A consensus process to identify research priorities in paediatric urology in the United Kingdom.

INTRODUCTION: Paediatric urologists manage a spectrum of conditions, much of the evidence for relevant treatment pathways is of low quality. For many conditions treatment varies according to location and surgeon; children with the same condition might have surgery in one unit but watchful waiting in another. Underlying this variation are differences in opinion, and insufficient high-level evidence with few prospective randomized studies. Such studies may be challenging to design, fund and recruit into, and are more likely to succeed if there is a collaborative approach. Research prioritization is a tool to identify the research of most value. Delphi methodology is an interpretive technique aiming to gain the consensus view of interested parties. The British Association of Paediatric Urologists (BAPU) set out to ascertain consensus on what paediatric urologists, working in the UK, consider to be areas of priority for research. This paper describes the process used, and the resulting list of research questions. METHODS: A scoping survey of paediatric urologists in the UK was undertaken to identify an initial set of research questions. These were refined by the BAPU research committee (BAPU RC), then prioritized using a modified Delphi process. During Stage 1a multiple new research questions were submitted leading to Stage 1b, an interim process. All UK paediatric urologists were invited to take part in Stage 2 of the prioritization process. RESULTS: Sixty-five questions were submitted to the scoping survey by 24 paediatric urologists. The BAPU RC refined these to 60 questions, which were submitted to Stage 1a of the modified Delphi process. Sixty-seven people completed Stage 1a, at the same time submitting 224 additional research questions. The BAPU RC revised the entire question set, ensuring the key subject of the original question was not altered and novel questions were retained. The BAPU RC undertook interim scoring of the resultant 79 questions, the top scoring 25 questions plus 5 lower scoring 'wild card' questions (to ensure the breadth of the specialty was represented) were put forward to Stage 2. A total of 65 people completed Stage 2, including a lay representative. A list of 30 priority research questions was generated; the top 10 includes management of neuropathic bladder, posterior urethral valves, antibiotic prophylaxis, DSD & CAH, continence, male external genitalia, VUR and transition care (Table). CONCLUSION: This process has provided BAPU, paediatric urologists in the UK, and funders with areas of research considered a priority in the specialty.

Nonspecific abdominal pain is a safe diagnosis.

AIM: The aim of this study is to assess if a clinical diagnosis of nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) is safe and if patients with this initial diagnosis are likely to require further investigation or surgical intervention. METHODS: 3323 patients admitted with NSAP from July 1990 to September 2012 utilizing a prospective database of all surgical admissions were included. Readmission over the period of the study and specifically within 30 days of their initial presentation was identified together with any invasive investigation or surgical intervention. MAIN RESULTS: 319 children (9.6%) were subsequently readmitted with abdominal pain at some point during the study period. Of these, 78 (2.3%) were readmitted within 30 days. 118 (3.5%) children subsequently had an operation or invasive investigation some point following their initial admission. Of these 33 (0.6%) had the procedure within 3 months of the initial admission. 13 patients had an appendicectomy within 3 months of the initial presentation. Of these histology confirmed appendicitis in 8 patients. This gives an overall incidence of "missed" appendicitis of 0.2 % (8/3323). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that a clinical diagnosis of nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) is safe in a pediatric population and the risk of "missing" appendicitis is only 0.2%. Patients and/or parents can be confidently reassured that the risk of missing organic pathology is very low.

Choledochal malformations: the Scottish experience.

INTRODUCTION: Excisional surgery for choledochal malformations in Scotland is currently performed in three specialist pediatric surgical centers using open or laparoscopic-assisted techniques. We reviewed the outcome of children who had excisional surgery in Scotland between 1992 and 2010. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Case notes for all patients undergoing excisional surgery in any of the three specialist pediatric surgical centers in Scotland between 1992 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were identified, with a female preponderance of 4:1. Of these, three patients (12%) were diagnosed by antenatal ultrasound scan. The commonest presenting symptoms were anorexia (56%), abdominal pain (52%), and jaundice (52%). Only 20% had the classical triad of abdominal pain, jaundice, and a palpable mass. Using the King's College Hospital classification, 14 patients had type 1 malformations, 8 had type 4 malformations, and 3 had type 2 malformations. Median age at operation was 2 years (range 35 days to 13.5 years). Two centers performed open excision while the third center used primarily a laparoscopic-assisted technique. Median follow-up was 2.1 years (range 30 days to 11.9 years). Three patients (12%) required repeat laparotomy. The wound infection rate was 8% (n=2). The recurrent cholangitis rate was 8% (n=2). There was one late death due to adhesive small bowel obstruction, 4 years after surgery. To date, no patient has developed biliary tree stones or liver failure. CONCLUSIONS: Choledochal malformation excisional surgery, either open or laparoscopic assisted, can be safely performed in appropriately equipped, pediatric surgical centers in Scotland by experienced pediatric surgeons.

Urogenital anomalies in girls with sacrococcygeal teratoma: a commonly missed association.

BACKGROUND: The association of urogenital (UG) anomalies and sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) has not been widely reported. Our aim was to look at the national incidence and presentation of this anomaly in patients with SCT and to provide the first report of a clear anatomical description of this commonly missed association. METHODS: Sacrococcygeal teratoma cases in Scotland during the last 30 years were identified. Patients with associated UG anomalies were reviewed in detail to identify their presentation, anatomy, and management. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients with SCT were identified, including 41 girls. Five girls (12%) subsequently had a UG anomaly diagnosed, which was not apparent at the initial surgery. Two patients presented with retention, and their anomaly was diagnosed at 6 weeks and 7 months of age. The other 3 presented with incontinence, and despite thorough assessment, including cystoscopy, their UG anomalies were not recognized until the ages of 7, 9, and 13 years. CONCLUSIONS: Urogenital anomalies are surprisingly common in girls with SCT. The reason for this association is unclear. None of these cases were diagnosed initially, which means that it was either missed or acquired. Urogenital anomalies should be suspected in girls with SCT and actively excluded in those with voiding difficulties.

Elective laparoscopic appendicectomy for chronic right iliac fossa pain in children.

AIM: To determine whether elective laparoscopic appendicectomy is justified for chronic right iliac fossa (RIF) pain of undetermined origin. METHODS: A retrospective audit of all laparoscopic appendicectomies between January 1997 and August 2003 was performed. The expanded medical audit system (EMAS) and a Microsoft Access database of operative records were used to identify patients with chronic RIF pain subjected to elective appendicectomy. Case notes were retrieved and analysed for patient profile, duration of symptoms including clinic visits and admissions, operative findings, histological analysis, and postoperative performance. A correlation between histological findings and final outcome was investigated. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy during the period of the study. A total of 11 cases with chronic RIF pain were identified. Nine were female and 2 male. Age ranged from 9 to 14 years with a mean of 11.9 years. The number of clinic visits and admissions for chronic RIF pain ranged from 2 to 8, with a mean of 4. Duration of symptoms ranged from 1 to 36 months, with a mean of 12.1 months. Detailed history, clinical examination, and serological and radiological investigations failed to reveal the cause of the pain in all cases. Patients were followed up in postoperative clinics for between 1 and 72 months, with a mean of 16.1 months. Histology of resected appendices showed acute inflammation (3 cases), fecoliths (2 cases), lymphoid hyperplasia (LH) (1 case), LH and a foreign body reaction (1 case), LH and mucosal hyperplasia (1 case), and Enterobius vermicularis parasites in 1 case. The appendix was normal in 2 cases. Eight patients had complete resolution of RIP pain. Seven of these had pathology within the appendix and 1 was histologically normal. Two patients with resolved RIF pain, but with pain elsewhere, had lymphoid hyperplasia noted within the appendix. One patient with persistent pain 6 years postoperatively had a normal appendix. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a significant number of patients with chronic RIF pain have pathology within the appendix. The majority of these cases will benefit from elective appendicectomy. It is critical however that all other possible causes of pain in the RIF are excluded. Laparoscopy is an integral part of the diagnosis and management of this particularly difficult group of patients.