Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Vet Intern Med ; 31(5): 1551-1555, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28661019

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is recognized as a cause of nosocomial infections in both human and veterinary medicine. Studies that examine the nasopharynx and guttural pouches of the horse as carriage sites for MRSA have not been reported. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE: MRSA colonizes the nasopharynx and guttural pouch of horses. To determine the prevalence of MRSA in equine nasopharyngeal wash (NPW) and guttural pouch lavage (GPL) samples in a field population of horses. SAMPLES: One hundred seventy-eight samples (123 NPW and 55 GPL) from 108 horses. METHODS: Prospective study. Samples were collected from a convenience population of clinically ill horses with suspected Streptococcus equi subsp. equi (S. equi) infection, horses convalescing from a known S. equi infection, and asymptomatic horses undergoing S. equi screening. Samples were submitted for S. aureus aerobic bacterial culture with mannitol salt broth and two selective agars (cefoxitin CHROMagar as the PBP2a inducer and mannitol salt agar with oxacillin). Biochemical identification of Staphylococcus species and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), to determine clonal relationships between isolates, were performed. RESULTS: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (MRS) was isolated from the nasopharynx of 7/108 (4%) horses. Three horses had MRSA (2.7%), and 4 had MR-Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP). MRSA was isolated from horses on the same farm. PFGE revealed the 3 MRSA as USA 500 strains. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Sampling the nasopharynx and guttural pouch of community-based horses revealed a similarly low prevalence rate of MRSA as other studies sampling the nares of community-based horses. More study is required to determine the need for sampling multiple anatomic sites when screening horses for MRSA.


Assuntos
Tuba Auditiva/microbiologia , Doenças dos Cavalos/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Nasofaringe/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/veterinária , Animais , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Portador Sadio/veterinária , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado/veterinária , Feminino , Doenças dos Cavalos/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças dos Cavalos/microbiologia , Cavalos/microbiologia , Masculino , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia
2.
J Vet Intern Med ; 30(1): 276-81, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26678318

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bacterial culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for the detection of Streptococcus equi in nasopharyngeal washes (NPW) and guttural pouch lavage (GPL) samples have low sensitivity. In human diagnostics, processing of samples with flocked swabs has improved recovery rates of bacterial agents because of improved surface area and elution factors. HYPOTHESIS: For S. equi subsp. equi (S. equi) detection in NPW and GPL samples we hypothesized that: direct-PCR would be more reliable than flocked swab culture (FS culture); flocked swab PCR (FS-PCR) would be equivalent to direct-PCR; and FS culture would be more reliable than traditional culture. SAMPLES: A total of 193 samples (134 NPW and 59 GPL) from 113 horses with either suspected S. equi infection, convalescing from a known S. equi infection, or asymptomatic horses screened for S. equi. METHODS: Prospective study. Samples were submitted for S. equi direct-PCR. Using logistic regression, direct-PCR (gold standard) was compared to FS culture, traditional culture, and FS-PCR also performed. RESULTS: Direct-PCR was statistically more sensitive than FS-PCR, FS culture, and traditional culture (P < .001). All methods had sensitivities <70% relative to the direct-PCR. FS culture had a similar sensitivity relative to traditional culture. The odds of GPL samples being positive on direct-PCR (P = .030) and FS-PCR were greater than those for NPW samples (P = .021). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Use of flocked swabs during laboratory preprocessing did not improve detection of S. equi via either PCR or bacterial culture from samples. Direct-PCR is the preferred method of detection of S. equi.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Cavalos/microbiologia , Nasofaringe/microbiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Infecções Estreptocócicas/veterinária , Streptococcus equi/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Feminino , Doenças dos Cavalos/diagnóstico , Cavalos , Masculino , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA