Nonoperative management protocol for locally advanced rectal cancer.

AIM: The standard treatment for low rectal cancer is preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery with low anterior resection with diverting ileostomy or abdominoperineal resection, both of which have significant long-term effects on bowel and sexual function. Due to the high morbidity of surgery, there has been increasing interest in nonoperative management for low rectal cancer. The aim of this work is to conduct a pan-Canadian Phase II trial assessing the safety of nonoperative management for low rectal cancer. METHOD: Patients with Stage II or III low rectal cancer completing chemoradiotherapy according to standard of care at participating centres will be assessed for complete clinical response 8-14 weeks following completion of chemoradiotherapy. Subjects achieving a clinical complete response will undergo active surveillance including endoscopy, imaging and bloodwork at regular intervals for 24 months. The primary outcome will be the rate of local regrowth 2 years after chemoradiotherapy. Nonoperative management will be considered safe (i.e. as effective as surgery to achieve local control) if the rate of local regrowth is ≤30% and surgical salvage is possible for all local regrowths. Secondary outcomes will include disease-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION: The results will be highly clinically relevant, as it is expected that nonoperative management will be safe and lead to widespread adoption of nonoperative management in Canada. This change in practice has the potential to decrease the number of patients requiring surgery and the costs associated with surgery and long-term surgical morbidity.

Surgical management of rectal cancer with synchronous treatment of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of synchronous treatments for rectal (RC) and prostate (PC) cancers. METHODS: Single-center retrospective study (2007-2021) of patients treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and total mesorectal excision (TME) for RC with synchronous PC treatment. The endpoints were 30-day postoperative severe complications, R0 resection rates, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among the 16 patients, 15 (93.7%) received neoadjuvant pelvic RT (40-50.4 Gray) followed by either transperineal high dose rate prostate brachytherapy (62.5%), prostate external RT boost (25.0%), or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone (6.3%). One (6.3%) patient received neoadjuvant rectal brachytherapy and ADT. Pelvic RT was combined with chemotherapy in 87.5% of cases. TME was performed in all patients with low anterior resection (87.5%) or abdominoperineal resection (12.5%), primarily using minimally invasive surgery (87.5%). The R0 resection rate was 93.8%. Six (37.5%) patients experienced 30-day Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb complications, including one (7.1%) anastomotic leak. After a median follow-up of 39.0 months, 63.6% of diverting ileostomies were reversed. Three-year DFS from RC was 71.4% (CI 40.2-88.3) and 3-year OS was 84.4% (CI 95% 50.4-95.9). No PC recurrence or death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Synchronous management of RC and PC with pelvic RT followed by curative prostate RT doses and TME showed acceptable morbidity and oncologic results. Prostate brachytherapy, the most commonly used treatment modality, allowed avoidance of prostatectomy and additional external RT to the rectum. PC should not limit the curative intent of RC, as all recurrences were from rectal origin.

Loop Ileostomy Closure as a 23-Hour Stay Procedure With Preoperative Efferent Limb Enteral Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Loop ileostomy closure is a common procedure in colorectal surgery. Often seen as a simple operation associated with a low complication rate, it still leads to lengthy hospitalizations. Reducing postoperative complications and ileus rates could lead to a shorter length of stay and even ambulatory surgery. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of ileostomy closure performed in a 23-hour hospitalization setting using a standardized enhanced recovery pathway. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: Two high-volume colorectal surgery centers. PATIENTS: Healthy adults undergoing elective ileostomy closure from July 2019 to January 2022. INTERVENTION: All patients were enrolled in a standardized enhanced recovery pathway specific to ileostomy closure, including daily irrigation of efferent limb with a nutritional formula for 7 days before surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to either conventional hospitalization (n = 23) or a 23-hour stay (n = 24). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was total length of stay and secondary outcomes were 30-day rates of readmission, postoperative ileus, surgical site infections, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were ultimately randomly allocated. Patients in the 23-hour hospitalization arm had a shorter median length of stay (1 vs 2 days, p = 0.02) and similar rates of readmission (4% vs 13%, p = 0.35), postoperative ileus (none in both arms), surgical site infection (0% vs 4%, p = 0.49), postoperative morbidity (21% vs 22%, p = 1.00), and mortality (none in both arms). LIMITATIONS: Due to coronavirus disease 2019, access to surgical beds was greatly limited, leading to a shift toward ambulatory surgery for ileostomy closure. The study was terminated early, which affected its statistical power. CONCLUSION: Loop ileostomy closures as 23-hour stay procedures are feasible and safe. Ileus rate might be reduced by preoperative intestinal stimulation with nutritional formula through the stoma's efferent limb, although specific randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this association. See Video Abstract . CIERRE DE ILEOSTOMA EN ASA COMO PROCEDIMIENTO AMBULATORIO DE HORAS CON ESTMULO PREOPERATORIO ENTERAL EFERENTE ESTUDIO ALEATORIO CONTROLADO: ANTECEDENTES:El cierre de la ileostomía en asa es un procedimiento común en la cirugía colorrectal. A menudo vista como una operación simple asociada con bajas tasas de complicaciones, aún conduce a largas hospitalizaciones. La reducción de las complicaciones postoperatorias y las tasas de íleo podría conducir a una estadía hospitalaria más corta o incluso a una cirugía ambulatoria.OBJETIVOS:El presente estudio pretende evaluar la seguridad y la viabilidad del cierre de ileostomía realizadas en un entorno de hospitalización de 23 horas utilizando una vía de recuperación mejorada y estandarizada.DISEÑO:Estudio aleatorio controladoAJUSTES:Dos centros de cirugía colorrectal de gran volúmenPACIENTES:Adultos sanos sometidos a cierre electivo de ileostomía, desde Julio de 2019 hasta Enero de 2022.INTERVENCIÓN:Todos los pacientes fueron inscritos en una vía de recuperación mejorada y estandarizada específica para el cierre de la ileostomía, incluyendo la irrigación diaria de la extremidad eferente del intestino asociada a una fórmula nutricional durante 7 días previos a la cirugía. Los pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente en hospitalización convencional (n = 23) o a una estadía de 23 horas (n = 24).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la duración total de la estadía hospitalaria y los resultados secundarios fueron las tasas de reingreso a los 30 días, el íleo postoperatorio, las infecciones de la herida quirúrgica, la morbilidad y mortalidad postoperatorias.RESULTADOS:Finalmente fueron randomizados un total de 47 pacientes. Aquellos que se encontraban en el grupo de hospitalización de 23 horas tuvieron una estadía media más corta (1 día versus 2 días, p = 0,02) y tasas similares de reingreso (4% vs 13%, p = 0,35), de íleo postoperatorio (ninguno en ambos brazos), de infección del sitio quirúrgico (0 vs 4%, p = 0,49), de morbilidad postoperatoria (21% vs 22%, p > 0,99) y de mortalidad (ninguna en ambos brazos).LIMITACIONES:Debido a la pandemia SARS CoV-2, el acceso a las camas quirúrgicas fue muy limitado, lo que llevó a un cambio hacia la cirugía ambulatoria para el cierre de ileostomías. El estudio finalizó anticipadamente, lo que afectó su poder estadístico.CONCLUSIÓN:Los cierres de ileostomía en asa como procedimientos de estadía de 23 horas son factibles y seguros. La tasa de íleo podría reducirse mediante la estimulación intestinal preoperatoria a través de la rama eferente del estoma asociada a fórmulas nutricionales, por lo que se necesitan estudios randomizados específicos para confirmar esta asociación. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Evaluation of physicians' current practices and awareness regarding the treatment of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis: results of a provincial survey.

OBJECTIVE: International guidelines now recommend nonantibiotic treatment of uncomplicated diverticulitis. We assessed physicians' current management strategies for uncomplicated diverticulitis, their awareness of the updated recommendations, and barriers to practice change. METHODS: A 21-question web-based survey conducted between 09/2022 and 11/2022 was sent to participants through their respective Quebec provincial associations or working groups. Participants included general surgeons, emergency physicians, gastroenterologists and general practitioners. Physicians who did not treat diverticulitis were excluded. The main outcomes were awareness of guideline recommendations on uncomplicated diverticulitis treatment, the use of nonantibiotic management for uncomplicated diverticulitis and identification of perceived barriers to practice change. RESULTS: The participation rate was 15.9%. The 465 participants consisted primarily of general practitioners (41.7%), general surgeons (29.2%) and emergency physicians (17.8%). Eighty-two percent had heard of the nonantibiotic treatment strategy for uncomplicated diverticulitis; 7.5% were "uncomfortable" and 44.6% "somewhat uncomfortable" with this practice. A third (31.8%) of all physicians had no knowledge of the updated guidelines on uncomplicated diverticulitis treatment. Most reported "never" (41.6%) or "rarely" (25.1%) omitting antibiotics for uncomplicated diverticulitis. When informed about nonantibiotic treatment, 28.7% and 51.4% of all physicians, respectively, indicated that this "will" change or "may" change their practice. Common perceived barriers to nonantibiotic treatment were concerns about treatment failure (69.6%), unawareness of updated recommendations (67.0%), difficulty in ensuring proper follow-up (59.0%) and workplace culture (54.9%). CONCLUSION: Physicians' awareness of practice guidelines recommending nonantibiotic treatment for uncomplicated diverticulitis and their application are suboptimal. Knowledge transfer activities, educational interventions and optimization of local protocols are needed to ensure the rational use of antibiotics.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les lignes directrices internationales recommandent désormais un traitement non antibiotique de la diverticulite non compliquée. Nous avons évalué les stratégies de traitement actuelles des médecins pour la diverticulite non compliquée, leur connaissance des recommandations mises à jour et les obstacles au changement de pratique. MéTHODES: Un sondage en ligne de 21 questions mené entre le 09/2022 et le 11/2022 a été envoyé aux participants par l'intermédiaire de leurs associations ou groupes de travail provinciaux respectifs au Québec. Les participants comprenaient des chirurgiens généraux, des urgentologues, des gastroentérologues et des médecins de famille. Les médecins qui ne traitaient pas de diverticulite ont été exclus. Les principales issues étaient la connaissance des recommandations des lignes directrices sur le traitement de la diverticulite non compliquée, l'utilisation du traitement non antibiotique pour la diverticulite non compliquée et l'identification des obstacles perçus au changement de pratique. RéSULTATS: Le taux de participation était de 15,9 %. Les 465 participants étaient principalement des médecins de famille (41,7 %), des chirurgiens généraux (29,2 %) et des urgentologues (17,8 %). Quatre-vingt-deux pour cent avaient entendu parler de la stratégie de traitement non antibiotique pour la diverticulite non compliquée; 7,5% étaient "inconfortables" et 44,6% "quelque peu inconfortables" avec cette pratique. Un tiers (31,8 %) des médecins ne connaissaient pas les lignes directrices mises à jour sur le traitement de la diverticulite non compliquée. La plupart ont rapporté "jamais" (41,6%) ou "rarement" (25,1%) omettre les antibiotiques pour la diverticulite non compliquée. Lorsqu'ils ont été informés du traitement non antibiotique, 28,7 % et 51,4 % de tous les médecins ont indiqué que cela «changera¼ ou «pourrait changer¼ leur pratique. Les fréquents obstacles au traitement non antibiotique étaient les préoccupations concernant l'échec du traitement (69,6 %), l'ignorance des recommandations mises à jour (67,0 %), la difficulté d'assurer un suivi approprié (59,0 %) et la culture en milieu de travail (54,9 %). CONCLUSIONS: La connaissance des lignes directrices recommandant un traitement non antibiotique pour la diverticulite non compliquée et leur application sont sous-optimales. Des activités de transfert de connaissances, des interventions éducatives et des protocoles locaux sont nécessaires pour assurer l'utilisation rationnelle des antibiotiques.

Emergency Colon Resection in the Geriatric Population: the Modified Frailty Index as a Risk Factor of Early Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Surgical interventions in the elderly are becoming more frequent given the aging of the population. Due to their increased vulnerability in an emergent context, we aimed to evaluate various risk factors associated with an early mortality and an unfavorable postoperative trajectory. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study including patients over the age of 75 who underwent emergency colon resection between January 2016 and December 2020. RESULTS: Among 299 patients included, the type of resection most frequently encountered was right hemicolectomy (34%). Large bowel obstruction was the surgical indication for 61% of patients (n = 182). The mortality rate within 30 days of primary surgery was 14% (n = 42). The main factors having a significant impact on early mortality were the modified Frailty Index (mFI) (26% vs 4%; p < 0.001), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (20 vs 0%; p = 0.03) and surgical indication (36% vs 11%; p = 0.03). No statistically significant difference was observed according to the age of the patients. Patients with a higher mFI ([Formula: see text] 3) had an increased risk of early mortality with an odds ratio (OR) of 11.94 (95%CI: 2.38-59.88; p < 0.001) in multivariate analysis. This association was also observed for the secondary outcomes, as patients with a higher mFI were less likely to return home (59% vs 32%; p = 0.009) and have their stoma closured at the end of the follow-up period (94% vs 33%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the geriatric population, the use of mFI is a good predictor of early mortality following an emergency colon resection. This accessible tool could be used to guide the surgical decision-making.

Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a retrospective cohort study of anastomotic complications.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) can be performed with an intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) or extracorporeal anastomosis (EA). It is not clear which technique is best. This study evaluated the impact of each anastomosis technique on perioperative safety and postoperative evolution. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study at a tertiary colorectal surgery center. All patients who had an elective LRH from 2015 to 2019 were analyzed according to the anastomosis technique used. RESULTS: In total, 285 patients were included in the study. IA was performed in 64 patients (22.5%). Mean operative time was longer in the patients with IA (IA, 160±31 minutes vs. EA, 138±42 minutes; P<0.001). No differences were observed in intraoperative complications, time to first bowel movement, length of stay, reoperation, or rehospitalization. Time to first flatus was longer in the patients with IA (P=0.049). At 30 days after surgery, there were no differences in the frequency of anastomotic leak (IA, 0% vs. EA, 2.3%; P=0.59), bleeding (IA, 3.1% vs. EA, 2.7%; P>0.99), or intraabdominal abscess (IA, 0% vs. EA, 0.5%; P>0.99). During follow-up, we noted more incisional hernias in patients with EA (IA, 1.6% vs. EA, 11.3%; P=0.01) and a trend toward more hernia in patients with EA in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 7.13; P=0.06). Anastomosis technique had no influence on recurrence. CONCLUSION: For LRH, both IA and EA are safe, with a low incidence of complications when performed by experienced surgeons. IA may be associated with a lower incidence of incisional hernia.

Recurrence following transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a monocentric retrospective series of technically difficult cases.

PURPOSE: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has been proposed to overcome surgical difficulties encountered during rectal resection, especially for patients having high body mass index or low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate oncologic outcomes following TaTME. METHODS: This retrospective study included all consecutive patients with rectal cancer who had a TaTME from 2013 to 2019. The main outcome was the incidence of locoregional recurrence by the end of the follow-up period. RESULTS: Among a total of 81 patients, 96.3% were male, and their mean age was 63±9 years. The mean body mass index was 30.3±5.7 kg/m2, and the median distance from tumor to anal verge was 5.0 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 4.0-6.0 cm). Most patients had a low anterior resection performed (n=80, 98.8%) with a diverting ileostomy (n=64, 79.0%). Distal and circumferential resection margins were positive in 2.5% and 6.2% of patients, respectively. Total mesorectal excision was complete or near complete in 95.1% of patients. A successful resection was achieved in 72 patients (88.9%). After a median follow-up of 27.5 months (IQR, 16.7-48.1 months), 4 patients (4.9%) experienced locoregional recurrence. Anastomotic leaks were observed in 21 patients (25.9%). At the end of the follow-up, 69 patients (85.2%) were stoma-free. CONCLUSION: TaTME was associated with acceptable oncological outcomes, including low locoregional recurrence rates in selected patients with low rectal cancer. Although associated with a high incidence of postoperative morbidities, the use of TaTME enabled a high rate of successful sphincter-saving procedures in selected patients who posed a technical challenge.

Patient and surgeon preferences for early ileostomy closure following restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer: why aren't we doing it?

BACKGROUND: Early ileostomy closure (EIC), ≤ 2 weeks from creation, is a relatively new practice. Multiple studies have demonstrated that this approach is safe, feasible, and cost-effective. Despite the demonstrated benefits, this is neither routine practice, nor has it been studied, in North America. This study aimed to assess patient and surgeon perspectives about EIC. METHODS: A mixed-methods, cross-sectional study of patients and surgeons was performed. Rectal cancer survivors from a single institution who underwent restorative proctectomy with diverting loop ileostomy and subsequent closure within the last 5 years were contacted. North American surgeons with high rectal cancer volumes (> 20 cases/year) were included. Surveys (patients) and semi-structured interviews (surgeons) were conducted. Analysis employed descriptive statistics and thematic analysis, respectively. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were surveyed (mean age 65.1 ± 11.8 years; 54.2% male). Stoma closure occurred after a median of 7.7 months (IQR 4.8-10.9) and 50.0% (24) found it "difficult" or "very difficult" to live with their stoma. Patients considered improvement in quality of life and quicker return to normal function the most important advantages of EIC, whereas the idea of two operations in two weeks being too taxing on the body was deemed the biggest disadvantage. Most patients (35, 72.9%) would have opted for EIC. Surgeon interviews (15) revealed 4 overarching themes: (1) there are many benefits to EIC; (2) specific patient characteristics would make EIC an appropriate option; (3) many barriers to implementing EIC exist; and (4) many logistical hurdles need to be addressed for successful implementation. Most surgeons (12, 80.0%) would "definitely want to participate" in a North American randomized-controlled trial (RCT) on EIC for rectal cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing EIC poses many logistical challenges. Both patients and surgeons are interested in further exploring EIC and believe it warrants a North American RCT to motivate a change in practice.

Self-Expanding Metal Stents Do Not Adversely Affect Long-term Outcomes in Acute Malignant Large-Bowel Obstruction: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Self-expanding metal stents as a bridge to surgery in acute malignant large-bowel obstruction has gained popularity. However, long-term oncologic outcomes have not been well established. OBJECTIVE: To investigate long-term oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing curative resection after the placement of a colonic stent compared with emergency surgery for acute malignant large-bowel obstruction. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. SETTING: All patients presenting at 3 tertiary care centers between April 2002 and December 2012 with a diagnosis of complete malignant large-bowel obstruction were reviewed. Patients with disease distal to the hepatic flexure were selected for analysis. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-two patients who underwent either emergency surgery or placement of a colonic stent with curative intent were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients receiving emergency surgery within 24 hours of presenting with obstructive symptoms, including those with failed stents, were included in the emergency surgery group. All patients with clinically successful stent deployment before surgery were included in the stent group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients underwent emergency surgery, and 58 patients underwent placement of a self-expanding metal stent. Groups were similar in terms of sex, tumor stage and grade, and Charlson and Charlson-Age Comorbidity Index scores. Patients in the surgery group were older than patients in the stent group. There were no differences in the number of lymph nodes harvested, positive nodes, rates of vascular and perineural invasion, or utilization of chemotherapy. Thirty-day mortality after resection was similar between groups (7.41% vs 4.41%; p > 0.05). Patients who underwent colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery had similar 10-year overall survival (40.5% vs 32.7%; p = 0.13) and 10-year disease-free survival (40.2% vs 33.8%; p = 0.26) compared with those who underwent emergency surgery. Similar results were seen on intention-to-treat analysis. LIMITATIONS: This was a small retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: Stent insertion followed by oncologic resection is associated with similar overall survival and disease-free survival compared with emergency resection. Stent insertion as a bridge to surgery should be considered in patients presenting with malignant colorectal obstruction. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B714Los Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles No Afectan Negativamente Los Resultados A Largo Plazo En La Obstrucción Maligna Aguda Del Colon: Un Análisis Retrospectivo. ANTECEDENTES: Los stents metálicos autoexpandibles como puente a una cirugía en la obstrucción maligna aguda del colon han ganado popularidad. Sin embargo, no se han establecido bien los resultados oncológicos a largo plazo. OBJETIVO: Investigar los resultados oncológicos a largo plazo de los pacientes sometidos a resección curativa después de la colocación de un stent colónico en comparación con la cirugía de urgencia para la obstrucción maligna aguda del colon. DISEO: Estudio retrospectivo. MBITO: Entre abril de 2002 y diciembre de 2012, se revisaron todos los pacientes que acudieron a tres centros de tercer nivel con un diagnóstico de obstrucción maligna completa del colon. Se seleccionaron para el análisis los pacientes con enfermedad distal al ángulo hepático. PACIENTES: Se incluyeron 122 pacientes que fueron operados de urgencia o a una colocación de un stent colónico con intención curativa. PROCEDIMIENTOS: Los pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía de urgencia dentro de las 24 horas posteriores a la presentación de síntomas obstructivos; se incluyeron aquellos con stents fallidos en el grupo de cirugía de urgencia. Todos los pacientes con colocación clínicamente exitosa del stent antes de la cirugía se incluyeron en el grupo de stent. PRINCIPALES VARIABLES ANALIZADAS: La sobrevida global y la sobrevida libre de enfermedad se calcularon mediante el método de Kaplan-Meier. RESULTADOS: Sesenta y cuatro pacientes fueron llevados a cirugía urgente y en 58 pacientes se colocó de un stent metálico autoexpandible. Los grupos fueron similares en relación a sexo, estadio y grado del tumor, puntuación de comorbilidad de Charlson y Charlson-Age. Los pacientes del grupo de cirugía eran mayores que los del grupo de stents. No hubo diferencias en el número de ganglios linfáticos recolectados, ganglios positivos, tasas de invasión vascular y perineural o utilización de quimioterapia. La mortalidad a los 30 días después de la resección fue similar entre los grupos (7,41% frente a 4,41%; p> 0,05). Los pacientes que se sometieron a la colocación de un stent colónico como puente a la cirugía tuvieron una sobrevida general a diez años similar (40,5% vs 32,7%; p = 0,13) y una sobrevida libre de enfermedad a diez años (40,2% vs 33,8%, respectivamente; p = 0,26) en comparación a los operados de urgencia. Se observaron resultados similares en el análisis por intención de tratamiento. LIMITACIONES: Estudio retrospectivo reducido. CONCLUSIONES: La utilización de un stent y posteriormente la resección oncológica se asocia a una sobrevida general y una sobrevida libre de enfermedad similar en comparación con la resección de urgencia. La utilización de un stent como puente a la cirugía debe considerarse en pacientes que presentan obstrucción colorrectal maligna. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B714. (Traducción-Dr. Lisbeth Alarcon-Bernes).

Colorectal resection in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients: experience from a single tertiary center.

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) and renal replacement therapy (RRT) are important risk factors for post-operative morbidity and mortality but remains poorly reported in colorectal surgery. This study aims to evaluate postoperative outcomes of ESRD patients under RRT undergoing colorectal resection. METHODS: All ESRD patients under RRT who underwent colorectal resection between 2006 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative outcomes were analysed, such as risk factors of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were analysed, including 27 emergency and 15 elective surgeries. The most frequent indication was acute colonic ischemia for emergency and malignancy for elective procedures. Laparoscopic approach was used in 12 patients (29%), without difference between elective and emergency groups. Postoperative severe complications rate (including deaths) was 50% (21/42), including 56% (15/27) and 40% (6/15) in emergency and elective groups, respectively (p = .334). Anastomotic leak was observed in 3 of the 23 patients (13%) undergoing digestive anastomosis, (1 in emergency and 2 in elective groups, p = .246). The postoperative mortality rate was 29%, not significantly different between groups. The median hospital stay was 14.5 days (8-42). At univariate analysis, history of cardiac event (p = .028) and open approach (p = .040) were associated with severe complications, and ASA score >3 (p = .043), history of cardiac event (p = .001) and diabetes (p = .030) associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal surgery in ESRD patient exposes to high risk of morbidity and mortality, even in the elective setting, especially in patients with comorbidities like cardiac event and diabetes. Careful patient selection and closed management is required in such fragile patients.

Prophylactic retromuscular mesh placement for parastomal hernia prevention: a retrospective cohort study of permanent colostomies and ileostomies.

PURPOSE: Parastomal hernia (PSH) is the most common complication of stoma formation. The safety and efficiency of prophylactically placing mesh to prevent PSH remain controversial. To address this question, we examined the incidence of clinical and radiological PSH when using parastomal prophylactic mesh (PPM). METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center, cohort study that included all patients with permanent stoma creation between 2015 and 2018. Patients were divided into two groups according to the utilization of PPM or not. RESULTS: During the study period, 185 patients had a permanent stoma created, 144 with colostomy and 41 with ileostomy. PPM was placed in 79 patients. There was no difference in the need for early surgical reintervention (p = 0.652) or rehospitalization (p = 0.314) for stoma-related complications in patients with mesh as compared with patients without. Similarly, there was no difference in operative time (p = 0.782) or in length of hospital stay (p = 0.806). No patients experienced infection of the mesh or required prosthesis removal. There was a lower incidence rate of PSH with PPM placement in patients with permanent colostomy [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.50 (95% confidence interval 0.28-0.89); p = 0.018]. In contrast, a higher incidence rate of PSH was observed in patients with ileostomy and PPM [adjusted HR 5.92 (95% confidence interval 1.07-32.65); p = 0.041]. CONCLUSION: Parastomal prophylactic mesh placement to prevent PSH is a safe and efficient approach to reduce the incidence of PSH in patients requiring a permanent colostomy. However, mesh may increase the rate of PSH after permanent ileostomy.

The role of radiological classification of parastomal hernia as a predictor of the need for surgical hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a frequent complication of stoma creation during colorectal surgery. Radiological classification systems have been proposed for PSH but are primarily used for research. Our objective was to determine if PSH radiological classification at diagnosis could predict the need for surgical repair during follow-up. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 705 postoperative CT scans from 154 patients with permanent stoma creation from 2015 to 2018. Patients were included for analysis if a primary PSH was diagnosed on any exam. PSH were classified according to the European Hernia Society (EHS) and Moreno-Matias (MM) classification systems. RESULTS: The incidence of radiological PSH was 41% (63/154) after a median radiological follow-up of 19.2 months (interquartile range, 10.9-32.9). Surgical repair was required in 17 of 62 patients with a primary PSH. There was no significant correlation between PSH classification and surgical hernia repair for either the EHS (p = 0.56) or MM classification systems (p = 0.35) in a univariate analysis. However, in a multivariate analysis, the type of PSH according to the EHS classification was significantly correlated with PSH repair during follow-up (p = 0.02). Type III PSH were associated with a lower incidence of surgical hernia repair as compared with type I, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.01 (95% CI, <0.00-0.20). A similar correlation was not seen using the MM classification (p = 0.10). CONCLUSION: EHS classification of PSH was significant correlated with the need for surgical repair during short-term follow-up. Prospective studies are required to establish a potential role in patient care.

Quality indicator selection for the Canadian Partnership against Cancer rectal cancer project: A modified Delphi study.

AIM: It is well established that (i) magnetic resonance imaging, (ii) multidisciplinary cancer conference (MCCs), (iii) preoperative radiotherapy, (iv) total mesorectal excision surgery and (v) pathological assessment as described by Quirke are key processes necessary for high quality, rectal cancer care. The objective was to select a set of multidisciplinary quality indicators to measure the uptake of these clinical processes in clinical practice. METHOD: A multidisciplinary panel was convened and a modified two-phase Delphi method was used to select a set of quality indicators. Phase 1 included a literature review with written feedback from the panel. Phase 2 included an in-person workshop with anonymous voting. The selection criteria for the indicators were strength of evidence, ease of capture and usability. Indicators for which ≥90% of the panel members voted 'to keep' were selected as the final set of indicators. RESULTS: During phase 1, 68 potential indicators were generated from the literature and an additional four indicators were recommended by the panel. During phase 2, these 72 indicators were discussed; 48 indicators met the 90% inclusion threshold and included eight pathology, five radiology, 11 surgical, six radiation oncology and 18 MCC indicators. CONCLUSION: A modified Delphi method was used to select 48 multidisciplinary quality indicators to specifically measure the uptake of key processes necessary for high quality care of patients with rectal cancer. These quality indicators will be used in future work to identify and address gaps in care in the uptake of these clinical processes.

Optimizing treatment sequencing of chemotherapy for patients with rectal cancer: The KIR randomized phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Randomized studies have shown low compliance to adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy and external beam radiation (CT/EBRT) with total mesorectal excision. We hypothesize that giving neoadjuvant CT before local treatment would improve CT compliance. METHODS: Between 2010-2017, 180 patients were randomized (2:1) to either Arm A (AA) with FOLFOX x6 cycles prior to high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and surgery plus adjuvant FOLFOX x6 cycles, or Arm B (AB), with neoadjuvant HDRBT with surgery and adjuvant FOLFOX x12 cycles. The primary endpoint was CT compliance to ≥85% of full-dose CT for the first six cycles. Secondary endpoints were ypT0N0, five-year disease free survival (DFS), local control and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Patients were randomized to either AA (n = 120, median age (MA) 62 years) or AB (n = 60, MA 63 years). 175/180 patients completed HDRBT as planned (97.2%). In AA, two patients expired during CT; three patients post-randomization received short course EBRT because of progression under CT (n = 2, AA) or personal preference (n = 1, AB). ypT0N0 was 31% in AA and 28% in AB (p = 0.7). CT Compliance was 80% in AA and 53% in AB (p = 0.0002). Acute G3/G4 toxicity was 35.8% in AA and 27.6% in AB (p = 0.23). With a median follow-up of 48.5 months (IQR 33-72), the five-year DFS was 72.3% with AA and 68.3% with AB (p = 0.74), the five-year OS 83.8% for AA and 82.2% for AB (p = 0.53), and the five-year local recurrence was 6.3% for AA and 5.8% for AB (p = 0.71). CONCLUSION: We confirmed improved compliance to neoadjuvant CT in this study. Although there is no statistical difference in ypT0N0 rate, local recurrence, and DFS between the two arms, a trend towards favourable oncological outcomes is observed.

Canadian taTME expert collaboration (CaTaCO) position statement.

INTRODUCTION: Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is a novel approach to surgery for rectal cancer. The technique has gained significant popularity in the surgical community due to the promising ability to overcome technical difficulties related to the access of the distal pelvis. Recently, Norwegian surgeons issued a local moratorium related to potential issues with the safety of the procedure. Early adopters of taTME in Canada have recognized the need to create guidelines for its adoption and supervision. The objective of the statement is to provide expert opinion based on the best available evidence and authors' experience. METHODS: The procedure has been performed in Canada since 2014 at different institutions. In 2016, the first Canadian taTME congress was held in the city of Toronto, organized by two of the authors. In early 2019, a multicentric collaborative was established [The Canadian taTME expert Collaboration] which aimed at ensuring safe performance and adoption of taTME in Canada. Recently surgeons from 8 major Canadian rectal cancer centers met in the city of Toronto on December 7 of 2019, to discuss and develop a position statement. There in person, meeting was followed by 4 rounds of Delphi methodology. RESULTS: The generated document focused on the need to ensure a unified approach among rectal cancer surgeons across the country considering its technical complexity and potential morbidity. The position statement addressed four domains: surgical setting, surgeons' requirements, patient selection, and quality assurance. CONCLUSIONS: Authors agree transanal total mesorectal excision is technically demanding and has a significant risk for morbidity. As of now, there is uncertainty for some of the outcomes. We consider it is possible to safely adopt this operation and obtain adequate results, however for this purpose it is necessary to meet specific requirements in different domains.

The Canadian Partnership Against Cancer Rectal Cancer Project: Protocol for a Pan-Canadian, Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Initiative to Optimize the Quality of Rectal Cancer Care.

BACKGROUND: Over the last 2 decades, the use of multimodal strategies, including total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery, preoperative chemotherapy, multidisciplinary case conference, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, and pathologic assessment using Quirke method, has led to significant improvements in oncologic outcomes for patients with rectal cancer. Although the literature supports claims on the effectiveness of these multimodal strategies, the uptake of these multimodal strategies varies considerably among centers, suggesting that the best evidence is not always implemented into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to perform a quality improvement initiative to (1) identify existing gaps in care for these multimodal strategies and (2) implement knowledge translation (KT) interventions to close these gaps to optimize quality of care for patients with rectal cancer across high-volume centers in Canada. METHODS: Process indicators for the selected multimodal strategies to optimize rectal cancer care will be selected and prospectively collected for all patients with stages 1 to 3 rectal cancer undergoing TME surgery. KT interventions, including audit and feedback, opinion leaders, and community of practice, will be implemented to increase the uptake of these clinical strategies. RESULTS: The uptake of the process indicators over time and the effect of the uptake of the process indicators on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes will be evaluated for each multimodal strategy. CONCLUSIONS: This quality improvement initiative will identify existing gaps in care for the selected multimodal strategies and implement KT interventions to close these gaps. The results of this study will inform further efforts to optimize rectal cancer care. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/15535.

Additional value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI to conventional extracellular gadolinium-enhanced MRI for the surgical management of colorectal and neuroendocrine liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Liver resection being the only potentially curative treatment for patients with liver metastasis, it is critical to select the appropriate preoperative imaging modality. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI compared to a conventional extracellular gadolinium-enhanced MRI on the surgical management of colorectal and neuroendocrine liver metastasis. METHODS: We included 110 patients who underwent both a gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (hepatospecific contrast) and conventional extracellular gadolinium for the evaluation of colorectal or neuroendocrine liver metastases, from January 2012 to December 2015 at the CHU de Québec - Université Laval. When the number of lesions differed, a hepatobiliary surgeon evaluated if the gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI modified the surgical management. RESULTS: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI found new lesions in 25 patients (22.7%), excluded lesions in 18 patients (16.4%) and identified the same number in 67 patients (60.9%). The addition of the gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI directly altered the surgical management in 19 patients overall (17.3% (95% CI [10.73-25.65])). CONCLUSION: Despite the additional cost associated with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI compared to conventional extracellular gadolinium-enhanced MRI, the use of this contrast agent has a significant impact on the surgical management of patients with liver metastases.

Effects of quadratus lumborum block regional anesthesia on postoperative pain after colorectal resection: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pain following colorectal surgery is associated with a significant use of opioids. Recently, regional anesthesia, such as the posterior quadratus lumborum block (QL2), has been proposed to improve pain relief and reduce opioid use. However, the benefit of the QL2 on postoperative pain control remains controversial. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing colorectal surgery at the CHU de Québec-Université Laval. Patients were randomized to regional QL2 anesthesia with 150 mg of ropivacaine combined with standard analgesia or to QL2 with a sham intervention and standard analgesia. Our primary outcome was postoperative opioid administration at 24 h. Secondary outcomes included opioid administration in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), at 48 h and at hospital discharge, postoperative pain scores, delay in resumption of intestinal transit, nausea and vomiting, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were enrolled from November 2017 to February 2018. QL2 regional anesthesia compared with a sham intervention was not associated with a reduction in postoperative morphine dose equivalent (100.2 mg, 95% CI 68.9-131.5 versus 88.7 mg, 95% CI 59.3-118.0, p = 0.81, respectively). Compared to QL2 regional anesthesia, postoperative pain scores in the control group were lower although statistical significance was not consistent for all postoperative time points. Other secondary outcomes were comparable between both groups. CONCLUSION: We did not observe a reduction in postoperative opioid administration at 24 h with a posterior quadratus lumborum block regional anesthesia in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal villous tumours: Can we rely solely on preoperative biopsies and the surgeon's experience?

Background: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery has become the standard of treatment for rectal villous adenomas. However, the role of preoperative imaging for these lesions is not clear. The aim of this study was to compare the value of preoperative imaging and surgeon clinical staging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with rectal villous adenomas having transanal endoscopic microsurgery resection. Methods: We conducted a single-centre comparative retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery surgery for rectal villous adenomas from 2011 to 2013. The intervention was preoperative imaging versus surgeon clinical staging. The primary outcome was the accuracy of clinical staging by preoperative imaging and surgeon clinical staging according to the histopathologic staging. Results: A total of 146 patients underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery surgery for rectal villous adenomas. One hundred and twelve (76.7%) of those patients had no preoperative imaging while 34 patients (23.3%) had either endorectal ultrasound (22 patients) or magnetic resonance imaging (12 patients). Surgeon staging was accurate in 89.3% of cases whereas staging by endorectal ultrasound was accurate in 40.9% cases and magnetic resonance imaging was accurate in 0% of cases. In the imaging group, inaccurate staging would have led to unnecessary radical surgery in 44.0% of patients. Conclusion: This study was subject to selection bias because of its retrospective nature and the limited number of patients with imaging. Patients with rectal villous tumours without invasive carcinoma on biopsies and without malignant characteristics on appearance in the judgment of an experienced colorectal surgeon might not benefit from preoperative imaging before undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery procedures.

Contexte: La microchirurgie endoscopique transanale est devenue le traitement standard des adénomes villeux rectaux. La valeur de l'imagerie préopératoire pour le traitement de ces lésions n'est toutefois pas bien établie. Cette étude visait à comparer l'exactitude de la stadification par imagerie préopératoire et de la stadification clinique par le chirurgien dans le cadre de l'évaluation préopératoire des patients atteints d'adénomes villeux rectaux qui subissent une résection par microchirurgie endoscopique transanale. Méthodes: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte rétrospective comparative monocentrique chez des patients ayant subi une microchirurgie endoscopique transanale pour un adénome villeux rectal entre 2011 et 2013. Les interventions comparées étaient la stadification par imagerie préopératoire et la stadification clinique par le chirurgien. L'issue principale était l'exactitude de la stadification clinique par imagerie préopératoire et de la stadification clinique par le chirurgien, confirmée par stadification histopathologique. Résultats: Au total, 146 patients ont subi une microchirurgie endoscopique transanale pour le traitement d'un adénome villeux rectal. De ces patients, 112 (76,7 %) n'avaient pas subi d'imagerie préopératoire et 34 (23,3 %) avaient subi une échographie endorectale (22 patients) ou une imagerie par résonance magnétique (12 patients). La stadification par le chirurgien était exacte dans 89,3 % des cas, contre 40,9 % des cas pour l'échographie endorectale et 0 % des cas pour l'imagerie par résonnance magnétique. Dans le groupe ayant subi une imagerie, l'inexactitude de la stadification aurait mené à une chirurgie radicale inutile pour 44,0 % des patients. Conclusion: Cette étude comportait un biais de sélection en raison de sa nature rétrospective et du nombre limité de patients ayant subi une imagerie. L'imagerie préopératoire avant une microchirurgie endoscopique transanale pourrait ne présenter aucun avantage pour les patients présentant des tumeurs villeuses rectales dans les cas où aucun carcinome invasif n'a été détecté par biopsie et où un chirurgien colorectal chevronné n'a détecté aucune caractéristique maligne.