h and 1870 L, respectively. The complex absorption was described with a transit compartment for the first input. The second input function embraces saturable "binding" in the "absorption compartment", and a time-varying rate constant. Covariate evaluation demonstrated that age, aspartate aminotransferase, and health (painful diabetic neuropathy or not) had a statistically significant effect on apparent clearance, and bioavailability appeared to be dependent on body weight. The pcVPC indicted that the model provided a robust and unbiased fit to the data. CONCLUSIONS: A one-compartment disposition model with two input functions and first-order elimination adequately described the pharmacokinetics of tapentadol ER. The dose-dependency in the pharmacokinetics of tapentadol ER is adequately described by the absorption model. None of the covariates were considered as clinically relevant factors that warrant dose adjustments.

Pharmacokinetics of recombinant human antithrombin in delivery and surgery patients with hereditary antithrombin deficiency.

Population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses were conducted to refine dosing recommendations for recombinant human anti-thrombin therapy in surgery and delivery patients with hereditary antithrombin deficiency (HD). Single-dose PK data from patients with HD and nonlinear mixed-effects modeling were used to devise a dosing regimen to target antithrombin (AT) activity levels between 80% and 120% of normal. External validation with data from a phase 3 trial confirmed the correctness of a covariate-free model for surgery patients, but dosing adjustment was necessary for delivery patients. After different covariates were tested, the model was updated to incorporate the influential covariate, delivery. Simulations were used to develop a therapeutic drug-monitoring scenario that results in steady state AT activity levels within the target range as quickly as practically feasible. Data from a second clinical trial provided additional external validation and confirmed the accuracy of the dosing model for both groups of patients.

Evaluation of blood-brain barrier transport and CNS drug metabolism in diseased and control brain after intravenous L-DOPA in a unilateral rat model of Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Changes in blood-brain barrier (BBB) functionality have been implicated in Parkinson's disease. This study aimed to investigate BBB transport of L-DOPA transport in conjunction with its intra-brain conversion, in both control and diseased cerebral hemispheres in the unilateral rat rotenone model of Parkinson's disease. METHODS: In Lewis rats, at 14 days after unilateral infusion of rotenone into the medial forebrain bundle, L-DOPA was administered intravenously (10, 25 or 50 mg/kg). Serial blood samples and brain striatal microdialysates were analysed for L-DOPA, and the dopamine metabolites DOPAC and HVA. Ex-vivo brain tissue was analyzed for changes in tyrosine hydroxylase staining as a biomarker for Parkinson's disease severity. Data were analysed by population pharmacokinetic analysis (NONMEM) to compare BBB transport of L-DOPA in conjunction with the conversion of L-DOPA into DOPAC and HVA, in control and diseased cerebral hemisphere. RESULTS: Plasma pharmacokinetics of L-DOPA could be described by a 3-compartmental model. In rotenone responders (71%), no difference in L-DOPA BBB transport was found between diseased and control cerebral hemisphere. However, in the diseased compared with the control side, basal microdialysate levels of DOPAC and HVA were substantially lower, whereas following L-DOPA administration their elimination rates were higher. CONCLUSIONS: Parkinson's disease-like pathology, indicated by a huge reduction of tyrosine hydroxylase as well as by substantially reduced levels and higher elimination rates of DOPAC and HVA, does not result in changes in BBB transport of L-DOPA. Taking the results of this study and that of previous ones, it can be concluded that changes in BBB functionality are not a specific characteristic of Parkinson's disease, and cannot account for the decreased benefit of L-DOPA at later stages of Parkinson's disease.

Pharmacokinetics of a granisetron transdermal system for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of granisetron transdermal formulation and examine its possible relationship with age, gender, and renal function. METHODS: This article describes a Phase I PK study and a post hoc pooled population PK analysis. The Phase I study was a randomized, cross-over study that assessed PK parameters of three granisetron patch sizes and oral granisetron. The pooled population PK analysis included data from three trials in healthy subjects (n = 48) and from Phase II and III studies in patients with cancer (n = 793). The population PK model was used to investigate granisetron exposure and its possible relationship with age, gender, and renal function. RESULTS: Following oral dosing, plasma granisetron concentration was quantifiable at 1 h, and maximal mean concentration (4.7 ng/mL) was reached 2 h after administration. With transdermal application, maximal concentration was reached 48 h post-application; t(1/2) was 36 h. With oral dosing, overall exposure after 5 days was 306 ng/mL.h, and C(avg) 2.6 ng/mL. This corresponded to an AUC(0-infinity) for the 52 cm(2) patch of 420 ng/mL.h and C(avg) 2.2 ng/mL over 6 days. Clearance was not affected by age, gender, weight, or renal function. CONCLUSION: The 52 cm( 2) granisetron patch achieves a similar exposure to that of a 2 mg oral dose and provides continuous delivery of granisetron over 6 days. The patch may have utility in treating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting where prolonged drug delivery is advantageous. No dose adjustments would be needed based on age or renal function.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex.

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex selectively binds steroidal neuromuscular blocking drugs, leading to reversal of neuromuscular blockade. The authors developed a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for reversal of neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex, assuming that reversal results from a decrease of free drug in plasma and/or neuromuscular junction. The model was applied for predicting the interaction between sugammadex and rocuronium or vecuronium. METHODS: Noninstantaneous equilibrium of rocuronium-sugammadex complex formation was assumed in the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic interaction model. The pharmacokinetic parameters for the complex and sugammadex alone were assumed to be identical. After development of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for rocuronium alone, the interaction model was optimized using rocuronium and sugammadex concentration data after administration of 0.1-8 mg/kg sugammadex 3 min after administration of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. Subsequently, the predicted reversal of neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex was compared with data after administration of up to 8 mg/kg sugammadex at reappearance of second twitch of the train-of-four; or 3, 5, or 15 min after administration of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. Finally, the model was applied to predict reversal of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. RESULTS: Using the in vitro dissociation constants for the binding of rocuronium and vecuronium to sugammadex, the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic interaction model adequately predicted the increase in total rocuronium and vecuronium plasma concentrations and the time-course of reversal of neuromuscular blockade. CONCLUSIONS: Model-based evaluation supports the hypothesis that reversal of rocuronium- and vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex results from a decrease in the free rocuronium and vecuronium concentration in plasma and neuromuscular junction. The model is useful for prediction of reversal of rocuronium and vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex.