A new word embedding model integrated with medical knowledge for deep learning-based sentiment classification.

The development of intelligent systems that use social media data for decision-making processes in numerous domains such as politics, business, marketing, and finance, has been made possible by the popularity of social media platforms. However, the utilization of textual data from social media in the healthcare management industry is still somewhat limited when it is compared to other industries. Investigating how current machine learning and natural language processing technologies can be used in the healthcare industry to gauge public sentiment is an important study. Earlier works on healthcare sentiment analysis have utilized traditional word embedding models trained on the general and medical corpus. However, integration of medical knowledge to pre-trained word embedding models has not been considered yet. Word embedding models trained on the general corpus led to the problem of lacking medical knowledge and the models trained on the small size of the medical corpus have limitations in capturing semantic and syntactic properties. This research proposes a new word embedding model named Word Embedding Integrated with Medical Knowledge Vector (WE-iMKVec). The proposed model integrates sentiment lexicons and medical knowledgebases into the pre-trained word embedding to enrich the properties of word embedding. A new medical-aware sentiment polarity score is proposed for the utilization in learning neural-network sentiment and these vectors incorporate with the original pre-trained word vectors. The resulting vectors are enriched with lexicon vectors and the medical knowledge vectors: Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) vector and Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) vector are used to build the proposed WE-iMKVec model. WE-iMKVec is validated on the five different social media healthcare review datasets and the empirical results showed its superiority over traditional word embedding models in medical sentiment analysis. The highest improvement can be found in the patients.info medical condition dataset where the proposed model outperforms three conventional word2vec models (Google-News, PubMed-PMC, and Drug Reviews) by 12.7 %, 31.4 %, and 25.4 % respectively in terms of F1 score.

Comparison of intracranial injury predictability between machine learning algorithms and the nomogram in pediatric traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: The overuse of head CT examinations has been much discussed, especially those for minor traumatic brain injury (TBI). In the disruptive era, machine learning (ML) is one of the prediction tools that has been used and applied in various fields of neurosurgery. The objective of this study was to compare the predictive performance between ML and a nomogram, which is the other prediction tool for intracranial injury following cranial CT in children with TBI. METHODS: Data from 964 pediatric patients with TBI were randomly divided into a training data set (75%) for hyperparameter tuning and supervised learning from 14 clinical parameters, while the remaining data (25%) were used for validation purposes. Moreover, a nomogram was developed from the training data set with similar parameters. Therefore, models from various ML algorithms and the nomogram were built and deployed via web-based application. RESULTS: A random forest classifier (RFC) algorithm established the best performance for predicting intracranial injury following cranial CT of the brain. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the performance of RFC algorithms was 0.80, with 0.34 sensitivity, 0.95 specificity, 0.73 positive predictive value, 0.80 negative predictive value, and 0.79 accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The ML algorithms, particularly the RFC, indicated relatively excellent predictive performance that would have the ability to support physicians in balancing the overuse of head CT scans and reducing the treatment costs of pediatric TBI in general practice.

Clinical Nomogram Predicting Intracranial Injury in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: There are differences in injured mechanisms among pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) in developing countries. This study aimed to develop and validate clinical nomogram for predicting intracranial injury in pediatric TBI that will be implicated in balancing the unnecessary investigation in the general practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted in all patients who were younger than 15 years old and underwent computed tomography (CT) of the brain after TBI in southern Thailand. Injured mechanisms and clinical characteristics were identified and analyzed with binary logistic regression for predicting intracranial injury. Using random sampling without replacement, the total data was split into nomogram developing dataset (80%) and testing dataset (20%). Therefore, a nomogram was constructed and applied via the web-based application from the developing dataset. Using testing dataset, validation as binary classifiers was performed by various probabilities levels. RESULTS: A total of 900 victims were enrolled. The mean age was 87.2 (standard deviation [SD] 57.4) months, and 65.3% of all patients injured were from road traffic accidents. The rate of positive findings in CT of the brain was 32.8%. A nomogram was developed from the significant variables, including age groups, road traffic accidents, loss of consciousness, scalp hematoma/laceration, motor weakness, signs of basilar skull fraction, low Glasgow Coma Scale score, and pupillary light reflex.Therefore, a nomogram was developed from 80% of data and was validated from 20% of data. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of the nomogram were 0.83, 0.42, 1.00, 1.00, and 0.81 at a cutoff value of 0.5 probability. CONCLUSION: This study provides a clinical nomogram that will be applied to making decisions in general practice as a diagnostic tool from high specificity.