Masson Tumor of the Central Nervous System: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND Masson's tumor, also known as intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia (IPEH), is an unusual endothelial proliferation that leads to improper thrombus development due to faulty endothelial structure. Although IPEH is rare in the central nervous system, it can arise at any location in the brain. Headaches, seizures, and focal neurological symptoms ae the most common presenting symptoms. It is more common in females and it can occur at any age. CASE REPORT Herein, we present a 65-year-old female patient with a progressively enlarging right temporal lobe mass that was initially considered metastatic ovarian carcinoma. She underwent a right temporal craniotomy and the lesion was totally resected. Contrary to expectations, the pathology report was an IPEH. CONCLUSIONS In this paper, we conducted a literature review of previously reported cerebral IPEH cases, with a focus on their clinical and radiological presentations, management, and especially their association with previous radiotherapy. The important point is that one-third of the cases had a history of radiation therapy to the head, and most of them had stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) on the location of the brain from which IPEH subsequently developed. The major question for which we are looking for an answer is its relationship with previous radiotherapies. We wanted to know how many of these cases were associated with radiotherapy in the same area, the time interval from radiotherapy to the onset of IPEH or symptoms, the dose of the previous radiotherapy, and, overall, if there is any cause-effect relationship between IPEH and radiotherapy.

Margin details matter: The prognostic significance of pseudocapsule invasion at the site of involved margin in prostatectomy specimens.

BACKGROUND: An involved surgical margin at prostatectomy has long been associated with elevated risk of prostate cancer recurrence; however, not all patients with an involved margin will relapse, and thus details of the involved margin may provide an opportunity for risk subset stratification. The present investigation seeks to determine whether a difference exists in recurrence rates when the margin involvement is at a site of prostate pseudocapsule invasion vs. within the prostate parenchyma proper. METHODS: Patients were retrospectively identified for inclusion by clinically localized disease and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of< 30 ng/ml at diagnosis, managed with prostatectomy alone and identified to have involvement of surgical margin(s). Exclusion criteria were: pT3b or pN1 disease, immediate/nonsalvage postoperative radiation or hormone therapy, or insufficient follow-up (<12 mo). Pathology slides were reviewed by a pathologist blinded to outcome, for determination of pseudocapsule invasion at a site of margin involvement. Disease recurrence was defined as PSA level of ≥ 0.2 ng/ml and rising, per contemporary guidelines. Kaplan-Meier method was used for construction of disease control estimate confidence intervals; Cox Proportional Hazards Model was used to compare disease control across groups. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2010, 155 patients were identified for inclusion in the present study. The median age was 61 years, and all had clinical stage T1 and T2 disease (75% T1c). At diagnosis, the Gleason score was 6, 7, and 8-9 for 103 (66%), 42 (27%), and 10 (6%) patients, respectively, with median PSA level of 5.6 ng/ml (85%≤ 10). For 149 patients with reviewable margin site data, 51 (34%) demonstrated involvement within or beyond the pseudocapsule. At a median follow-up of 68 months (range: 13-137), 62 patients had experienced PSA relapse. The estimated 5-year PSA relapse rates for patients with an involved margin at the site of pseudocapsule invasion vs. prostate parenchyma were 49% vs. 34%, respectively (P = 0.017; hazard ratio = 1.853). CONCLUSIONS: Early PSA relapse rates are high for patients with involved surgical margin(s) without seminal vesicle or node involvement at prostatectomy; however, for patients who are followed without immediate adjuvant therapy, presence of tumor cells at the margin in a site of pseudocapsule invasion or penetration confers a higher risk of recurrence.

Margin involvement at prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: does a low-risk group exist?

PURPOSE: To determine whether additional pathology details may provide risk stratification for patients with involved surgical margins at radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients underwent RP between 2003 and 2010. Patients with preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥20, follow-up <12 months, lymph node or seminal vesicle involvement, or who received radiation therapy or hormone therapy prior to PSA relapse were excluded. Surgical specimens were reviewed by a study pathologist, blinded to outcomes. Survival analysis methods were employed to assess disease control and survival rates, as well as association of patient-, tumor-, and treatment-specific factors for endpoints. RESULTS: Of 355 RP cases, 279 patients were eligible for the present analysis. At a median follow-up of 53 months (range, 16-127), 31/114 (27%) of patients with involved surgical margins experienced PSA relapse, as compared with 7/165 (4%) for negative margins (hazard ratio, 4.997; 95% confidence interval, 2.425-10.296; P < .0001). Detailed pathology review demonstrated associations between PSA relapse and Gleason score at RP, extent of margin involvement (width), capsule penetration, and perineural invasion. Subgroup analysis identified low risk (4%) of 5-year PSA relapse for patients with Gleason ≤6 mm and margin width ≤4 mm (single maximal or cumulative). All subgroups with higher Gleason score or wider margin were associated with >20% risk of PSA relapse at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Within the present study, Gleason score, 6 patients with margin width ≤4 mm appear to have low rates of early PSA relapse following RP. Low-grade cases with larger extent of margin involvement or higher risk Gleason score patients with any margin involvement have high rates of early PSA relapse.

What is the optimal management of Gleason score 7 prostate cancer at biopsy? A comparison of disease control for prostatectomy versus radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes between radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT) approaches for Gleason 7 (GS7) prostate cancer. METHODS: Patients were retrospectively identified for inclusion by clinically localized disease, GS7, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 30 ng/mL at diagnosis, and follow-up with PSA at > 12 months. Comparison of demographic, tumor, staging, and outcome variables was performed. Disease recurrence was defined as per contemporary society guidelines. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for disease control estimates. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2010, a total of 253 patients were diagnosed with GS7 prostate cancer, of whom 207 were eligible for the current analysis (120 RP, 87 RT). Excepting older age for RT patients (median 73 vs. 62 years), the groups were well balanced. For RP patients, 82 patients (60%) had at least 1 high-risk feature, 4 (5%) of whom received adjuvant RT. For RT patients, 71 patients (82%) received hormone therapy (median duration 6 months). At a median follow-up of 62.2 months (range 13.1-136.6 months, with no difference between treatment groups), 64 patients had PSA relapse (51 RP, 13 RT), and 15 had died (5 of or with disease). PSA relapse-free survival was inferior for RP versus RT (P < .0001), with 5-year rates of 55.4% versus 82.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: For GS7 prostate cancer patients, RT is associated with superior disease-free survival at 5 years compared to RP alone, without difference in disease-specific survival. Whether this difference remains in the setting of appropriately used adjuvant RT after RP, and the effect of possible delay in testosterone recovery for older RT patients remain to be determined.

Irradiation of donor mononuclear cells for treatment of chemorefractory metastatic solid cancers: a community-based immune transplant pilot study.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy has demonstrated ability to generate tumor antigens secondary to induction of apoptosis, against which human leukocyte antigen-compatible, irradiated, related donor mononuclear cells may be administered with immune stimulation to activate antigen presenting and cytotoxic T cells, while minimizing risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The present study endeavours to describe feasibility and efficacy of this treatment, specifically in the community setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had rapidly progressive, chemorefractory metastatic solid tumors. Treatment consisted of intravenous etoposide and cyclosporine for three days followed by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for 5 days. The following week, 5×10(7) haploidentical or more closely matched irradiated donor mononuclear cells were given weekly for 10 weeks along with interleukin-2. RESULTS: Three patients were enrolled, and the regimen was well-tolerated, with no GVHD observed. All patients had clinical response, despite advanced and heavily pretreated disease. CONCLUSION: The above-outlined protocol demonstrates favorable tolerability and efficacy, and appears to be feasible in the community setting. While the optimal chemotherapy, immunostimulation, and irradiation regimens may be further optimized, future investigation appears warranted, and may include community oncology programs.

The dosimetric quality of brachytherapy implants in patients with small prostate volume depends on the experience of the brachytherapy team.

PURPOSE: To investigate the dosimetric outcome of brachytherapy in patients with small prostate volume (PV). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-three patients with small PV (<25 cm(3)) as determined using transrectal ultrasound and 120 patients with non-small PV (>25 cm(3)) that had received (125)I seed implants were reviewed in a retrospective cohort study. Implantations were performed under transrectal ultrasound guidance, and the prescription dose was 145 Gy. A CT and MRI scan of the pelvis were performed 1 month after implantation for dosimetric study. RESULTS: Compared with non-small PV patients, patients with small PV experienced larger 1-month edema (p<0.001); lower dose to 90% (the isodose enclosing 90% of PV and representing a minimum dose to that volume of the prostate [D(90)]) of the prostate (p=0.03); higher intracapsular seed density (p<0.001); and were less likely to achieve D(90)>or=140 Gy (p=0.013) in a postimplant dosimetric study. The number of patients with D(90)<140 Gy decreased steadily in both subsets of patients as the implant program matured (odds ratio=0.56 per year, p<0.001), but the small prostate group exhibited more improvement compared with the non-small prostate patients over the same time period. Multivariate analysis revealed that brachytherapy team experience rather than the size of prostate was a more important predictive factor of implant quality (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This single institution experience demonstrated a significant learning curve in the initial years of a prostate brachytherapy program, especially for patients with small prostates. A small prostate itself is not a contraindication of brachytherapy. The quality of implant for patients with small prostates depends more on the skill of the brachytherapy team.

Efficacy of complete decongestive therapy and manual lymphatic drainage on treatment-related lymphedema in breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of combined decongestive therapy and manual lymphatic drainage in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The data from 250 patients were reviewed. The pre- and posttreatment volumetric measurements were compared, and the correlation with age, body mass index, and type of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy was determined. The Spearman correlation coefficients and Wilcoxon two-sample test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of the 250 patients, 138 were included in the final analysis. The mean age at presentation was 54.3 years. Patients were stratified on the basis of the treatment modality used for breast cancer management. Lymphedema was managed with combined decongestive therapy in 55%, manual lymphatic drainage alone in 32%, and the home program in 13%. The mean pretreatment volume of the affected and normal arms was 2929 and 2531 mL. At the end of 1 year, the posttreatment volume of the affected arm was 2741 mL. The absolute volume of the affected arm was reduced by a mean of 188 mL (p < 0.0001). The type of surgery (p = 0.0142), age (p = 0.0354), and body mass index (p < 0.0001) were related to the severity of lymphedema. CONCLUSION: Combined decongestive therapy and manual lymphatic drainage with exercises were associated with a significant reduction in the lymphedema volume.

Amelioration of acute and relapsing stages of the experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by cobra toxins.

Neurological deficits in multiple sclerosis (MS) and in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) show demyelination of the nerve fibers, which are responsible for transmission of signals. The myelin appears to be attacked by the cells of the immune system. A viral etiology has been implicated in patients with MS. Oxidized toxins (MN) have been shown over the past 50 years to act as antiviral agents that are capable of inhibiting viral replication, and have shown promise in alleviating symptoms in EAE models of MS. The safety of these compounds has been a factor in their limited use. Development of a modified cobra toxin (MCTX) may prove more beneficial in inhibiting symptoms of EAE. In this study a modified cobra toxin (MCTX) was compared with the older oxidized toxin (MN) in an established EAE animal model. The results show that MCTX is capable of inhibiting the development as well as the relapsing phase of EAE in Lewis rats more efficiently than MN. It is possible that a safe cobra toxin can be developed with therapeutic efficacy for treatment of MS or vaccine development.