Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dev Biol (Basel) ; 134: 23-7, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22888591

RESUMO

Batch potency testing of rabies vaccines could be done by challenge, measurement of serum response or antigen quantification. Here, we show the development of a serological test that was successfully validated for use in batch release. The serological test is based on serum neutralization (SNT). The correlation to the NIH challenge was demonstrated by batches passing respectively failing equivalently in the NIH and SNT. The SNT provides information on immunogenicity and exhibits several advantages to the NIH: 1) SNT uses many fewer animals for batch release. 2) SNT allows quantitative information on the individual serum response, in contrast to the "dead"/"alive" interpretation of the NIH. 3) SNT is quicker than the NIH and needs fewer working hours. 4) SNT avoids the highly disturbing intra-cerebral injection and suffering from rabies for mice and spares the staff the emotional stress of massively harming animals.


Assuntos
Vacina Antirrábica/imunologia , Raiva/imunologia , Vacinação/métodos , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Antígenos Virais/imunologia , Camundongos , Testes de Neutralização/métodos , Raiva/sangue , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Vacina Antirrábica/administração & dosagem , Vírus da Raiva/imunologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia
3.
Biologicals ; 37(2): 119-26, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19181541

RESUMO

The European Pharmacopoeia proposes two methods for potency determination of inactivated rabies vaccines for veterinary use: The first one is a classical mouse challenge test, which is imprecise, time-consuming, and causes severe distress to the test animals. Alternatively, the potency may be determined serologically by measuring the neutralizing antibody titers induced after vaccination of mice by using a rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT). Although this method is faster and less painful for the animals, it is not widely used yet, and only little data exist concerning the comparability of both methods. We have therefore performed a comparative study, in which we demonstrated a good correlation between the challenge test results and the mean titers determined by RFFIT. Furthermore, all vaccine batches failing the challenge test were also recognized as insufficient in the serological assay. This publication further describes the influence of different vaccine administration routes on the resulting antibody titers, and it proposes various modifications to the serological assay protocol which could improve its overall practicability. Finally, we recommend that the serological assay be used for the potency testing of inactivated rabies vaccines.


Assuntos
Vacina Antirrábica/análise , Animais , Formação de Anticorpos/imunologia , Células Cultivadas , Feminino , Imunofluorescência/métodos , Camundongos , Testes de Neutralização/métodos , Raiva/sangue , Raiva/diagnóstico , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Vacina Antirrábica/imunologia , Testes Sorológicos/métodos , Vacinação/métodos , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/análise
4.
Vet Rec ; 159(1): 7-12, 2006 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16816154

RESUMO

Serum antibody titres to canine distemper virus (CDV), canine parvovirus (CPV) and rabies were measured in dogs that had not been revaccinated annually and compared with the titres in a control group of regularly vaccinated animals; 83 per cent (171 of 207) of the dogs vaccinated against CDV one or more years earlier had serum neutralising antibody titres equal to or greater than 16; 64 per cent (136 of 213) of the dogs vaccinated against CPV one or more years earlier had haemagglutination inhibiting titres equal to or greater than 80; and 59 per cent (46 of 78) of the dogs vaccinated against rabies two or more years earlier had serum neutralising antibody titres equal to or greater than 0.5 iu/ml. Three weeks after a single booster vaccination the dogs' antibody titres against CDV had increased above the threshold level in 94 per cent of the dogs, against CPV in 68 per cent, and against rabies in 100 per cent.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Doenças do Cão/imunologia , Cães/imunologia , Vacinação/veterinária , Viroses/veterinária , Animais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Cinomose/imunologia , Vírus da Cinomose Canina/imunologia , Doenças do Cão/sangue , Doenças do Cão/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Masculino , Infecções por Parvoviridae/imunologia , Infecções por Parvoviridae/veterinária , Parvovirus Canino/imunologia , Raiva/imunologia , Raiva/veterinária , Vírus da Raiva/imunologia , Suíça/epidemiologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Viroses/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA