Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
1.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 77, 2024 May 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782770

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The diagnostic accuracy of Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) in the endoscopic surveillance of ulcerative colitis (UC) has been disappointing in most trials which used the Kudo classification. We aim to compare the performance of NBI in the lesion characterization of UC, when applied according to three different classifications (NICE, Kudo, Kudo-IBD). METHODS: In a prospective, real-life study, all visible lesions found during consecutive surveillance colonoscopies with NBI (Exera-II CV-180) for UC were classified as suspected or non-suspected for neoplasia according to the NICE, Kudo and Kudo-IBD criteria. The sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive (+LR) and negative (-LR) likelihood ratios of the three classifications were calculated, using histology as the reference standard. RESULTS: 394 lesions (mean size 6 mm, range 2-40 mm) from 84 patients were analysed. Twenty-one neoplastic (5%), 49 hyperplastic (12%), and 324 inflammatory (82%) lesions were found. The diagnostic accuracy of the NICE, Kudo and Kudo-IBD classifications were, respectively: SE 76%-71%-86%; SP 55-69%-79% (p < 0.05 Kudo-IBD vs. both Kudo and NICE); +LR 1.69-2.34-4.15 (p < 0.05 Kudo-IBD vs. both Kudo and NICE); -LR 0.43-0.41-0.18. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of NBI in the differentiation of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions in UC is low if used with conventional classifications of the general population, but it is significantly better with the modified Kudo classification specific for UC.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Colonoscopia , Imagem de Banda Estreita , Humanos , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico por imagem , Colite Ulcerativa/patologia , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico , Colite Ulcerativa/classificação , Imagem de Banda Estreita/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Colonoscopia/métodos , Idoso , Vigilância da População
3.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 19(11): 2293-2301.e1, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34139332

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is uncertainty regarding the optimal duration of treatment with azathioprine (AZA) in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). We analyzed the clinical course and predictors of relapse after AZA withdrawal in patients in sustained deep remission. METHODS: A prospective study was performed on patients who stopped their treatment with AZA while being in steroid-free, extended deep remission (normal clinical, endoscopic, and histologic indexes, C-reactive protein, and fecal calprotectin [FC]). Standard biochemical tests and FC were measured at 3 and 6 months, then every 6 months. Bowel ultrasounds and ileocolonoscopy were performed every 6 and 12 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis for predictors of relapse was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model and hazard ratios were calculated. Spearman nonparametric correlation test was also used. The accuracy of significant predictors was calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients with inflammatory bowel disease stopped AZA after median 7 years (range, 5-19) and were followed up for median 50 months (range, 25-85). Twenty-six patients (18/31 UC, 8/26 CD; P = .003) relapsed, within a median 15 months (range, 2-37). FC was the only variable significantly correlated with later relapse of both diseases (UC: hazard ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-10; CD: hazard ratio, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-12.5). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of FC were 50%, 100%, 100%, and 59% in UC and 50%, 94%, 80%, and 81% in CD. CONCLUSIONS: More than half patients with UC and one-third of patients with CD relapse after AZA withdrawal despite previous deep remission. FC positivity is associated with high risk of relapse, allowing early correction of the therapeutic strategy.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Doença de Crohn , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Azatioprina , Fezes , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Complexo Antígeno L1 Leucocitário , Estudos Prospectivos , Indução de Remissão
5.
Endosc Int Open ; 8(10): E1414-E1422, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33015345

RESUMO

Background and study aims Virtual chromoendoscopy with Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement (FICE) has never been studied in prospective trials of endoscopic surveillance for ulcerative colitis (UC). We compared FICE and white light endoscopy (WLE) in differentiation of visible lesions in UC. Patients and methods In a prospective parallel study, we compared consecutive outpatients with UC submitted to surveillance colonoscopy with FICE or WLE. At least one visible polypoid or non-polypoid lesion for each patient was required. Random biopsies from normal mucosa, targeted biopsies or removal of suspected neoplastic lesions and targeted biopsies of unsuspected lesions were performed. In the FICE arm, neoplasia was suspected according to a modified Kudo classification (FICE-KUDO/inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]). Sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR) and negative predictive value (NPV) were analyzed. Results One hundred patients were submitted to FICE (n = 46) or WLE (n = 54). Twenty-two patients (11 in WLE, 11 in FICE) had a least one neoplastic lesion. No neoplasia was found in random biopsies. Among 275 lesions, 17 of 136 by FICE and 27 of 139 by WLE were suspected neoplasia, but 28 (14 in each arm) were true neoplastic lesions. The accuracy of FICE-KUDO/IBD vs WLE (per lesion) was: SE 93 % vs 64 % ( P  = 0.065), SP 97 % vs 86 % ( P  = 0.002), positive-LR 28.3 vs 4.5 ( P  = 0.001), negative-LR 0.07 vs 0.42 ( P  = 0.092), NPV 99 % vs 96 % ( P  = 0.083). FICE-KUDO/IBD detected more non-polypoid lesions than WLE ( P  = 0.016). Conclusions Targeted biopsies of polypoid and non-polypoid lesions, using the modified Kudo classification with FICE are more accurate than WLE in UC surveillance.

6.
Epidemiol Prev ; 44(4): 308-312, 2020.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32921038

RESUMO

Le linee guida 2019 delle Società europee di cardiologia e dell'aterosclerosi sulla gestione delle dislipidemie hanno aumentato l'aggressività diagnostico-terapeutica e non distinguono prevenzione primaria e secondaria, con parziale eccezione per gli ultra75enni. Raccomandano nuovi target di cLDL: per pazienti a rischio molto alto si raccomanda una riduzione a <55 mg/dl e >=50% rispetto al basale; per pazienti a rischio alto una riduzione a <70 mg/dl e >=50% del basale; per pazienti a rischio moderato una riduzione a <100 mg/dl; per pazienti a rischio basso una riduzione a <116 mg/dl. In base alle carte SCORE e ai dati di mortalità cardiovascolare in Italia, quasi tutti i maschi dai 70 anni e le donne dai 70-75 anni risulterebbero ad alto rischio per solo effetto dell'età. Anche quasi tutti i 60enni sarebbero a rischio moderato, con target di cLDL <100, e spesso necessità di aggiungere costosi ipolipemizzanti per chi già assume statine. Le prove supportano ben poco tale aggressività. Infatti, anche negli studi randomizzati controllati (RCT) i benefici su esiti cardiovascolari non fatali subiscono esagerazioni sistematiche, quello meno distorto e di maggior interesse per gli assistiti è la mortalità totale. Questa, con terapie ipocolesterolemizzanti più intensive, non si è ridotta nelle metanalisi di RCT con pazienti con cLDL tra 80 e <100 mg/dl al basale; con inibitori di PCSK9, pazienti con questi valori mostrano persino tendenza all'aumento della mortalità totale. Dunque, abbassare il cLDL a <80 mg/dl può non giovare neppure ad anziani coronaropatici. A oggi, ciò vale ancora di più per anziani nella popolazione generale, in cui una revisione sistematica di studi di coorte ha mostrato relazioni nulle o più spesso inverse tra cLDL e mortalità. Le nuove linee guida europee forzano le prove disponibili, trascurano il principio di precauzione e non possono esser base per un equo consenso informato.


Assuntos
Dislipidemias , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Dislipidemias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Itália , Pró-Proteína Convertase 9
8.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 10(5)2020 Apr 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32357488

RESUMO

Oocyte donations (OD) represent 4.5% of all in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. While OD pregnancies face increased risks of obstetrical complications, especially pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia (PE), little is known about the physiology and the physiopathology of placentation. We performed a prospective case-control study to analyze uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and serum maternal 17ß-estradiol (17ß-E) at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation in singleton pregnancies with different modes of conception. Study groups were: 55 OD, 48 IVF with autologous oocytes from fresh cycles (Autologous-Fresh IVF), 10 IVF with autologous oocytes from frozen cycles (Autologous-Frozen IVF) and 122 spontaneously conceived pregnancies (SC). The mean UtA-PI and serum maternal 17ß-E at 11 to 13 + 6 weeks were significantly lower in OD as compared to SC and autologous IVF, either from fresh or frozen cycles. Oocyte donation presents lower UtA-PI and lower serum 17ß-E in the first trimester of pregnancy. The etiology of these particularr differences is likely multifactorial and deserves further investigation.

10.
PLoS One ; 15(3): e0228725, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32187195

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification is challenging in conditions, such as chest pain, shortness of breath and syncope, which can be the manifestation of many possible underlying diseases. In these cases, decision tools are unlikely to accurately identify all the different adverse events related to the possible etiologies. Attribute matching is a prediction method that matches an individual patient to a group of previously observed patients with identical characteristics and known outcome. We used syncope as a paradigm of clinical conditions presenting with aspecific symptoms to test the attribute matching method for the prediction of the personalized risk of adverse events. METHODS: We selected the 8 predictor variables common to the individual-patient dataset of 5 prospective emergency department studies enrolling 3388 syncope patients. We calculated all possible combinations and the number of patients in each combination. We compared the predictive accuracy of attribute matching and logistic regression. We then classified ten random patients according to clinical judgment and attribute matching. RESULTS: Attribute matching provided 253 of the 384 possible combinations in the dataset. Twelve (4.7%), 35 (13.8%), 50 (19.8%) and 160 (63.2%) combinations had a match size ≥50, ≥30, ≥20 and <10 patients, respectively. The AUC for the attribute matching and the multivariate model were 0.59 and 0.74, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Attribute matching is a promising tool for personalized and flexible risk prediction. Large databases will need to be used in future studies to test and apply the method in different conditions.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Medicina de Precisão , Síncope/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco
11.
Epidemiol Prev ; 44(5-6 Suppl 2): 42-50, 2020.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33412793

RESUMO

The article compares two of the most followed indices in the monitoring of COVID-19 epidemic cases: the Rt and the RDt indices. The first was disseminated by the Italian National Institute of Health (ISS) and the second, which is more usable due to the lower difficulty of calculation and the availability of data, was adopted by various regional and local institutions.The rationale for the Rt index refers to that for the R0 index, the basic reproduction number, which is used by infectivologists as a measure of contagiousness of a given infectious agent in a completely susceptible population. The RDt index, on the other hand, is borrowed from the techniques of time series analysis for the trend of an event measurement that develops as a function of time. The RDt index does not take into account the time of infection, but the date of the diagnosis of positivity and for this reason it is defined as diagnostic replication index, as it aims to describe the intensity of the development of frequency for cases recognized as positive in the population.The comparison between different possible applications of the methods and the use of different types of monitoring data was limited to four areas for which complete individual data were available in March and April 2020. The main problems in the use of Rt, which is based on the date of symptoms onset, arise from the lack of completeness of this information due both to the difficulty in the recording and to the absence in asymptomatic subjects.The general trend of RDt, at least at an intermediate lag of 6 or 7 days, is very similar to that of Rt, as confirmed by the very high value of the correlation index between the two indices. The maximum correlation between Rt and RDt is reached at lag 7 with a value of R exceeding 0.97 (R2=0.944).The two indices, albeit formally distinct, are both valid; they show specific aspects of the phenomenon, but provide basically similar information to the public health decision-maker. Their distinction lies not so much in the method of calculation, rather in the use of different information, i.e., the beginning of symptoms and the swabs outcome.Therefore, it is not appropriate to make a judgment of preference for one of the two indices, but only to invite people to understand their different potentials so that they can choose the one they consider the most appropriate for the purpose they want to use it for.


Assuntos
Número Básico de Reprodução , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Tomada de Decisões , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Itália/epidemiologia , Nasofaringe/virologia , Risco , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Avaliação de Sintomas , Fatores de Tempo
13.
PLoS One ; 14(2): e0212194, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30789923

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: HIV-1 infected patients show impaired semen parameters. Currently, it is not clear whether HIV-1 infection itself or antiretroviral therapy have an effect on semen parameters. We aim evaluate semen quality in a large cohort of fertile HIV-1 infected men under stable highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and to assess the effect of HAART type and duration on semen parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 and June 2014, we enrolled in a retrospective case-control study 770 HIV-1 patients under stable HAART asking a reproductive counselling with their HIV negative partner. Co-infections with HBV or HCV, genital tract infections and known causes of infertility represented exclusion criteria. Semen samples were analysed and compared with the WHO reference values. A multivariate analysis including HAART type and duration, age, viral load and CD4 count, was performed on 600 patients out of 770. RESULTS: The median values of all semen parameters were significantly lower among HIV-1 infected patients compared to the WHO reference group, with a significant proportion of patients having values below the 5th percentile of the WHO reference value. In a multivariate analysis, only age and viral load negatively impacted progressive motility (ß -0.3 (95% CI: -0.5; -0.0) %, p<0.05) and semen morphology (ß -0.00 (95% CI: -0.00; -0.00) %, p≤0.01), while no associations were detected as regards HAART type and duration. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-1 infected patients showed a significant impairment of semen parameters compared to the reference values. HAART type and duration showed no associations with semen quality. Further research is needed to investigate implications for clinical care of HIV infected men desiring a child.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , HIV-1 , Análise do Sêmen , Sêmen , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/patologia , Infecções por HIV/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carga Viral
14.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 53(4): 269-276, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29394176

RESUMO

GOALS: The aim of this study was to analyze the performance of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement (FICE) using the classification of Kudo in the differentiation of neoplastic and non-neoplastic raised lesions in ulcerative colitis (UC). BACKGROUND: The Kudo classification of mucosal pit patterns is an aid for the differential diagnosis of colorectal polyps in the general population, but no systematic studies are available for all forms of raised lesions in UC. STUDY: All raised, polypoid and nonpolypoid, lesions found during consecutive surveillance colonoscopies with FICE for long-standing UC were included. In the primary prospective analysis, the Kudo classification was used to predict the histology by FICE. In a post hoc analysis, further endoscopic markers were also explored. RESULTS: Two hundred and five lesions (mean size, 8 mm; range, 2 to 30 mm) from 59 patients (mean age, 56 y; range, 21 to 79 y) were analyzed. Twenty-three neoplastic (11%), 18 hyperplastic (9%), and 164 inflammatory (80%) lesions were found. Thirty-one lesions (15%), none of which were neoplastic, were unclassifiable according to Kudo. After logistic regression, a strong negative association resulted between endoscopic activity and neoplasia, whereas the presence of a fibrin cap was significantly associated with endoscopic activity. Using FICE, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of the Kudo classification were 91%, 76%, 3.8, and 0.12, respectively. The corresponding values by adding the fibrin cap as a marker of inflammation were 91%, 93%, 13, and 0.10, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FICE can help to predict the histology of raised lesions in UC. A new classification of pit patterns, based on inflammatory markers, should be developed in the setting of UC to improve the diagnostic performance.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/patologia , Pólipos do Colo/diagnóstico , Colonoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Pólipos do Colo/patologia , Cor , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Aumento da Imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
15.
Eur Radiol ; 29(6): 3090-3099, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30547205

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) in cirrhotic patients with different degrees of liver dysfunction. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we analyzed the unenhanced phase and the HBP of 131 gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI examinations (gadobenate dimeglumine group) and 127 gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI examinations (gadoxetic acid group) performed in 249 cirrhotic patients (181 men and 68 women; mean age, 64.8 years) from August 2011 to April 2017. For each MRI, the contrast enhancement index of the liver parenchyma was calculated and correlated to the Model For End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (multiple linear regression analysis). A qualitative analysis of the adequacy of the HBP, adjusted for the MELD score (logistic regression analysis), was performed. RESULTS: The contrast enhancement index was inversely related (r = - 0.013) with MELD score in both gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine group. At the same MELD score, the contrast enhancement index in the gadoxetic acid group was increased by a factor of 0.23 compared to the gadobenate dimeglumine group (p < 0.001), and the mean odds ratio to have an adequate HBP with gadoxetic acid compared to gadobenate dimeglumine was 3.64 (p < 0.001). The adequacy of the HBP in the gadoxetic acid group compared to the gadobenate dimeglumine group increased with the increase of the MELD score (exp(b)interaction = 1.233; p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: In cirrhotic patients, the hepatobiliary phase obtained with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is of better quality in comparison to gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI, mainly in patients with high MELD score. KEY POINTS: • In cirrhotic patients, the adequacy of the hepatobiliary phase with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is better compared to gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI. • Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI should be preferred to gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI in cirrhotic patients with MELD score > 10, if the hepatobiliary phase is clinically indicated. • In patients with high MELD score (> 15), the administration of the hepatobiliary agent could be useless; even though, if it is clinically indicated, we recommend to use gadoxetic acid given the higher probability of obtaining clinically relevant information.


Assuntos
Gadolínio DTPA , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Meglumina/análogos & derivados , Compostos Organometálicos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Meios de Contraste , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto Jovem
17.
Am J Mens Health ; 12(6): 1835-1842, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30132391

RESUMO

HIV-1-affected couples' desire to have children and free sexual intercourses with the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis for the negative partner has emerged as an alternative option to assisted reproduction in aviremic patients under highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). It is already known that sperm quality may be impaired in HIV-infected men. The underlying physiopathological mechanism is still debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of HAART on sperm DNA fragmentation, comparing HIV-1-infected patients taking HAART versus naïve HIV-1-infected patients. This is a prospective case-control study. Sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation rate was evaluated by the sperm chromatin dispersion test in 77 HIV-infected men: 53 HIV-1 patients receiving HAART (Group 1) versus 24 naïve HIV-1 patients not receiving HAART (Group 2). Complete semen analysis was performed according to WHO 2010 recommendations. Patients with HBV infection or HCV infection coinfections and genital tract infections wre excluded. All the patients did not present any clinical signs of their disease. Seminal parameters were examined in the two groups, showing no significant differences. Increased sperm DNA fragmentation > 30% was demonstrated in 67.9% of patients in Group 1 and 37.5% of patients in Group 2, respectively ( p = .02). A positive but nonsignificant trend toward increased fragmentation was reported with advancing patients' age. In conclusion, sperm nuclear fragmentation rate is increased in HIV-1-infected patients taking HAART compared to HIV-1 patients not receiving HAART.


Assuntos
Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade , Fragmentação do DNA/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , HIV-1 , Espermatozoides/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise do Sêmen
19.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 6: CD010296, 2017 06 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28598495

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: People with abdominal aortic aneurysm who receive endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) need lifetime surveillance to detect potential endoleaks. Endoleak is defined as persistent blood flow within the aneurysm sac following EVAR. Computed tomography (CT) angiography is considered the reference standard for endoleak surveillance. Colour duplex ultrasound (CDUS) and contrast-enhanced CDUS (CE-CDUS) are less invasive but considered less accurate than CT. OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of colour duplex ultrasound (CDUS) and contrast-enhanced-colour duplex ultrasound (CE-CDUS) in terms of sensitivity and specificity for endoleak detection after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, ISI Conference Proceedings, Zetoc, and trial registries in June 2016 without language restrictions and without use of filters to maximize sensitivity. SELECTION CRITERIA: Any cross-sectional diagnostic study evaluating participants who received EVAR by both ultrasound (with or without contrast) and CT scan assessed at regular intervals. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two pairs of review authors independently extracted data and assessed quality of included studies using the QUADAS 1 tool. A third review author resolved discrepancies. The unit of analysis was number of participants for the primary analysis and number of scans performed for the secondary analysis. We carried out a meta-analysis to estimate sensitivity and specificity of CDUS or CE-CDUS using a bivariate model. We analysed each index test separately. As potential sources of heterogeneity, we explored year of publication, characteristics of included participants (age and gender), direction of the study (retrospective, prospective), country of origin, number of CDUS operators, and ultrasound manufacturer. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 42 primary studies with 4220 participants. Twenty studies provided accuracy data based on the number of individual participants (seven of which provided data with and without the use of contrast). Sixteen of these studies evaluated the accuracy of CDUS. These studies were generally of moderate to low quality: only three studies fulfilled all the QUADAS items; in six (40%) of the studies, the delay between the tests was unclear or longer than four weeks; in eight (50%), the blinding of either the index test or the reference standard was not clearly reported or was not performed; and in two studies (12%), the interpretation of the reference standard was not clearly reported. Eleven studies evaluated the accuracy of CE-CDUS. These studies were of better quality than the CDUS studies: five (45%) studies fulfilled all the QUADAS items; four (36%) did not report clearly the blinding interpretation of the reference standard; and two (18%) did not clearly report the delay between the two tests.Based on the bivariate model, the summary estimates for CDUS were 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.91) for sensitivity and 0.93 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.96) for specificity whereas for CE-CDUS the estimates were 0.94 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.98) for sensitivity and 0.95 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.98) for specificity. Regression analysis showed that CE-CDUS was superior to CDUS in terms of sensitivity (LR Chi2 = 5.08, 1 degree of freedom (df); P = 0.0242 for model improvement).Seven studies provided estimates before and after administration of contrast. Sensitivity before contrast was 0.67 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.83) and after contrast was 0.97 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.99). The improvement in sensitivity with of contrast use was statistically significant (LR Chi2 = 13.47, 1 df; P = 0.0002 for model improvement).Regression testing showed evidence of statistically significant effect bias related to year of publication and study quality within individual participants based CDUS studies. Sensitivity estimates were higher in the studies published before 2006 than the estimates obtained from studies published in 2006 or later (P < 0.001); and studies judged as low/unclear quality provided higher estimates in sensitivity. When regression testing was applied to the individual based CE-CDUS studies, none of the items, namely direction of the study design, quality, and age, were identified as a source of heterogeneity.Twenty-two studies provided accuracy data based on number of scans performed (of which four provided data with and without the use of contrast). Analysis of the studies that provided scan based data showed similar results. Summary estimates for CDUS (18 studies) showed 0.72 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.85) for sensitivity and 0.95 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.96) for specificity whereas summary estimates for CE-CDUS (eight studies) were 0.91 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.98) for sensitivity and 0.89 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.96) for specificity. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that both ultrasound modalities (with or without contrast) showed high specificity. For ruling in endoleaks, CE-CDUS appears superior to CDUS. In an endoleak surveillance programme CE-CDUS can be introduced as a routine diagnostic modality followed by CT scan only when the ultrasound is positive to establish the type of endoleak and the subsequent therapeutic management.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Meios de Contraste , Endoleak/diagnóstico por imagem , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Ultrassonografia Doppler Dupla , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Stents/estatística & dados numéricos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...