Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Addict Med ; 17(2): e129-e131, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36731105

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Smoking stimulants, such as methamphetamine and "crack" cocaine, can spread infections, including hepatitis C and COVID-19, and lead to injuries, particularly when individuals share or use makeshift pipes. The purpose of the study was to assess the practices of people who inhale ("smoke") stimulants to guide future clinical harm reduction efforts. METHODS: Anonymous surveys were administered to participants reporting inhalation of crack cocaine and/or methamphetamine in the past 3 months. Participants were eligible if they sought services from an outreach team staffed by a municipal syringe service program (SSP) or if they were patients at a low-threshold substance use disorder treatment program, the Massachusetts General Hospital Bridge Clinic. RESULTS: The survey was administered to 68 total participants, 30% of whom were recruited in the Massachusetts General Hospital Bridge Clinic and 70% through SSP outreach. Unsafe smoking practices were reported by 93% of participants. Among the 46% of participants surveyed who both smoked and injected stimulants, 61% of those participants stated that they injected instead of smoked stimulants because of lack of access to pipes. Amid COVID-19, 35% of participants adopted safer smoking practices. Most participants reported that they would be more likely to attend an SSP or health center if pipes were provided. CONCLUSIONS: Inhalational practices that place participants at risk of injury and illness are common. Providing safer smoking equipment may promote health and engage individuals in care.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Metanfetamina , Humanos , Fumaça , Promoção da Saúde , Fumar , Fármacos do Sistema Nervoso Central
2.
J Abnorm Child Psychol ; 37(8): 1165-76, 2009 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19707868

RESUMO

Fire interest is a risk factor for firesetting. This study tested whether a fire-specific emotional Stroop task can effectively measure an information-processing bias for fire-related stimuli. Clinic-referred and nonreferred adolescents (aged 13-16 years) completed a pictorial "Fire Stroop," as well as a self-report fire interest questionnaire and several control tasks. Results showed (a) comparatively greater fire-specific attentional bias among referred adolescent firesetters, (b) a negative relationship between Fire Stroop attentional bias and self-reported fire interest, and (c) positive correspondence between Fire Stroop attentional bias and self-reported firesetting frequency. These findings suggest that instruments that measure an automatic bias for fire-specific stimuli may usefully supplement self-report measures in the assessment and understanding of firesetting behavior.


Assuntos
Atenção , Percepção de Cores , Incêndios , Piromania/psicologia , Reconhecimento Visual de Modelos , Teste de Stroop/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Sinais (Psicologia) , Discriminação Psicológica , Piromania/diagnóstico , Piromania/reabilitação , Humanos , Delinquência Juvenil/legislação & jurisprudência , Delinquência Juvenil/psicologia , Delinquência Juvenil/reabilitação , Masculino , Psicometria , Desempenho Psicomotor , Tempo de Reação , Encaminhamento e Consulta/legislação & jurisprudência , Software
3.
J Autism Dev Disord ; 37(7): 1337-43, 2007 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17080272

RESUMO

The present study examined public perceptions toward children with autism or with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A convenience sample was used consisting of 30 children (7-12-year-olds) and 30 adults. Participants read a stereotyped scenario featuring either a child with autism, a child with ADHD, or a normal child. Child participants were significantly more likely than adults to (a) express dislike/avoidance toward a child described with either stereotypic autistic or ADHD behaviors, and (b) perceive the child with ADHD as unlike themselves. However, child participants and adults were equally likely to see the autistic child as unlike themselves. Reasons for the different perceptions of children and adults may include differences in perceived threat and in categorization.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade , Transtorno Autístico , Comportamento Infantil , Percepção Social , Adulto , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Criança , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Desejabilidade Social
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...