Clinical impact of intesified 5-Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy using a prospective pharmacokinetically-guided dosing approach: comparative study in elderly and non-elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

We compared clinical outcome and pharmacokinetic (pK) parameters of a new pharmacokinetically-guided dosing strategy in two groups of patients (age < or >65 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We retrospectively analyzed all the patients with mCRC, receiving standard LV5FU2 regimen during cycle-1, intensified from cycle-2 onwards according to an adaptation schedule based on the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) value (mg.h/l.m(2)) of 5-FU measured during cycle-1. Among the 103 eligible patients, the 48 elderly (median age 70 range 65-80) did not differ significantly from the 55 non-elderly patients (median age 59 range 33-64) in pPK parameters (including AUC at cycle-1 and cycle-2), efficacy (objective response rate of 27% [16.1-40.9] in younger and 35% [22.2-50.5] in older patients, p = 0.4) and tolerability (33.3% of overall grade 3-4 toxicities in older patients and 34.5% in younger, p = 0.9). Our data indicated high dose-intensity values, not significantly different between elderly and non-elderly patients. it was feasible to increase the 5-fU continuous infusion dose in 43/55 (78%) younger and 40/48 (83%) older patients (p=0.509) and even to double it in half of the patients of both groups. Aging did not seem to limit intensified chemotherapy or to affect the pK behavior of the 5-FU.

Functional categories of TP53 mutation in colorectal cancer: results of an International Collaborative Study.

BACKGROUND: Loss of TP53 function through gene mutation is a critical event in the development and progression of many tumour types including colorectal cancer (CRC). In vitro studies have found considerable heterogeneity amongst different TP53 mutants in terms of their transactivating abilities. The aim of this work was to evaluate whether TP53 mutations classified as functionally inactive (< or=20% of wildtype transactivation ability) had different prognostic and predictive values in CRC compared with mutations that retained significant activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TP53 mutations within a large, international database of CRC (n = 3583) were classified according to functional status for transactivation. RESULTS: Inactive TP53 mutations were found in 29% of all CRCs and were more frequent in rectal (32%) than proximal colon (22%) tumours (P < 0.001). Higher frequencies of inactive TP53 mutations were also seen in advanced stage tumours (P = 0.0003) and in tumours with the poor prognostic features of vascular (P = 0.006) and lymphatic invasion (P = 0.002). Inactive TP53 mutations were associated with significantly worse outcome only in patients with Dukes' stage D tumours (RR = 1.71, 95%CI 1.25-2.33, P < 0.001). Patients with Dukes' C stage tumours appeared to gain a survival benefit from 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regardless of TP53 functional status for transactivation ability. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations that inactivate the transactivational ability of TP53 are more frequent in advanced CRC and are associated with worse prognosis in this stage of disease.

[Clinical practice guidelines: 2004 Standards, Options and Recommendations for the management of patient with adenocarcinoma of the stomach--radiotherapy]. / Recommandations pour la pratique clinique : standards, options et recommandations 2004 pour la prise en charge par radiothérapie des patients atteints d'adénocarcinomes de l'estomac (cancers du cardia, autres types histologiques exclus).

CONTEXT: "The Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of French Cancer Centers (FNCLCC), the 20 French regional cancer centers, and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. OBJECTIVES: To elaborate clinical practice guidelines for patients with stomach adenocarcinoma. These recommendations cover the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of these tumors. METHODS: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. The Standards, Options and Recommendations are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. RESULTS: Adjuvant radiation therapy alone is not a standard treatment for patients with stomach adenocarcinoma. Adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy is not a standard treatment for patients with stage II or III stomach adenocarcinoma R0, with Dl or D2 lymphadenectomy who have undergone surgery. Following surgical resection, adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy should be proposed to patients without denutrition with a lymphadenectomy < Dl (fewer than 15 lymph nodes examined) and those with T3 and/or N+ tumours following the protocol used in the MacDonald trials (SWOG-9008) (Level of evidence B1). Adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy can be administered to patients without denutrition with DI or D2 lymphadenectomy and with involvement of regional lymph nodes (N2 or N3).

Five-year change in statistical designs of phase II trials published in leading cancer journals.

This study compares the evolution in statistical design reporting for phase II cancer clinical trials published in the six following leading journals: American Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, British Journal of Cancer, Cancer, European Journal of Cancer and Journal of Clinical Oncology. Only articles where tumour response was considered as the primary endpoint were selected. A total of 393 phase II trials published in 1995 (n=185) and 2000 (n=208) were reviewed. Neither sample size nor design parameters were specified in 157 (85%) and 113 (46%) papers in 1995 and 2000, respectively. 28 (15%) and 95 (46%) papers included at least some information on the statistical designs used: Gehan (4.3% and 3.3%), Fleming (2.2% and 4.3%), and Simon (2.7% and 11.0%). Ad hoc, non-referenced methods were used in 5.9% and 27.3% articles in 1995 and 2000, respectively. Although there is an increase in the mention of at least some statistical design parameters in phase II cancer clinical trials over a 5-year period in these selected cancer journals, the use of referenced methods is still short or often inadequate.

Efficacy of prophylactic anti-diarrhoeal treatment in patients receiving Campto for advanced colorectal cancer.

This study assessed the efficacy of combined prophylactic and curative anti-diarrhoeal medication in advanced colorectal patients treated by irinotecan. Thirty-four pre-treated eligible patients were evaluated. There were 44% women, the median age was 65 and 38% of the patients had a 0 performance status. The patients received sucralfate(4g/d) and nifuroxazide(600 mg/d) prophylactic treatment on days 0-7. In the case of severe diarrhoea, preventive treatment was replaced by loperamide(12 mg/d) and diosmectite (9 g/d). Grade 3 delayed diarrhoea occurred in 18% of patients (90% CI: [9.5-28.9]) and 4.6% of cycles. No grade 4 delayed diarrhoea was observed. Twenty-nine patients (85%) received the preventive treatment at cycle 1, while 14% (90% CI: [6.2-25.7]) experienced grade 3 delayed diarrhoea in 3.7% of cycles for a median 4.5 days. The objective response rate was 8% (90% CI [1.4-23.1]) among the 25 assessable patients. Preventive combined treatment is effective in reducing the incidence of severe delayed diarrhoea, and it should be proposed to patients treated with mono-therapy Campto(r) and evaluated in poly-chemotherapy protocols.

Clinical significance and prognostic value of CA72-4 compared with CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer.

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 19-9 are both widely used in the follow up of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. More recently another tumor marker, named CA 72-4 has been identified and characterized using two different monoclonal antibodies B72.3 and CC49. Several reports evaluated CA 72-4 as a serum tumor marker for gastric cancer and compared its clinical utility with that of CEA or CA 19-9; few reports concerned its prognostic value. In the present study, CA 72-4 is evaluated and compared with CEA and CA 19-9 in various populations of patients with gastric cancer and benign disease; for 52 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and 57 patients without neoplastic disease CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 were evaluated before treatment. Sensitivity of the tumor markers CA 72-4, CA 19-9 and CEA at the recommended cut-off level in all 52 patients were 58%, 50% the sensitivity increased to 75%. of these markers, for non metastatic patients, multivariate analyses indicated that none of the markers were significant, when adjusted for gender and age (which were indicators of poor prognosis); patients with abnormal values of CA72-4 tended to have shorter survival than patients with normal values (p<0.07). In the metastatic population, only high values of CA19-9 (p<0.02) and gender (women) p<0.03) were indicators of poor prognosis in univariate analysis; multivariate analysis revealed that both CA72-4 (p=0.034) and CA19-9 p=0.009), adjusted for gender were independent prognostic factors. However, CA72-4 lost significance (p=0.41) when adjusted for CA19-9 and gender, indicating that CA19-9 provides more prognostic information than CA72-4. When limited to the metastatic male population with normal values of CA 19-9 and CEA, CA 72-4 pretherapeutic positive levels were associated with a worse prognosis (p<0.005). In conclusion, this study suggests that the addition of CA 72-4 to CEA and/or CA 19-9 could improve sensitivity in gastric cancer. The prognostic role of this marker is not yet clearly demonstrated but its usefulness in the monitoring of gastric cancer should be taken into account.

Individual 5FU-dose adaptation schedule using bimonthly pharmacokinetically modulated LV5FU2 regimen: a feasibility study in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

AIM OF THE STUDY: SFU-dose adaptation optimal schedule using bimonthly LV5FU2 regimen was modulated by previously validated individual pharmacokinetic parameters, in 38 patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: At the 1st cure, 5F-U pharmacokinetic parameters (particularly the area under curve (AUC) in mg.h/l.m2) were calculated in all patients. In 19 patients (A), 5FU infusion doses were progressively increased from 25 to 50% (at every cycle), according to AUC levels from 2nd to 6th; in 19 consecutive patients (B), 5FU infusion doses were increased, at the same time, at the 2nd cure, according to a protocol taking in account AUC at the 1st cure: increase of 150% it AUC < 5, of 100% if 5 < AUC < 10, of 50% if 10 < AUC < 15, of 25% if 15 < AUC < 20 in case of toxicity < grade 3. RESULTS: a) AUC in all patients, at the beginning of the treatment averaged 9.05 +/- 3.115 (range from 3.9 to 16.41). Large interindividual variability was observed. b) FU infusion doses at the 2nd cure, increased 40% in group A and 82% in group B. Corresponding AUC increased respectively of 42% and 96%. 3-WHO toxicity 23 (per cycle) occurred not very frequently (8% haematological, 6% digestive and 2% cutaneous toxicity) and remained acceptable. CONCLUSION: This feasibility study established a 5FU-dose intensification optimal strategy within the bimonthly LV5FU2 schedule with a control for the risk of toxicity. This study constitutes the basis for a multicentre phase II trial to evaluate the importance of this approach in terms of efficacy and survival.

Plasma and salivary pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving 5-FU bolus plus continuous infusion with high-dose folinic acid.

The comparative saliva/plasma pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were investigated in 21 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving high-dose folinic acid (LV (leucovorin) 200 mg/m2) followed by 5-FU bolus (400 mg/m2) and continuous infusion (600, 750, 900 or 1200 mg/m2) on days 1 and 2. Quantitation of unchanged drug was assessed by a highly specific high-performance liquid chromatographic method. Large patient-to-patient variations in plasma and saliva 5-FU concentrations were observed. Saliva pharmacokinetics could be described using a bi-exponential pattern. The half-life of the rapid phase averaged 8.0 min, and was of the same order of magnitude as the 5-FU elimination half-life determined from plasma data. The half-life of the terminal part of the curve averaged 8 h; such decrease in salivary concentrations could be due to changes in salivary gland function caused by 5-FU, which results in reduced salivary flow rate. Between individual 5-FU concentrations in parotid saliva and plasma a statistically significant straight line could be fitted with a coefficient of correlation of 0.675. Moreover, the risk of developing 5-FU-related mucositis was significantly linked to 5-FU salivary exposure. Diarrhoea was the most frequent toxicity encountered during the trial.

Circadian rhythm of 5-fluorouracil population pharmacokinetics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to estimate the population pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer using circadian change kinetics. METHODS: Eighty-five patients (32 females, 53 males) were enrolled onto this study. All patients received folinic acid (200 mg/m(2)) by intravenous infusion over 2 h followed by a 5-FU loading dose (400 mg/m(2)) and then continuous infusion (600 mg/m(2)) for 22 h. This whole regimen was repeated on day 2 and was given on a 14-day cycle. Plasma 5-FU determinations were performed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet absorbance detection. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using the NONMEM computer program through the Visual-NM graphical interface. An open one-compartment pharmacokinetic model with zero-order input rate was used to describe the kinetics of 5-FU; moreover, circadian time-dependent changes in 5-FU concentrations were taken into account in the model. The circadian model was defined as the sum of two cyclic components; the amplitude of the first cyclic component (over 24 h) was about 30% of the average clearance and the amplitude of the second cyclic component (over 12 h) was about 50% of the amplitude of the first component. The acrophase (peak) times of the first and the second periodic component were 04 h 12 m and 00 h 25 m, respectively. The potential sources of variability on the population parameters (65 patients) were investigated using patient's sex, body area, age, body weight, height, liver enzymes and serum creatinine as covariables. RESULTS: Only the estimated clearance circadian changes were different for the two sexes. The population parameter estimates of mean clearance (CL(mean)) and initial volume of distribution (V), were as follows: the male subgroup showed a CL(mean) value twice larger (125 l/h) than the value observed in the female subgroup (65 l/h), and V = 21 l. A validation group of 20 additional patients was used to evaluate the predictive performances of the population parameters. The individual pharmacokinetic parameters were computed by means of a Bayesian fitting procedure. From the resulting individualized parameter values, concentrations of 5-FU in the plasma were calculated. To evaluate the performance of the Bayesian estimation, the experimental concentrations were compared with the predicted ones. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, a chronomodulated delivery schedule of 5-FU should be performed, using a perfusion rate inversely proportional to the circadian variations of clearance in order to maintain stable 5-FU plasma levels. Such a treatment schedule may result in increased effectiveness of the treatment and decreased occurrence of drug-associated side-effects. The present study develops a complete procedure to efficiently estimate 5-FU clearance in order to optimize dosage regimens in individual patients.

Phase II trial of oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Digestive Group of French Federation of Cancer Centers.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the objective tumor response rate and safety profile of oxaliplatin when administered to patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 39 patients were entered onto this phase II trial. One patient was excluded for having had a second cancer, so the study was based on 38 patients. Patients were treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 1, every 21 days. Patients were assessed for response every three courses. All clinical and radiologic data were reviewed by an external panel of experts, with their assessment being considered definitive. RESULTS: Nine partial responses (PRs) were observed (response rate, 24.3%; 95% confidence interval, 11.8% to 41.2%). The median duration of response was 216+ days. Fifteen patients (40.5%) had stable disease and 13 (35.2%) had progressive disease. The median progression-free survival time for all patients was 126+ days (range, 21 to 447+). The main toxicity was peripheral sensory neuropathy. Grade 3 neurotoxicity (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria [NCI-CTC]) was reported in 13%. Hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities were mild. The incidence of grade 3 neutropenia was 5.2%, while that of grade 3 or 4 thrombopenia was 7.9%. Vomiting (grade 3 or 4) occurred in 7.9% of patients and grade 3 diarrhea in 2.6%. CONCLUSION: This phase II study provides clear evidence of the safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin monotherapy at this dose and schedule in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Value of serial carcinoembryonic antigen levels in evaluating the response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced digestive cancers.

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and clinical response to chemotherapy. Sixty-five patients with gastrointestinal cancers treated by chemotherapy were studied. All patients had serial measurements of CEA and an evaluation of tumour response by CT scan. Responses based on CEA were defined in the same way as WHO clinical response based on CT scan. The sensitivity and specificity of CEA was respectively 85% and 90% for objective response, 52% and 76% for stable disease, 71% and 80% for progression. Among 19 patients in stable disease with stable or progressive evolution of their CEA level, 14 (74%) were in progression at a second evaluation, after 2 or 3 more courses of the same chemotherapy. The monitoring of chemotherapy by CEA in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancers could be helpful for patients stable at the first evaluation by CT scan or patients with non-measurable disease and having an elevated baseline level of CEA.

Pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FUra) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving 5-FUra bolus plus continuous infusion with high dose folinic acid (LV5FU2).

The pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FUra) were investigated in 16 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving high-dose folinic acid (LV 200 mg/m2) followed by 5-FUra bolus (400 mg/m2) and continuous infusion (600 mg/m2) on days 1 and 2. Quantitation of unchanged drug was assessed by a highly specific high-performance liquid chromatographic method. The concentrations of 5-FUra at the end of the loading dose averaged 30.7 +/- 13.2 micrograms/ml (i.e., 236 microM). The steady-state plasma concentration averaged 0.31 +/- 0.11 microgram/ml (i.e., 2.4 microM). 5-FUra plasma levels declined rapidly after the end of infusion with an apparent elimination half-life of 7.08 +/- 3.21 minutes. Clearance ranged from 776 to 3023 ml/min/m2. Large patient-to-patient variations in plasma 5-FUra concentrations were observed. No toxicity greater than WHO grade 2 was seen. One patient experienced grade 1 stomatitis and two others experienced grade 1 and 2 myelosuppression. One patient developed diarrhoea and another suffered asthenia. Nausea and vomiting were observed in 5 patients.